GNU logs - #18541, boring messages

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#18541: 24.3; ruler-mode: margins are reset when doing next-buffer/previous-buffer
Resent-From: Andrea Rossetti <andrea.rossetti@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 22:58:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.18541.B.141151302526203 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 18541 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Andrea Rossetti <andrea.rossetti@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 00:56:19 +0200
Message-ID: <84sijiuess.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

Hello, I think I found a bug in ruler-mode,
here's a recipe for it. Start "emacs -Q" and type:

M-x ruler-mode RET 
M-: (set-window-margins nil 10 10) RET

You will see left and right margins will narrow the
sides of *scratch* buffer. Now type

M-x next-buffer RET
M-x previous-buffer RET

  and you will see that the margins have unexpectedly
disappeared, i.e. the *scratch* buffer is shown full-width
without margins.

  May I please ask for a confirm of reproducibility at your side.
And also: does it seem like a bug for you too, or was it just
expected behaviour? 

  Thanks for your time and attention, kindest regards.

  Andrea

Message sent:

Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.503 (Entity 5.503)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Andrea Rossetti <andrea.rossetti@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#18541: Acknowledgement (24.3; ruler-mode: margins are reset
 when doing next-buffer/previous-buffer)
Message-ID: <handler.18541.B.141151302526203.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <84sijiuess.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 18541
X-Gnu-PR-Package: emacs
Reply-To: 18541 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 22:58:02 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 18541 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
18541: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D18541
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#18541: 24.3; ruler-mode: margins are reset when doing next-buffer/previous-buffer
Resent-From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 00:52:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.18541.B18541.14115198765902 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: Andrea Rossetti <andrea.rossetti@HIDDEN>
Cc: 18541 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <jwvvbodvoc1.fsf-monnier+emacsbugs@HIDDEN>
References: <84sijiuess.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 20:51:09 -0400
In-Reply-To: <84sijiuess.fsf@HIDDEN> (Andrea Rossetti's message of "Wed, 24
 Sep 2014 00:56:19 +0200")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

> Hello, I think I found a bug in ruler-mode,
> here's a recipe for it. Start "emacs -Q" and type:
> M-x ruler-mode RET 
> M-: (set-window-margins nil 10 10) RET

Setting margins with set-window-margins is a low-level operation.
Margins get re-set whenever the buffer displayed is changed.
IOW I think the behavior you describe with above recipe is not a bug.

But indeed, if you set the margin with S-mouse-1 or S-mouse-3 on the
header-line, then ruler-mode should arguably try to preserve this
setting like you request it.


        Stefan

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#18541: 24.3; ruler-mode: margins are reset when doing next-buffer/previous-buffer
Resent-From: Andrea Rossetti <andrea.rossetti@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 22:15:04 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.18541.B18541.141159688427868 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
Cc: 18541 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Andrea Rossetti <andrea.rossetti@HIDDEN>
References: <84sijiuess.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <jwvvbodvoc1.fsf-monnier+emacsbugs@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 00:14:37 +0200
In-Reply-To: <jwvvbodvoc1.fsf-monnier+emacsbugs@HIDDEN> (Stefan Monnier's
 message of "Tue, 23 Sep 2014 20:51:09 -0400")
Message-ID: <84r3z01x9u.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (windows-nt)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN> writes:
> But indeed, if you set the margin with S-mouse-1 or S-mouse-3 on the
> header-line, then ruler-mode should arguably try to preserve this
> setting like you request it.

  Thanks for your reply Stefan.

  Even if I set margins with S-mouse-1 and S-mouse-3, and then
type M-x next-buffer RET M-x previous-buffer RET , the margins
disappear.

  It could indeed be a nice addition in the future if there's
some agreement. I can't think of a case where margin preservation
could be inappropriate (just a guess: maybe non-interactive sessions?).

