GNU logs - #18847, boring messages

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#18847: 24.4; Inconsistent behaviour of M-h with negative arguments
Resent-From: dieter@HIDDEN (H. Dieter Wilhelm)
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 23:29:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.18847.B.14143660821318 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 18847 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: dieter@HIDDEN (H. Dieter Wilhelm)
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 00:27:20 +0100
Message-ID: <877fzmqunb.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

Hello,

please try M-- M-h M-h M-h.

below some paragraphs.  The behaviour is not in line with the other
marking commands like M-@, ...

Here's a suggestion and a matching patch:

(defun mark-paragraph (&optional arg allow-extend)
  "Put mark at beginning of this paragraph,  point at end.
The paragraph marked is the one that contains point or follows
point. 

With argument ARG, puts mark at the end of a following paragraph,
so that the number of paragraphs marked equals ARG.

If ARG is negative, point is put at the beginning of this
paragraph, mark is put at the end of this or a previous
paragraph.

Interactively, if this command is repeated or (in Transient Mark
Mode) if the mark is active, it marks the next ARG paragraphs
after the ones already marked.  This means when activating the
mark before using this command, the current paragraph is only
marked from point."
  (interactive "P\np")
  (let ((numeric-arg (prefix-numeric-value arg)))
    (cond ((eobp)			; smart-aleck?
	   (backward-paragraph (abs numeric-arg))
	   (push-mark nil t t)
	   (forward-paragraph (abs numeric-arg)))
	  ((and allow-extend ;we already called this function or have
			     ;a (possibly empty) region
		(or (eq last-command this-command)
		    (region-active-p)))
	   (if arg
	       (setq arg numeric-arg)
	     (if (< (mark) (point))
		 (setq arg -1)
	       (setq arg 1)))
	   (set-mark
	    (save-excursion
	      (goto-char (mark))
	      (forward-paragraph arg)
	      (point))))
	  ((zerop numeric-arg)		
	   (message "Will not mark zero paragraphs."))
	  (t
	   (forward-paragraph numeric-arg)
	   (push-mark nil t t)
	   (backward-paragraph numeric-arg)))))

Thank you for your troubles!

diff -c /usr/local/src/emacs-24.4/lisp/textmodes/paragraphs.el /usr/local/src/emacs/lisp/textmodes/paragraphs.el
*** /usr/local/src/emacs-24.4/lisp/textmodes/paragraphs.el	2014-03-21 06:34:40.000000000 +0100
--- /usr/local/src/emacs/lisp/textmodes/paragraphs.el	2014-10-27 00:22:41.874845901 +0100
***************
*** 370,403 ****
    (forward-paragraph (- arg)))

  (defun mark-paragraph (&optional arg allow-extend)
!   "Put point at beginning of this paragraph, mark at end.
! The paragraph marked is the one that contains point or follows point.

! With argument ARG, puts mark at end of a following paragraph, so that
! the number of paragraphs marked equals ARG.

! If ARG is negative, point is put at end of this paragraph, mark is put
! at beginning of this or a previous paragraph.

! Interactively (or if ALLOW-EXTEND is non-nil), if this command is
! repeated or (in Transient Mark mode) if the mark is active,
! it marks the next ARG paragraphs after the ones already marked."
!   (interactive "p\np")
!   (unless arg (setq arg 1))
!   (when (zerop arg)
!     (error "Cannot mark zero paragraphs"))
!   (cond ((and allow-extend
! 	      (or (and (eq last-command this-command) (mark t))
! 		  (and transient-mark-mode mark-active)))
! 	 (set-mark
! 	  (save-excursion
! 	    (goto-char (mark))
! 	    (forward-paragraph arg)
! 	    (point))))
! 	(t
! 	 (forward-paragraph arg)
! 	 (push-mark nil t t)
! 	 (backward-paragraph arg))))

  (defun kill-paragraph (arg)
    "Kill forward to end of paragraph.
--- 370,417 ----
    (forward-paragraph (- arg)))

  (defun mark-paragraph (&optional arg allow-extend)
!   "Put mark at beginning of this paragraph,  point at end.
! The paragraph marked is the one that contains point or follows
! point.

! With argument ARG, puts mark at the end of a following paragraph,
! so that the number of paragraphs marked equals ARG.

! If ARG is negative, point is put at the beginning of this
! paragraph, mark is put at the end of this or a previous
! paragraph.

! Interactively, if this command is repeated or (in Transient Mark
! Mode) if the mark is active, it marks the next ARG paragraphs
! after the ones already marked.  This means when activating the
! mark before using this command, the current paragraph is only
! marked from point."
!   (interactive "P\np")
!   (let ((numeric-arg (prefix-numeric-value arg)))
!     (cond ((eobp)			; smart-aleck?
! 	   (backward-paragraph (abs numeric-arg))
! 	   (push-mark nil t t)
! 	   (forward-paragraph (abs numeric-arg)))
! 	  ((and allow-extend ;we already called this function or have
! 			     ;a (possibly empty) region
! 		(or (eq last-command this-command)
! 		    (region-active-p)))
! 	   (if arg
! 	       (setq arg numeric-arg)
! 	     (if (< (mark) (point))
! 		 (setq arg -1)
! 	       (setq arg 1)))
! 	   (set-mark
! 	    (save-excursion
! 	      (goto-char (mark))
! 	      (forward-paragraph arg)
! 	      (point))))
! 	  ((zerop numeric-arg)
! 	   (message "Will not mark zero paragraphs."))
! 	  (t
! 	   (forward-paragraph numeric-arg)
! 	   (push-mark nil t t)
! 	   (backward-paragraph numeric-arg)))))

  (defun kill-paragraph (arg)
    "Kill forward to end of paragraph.

Diff finished.  Mon Oct 27 00:22:49 2014

-- 
Best wishes
H. Dieter Wilhelm
Darmstadt, Germany

Message sent:

Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.503 (Entity 5.503)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: dieter@HIDDEN (H. Dieter Wilhelm)
Subject: bug#18847: Acknowledgement (24.4; Inconsistent behaviour of M-h
 with negative arguments)
Message-ID: <handler.18847.B.14143660821318.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <877fzmqunb.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 18847
X-Gnu-PR-Package: emacs
Reply-To: 18847 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 23:29:02 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 18847 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
18847: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D18847
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#18847: 24.4; Inconsistent behaviour of M-h with negative arguments
In-Reply-To: <877fzmqunb.fsf@HIDDEN>
Resent-From: dieter@HIDDEN (H. Dieter Wilhelm)
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 09:21:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.18847.B.141440164228331 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 18847 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: dieter@HIDDEN (H. Dieter Wilhelm)
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 08:37:44 +0100
Organization: The Church of Emacs
Lines: 291
Message-ID: <8738aaq7xz.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <877fzmqunb.fsf@HIDDEN>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Iw53S0/620lZew01ZDTPBctBmyw=
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

dieter@HIDDEN (H. Dieter Wilhelm) writes:

> Hello,
>
> please try M-- M-h M-h M-h.
>
> below some paragraphs.  The behaviour is not in line with the other
> marking commands like M-@, ...
>
> Here's a suggestion and a matching patch:

I'm sorry, I overlooked a special case:

(defun mark-paragraph (&optional arg allow-extend)
  "Put mark at beginning of this paragraph,  point at end.
The paragraph marked is the one that contains point or follows
point.

With argument ARG, puts mark at the end of this or a following
paragraph, so that the number of paragraphs marked equals ARG.

If ARG is negative, point is put at the beginning of this
paragraph, mark is put at the end of this or a previous
paragraph.