  My suggested alternative if one needs to jump around buffers while
keeping margins enabled in a certain buffer: I noticed that the "window
configuration registers" preserve margins properly:

- (... set margins with S-mouse-1 and S-mouse-3 ...)
- C-x r w a
- M-x next-buffer RET
- C-x r j a

Kindest regards,

  Andrea

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#18541: 24.3; ruler-mode: margins are reset when doing next-buffer/previous-buffer
Resent-From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 01:11:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.18541.B18541.141160740913587 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18541
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Andrea Rossetti <andrea.rossetti@HIDDEN>
Cc: 18541 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 18541-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B18541.141160740913587
          (code B ref 18541); Thu, 25 Sep 2014 01:11:02 +0000
Received: (at 18541) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Sep 2014 01:10:09 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51417 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1XWxZQ-0003X4-0y
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 21:10:09 -0400
Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:37820)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80)
 (envelope-from <monnier@HIDDEN>) id 1XWxZJ-0003WU-IR
 for 18541 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 21:10:05 -0400
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArUGAIDvNVOnWBcZ/2dsb2JhbABZgwaDSsA9gRcXdIIlAQEBAQIBViMFCws0EhQYDSSIBAjSGReOegeEOASrA4FxgVsh
X-IPAS-Result: ArUGAIDvNVOnWBcZ/2dsb2JhbABZgwaDSsA9gRcXdIIlAQEBAQIBViMFCws0EhQYDSSIBAjSGReOegeEOASrA4FxgVsh
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,753,1389762000"; d="scan'208";a="90807458"
Received: from 167-88-23-25.cpe.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home)
 ([167.88.23.25])
 by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA;
 24 Sep 2014 21:09:59 -0400
Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848)
 id 6A60466094; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 21:09:59 -0400 (EDT)
From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <jwvvboc1pft.fsf-monnier+emacsbugs@HIDDEN>
References: <84sijiuess.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <jwvvbodvoc1.fsf-monnier+emacsbugs@HIDDEN> <84r3z01x9u.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 21:09:59 -0400
In-Reply-To: <84r3z01x9u.fsf@HIDDEN> (Andrea Rossetti's message of "Thu, 25
 Sep 2014 00:14:37 +0200")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)

>> But indeed, if you set the margin with S-mouse-1 or S-mouse-3 on the
>> header-line, then ruler-mode should arguably try to preserve this
>> setting like you request it.
>   Even if I set margins with S-mouse-1 and S-mouse-3, and then
> type M-x next-buffer RET M-x previous-buffer RET , the margins
> disappear.

Yes, that's what I meant, and this is the actual bug that needs fixing.

>   It could indeed be a nice addition in the future if there's
> some agreement.  I can't think of a case where margin preservation
> could be inappropriate (just a guess: maybe non-interactive sessions?).

There's no reason not to preserve the margin (other than the fact it's
not implemented).  There are questions about *how* to do it, tho.

Mostly, should the margin set by the user be considered as a property of
the buffer (applied wherever the buffer gets displayed), or is it
a property that applies to this buffer but only in this particular window?

E.g. if I have the buffer in window 1 and then display it in window 2,
should window 2 get the same margins as well?  What if window 2 has
a completely different width than window 1?

>   My suggested alternative if one needs to jump around buffers while
> keeping margins enabled in a certain buffer: I noticed that the "window
> configuration registers" preserve margins properly:

> - (... set margins with S-mouse-1 and S-mouse-3 ...)
> - C-x r w a
> - M-x next-buffer RET
> - C-x r j a