Interactively, if this command is repeated or (in Transient Mark
Mode) if the mark is active, it marks the next ARG paragraphs
after the region already marked.  This also means when activating
the mark immediately before using this command, the current
paragraph is only marked from point."
  (interactive "P\np")
  (let ((numeric-arg (prefix-numeric-value arg)))
    (cond ((eobp)			; smart-aleck?
	   (backward-paragraph (abs numeric-arg))
	   (push-mark nil t t)
	   (forward-paragraph (abs numeric-arg)))
	  ((and allow-extend
		(or (region-active-p)
		    (and (eq last-command this-command) mark-active)))
	   (if arg
	       (setq arg numeric-arg)
	     (if (< (mark) (point))
		 (setq arg -1)
	       (setq arg 1)))
	   (set-mark
	    (save-excursion
	      (goto-char (mark))
	      (forward-paragraph arg)
	      (point))))
	  ((zerop numeric-arg)
	   (message "Will not mark zero paragraphs."))
	  (t
	   (forward-paragraph numeric-arg)
	   (push-mark nil t t)
	   (backward-paragraph numeric-arg)))))

diff -c /usr/local/src/emacs-24.4/lisp/textmodes/paragraphs.el /usr/local/src/emacs/lisp/textmodes/paragraphs.el
*** /usr/local/src/emacs-24.4/lisp/textmodes/paragraphs.el	2014-03-21 06:34:40.000000000 +0100
--- /usr/local/src/emacs/lisp/textmodes/paragraphs.el	2014-10-27 08:31:27.457755345 +0100
***************
*** 370,403 ****
    (forward-paragraph (- arg)))

  (defun mark-paragraph (&optional arg allow-extend)
!   "Put point at beginning of this paragraph, mark at end.
! The paragraph marked is the one that contains point or follows point.

! With argument ARG, puts mark at end of a following paragraph, so that
! the number of paragraphs marked equals ARG.

! If ARG is negative, point is put at end of this paragraph, mark is put
! at beginning of this or a previous paragraph.

! Interactively (or if ALLOW-EXTEND is non-nil), if this command is
! repeated or (in Transient Mark mode) if the mark is active,
! it marks the next ARG paragraphs after the ones already marked."
!   (interactive "p\np")
!   (unless arg (setq arg 1))
!   (when (zerop arg)
!     (error "Cannot mark zero paragraphs"))
!   (cond ((and allow-extend
! 	      (or (and (eq last-command this-command) (mark t))
! 		  (and transient-mark-mode mark-active)))
! 	 (set-mark
! 	  (save-excursion
! 	    (goto-char (mark))
! 	    (forward-paragraph arg)
! 	    (point))))
! 	(t
! 	 (forward-paragraph arg)
! 	 (push-mark nil t t)
! 	 (backward-paragraph arg))))

  (defun kill-paragraph (arg)
    "Kill forward to end of paragraph.
--- 370,416 ----
    (forward-paragraph (- arg)))

  (defun mark-paragraph (&optional arg allow-extend)
!   "Put mark at beginning of this paragraph,  point at end.
! The paragraph marked is the one that contains point or follows
! point.

! With argument ARG, puts mark at the end of this or a following
! paragraph, so that the number of paragraphs marked equals ARG.

! If ARG is negative, point is put at the beginning of this
! paragraph, mark is put at the end of this or a previous
! paragraph.

! Interactively, if this command is repeated or (in Transient Mark
! Mode) if the mark is active, it marks the next ARG paragraphs
! after the region already marked.  This also means when activating
! the mark immediately before using this command, the current
! paragraph is only marked from point."
!   (interactive "P\np")
!   (let ((numeric-arg (prefix-numeric-value arg)))
!     (cond ((eobp)			; smart-aleck?
! 	   (backward-paragraph (abs numeric-arg))
! 	   (push-mark nil t t)
! 	   (forward-paragraph (abs numeric-arg)))
! 	  ((and allow-extend
! 		(or (region-active-p)
! 		    (and (eq last-command this-command) mark-active)))
! 	   (if arg
! 	       (setq arg numeric-arg)
! 	     (if (< (mark) (point))
! 		 (setq arg -1)
! 	       (setq arg 1)))
! 	   (set-mark
! 	    (save-excursion
! 	      (goto-char (mark))
! 	      (forward-paragraph arg)
! 	      (point))))
! 	  ((zerop numeric-arg)
! 	   (message "Will not mark zero paragraphs."))
! 	  (t
! 	   (forward-paragraph numeric-arg)
! 	   (push-mark nil t t)
! 	   (backward-paragraph numeric-arg)))))

  (defun kill-paragraph (arg)
    "Kill forward to end of paragraph.

Diff finished.  Mon Oct 27 08:31:56 2014

> (defun mark-paragraph (&optional arg allow-extend)
>   "Put mark at beginning of this paragraph,  point at end.
> The paragraph marked is the one that contains point or follows
> point. 
>
> With argument ARG, puts mark at the end of a following paragraph,
> so that the number of paragraphs marked equals ARG.
>
> If ARG is negative, point is put at the beginning of this
> paragraph, mark is put at the end of this or a previous
> paragraph.
>
> Interactively, if this command is repeated or (in Transient Mark
> Mode) if the mark is active, it marks the next ARG paragraphs
> after the ones already marked.  This means when activating the
> mark before using this command, the current paragraph is only
> marked from point."
>   (interactive "P\np")
>   (let ((numeric-arg (prefix-numeric-value arg)))
>     (cond ((eobp)			; smart-aleck?
> 	   (backward-paragraph (abs numeric-arg))
> 	   (push-mark nil t t)
> 	   (forward-paragraph (abs numeric-arg)))
> 	  ((and allow-extend ;we already called this function or have
> 			     ;a (possibly empty) region
> 		(or (eq last-command this-command)
> 		    (region-active-p)))
> 	   (if arg
> 	       (setq arg numeric-arg)
> 	     (if (< (mark) (point))
> 		 (setq arg -1)
> 	       (setq arg 1)))
> 	   (set-mark
> 	    (save-excursion
> 	      (goto-char (mark))
> 	      (forward-paragraph arg)
> 	      (point))))
> 	  ((zerop numeric-arg)		
> 	   (message "Will not mark zero paragraphs."))
> 	  (t
> 	   (forward-paragraph numeric-arg)
> 	   (push-mark nil t t)
> 	   (backward-paragraph numeric-arg)))))
>
>
> Thank you for your troubles!
>
> diff -c /usr/local/src/emacs-24.4/lisp/textmodes/paragraphs.el /usr/local/src/emacs/lisp/textmodes/paragraphs.el
> *** /usr/local/src/emacs-24.4/lisp/textmodes/paragraphs.el	2014-03-21 06:34:40.000000000 +0100
> --- /usr/local/src/emacs/lisp/textmodes/paragraphs.el	2014-10-27 00:22:41.874845901 +0100
> ***************
> *** 370,403 ****
>     (forward-paragraph (- arg)))
>   
>   (defun mark-paragraph (&optional arg allow-extend)
> !   "Put point at beginning of this paragraph, mark at end.
> ! The paragraph marked is the one that contains point or follows point.
>   
> ! With argument ARG, puts mark at end of a following paragraph, so that
> ! the number of paragraphs marked equals ARG.
>   
> ! If ARG is negative, point is put at end of this paragraph, mark is put
> ! at beginning of this or a previous paragraph.
>   
> ! Interactively (or if ALLOW-EXTEND is non-nil), if this command is
> ! repeated or (in Transient Mark mode) if the mark is active,
> ! it marks the next ARG paragraphs after the ones already marked."
> !   (interactive "p\np")
> !   (unless arg (setq arg 1))
> !   (when (zerop arg)
> !     (error "Cannot mark zero paragraphs"))
> !   (cond ((and allow-extend
> ! 	      (or (and (eq last-command this-command) (mark t))
> ! 		  (and transient-mark-mode mark-active)))
> ! 	 (set-mark
> ! 	  (save-excursion
> ! 	    (goto-char (mark))
> ! 	    (forward-paragraph arg)
> ! 	    (point))))
> ! 	(t
> ! 	 (forward-paragraph arg)
> ! 	 (push-mark nil t t)
> ! 	 (backward-paragraph arg))))
>   
>   (defun kill-paragraph (arg)
>     "Kill forward to end of paragraph.
> --- 370,417 ----
>     (forward-paragraph (- arg)))
>   
>   (defun mark-paragraph (&optional arg allow-extend)
> !   "Put mark at beginning of this paragraph,  point at end.
> ! The paragraph marked is the one that contains point or follows
> ! point.
>   
> ! With argument ARG, puts mark at the end of a following paragraph,
> ! so that the number of paragraphs marked equals ARG.
>   
> ! If ARG is negative, point is put at the beginning of this
> ! paragraph, mark is put at the end of this or a previous
> ! paragraph.
>   
> ! Interactively, if this command is repeated or (in Transient Mark
> ! Mode) if the mark is active, it marks the next ARG paragraphs
> ! after the ones already marked.  This means when activating the
> ! mark before using this command, the current paragraph is only
> ! marked from point."
> !   (interactive "P\np")
> !   (let ((numeric-arg (prefix-numeric-value arg)))
> !     (cond ((eobp)			; smart-aleck?
> ! 	   (backward-paragraph (abs numeric-arg))
> ! 	   (push-mark nil t t)
> ! 	   (forward-paragraph (abs numeric-arg)))
> ! 	  ((and allow-extend ;we already called this function or have
> ! 			     ;a (possibly empty) region
> ! 		(or (eq last-command this-command)
> ! 		    (region-active-p)))
> ! 	   (if arg
> ! 	       (setq arg numeric-arg)
> ! 	     (if (< (mark) (point))
> ! 		 (setq arg -1)
> ! 	       (setq arg 1)))
> ! 	   (set-mark
> ! 	    (save-excursion
> ! 	      (goto-char (mark))
> ! 	      (forward-paragraph arg)
> ! 	      (point))))
> ! 	  ((zerop numeric-arg)
> ! 	   (message "Will not mark zero paragraphs."))
> ! 	  (t
> ! 	   (forward-paragraph numeric-arg)
> ! 	   (push-mark nil t t)
> ! 	   (backward-paragraph numeric-arg)))))
>   
>   (defun kill-paragraph (arg)
>     "Kill forward to end of paragraph.
>
> Diff finished.  Mon Oct 27 00:22:49 2014