Right, that can be a good workaround until ruler-mode does that for you,


        Stefan

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#18541: 24.3; ruler-mode: margins are reset when doing next-buffer/previous-buffer
Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 15:35:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.18541.B18541.162938729131472 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18541
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
Cc: Andrea Rossetti <andrea.rossetti@HIDDEN>, 18541 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 18541-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B18541.162938729131472
          (code B ref 18541); Thu, 19 Aug 2021 15:35:02 +0000
Received: (at 18541) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Aug 2021 15:34:51 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60678 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1mGk4B-0008BX-Cg
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 11:34:51 -0400
Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:50668)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1mGk49-0008BH-Dq
 for 18541 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 11:34:49 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org;
 s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:
 References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:
 Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:
 Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:
 List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
 bh=UBAErHDq/9Hqy1srMBeA71O6vp9bawFQqZmX4+de8tw=; b=srLK+FNcoX+1/i9jPeyH/LTf/z
 oGsqpYhUwlf8cUIX3Y4pBHZ/b5wVWJFu4DyqU3lILXY5UaqlgiD2k6uvsk+rQvQpyzBT7/sMyY8I6
 a3bpp9Bp65pq5BDWL+1B7k8mAjtBI8/EIVyAqnM6ybN7V4DtcYWA+p0qihQv1F3nMVSU=;
Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva)
 by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>)
 id 1mGk3x-0007db-7u; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 17:34:41 +0200
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
References: <84sijiuess.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <jwvvbodvoc1.fsf-monnier+emacsbugs@HIDDEN> <84r3z01x9u.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <jwvvboc1pft.fsf-monnier+emacsbugs@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 17:34:33 +0200
In-Reply-To: <jwvvboc1pft.fsf-monnier+emacsbugs@HIDDEN> (Stefan Monnier's
 message of "Wed, 24 Sep 2014 21:09:59 -0400")
Message-ID: <87zgtd4fee.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
 Content preview:  Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN> writes: > Mostly, 
 should the margin set by the user be considered as a property of > the buffer
 (applied wherever the buffer gets displayed), or is it > a property that
 applies to this buffer but only in this [...] 
 Content analysis details:   (-2.9 points, 5.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 [score: 0.0000]
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN> writes:

> Mostly, should the margin set by the user be considered as a property of
> the buffer (applied wherever the buffer gets displayed), or is it
> a property that applies to this buffer but only in this particular window?
>
> E.g. if I have the buffer in window 1 and then display it in window 2,
> should window 2 get the same margins as well?  What if window 2 has
> a completely different width than window 1?

Those are all very good questions.

Perhaps it only makes sense to restore window margins if we're popping
the same buffer back into the same window?

But that's such an unlikely thing to happen that I'm not sure it's much
of a user interface.  Perhaps restoring it if jumping back to the buffer
in the same frame?

How would we implement this?  Perhaps via a hook in
`window--display-buffer' that `ruler-mode' could set?

Or...  we could just leave it alone, because I suspect that whatever we
do here, it's going to be pretty confusing.  Anybody got an opinion here?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no

Message received at control <at> debbugs.gnu.org:

Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Aug 2021 15:34:54 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 19 11:34:54 2021
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60681 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1mGk4E-0008Bm-LF
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 11:34:54 -0400
Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:50684)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1mGk4C-0008BM-6N
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 11:34:52 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org;
 s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:
 MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:
 Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc
 :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:
 List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
 bh=qoA+C0xbs+bKH+mKPH1ycD68YrxQlDcC80SQ5nJkH78=; b=OeNBTYK57ORR33dSUIedA/Bpkg
 1/2V3ax26lqk921bHJWptZ5x+0o/Xu5ZNNwlq9/Gz0QUuIpr8q/YEsrkvSsER7DoSBbj/vKmKa/TA
 4pJNX8/Sl7KKkrR3AO4usFr93hYkxio1oOURrAjPZwdpDemZIaxGsdyPfhzmtnAho2h4=;
Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva)
 by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1mGk44-0007dl-Cy
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 17:34:46 +0200
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 17:34:43 +0200
Message-Id: <87y28x4fe4.fsf@HIDDEN>
To: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
Subject: control message for bug #18541
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
 Content preview:  tags 18541 + moreinfo quit 
 Content analysis details:   (-2.9 points, 5.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 [score: 0.0000]
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