-- 
Best wishes
H. Dieter Wilhelm
Darmstadt, Germany

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#18847: 24.4; Inconsistent behaviour of M-h with negative arguments
Resent-From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 17:06:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.18847.B18847.14145159115567 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: dieter@HIDDEN (H. Dieter Wilhelm)
Cc: 18847 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <jwvfve8uo1r.fsf-monnier+emacsbugs@HIDDEN>
References: <877fzmqunb.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 13:04:44 -0400
In-Reply-To: <877fzmqunb.fsf@HIDDEN> (H. Dieter Wilhelm's message of
 "Mon, 27 Oct 2014 00:27:20 +0100")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

> please try M-- M-h M-h M-h.
> below some paragraphs.  The behaviour is not in line with the other
> marking commands like M-@, ...

Could you give more details about which differences you're thinking of?
I have my ideas, but they don't seem to match yours, at least based on
my reading of your patch.

        Stefan

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#18847: 24.4; Inconsistent behaviour of M-h with negative arguments
Resent-From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 16:36:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.18847.B18847.141468690428414 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18847
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: dieter@HIDDEN (H. Dieter Wilhelm)
Cc: 18847 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 18847-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B18847.141468690428414
          (code B ref 18847); Thu, 30 Oct 2014 16:36:02 +0000
Received: (at 18847) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Oct 2014 16:35:04 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40704 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1Xjsgh-0007OD-7M
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 12:35:03 -0400
Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:40581)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80)
 (envelope-from <monnier@HIDDEN>) id 1Xjsge-0007Nl-P4
 for 18847 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 12:35:01 -0400
Received: from ceviche.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242])
 by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id s9UGYw0C031758;
 Thu, 30 Oct 2014 12:34:59 -0400
Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848)
 id EAA106610C; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 12:35:00 -0400 (EDT)
From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <jwvioj1a5ei.fsf-monnier+emacsbugs@HIDDEN>
References: <877fzmqunb.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <jwvfve8uo1r.fsf-monnier+emacsbugs@HIDDEN>
 <87oasvq1ja.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 12:35:00 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87oasvq1ja.fsf@HIDDEN> (H. Dieter Wilhelm's message of
 "Tue, 28 Oct 2014 23:20:41 +0100")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO
X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5
X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0
X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered
	RV5110=0
X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9393 : core <5110> : inlines <1462> : streams
 <1330543> : uri <1830472>
X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-)

[ Be careful to keep 18847 <at> debbugs.gnu.org in the Cc, please.  ]

> 1) The sole real bug - in my opinion - is that M-h doesn't retain the
>    "marking direction" from a negative argument when repeating.

OK, I agree with this, it's a plain bug.

> 2) When applying M-h (or any other marking command) at the end of a
>    buffer (at least interactively, I failed to address this), the right
>    thing to do is marking (a) previous element(s).  I would like to know
>    if you find this a good idea.

I have no opinion on this, I never use M-h myself.

> 3) M-h (C-M-h and C-x C-p ) differ from C-@ and C-M-@ that they are
>    always marking (a) whole element(s).  I wanted to clarify in the
>    documentation string that a marking from point is also achievable
>    with M-h.

So this part is just a docstring change, right?

> 4) M-h does signal an error applying zero as an argument, the other
>    marking commands just ignore zero, so I thought a message might be a
>    good compromise to the current state...

I have no opinion on this one either.  It doesn't seem terribly
important, so reducing discrepancies in this case might be the
dominating factor.


        Stefan

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#18847: 24.4; Inconsistent behaviour of M-h with negative arguments
In-Reply-To: <877fzmqunb.fsf@HIDDEN>
Resent-From: dieter@HIDDEN (H. Dieter Wilhelm)
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 17:57:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.18847.B18847.141503737322905 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18847
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
Cc: 18847 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 18847-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B18847.141503737322905
          (code B ref 18847); Mon, 03 Nov 2014 17:57:01 +0000
Received: (at 18847) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Nov 2014 17:56:13 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47786 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1XlLrQ-0005xM-UO
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 12:56:13 -0500
Received: from mail-lb0-f181.google.com ([209.85.217.181]:61986)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80)
 (envelope-from <dieter.wilhelm@HIDDEN>) id 1XlLrN-0005x7-VO
 for 18847 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 12:56:10 -0500
Received: by mail-lb0-f181.google.com with SMTP id l4so3087116lbv.12
 for <18847 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 09:56:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:message-id:user-agent
 :mime-version:content-type;
 bh=QekHHlpvd9dEsoXZ6nUoP7Bz8kaF2nnkxo0Mi1t98do=;
 b=TPi/YjuzC+f97xrgsLScBWEqe7KmbkNAsc63HiO4K2EXNy41tn746dyWF64OGZoZwR
 X+3rsAQtIssZbNz2wMcaQZ3/IcQis/X8M9TObcm/lZ1Gakmutqw+x8o2OlvfBlrPZu9n
 yKhe4aRV1cGvSGO0gV+s/ypvVB6CCkPmjMHsmDlQBIQclSf81M+39NpGpflHIzcIDOJA
 vpUAE6YKVfaO24VMsjvUqsNuRlMA42MnqjfCUHCBksG3kE7XffUPoazeSib9lcAHu/iU
 6t8hJiwvYO8CVSFtIJ+pdCBUKoEdRrPxZjNoq3Lb2+4eAD29DkBvTRZkr2EzeaWpdQvV
 8S2g==
X-Received: by 10.112.169.106 with SMTP id ad10mr52740262lbc.13.1415037363606; 
 Mon, 03 Nov 2014 09:56:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vsl28t2g.ww011 (p4FD4F4FD.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [79.212.244.253])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id or5sm8191666lbb.42.2014.11.03.09.56.02
 for <multiple recipients>
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
 Mon, 03 Nov 2014 09:56:03 -0800 (PST)
From: dieter@HIDDEN (H. Dieter Wilhelm)
References: <877fzmqunb.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <jwvfve8uo1r.fsf-monnier+emacsbugs@HIDDEN>
 <87oasvq1ja.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <jwvioj1a5ei.fsf-monnier+emacsbugs@HIDDEN>
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 18:56:00 +0100
Message-ID: <877fzc418v.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)

Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN> writes:

> [ Be careful to keep 18847 <at> debbugs.gnu.org in the Cc, please.  ]

Sorry, I overlooked the Cc field.