tags 18541 + moreinfo
quit

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#18541: 24.3; ruler-mode: margins are reset when doing next-buffer/previous-buffer
Resent-From: martin rudalics <rudalics@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 08:19:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.18541.B18541.162944753230434 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18541
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>, Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
Cc: Andrea Rossetti <andrea.rossetti@HIDDEN>, 18541 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 18541-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B18541.162944753230434
          (code B ref 18541); Fri, 20 Aug 2021 08:19:02 +0000
Received: (at 18541) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Aug 2021 08:18:52 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32929 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1mGzjn-0007uo-Sl
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 04:18:52 -0400
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:59821)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <rudalics@HIDDEN>) id 1mGzjl-0007uZ-G4
 for 18541 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 04:18:50 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net;
 s=badeba3b8450; t=1629447519;
 bh=SBJ6/MHYgq7VtVWq10ib/8SFUBuBu+eLEDIlAFHTAZg=;
 h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To;
 b=RnyDRbehQrM1SVALbljSzTjQ1Pv2xKg6ZD46wOgfWrthMvHrrrAN3pHqaL8kRGtzM
 uFTiKeHszkjzwvcGgBfIM4RS7rzU6nsB9QexUdxeIZsoKk/deUFtTmOMOfBae5Dlfv
 0EaygjD9uEK7qdT26MPWTythqeV/R34mVIZh8GhE=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.1.102] ([212.95.5.218]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx005
 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MtwZ4-1n4Z5115qe-00uJzX; Fri, 20
 Aug 2021 10:18:39 +0200
References: <84sijiuess.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <jwvvbodvoc1.fsf-monnier+emacsbugs@HIDDEN> <84r3z01x9u.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <jwvvboc1pft.fsf-monnier+emacsbugs@HIDDEN> <87zgtd4fee.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: martin rudalics <rudalics@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <c0c9bc90-67da-31f4-4da1-020ea81ca115@HIDDEN>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 10:18:37 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <87zgtd4fee.fsf@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:Q2mvO6Whn6BCleeF5eOJosC9o+GwZc1dYGuWQXmtgQs7598A+4w
 vx+R1r/R+K0OyYCXhQDclsrc5cvTmJw6RiK4LQakDB3B5oHYna5JSjbcIClTNOCHwfy22el
 8aI/YrCfRinpwZs3XjXRbdJcmCwbozntIjRnZBfz9ZFDfVApHiiYGz07qqDLLy2aRVbXndn
 2/Teh1uEpxIVk9pPtfAcw==
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:hqPQvxFpmTE=:ufb6dgGTM3sOb8cbzcfgF7
 IovY8fIKz1N/ea1rMxCjx7/Ymq1wtSkqgIF5Kn6sZh86sZz0+f5fdZlYaKngYNb4gtr5PnjbI
 hxso3NOFB/n2n5cYlT0hh+82AWQy1duPeIOoNCbRo7fB54WtpQudTFK/0KlxceJC/bExznVq4
 4GbIqsXlV3ScVz+x7kbPQvZsj1RlxSZUeizHPM15NToi+12KjwiqbmQCH3ksHUtFtGBBJDnL0
 qI/WU5mYuCjTluiQloL3kydvU4vI+WkgskqO180BCJgDGlyQsJRD9x54iGUpQ20wiV3aIpTHA
 eYNQOkvwVnp8Xp8IfsOV6ZK+BDeNFQM/zORuqnw4JWtKZnTTCYSm82ozBrI+OzD586jd6k1cs
 s/qFPY85qsbJyxpz/uJOX9+y/hkkNMBXcFnwBpeDqKt5f33F8F1MwXx8E2HKtyLMlldnXdO1N
 wuFhnAfmjUaVFPJO2nvDxfLhW2eIHaNXzBuEdA2lUmAzTkKogt78bhAIJfjJCmR540IRi9LIf
 EqYnTl+OsGUEof5opbWu2zhD0ruZ+eV09DPcuYWLVyjoFiNfqAt/X+kZ9ydevOqroejNA2NHP
 eFtXwlW3iLwmfSrh8+pfJljv2tTKoALiZGPunD0CBKjvntB1s8bFLC6Y8O/5j4F6iM3LUwoGp
 yAx1hooNJyco2ce/dR0113QZFzLNJNjForUAkvy6Wq+tN1Ma4L3sV4wNn6xih1oylmIqfT0KN
 +ZSabK6FLaC6Ira290qrvA0yVuGdKORhFpOul3K2KBXOnbHPvcOKFe55AX0/OD40is7mHUM0I
 RF1KRS7aBl3Aqg9iZt7p/Gay0HC7LhklvRfIAhry4CiGEB9YDt6cVLR8bpGTM1VD3Llr5+l2n
 tPkqoRCoSn9jIudzfHFaqIDOvbT9VYbwzJdtWei9AirPtWtVDEaLUPb12hzslhBZ61yy5DRDR
 SPojkBxw5jTPPP7qIfi+W2HXk4zwHAzTc6+oyrW1GClhgNe9l4fGiFnncwdXzHkGjXn2tM3Ax
 kAeaZ127bR11DAOcP/evtwZtl1FPBMT1ayOdwfUBjShkEL7X3059BLZyapYUbGwhqyJVGdcj+
 MUrjZCr6kkpLMSj5V1JxQZc2ft4DPs5ZnvoD9HjQetNP5ceBTyPaiBqNQ==
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)