....

>> 2) When applying M-h (or any other marking command) at the end of a
>>    buffer (at least interactively, I failed to address this), the right
>>    thing to do is marking (a) previous element(s).  I would like to know
>>    if you find this a good idea.
>
> I have no opinion on this, I never use M-h myself.

Interesting, no M-h!  Anyway, in the meantime I tested M-h more
thoroughly in these borderline cases and I think its behaviour is
actually not correct.  I suggest to separate this issue and possible
enhancements from the current subject.

>> 3) M-h (C-M-h and C-x C-p ) differ from C-@ and C-M-@ that they are
>>    always marking (a) whole element(s).  I wanted to clarify in the
>>    documentation string that a marking from point is also achievable
>>    with M-h.
>
> So this part is just a docstring change, right?

Exactly.

>> 4) M-h does signal an error applying zero as an argument, the other
>>    marking commands just ignore zero, so I thought a message might be a
>>    good compromise to the current state...
>
> I have no opinion on this one either.  It doesn't seem terribly
> important, so reducing discrepancies in this case might be the
> dominating factor.

Right, I dropped the zero argument message. (But still inhibited M-h to
activate the mark in this situation.)

Thank you for your patience

       Dieter


(defun mark-paragraph (&optional arg allow-extend)
  "Put point at beginning of this paragraph, mark at end.
The paragraph marked is the one that contains point or follows
point.

With argument ARG, puts mark at the end of this or a following
paragraph, so that the number of paragraphs marked equals ARG.

If ARG is negative, point is put at the end of this paragraph,
mark is put at the beginning of this or a previous paragraph.

Interactively (or if ALLOW-EXTEND is non-nil), if this command is
repeated or (in Transient Mark mode) if the mark is active, it
marks the next ARG paragraphs after the region already marked.
This also means when activating the mark immediately before using
this command, the current paragraph is only marked from point."
  (interactive "P\np")
  (let ((numeric-arg (prefix-numeric-value arg)))
    (cond ((zerop numeric-arg))
	  ((and allow-extend
		(or (and (eq last-command this-command) mark-active)
		    (region-active-p)))
	   (if arg
	       (setq arg numeric-arg)
	     (if (< (mark) (point))
		 (setq arg -1)
	       (setq arg 1)))
	   (set-mark
	    (save-excursion
	      (goto-char (mark))
	      (forward-paragraph arg)
	      (point))))
	  (t
	   (forward-paragraph numeric-arg)
	   (push-mark nil t t)
	   (backward-paragraph numeric-arg)))))

diff --git a/lisp/textmodes/paragraphs.el b/lisp/textmodes/paragraphs.el
index 3e77d37..e1a735d 100644
--- a/lisp/textmodes/paragraphs.el
+++ b/lisp/textmodes/paragraphs.el
@@ -370,34 +370,47 @@ See `forward-paragraph' for more information."
   (forward-paragraph (- arg)))
 
 (defun mark-paragraph (&optional arg allow-extend)
-  "Put point at beginning of this paragraph, mark at end.
-The paragraph marked is the one that contains point or follows point.
-
-With argument ARG, puts mark at end of a following paragraph, so that
-the number of paragraphs marked equals ARG.
-
-If ARG is negative, point is put at end of this paragraph, mark is put
-at beginning of this or a previous paragraph.
-
-Interactively (or if ALLOW-EXTEND is non-nil), if this command is
-repeated or (in Transient Mark mode) if the mark is active,
-it marks the next ARG paragraphs after the ones already marked."
-  (interactive "p\np")
-  (unless arg (setq arg 1))
-  (when (zerop arg)
-    (error "Cannot mark zero paragraphs"))
-  (cond ((and allow-extend
-	      (or (and (eq last-command this-command) (mark t))
-		  (and transient-mark-mode mark-active)))
-	 (set-mark
-	  (save-excursion
-	    (goto-char (mark))
-	    (forward-paragraph arg)
-	    (point))))
-	(t
-	 (forward-paragraph arg)
-	 (push-mark nil t t)
-	 (backward-paragraph arg))))
+  "Put mark at beginning of this paragraph,  point at end.
+The paragraph marked is the one that contains point or follows
+point.
+
+With argument ARG, puts mark at the end of this or a following
+paragraph, so that the number of paragraphs marked equals ARG.
+
+If ARG is negative, point is put at the beginning of this
+paragraph, mark is put at the end of this or a previous
+paragraph.
+
+Interactively, if this command is repeated or (in Transient Mark
+Mode) if the mark is active, it marks the next ARG paragraphs
+after the region already marked.  This also means when activating
+the mark immediately before using this command, the current
+paragraph is only marked from point."
+  (interactive "P\np")
+  (let ((numeric-arg (prefix-numeric-value arg)))
+    (cond ((eobp)			; smart-aleck?
+	   (backward-paragraph (abs numeric-arg))
+	   (push-mark nil t t)
+	   (forward-paragraph (abs numeric-arg)))
+	  ((and allow-extend
+		(or (region-active-p)
+		    (and (eq last-command this-command) mark-active)))
+	   (if arg
+	       (setq arg numeric-arg)
+	     (if (< (mark) (point))
+		 (setq arg -1)
+	       (setq arg 1)))
+	   (set-mark
+	    (save-excursion
+	      (goto-char (mark))
+	      (forward-paragraph arg)
+	      (point))))
+	  ((zerop numeric-arg)
+	   (message "Will not mark zero paragraphs."))
+	  (t
+	   (forward-paragraph numeric-arg)
+	   (push-mark nil t t)
+	   (backward-paragraph numeric-arg)))))
 
 (defun kill-paragraph (arg)
   "Kill forward to end of paragraph.



-- 
Best wishes
H. Dieter Wilhelm
Darmstadt, Germany

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#18847: 24.4; Inconsistent behaviour of M-h with negative arguments
Resent-From: dieter@HIDDEN (H. Dieter Wilhelm)
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 19:14:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.18847.B18847.141607879026290 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18847
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
Cc: 18847 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 18847-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B18847.141607879026290
          (code B ref 18847); Sat, 15 Nov 2014 19:14:02 +0000
Received: (at 18847) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Nov 2014 19:13:10 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34114 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1XpimT-0006px-MR
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 14:13:10 -0500
Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:38500)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80)
 (envelope-from <dieter.wilhelm@HIDDEN>) id 1XpimR-0006pp-JI
 for 18847 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 14:13:08 -0500
Received: by mail-wg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id x13so21836089wgg.8
 for <18847 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 11:13:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id
 :user-agent:mime-version:content-type;
 bh=B9KPMRFjuAJcpi/1E+81Dfp4wbbJeiDv130v29tb3LU=;
 b=x9yoaCk6xFXb5JzI8zD2bXzaehQN5hDYanH4iv3cBe0+GTc2aBqbYBZaMfPqUNOQQu
 VcnmWFt5brKcEmPaZpYRHLXTmKTVc2B5K0kPAU7E3Epv5jHj7uua8jh4Gto5Edw3CcWE
 KGUs+dO1+Le2sj+LeMD9vtAO44WxZBdIyyneLJ5w+OdfsWc/m0dZ0koFCZsCLpVN7T63
 s7urbRfnd1QSNH9NVgytQmbftdB9bra1yzGriE9cB//qrq6HH1Jhkh4T6/dGYx76A8QV
 1eoIDEm4e7WCbrhsyax5TogUou5iXeNcppKbcwmXilf0gUu0VwaTi3+LD1kWVbPYoHlq
 T3Ig==
X-Received: by 10.194.5.227 with SMTP id v3mr25549007wjv.63.1416078786827;
 Sat, 15 Nov 2014 11:13:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vsl28t2g.ww011 (p57ACDB2D.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [87.172.219.45])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
 da3sm44323272wjb.12.2014.11.15.11.13.04 for <multiple recipients>
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Sat, 15 Nov 2014 11:13:05 -0800 (PST)
From: dieter@HIDDEN (H. Dieter Wilhelm)
References: <877fzmqunb.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <jwvfve8uo1r.fsf-monnier+emacsbugs@HIDDEN>
 <87oasvq1ja.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <jwvioj1a5ei.fsf-monnier+emacsbugs@HIDDEN>
 <877fzc418v.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 20:13:03 +0100
In-Reply-To: <877fzc418v.fsf@HIDDEN> (H. Dieter Wilhelm's message of
 "Mon, 03 Nov 2014 18:56:00 +0100")
Message-ID: <87ppco2s74.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)


The following patches

1) solve bug#18847 (when applying M-h with negative arguments and
   repeating this command)

2) solve another - not reported - bug.  When, e.g. at the end of the
   buffer, the numbers of paragraphs left in the buffer is less than
   ARG, then paragraphs are also marked *before* the current paragraph
   (contradicting the function's documentation)

3) (hopefully) clarifying a bit the documentation of mark-paragraph

4) aligning the behaviour of a zero argument to other marking commands
   (doing nothing, no error signal)

It still remains one anomaly - in my opinon - but only for a fringe
case, at the moment C-h and forward/backward-paragraph consider empty
lines at the end or the beginning of the buffer as an additional
paragraph...

Anyway, could some good soul apply the patches to emacs-24?

Thank you

      Dieter

diff --git a/lisp/ChangeLog b/lisp/ChangeLog
index a6ab3b8..463753c 100644
--- a/lisp/ChangeLog
+++ b/lisp/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2014-11-15  H. Dieter Wilhelm <dieter@HIDDEN>
+	* textmodes/paragraph.el (mark-paragraph): Handling of
+	negative arguments (bug#18847)
+
 2014-11-14  Ivan Andrus  <darthandrus@HIDDEN>
 
 	* progmodes/python.el (python-ffap-module-path): Use


diff --git a/lisp/textmodes/paragraphs.el b/lisp/textmodes/paragraphs.el
index 3e77d37..d17cf09 100644
--- a/lisp/textmodes/paragraphs.el
+++ b/lisp/textmodes/paragraphs.el
@@ -371,33 +371,47 @@ See `forward-paragraph' for more information."
 
 (defun mark-paragraph (&optional arg allow-extend)
   "Put point at beginning of this paragraph, mark at end.
-The paragraph marked is the one that contains point or follows point.
+The paragraph marked is the one that contains point or follows
+point.
 
-With argument ARG, puts mark at end of a following paragraph, so that
-the number of paragraphs marked equals ARG.
+With argument ARG, puts mark at the end of this or a following
+paragraph, so that the number of paragraphs marked equals ARG.
 
-If ARG is negative, point is put at end of this paragraph, mark is put
-at beginning of this or a previous paragraph.
+If ARG is negative, point is put at the end of this paragraph,
+mark is put at the beginning of this or a previous paragraph.
 
 Interactively (or if ALLOW-EXTEND is non-nil), if this command is
-repeated or (in Transient Mark mode) if the mark is active,
-it marks the next ARG paragraphs after the ones already marked."
-  (interactive "p\np")
-  (unless arg (setq arg 1))
-  (when (zerop arg)
-    (error "Cannot mark zero paragraphs"))
-  (cond ((and allow-extend
-	      (or (and (eq last-command this-command) (mark t))
-		  (and transient-mark-mode mark-active)))
-	 (set-mark
-	  (save-excursion
-	    (goto-char (mark))
-	    (forward-paragraph arg)
-	    (point))))
-	(t
-	 (forward-paragraph arg)
-	 (push-mark nil t t)
-	 (backward-paragraph arg))))
+repeated or (in Transient Mark mode) if the mark is active, it
+marks the next ARG paragraphs after the region already marked.
+This also means when activating the mark immediately before using
+this command, the current paragraph is only marked from point."
+  (interactive "P\np")
+  (let ((numeric-arg (prefix-numeric-value arg)))
+    (cond ((zerop numeric-arg))
+	  ((and allow-extend
+		(or (and (eq last-command this-command) mark-active)
+		    (region-active-p)))
+	   (if arg
+	       (setq arg numeric-arg)
+	     (if (< (mark) (point))
+		 (setq arg -1)
+	       (setq arg 1)))
+	   (set-mark
+	    (save-excursion
+	      (goto-char (mark))
+	      (forward-paragraph arg)
+	      (point))))
+	  ;; don't activate the mark when at eob
+	  ((and (eobp) (> numeric-arg 0)))
+	  (t
+	   (unless (save-excursion
+		     (forward-line 0)
+		     (looking-at  paragraph-start))
+	     (backward-paragraph (signum numeric-arg)))
+	   (push-mark
+	    (save-excursion
+	      (forward-paragraph numeric-arg)
+	      (point)) t t)))))
 
 (defun kill-paragraph (arg)
   "Kill forward to end of paragraph.



-- 
Best wishes
H. Dieter Wilhelm
Darmstadt, Germany

Message received at control <at> debbugs.gnu.org:

Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Aug 2020 16:55:20 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Aug 12 12:55:20 2020
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45369 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1k5u24-0000UC-Cf
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:55:20 -0400
Received: from mail-yb1-f171.google.com ([209.85.219.171]:35888)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <stefankangas@HIDDEN>) id 1k5u23-0000Tt-2M
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:55:19 -0400
Received: by mail-yb1-f171.google.com with SMTP id g3so1738079ybc.3
 for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 09:55:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=M9XfQrmPCHRcY5dMivQCmlN8OxDiE/LjsrHo35kMDtg=;
 b=bBHXk7P0EFjbMy/ebtlgN561HWQ8xVzNmEBbceQXzzjrj6R502H/zevq7JGEDVT+CJ
 M7MjXClT9bokiA2d9x64/ppO8NKPnhOc8MmN6yjVfuvKFf/VpxceSPdhrEM//+k5ZuqA
 4ynack7OPhxeL0+qy6nfBbde60PFx3WK6U5ge64XGt0+SbqogOwUZ+i4/OPQm9H41dxJ
 53Y3MDUdXtU+7bSMAni4BrLx9hR9GwufP1JgXdnisX41BX7jhvW38Z1oeVdRH/5eCB+Q
 AvgNGkIp3+f+LZ3CWkrZ0LATT1TyqHFb5w0HvA3X5asYM7geWl09vrXPuF7LYx7688TU
 kjrQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530RwIw5eCtnR1I9rq0Y7tt1ua7n9vF/iT7c9Gq//jGEnebgHShu
 v7e5R1VaV/ujpZkutHIZL2rT/7LXQVMyQcjR4UYK3EGS4ZE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz0n6BLGubgVOay9n5jkDs4N+O1e3sHNpB7mLPo9lNH1da2QGKLGPXxJDFYYvMJHkizqaN6oiRbvXs9FwVM2nM=
X-Received: by 2002:a5b:508:: with SMTP id o8mr426424ybp.43.1597251313337;
 Wed, 12 Aug 2020 09:55:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with
 HTTPREST; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 09:55:12 -0700
From: Stefan Kangas <stefan@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 09:55:12 -0700
Message-ID: <CADwFkmm0ZnjYrdR-LxwwAZ5JYXTApEcUKk9YVsnAQANnLMA2fQ@HIDDEN>
Subject: 
To: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 Content preview:  tags 18847 + patch thanks 
 Content analysis details:   (2.0 points, 10.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 0.0 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level
 mail domains are different
 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail
 provider (stefankangas[at]gmail.com)
 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 no trust [209.85.219.171 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2      RBL: Average reputation (+2)
 [209.85.219.171 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY      Informational: message has unparseable relay
 lines
 0.0 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and
 EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different
 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT          Subject is present but empty
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+)