 > Or...  we could just leave it alone, because I suspect that whatever we
 > do here, it's going to be pretty confusing.  Anybody got an opinion here?

Add an option that tells whether S-mouse-1/-3 should set up margins in a
buffer- or window-local way.

martin

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#18541: 24.3; ruler-mode: margins are reset when doing next-buffer/previous-buffer
Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 13:15:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.18541.B18541.162946527912530 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18541
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo
To: martin rudalics <rudalics@HIDDEN>
Cc: Andrea Rossetti <andrea.rossetti@HIDDEN>, Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>, 18541 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 18541-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B18541.162946527912530
          (code B ref 18541); Fri, 20 Aug 2021 13:15:01 +0000
Received: (at 18541) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Aug 2021 13:14:39 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33252 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1mH4M3-0003G2-HR
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 09:14:39 -0400
Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:60004)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1mH4M1-0003Fp-SI
 for 18541 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 09:14:38 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org;
 s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:
 References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:
 Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:
 Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:
 List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
 bh=FqWZZWSGhs5OzPSoXDeNqOD1+UrEzH+/RnCz8x6nFbA=; b=Xayab7e+jOqeIkOP5fXkLsm7eK
 VnXM033TsQ3jJbyUPXmzdcnOIYZ5fETBJpgqFpYYpwblnrqq+CMJQAY4odzTdNI3wPiLWFFDgGmfh
 MfsZ7+0aH8PIKy5wO9CbIuJFbtrj+OlHMazFdScQz96o2R6RfhU5S8uK++yt/7tTmQXc=;
Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva)
 by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>)
 id 1mH4Lq-0004JB-GI; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 15:14:30 +0200
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
References: <84sijiuess.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <jwvvbodvoc1.fsf-monnier+emacsbugs@HIDDEN> <84r3z01x9u.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <jwvvboc1pft.fsf-monnier+emacsbugs@HIDDEN> <87zgtd4fee.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <c0c9bc90-67da-31f4-4da1-020ea81ca115@HIDDEN>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 15:14:22 +0200
In-Reply-To: <c0c9bc90-67da-31f4-4da1-020ea81ca115@HIDDEN> (martin rudalics's
 message of "Fri, 20 Aug 2021 10:18:37 +0200")
Message-ID: <87im008dht.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
 Content preview: martin rudalics <rudalics@HIDDEN> writes: >> Or... we could
 just leave it alone, because I suspect that whatever we >> do here, it's
 going to be pretty confusing. Anybody got an opinion here? > > Add an option
 that tells whether S-mouse-1/-3 [...] 
 Content analysis details:   (-2.9 points, 5.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 [score: 0.0000]
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

martin rudalics <rudalics@HIDDEN> writes:

>> Or...  we could just leave it alone, because I suspect that whatever we
>> do here, it's going to be pretty confusing.  Anybody got an opinion here?
>
> Add an option that tells whether S-mouse-1/-3 should set up margins in a
> buffer- or window-local way.