tags 18847 + patch
thanks

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#18847: 24.4; Inconsistent behaviour of M-h with negative arguments
Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 09:53:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.18847.B18847.15973123327460 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18847
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch
To: dieter@HIDDEN (H. Dieter Wilhelm)
Cc: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>, 18847 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 18847-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B18847.15973123327460
          (code B ref 18847); Thu, 13 Aug 2020 09:53:02 +0000
Received: (at 18847) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Aug 2020 09:52:12 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46948 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1k69u8-0001wG-29
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 05:52:12 -0400
Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:55488)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1k69u6-0001vz-Dt
 for 18847 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 05:52:10 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org;
 s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:
 References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:
 Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:
 Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:
 List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
 bh=FsG4oDvBtzSlqSwM27RXtm6aJbic/lX2fPt84MB9rhY=; b=g3KV0WMOiftDlrnGwQeAkG49a+
 noQspxdfJSWQ/NPNfvmt9FvIlLlxuRWH2Wpg6sgp5h3QxC6YHOm/woBY733wMVd/mKdY/+CF9WANa
 QS//eAIWaMKndEhBEiS6bxl2Jw/AvZLor/SZE4rcyNSvPC3cZnfutMYmMeGTaMsjdptg=;
Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo)
 by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>)
 id 1k69tv-0004hn-VQ; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 11:52:03 +0200
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
References: <877fzmqunb.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <jwvfve8uo1r.fsf-monnier+emacsbugs@HIDDEN>
 <87oasvq1ja.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <jwvioj1a5ei.fsf-monnier+emacsbugs@HIDDEN>
 <877fzc418v.fsf@HIDDEN> <87ppco2s74.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 11:51:58 +0200
In-Reply-To: <87ppco2s74.fsf@HIDDEN> (H. Dieter Wilhelm's message of
 "Sat, 15 Nov 2014 20:13:03 +0100")
Message-ID: <87zh6yg9fl.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
 Content preview:  dieter@HIDDEN (H. Dieter Wilhelm) writes: >
 The following patches > > 1) solve bug#18847 (when applying M-h with negative
 arguments and > repeating this command) > > 2) solve another - not reported
 - bug. When, e.g. at the end of the > buffer [...] 
 Content analysis details:   (-2.9 points, 5.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 [score: 0.0000]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

dieter@HIDDEN (H. Dieter Wilhelm) writes:

> The following patches
>
> 1) solve bug#18847 (when applying M-h with negative arguments and
>    repeating this command)
>
> 2) solve another - not reported - bug.  When, e.g. at the end of the
>    buffer, the numbers of paragraphs left in the buffer is less than
>    ARG, then paragraphs are also marked *before* the current paragraph
>    (contradicting the function's documentation)
>
> 3) (hopefully) clarifying a bit the documentation of mark-paragraph
>
> 4) aligning the behaviour of a zero argument to other marking commands
>    (doing nothing, no error signal)

Thanks; I've now applied this patch to Emacs 28 (with some small
whitespace changes).

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no

Message received at control <at> debbugs.gnu.org:

Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Aug 2020 09:52:18 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 13 05:52:18 2020
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46951 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1k69uE-0001wY-AZ
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 05:52:18 -0400
Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:55504)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1k69uC-0001wE-9S
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 05:52:16 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org;
 s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:
 MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:
 Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc
 :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:
 List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
 bh=tqCMCjDkDce8Tjo7qh4ltudjoP3ewg0xkSqiucwh6e8=; b=tLRhNv3vBfdRRENZETIQYftucX
 dAS8EFtEEoz0Gn00AuuTjjXzODegDO4z6H6tJ4Jn00hVQJy1zpCLr5WVFOv95mK/Wbw5y39EwCJz+
 cadJeaNH+p1/yq7RfNztPcCIyXHMd+6C7CrMOCpaYB89ZKDTrEkgnxFP0QW22k83h4EM=;
Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo)
 by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1k69u4-0004i5-FP
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 11:52:10 +0200
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 11:52:07 +0200
Message-Id: <87y2mig9fc.fsf@HIDDEN>
To: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
Subject: control message for bug #18847
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
 Content preview:  tags 18847 fixed close 18847 28.1 quit 
 Content analysis details:   (-2.9 points, 5.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 [score: 0.0000]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

tags 18847 fixed
close 18847 28.1
quit

Message received at control <at> debbugs.gnu.org:

Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Aug 2020 09:52:18 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 13 05:52:18 2020
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46951 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1k69uE-0001wY-AZ
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 05:52:18 -0400
Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:55504)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1k69uC-0001wE-9S
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 05:52:16 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org;
 s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:
 MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:
 Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc
 :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:
 List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
 bh=tqCMCjDkDce8Tjo7qh4ltudjoP3ewg0xkSqiucwh6e8=; b=tLRhNv3vBfdRRENZETIQYftucX
 dAS8EFtEEoz0Gn00AuuTjjXzODegDO4z6H6tJ4Jn00hVQJy1zpCLr5WVFOv95mK/Wbw5y39EwCJz+
 cadJeaNH+p1/yq7RfNztPcCIyXHMd+6C7CrMOCpaYB89ZKDTrEkgnxFP0QW22k83h4EM=;
Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo)
 by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1k69u4-0004i5-FP
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 11:52:10 +0200
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 11:52:07 +0200
Message-Id: <87y2mig9fc.fsf@HIDDEN>
To: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
Subject: control message for bug #18847
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
 Content preview:  tags 18847 fixed close 18847 28.1 quit 
 Content analysis details:   (-2.9 points, 5.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 [score: 0.0000]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

tags 18847 fixed
close 18847 28.1
quit

Message received at fakecontrol@fakecontrolmessage:

Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage;
To: internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs@HIDDEN>
Subject: Internal Control
Message-Id: bug archived.
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 11:24:10 +0000
User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9

# This is a fake control message.
#
# The action:
# bug archived.
thanks
# This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs
# administrator

Message received at control <at> debbugs.gnu.org:

Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Oct 2021 12:15:41 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 11 08:15:41 2021
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56927 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1mZuDU-0002UC-LT
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 08:15:41 -0400
Received: from mail-pj1-f53.google.com ([209.85.216.53]:54090)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <stefankangas@HIDDEN>) id 1mZuDT-0002NH-8G
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 08:15:39 -0400
Received: by mail-pj1-f53.google.com with SMTP id ls18so13128319pjb.3
 for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 05:15:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:user-agent
 :mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=zYOATk75sI8UIDhp96oa3UoWBjvy0l9/CyuQHLMtwKw=;
 b=iAmDqjCpbN+XI5JpO6QQjRRlHmz0k6r6IFYPIhzbQuQZ0KDJ+Qo+74m1I12rBu2/gO
 vNjfeLEQR6Gy4hvVu7fbu1A+2sBxrQ1IYgdrqYY2AUysE10UHyyMVgMeL2tSBStYFtlB
 4BuvctNP4QC/tnj9W4U6iYUJU8fBpGd5aoQfxBlHXc7/NPrDj9l9cYbgKILzgSishWWg
 ZIfojUOkGulpB5VdV7BPZ4ctzlKPSMLFf/+/+phXXLZZiJ7fZTZCwctAVg4atKkv7KiG
 mELU60xDBRcp4rlrdXj/f391O2XpYH1LAe/KJQ/Urs9sA1EbJbMAX7SSjph5NCcFyzTb
 xImg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5316W9puZMviVtEfBebKBHHngTLwfSUHGAJAoRoBzHTFpStwmkFo
 dfpqcLret23FpirIQhZqhDIYna966rW6NSaQex/GkZ6t
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxs5E/mlbZuEVmbHb6NlqxFtb/BUkVEgRGHnJtGaWuYdr/6NjNr5rtqz/txuFN5LRVGGErEnnwsEcMQtFsnwDc=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:c70d:: with SMTP id
 o13mr12252505pjt.143.1633954533615; 
 Mon, 11 Oct 2021 05:15:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with
 HTTPREST; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 05:15:33 -0700
From: Stefan Kangas <stefan@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <CADwFkm=P1EQQgtsqPOzT+=Hg-ey3-EeFumVjencqz6SGPM92AA@HIDDEN>
 (Stefan Kangas's message of "Sat, 3 Apr 2021 20:01:02 -0500")
References: <E1kqUX6-0006L6-4i@HIDDEN> <87wnxdhh54.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <86pn2lk637.fsf@HIDDEN> <871rf16our.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <86czyjj9yl.fsf@HIDDEN> <87czyhymiz.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <CADwFkm=P1EQQgtsqPOzT+=Hg-ey3-EeFumVjencqz6SGPM92AA@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.60 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 05:15:33 -0700
Message-ID: <CADwFkm=-A58YBothezwQwMP9jh+ViESdVjsYveW7iP6xtO63nw@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#45318: 28.0.50; mark-paragraph
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Bcc: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control
Cc: "H. Dieter Wilhelm" <dieter@HIDDEN>, 45318 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 18847 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Richard Stallman <rms@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/)

unarchive 18847
reopen 18847
tags 18847 - patch
forcemerge 18847 45318
thanks

Stefan Kangas <stefan@HIDDEN> writes:

> Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN> writes:
>
>> "H. Dieter Wilhelm" <dieter@HIDDEN> writes:
>>
>>> Right, below is my suggestion, please have a look.
>>>
>>> Many thanks
>>>
>>>       Dieter
>>>
>>> PS: Please tell me if I can prepare patches in a better way or
>>>     format..
>>
>> The patch format looks good.  :-)
>>
>> However, this still doesn't quite restore how mark-paragraph works in
>> Emacs 27 -- it leaves point in other places than it was.
>>
>> So I've reverted the previous change for now, and I've added a test.
>> Could you have a look at the test
>>
>> cd check; make paragraphs-tests
>>
>> (it's the last one), and redo your original patch in a way that doesn't
>> break the behaviour as demonstrated by this test?
>
> That was 12 weeks ago.  Any news here?

It seems like Bug#18847 was fixed in a way that was lead to other
regressions.  That fix has since been reverted, so I'm reopening that
bug and merging this later bug with that one.

Message received at fakecontrol@fakecontrolmessage:

Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage;
To: internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs@HIDDEN>
Subject: Internal Control
Message-Id: bug No longer marked as fixed in versions 28.1 and reopened.
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 12:16:04 +0000
User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9

# This is a fake control message.
#
# The action:
# bug No longer marked as fixed in versions 28.1 and reopened.
thanks
# This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs
# administrator

Message received at control <at> debbugs.gnu.org:

Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Oct 2021 12:15:41 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 11 08:15:41 2021
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56927 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1mZuDU-0002UC-LT
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 08:15:41 -0400
Received: from mail-pj1-f53.google.com ([209.85.216.53]:54090)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <stefankangas@HIDDEN>) id 1mZuDT-0002NH-8G
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 08:15:39 -0400
Received: by mail-pj1-f53.google.com with SMTP id ls18so13128319pjb.3
 for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 05:15:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:user-agent
 :mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=zYOATk75sI8UIDhp96oa3UoWBjvy0l9/CyuQHLMtwKw=;
 b=iAmDqjCpbN+XI5JpO6QQjRRlHmz0k6r6IFYPIhzbQuQZ0KDJ+Qo+74m1I12rBu2/gO
 vNjfeLEQR6Gy4hvVu7fbu1A+2sBxrQ1IYgdrqYY2AUysE10UHyyMVgMeL2tSBStYFtlB
 4BuvctNP4QC/tnj9W4U6iYUJU8fBpGd5aoQfxBlHXc7/NPrDj9l9cYbgKILzgSishWWg
 ZIfojUOkGulpB5VdV7BPZ4ctzlKPSMLFf/+/+phXXLZZiJ7fZTZCwctAVg4atKkv7KiG
 mELU60xDBRcp4rlrdXj/f391O2XpYH1LAe/KJQ/Urs9sA1EbJbMAX7SSjph5NCcFyzTb
 xImg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5316W9puZMviVtEfBebKBHHngTLwfSUHGAJAoRoBzHTFpStwmkFo
 dfpqcLret23FpirIQhZqhDIYna966rW6NSaQex/GkZ6t
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxs5E/mlbZuEVmbHb6NlqxFtb/BUkVEgRGHnJtGaWuYdr/6NjNr5rtqz/txuFN5LRVGGErEnnwsEcMQtFsnwDc=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:c70d:: with SMTP id
 o13mr12252505pjt.143.1633954533615; 
 Mon, 11 Oct 2021 05:15:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with
 HTTPREST; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 05:15:33 -0700
From: Stefan Kangas <stefan@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <CADwFkm=P1EQQgtsqPOzT+=Hg-ey3-EeFumVjencqz6SGPM92AA@HIDDEN>
 (Stefan Kangas's message of "Sat, 3 Apr 2021 20:01:02 -0500")
References: <E1kqUX6-0006L6-4i@HIDDEN> <87wnxdhh54.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <86pn2lk637.fsf@HIDDEN> <871rf16our.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <86czyjj9yl.fsf@HIDDEN> <87czyhymiz.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <CADwFkm=P1EQQgtsqPOzT+=Hg-ey3-EeFumVjencqz6SGPM92AA@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.60 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 05:15:33 -0700
Message-ID: <CADwFkm=-A58YBothezwQwMP9jh+ViESdVjsYveW7iP6xtO63nw@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#45318: 28.0.50; mark-paragraph
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Bcc: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control
Cc: "H. Dieter Wilhelm" <dieter@HIDDEN>, 45318 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 18847 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Richard Stallman <rms@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/)

unarchive 18847
reopen 18847
tags 18847 - patch
forcemerge 18847 45318
thanks

Stefan Kangas <stefan@HIDDEN> writes:

> Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN> writes:
>
>> "H. Dieter Wilhelm" <dieter@HIDDEN> writes:
>>
>>> Right, below is my suggestion, please have a look.
>>>
>>> Many thanks
>>>
>>>       Dieter
>>>
>>> PS: Please tell me if I can prepare patches in a better way or
>>>     format..
>>
>> The patch format looks good.  :-)
>>
>> However, this still doesn't quite restore how mark-paragraph works in
>> Emacs 27 -- it leaves point in other places than it was.
>>
>> So I've reverted the previous change for now, and I've added a test.
>> Could you have a look at the test
>>
>> cd check; make paragraphs-tests
>>
>> (it's the last one), and redo your original patch in a way that doesn't
>> break the behaviour as demonstrated by this test?
>
> That was 12 weeks ago.  Any news here?