Yeah, I guess...  but...  is it really useful to restore the margins if
you display the same buffer in a (very) different frame?  (I'm thinking
gui vs. non-gui in an emacsclient setup.)

I think it would be natural to restore margins if the buffer is a window
in the same frame, but that's rather obscure, too.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#18541: 24.3; ruler-mode: margins are reset when doing next-buffer/previous-buffer
Resent-From: martin rudalics <rudalics@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2021 08:25:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.18541.B18541.162962068932652 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18541
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
Cc: Andrea Rossetti <andrea.rossetti@HIDDEN>, Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>, 18541 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 18541-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B18541.162962068932652
          (code B ref 18541); Sun, 22 Aug 2021 08:25:01 +0000
Received: (at 18541) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Aug 2021 08:24:49 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38143 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1mHimf-0008Ua-9i
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 22 Aug 2021 04:24:49 -0400
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:47153)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <rudalics@HIDDEN>) id 1mHimd-0008UN-V8
 for 18541 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 22 Aug 2021 04:24:48 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net;
 s=badeba3b8450; t=1629620678;
 bh=7+PMVTUH8oofa9DIgFPLAcIRirRa8qUZDgr+2cTqskM=;
 h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To;
 b=TtrhAKx9SPn7mjZ20V+pf5rc8oCc7HjJw7eVNlrqv3OzPTer4FDFiSSVh1PKtkeg2
 7GcjyznUsHHDaNFePGGs/f2bcGWUPgD/HlPOx4gwvYKrWCCZsnqNsqPM1C1OdTlCt8
 TEa/DBYCb5Fn88WftuLYnyN1DXblJ+kLb/yseIQw=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([212.95.5.239]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx004
 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MIdiZ-1mEkeR2LSf-00EZfq; Sun, 22
 Aug 2021 10:24:38 +0200
References: <84sijiuess.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <jwvvbodvoc1.fsf-monnier+emacsbugs@HIDDEN> <84r3z01x9u.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <jwvvboc1pft.fsf-monnier+emacsbugs@HIDDEN> <87zgtd4fee.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <c0c9bc90-67da-31f4-4da1-020ea81ca115@HIDDEN> <87im008dht.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: martin rudalics <rudalics@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <bf567767-9969-f91b-8d2a-adef93ac704c@HIDDEN>
Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2021 10:24:37 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <87im008dht.fsf@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:wmk3fpXskPftzN5mzOFCHpEJFE1dlbavghEwIJzJ2oBSH+VZDau
 JGN74szTacnvsXcQ7IojMNIa/brfI5yrMzvevaReFHOXTfAR+uxQ5QQ8PnkU+sIW3fiaJMZ
 7JXd216EgiosgLCdqEajlphb7JsJtpgadHErQx12njmZKZvZPngsJA9vcMdRCSXWr82MAw0
 B6taA1dLriDgxCpyub70g==
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:paS7hZBa9sI=:3oNjl500qVD7RETrkIdF5h
 VeOGroWV+0e24fGnTH0TMBl5a4h7rsyK8narZryWAWyl3fCTE7xWhhBbwR6s+Xv+bL00KVF8A
 fg8sZdFX5eaE4SpaKHM/+tJNE+WIud8UC4rB4nIlVX7fCBUYClAAAdsYIScZwDa+7FjKgvcnj
 gQI367s5bybaL8iZqae5QoFbzNLCyqfKkejh5fLreRbBKodqM+VZUw/SnaZ1xMevVgDYESfFx
 aMk8kyt0QCJ2esMR1v9OokEsAzxT7eMi7w+ySx8Fbc7mbXeceDmcOVTy3KTfh5bByXDQz5Ugx
 HkUzrFwNKKYhk+U2iNYxZrLbmec4sWh1gNKb3sg6NhCuZ/lvuyRJCGzxxfNDV+YG2BGInBHTI
 b+jUF7y+SxXuE38fOzQlbRyFJLcaEezSMy0MSEiMROqIw0nYVy+2ufXwsIktCEtPP1XLVYpc2
 WmC9aYzvJ5B07FIOTQ9bA7RA+VEfE7xOhyB34Wf+/8uwk196KehAFdePBCxXBOlpxm0ECsX0x
 WAfe20RKhLvEUeiV+rBh438DRaeXDl4mew5V1f0NhbD4u8YtvhdIak/qQahUd1H46MmhI4WqJ
 +nIVDuZXZrvNLPLUmUXLBDC7JVwx/QwYgwu63h6R7BowZYCGK9dnQy37b1FILgdIlL7UGjPHm
 DteZjBBAnhhbTVid8nDav8GEzQRHem2/eUAzvC1k9jNNhife1uKzLXfOyELMxiefrUZDcKUck
 GVww/6vGeeZ5AWvDGbVnWjezM9S2sjF8OZ+5NeSxOS74VneDoyrs2lbvVSuvtT4x9qzmToeir
 aagrDcHIeRffkXiBClGV6DOX+DlpRbvRwW+5x/a6ed7bzZJxG297xbpYqLN343GgVXN0S2zct
 2UJ/tC8+JGMuZjDwH6MVaOmtdRRmg/XBQlkCEIU5c+qnMFhJtZz7OewdfZoLHUtBGvw2CasHp
 sxXWz1n/CCyYLziwlwYoyBIqqOw9tiGmu9u79/ANhy5lmGvHbsV5wiedAWYveCpUYbBc5Zp2r
 KAlWi+1cTAa/rxeZ2KCGS+EdFxrxoTzT8pBrvPT2DlAC/TKj6ezKFPIEVmGgpRUd2r3lutF9w
 jCo25nIL1mBVpOTo5iYaLGBy5muCVQEC85KaXYm2fQ0NAYLFiEKSjBE8g==
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)