It seems like Bug#18847 was fixed in a way that was lead to other
regressions.  That fix has since been reverted, so I'm reopening that
bug and merging this later bug with that one.

Message received at control <at> debbugs.gnu.org:

Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Oct 2021 12:15:41 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 11 08:15:41 2021
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56927 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1mZuDU-0002UC-LT
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 08:15:41 -0400
Received: from mail-pj1-f53.google.com ([209.85.216.53]:54090)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <stefankangas@HIDDEN>) id 1mZuDT-0002NH-8G
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 08:15:39 -0400
Received: by mail-pj1-f53.google.com with SMTP id ls18so13128319pjb.3
 for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 05:15:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:user-agent
 :mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=zYOATk75sI8UIDhp96oa3UoWBjvy0l9/CyuQHLMtwKw=;
 b=iAmDqjCpbN+XI5JpO6QQjRRlHmz0k6r6IFYPIhzbQuQZ0KDJ+Qo+74m1I12rBu2/gO
 vNjfeLEQR6Gy4hvVu7fbu1A+2sBxrQ1IYgdrqYY2AUysE10UHyyMVgMeL2tSBStYFtlB
 4BuvctNP4QC/tnj9W4U6iYUJU8fBpGd5aoQfxBlHXc7/NPrDj9l9cYbgKILzgSishWWg
 ZIfojUOkGulpB5VdV7BPZ4ctzlKPSMLFf/+/+phXXLZZiJ7fZTZCwctAVg4atKkv7KiG
 mELU60xDBRcp4rlrdXj/f391O2XpYH1LAe/KJQ/Urs9sA1EbJbMAX7SSjph5NCcFyzTb
 xImg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5316W9puZMviVtEfBebKBHHngTLwfSUHGAJAoRoBzHTFpStwmkFo
 dfpqcLret23FpirIQhZqhDIYna966rW6NSaQex/GkZ6t
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxs5E/mlbZuEVmbHb6NlqxFtb/BUkVEgRGHnJtGaWuYdr/6NjNr5rtqz/txuFN5LRVGGErEnnwsEcMQtFsnwDc=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:c70d:: with SMTP id
 o13mr12252505pjt.143.1633954533615; 
 Mon, 11 Oct 2021 05:15:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with
 HTTPREST; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 05:15:33 -0700
From: Stefan Kangas <stefan@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <CADwFkm=P1EQQgtsqPOzT+=Hg-ey3-EeFumVjencqz6SGPM92AA@HIDDEN>
 (Stefan Kangas's message of "Sat, 3 Apr 2021 20:01:02 -0500")
References: <E1kqUX6-0006L6-4i@HIDDEN> <87wnxdhh54.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <86pn2lk637.fsf@HIDDEN> <871rf16our.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <86czyjj9yl.fsf@HIDDEN> <87czyhymiz.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <CADwFkm=P1EQQgtsqPOzT+=Hg-ey3-EeFumVjencqz6SGPM92AA@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.60 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 05:15:33 -0700
Message-ID: <CADwFkm=-A58YBothezwQwMP9jh+ViESdVjsYveW7iP6xtO63nw@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#45318: 28.0.50; mark-paragraph
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Bcc: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control
Cc: "H. Dieter Wilhelm" <dieter@HIDDEN>, 45318 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 18847 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Richard Stallman <rms@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/)

unarchive 18847
reopen 18847
tags 18847 - patch
forcemerge 18847 45318
thanks

Stefan Kangas <stefan@HIDDEN> writes:

> Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN> writes:
>
>> "H. Dieter Wilhelm" <dieter@HIDDEN> writes:
>>
>>> Right, below is my suggestion, please have a look.
>>>
>>> Many thanks
>>>
>>>       Dieter
>>>
>>> PS: Please tell me if I can prepare patches in a better way or
>>>     format..
>>
>> The patch format looks good.  :-)
>>
>> However, this still doesn't quite restore how mark-paragraph works in
>> Emacs 27 -- it leaves point in other places than it was.
>>
>> So I've reverted the previous change for now, and I've added a test.
>> Could you have a look at the test
>>
>> cd check; make paragraphs-tests
>>
>> (it's the last one), and redo your original patch in a way that doesn't
>> break the behaviour as demonstrated by this test?
>
> That was 12 weeks ago.  Any news here?

It seems like Bug#18847 was fixed in a way that was lead to other
regressions.  That fix has since been reverted, so I'm reopening that
bug and merging this later bug with that one.

Message received at control <at> debbugs.gnu.org:

Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Oct 2021 12:53:32 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 11 08:53:32 2021
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57047 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1mZuo8-00014o-2z
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 08:53:32 -0400
Received: from mail-pg1-f170.google.com ([209.85.215.170]:46726)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <stefankangas@HIDDEN>) id 1mZuo6-00014P-9y
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 08:53:30 -0400
Received: by mail-pg1-f170.google.com with SMTP id m21so10735347pgu.13
 for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 05:53:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=H40oClF4Zo7QCMx1VNwDgCVIl6yHazOt0oy5mlZZWs4=;
 b=2LD2abW3Uu3KcqvF/80h5VBrUfcuOvO4WJko9Zq/0TDY24JtJOAwqfEjHTQeuPrWR/
 hSShqsLoUneWhjoz4+YIA1kj3LBBETn+ZWXq+j8d0oyvmC+pCCsQfjN3JabjNhycrNyQ
 u8hUl3QNpmm9PSwE/0nggvMKDNJxnTzk72tReoEuOGP1j3gT8MWqmLCx5f2Me8k3lP/l
 Pp+jxu2FGrlJzzbtegqCnq36nvdd7VqX2dQfzgEF54luHx/wb+svCUi2DZPs1sjs7Aj5
 g8n4mdwsg8vfkbH/I9AktVJXx9Z0zx+ajBvHHB0wPGwP2mmXxdLfT7+pND5A+1TXJ3oj
 r6RQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530zLIVBFRB5rL4WY3yuQ+MLU3zM0DjbB0692J80/FgL09BauqAF
 SATTGJg2nhKcrYVJE2XHZlNdkfca5B1FYaey022h/Skq
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzwg0XcSMlUd0fdAS7NY/bjs9a5WBIemZVCg8tO5M4dlwT2G0LRMJ07e4ASJP9E7sybutnBdNYvrHw4VcDVkro=
X-Received: by 2002:a63:d506:: with SMTP id c6mr17938726pgg.42.1633956804634; 
 Mon, 11 Oct 2021 05:53:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with
 HTTPREST; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 05:53:24 -0700
From: Stefan Kangas <stefan@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 05:53:24 -0700
Message-ID: <CADwFkm=yd=NkN1mZ-8CYXvo8LPS-HnOghoq46xCoMp06sNeLsg@HIDDEN>
Subject: 
To: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 Content preview:  tags 18847 - fixed thanks 
 Content analysis details:   (2.5 points, 10.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail
 provider (stefankangas[at]gmail.com)
 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level
 mail domains are different
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 no trust [209.85.215.170 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3      RBL: Good reputation (+3)
 [209.85.215.170 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT          Subject is present but empty
 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY      Informational: message has unparseable relay
 lines -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL      Mailspike good senders
 0.2 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and
 EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  tags 18847 - fixed thanks 
 
 Content analysis details:   (1.5 points, 10.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3      RBL: Good reputation (+3)
                             [209.85.215.170 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
                              no trust
                             [209.85.215.170 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail
                             provider (stefankangas[at]gmail.com)
  0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
  0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level
                             mail domains are different
  2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT          Subject is present but empty
  0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY      Informational: message has unparseable relay
                             lines
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL      Mailspike good senders
  0.2 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and
                             EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are
                             different
 -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI     Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
                             manager

tags 18847 - fixed
thanks

Last modified: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 13:00:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.