 > Yeah, I guess...  but...  is it really useful to restore the margins if
 > you display the same buffer in a (very) different frame?  (I'm thinking
 > gui vs. non-gui in an emacsclient setup.)

Is it useful to make Ruler mode buffer local?

 > I think it would be natural to restore margins if the buffer is a window
 > in the same frame, but that's rather obscure, too.

Buffer local settings have to be respected anywhere.  A user who sets
the margins in a non-gui frame and switches to a gui frame may want to
see them there as well.

martin

Message received at control <at> debbugs.gnu.org:

Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Sep 2021 05:41:22 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Sep 21 01:41:22 2021
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44652 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1mSYWv-0008Ll-V5
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 01:41:22 -0400
Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:40236)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1mSYWu-0008LV-Dj
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 01:41:20 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org;
 s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:
 MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:
 Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc
 :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:
 List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
 bh=Mn03vRq0N+9srdZNoPfyO/Y8zpS/sM4Q1+Eqs5NO/UE=; b=cni4fVNx/Bg7wh1tR2QK47mRej
 75nEE80E0JMDMgF944FLVOhv2mh+ifLcJ5HDR8Tz6uT5zBuqBxa+8MGma6VRsPWz9a2mPIIHfAHiH
 ldPHf65PDXEr6kXH6MrsQKw9WUD3AfS1gzUdsc4fpBPKpvgQluYXA0IZGkIruoa70WFo=;
Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva)
 by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1mSYWm-0001Rp-NX
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 07:41:14 +0200
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 07:41:12 +0200
Message-Id: <87y27qcwp3.fsf@HIDDEN>
To: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
Subject: control message for bug #18541
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
 Content preview:  tags 18541 - moreinfo quit 
 Content analysis details:   (-2.9 points, 5.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 [score: 0.0000]
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)

tags 18541 - moreinfo
quit

Last modified: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 05:45:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.