GNU logs - #19222, boring messages

Message sent to bug-libtool@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#19222: Some test failures with LibTool-2.4.4 on non GNU/Linux systems
Resent-From: Assaf Gordon <assafgordon@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-libtool@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2014 01:57:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.19222.B.141731258421019 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 19222 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Message-ID: <547A7932.9010307@HIDDEN>
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2014 20:56:02 -0500
From: Assaf Gordon <assafgordon@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

Hello,

Trying the recently released libtool-2.4.4 on non gnu/linux systems give some failures.

=== FreeBSD 10.0 ====
95: versioning                                      FAILED (versioning.at:153)
169: Run tests with low max_cmd_len                  FAILED (cmdline_wrap.at:48)
==== NetBSD 6.1.4 =====
   55: debug tracing                                   FAILED (help.at:159)
  65: Link order test                                 FAILED (link-order.at:89)
  66: Link order of deplibs                           FAILED (link-order2.at:138)
  70: static linking flags for programs               FAILED (static.at:196)
  86: deplib in subdir                                FAILED (deplib-in-subdir.at:126)
  95: versioning                                      FAILED (versioning.at:179)
  97: DESTDIR with in-package deplibs                 FAILED (destdir.at:101)
143: C++ exception handling                          FAILED (exceptions.at:392)
164: deplibs without file command                    FAILED (deplibs-mingw.at:64)
169: Run tests with low max_cmd_len                  FAILED (cmdline_wrap.at:48)
==== OpenBSD 5.6 ====
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 26 27 28 29 30 31 33 34 35 36
38 39 40 41 42 48 49 50 51 52 98 99 100 101 102 117 118 119 120 121
122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 133 134 135 144 145 146 148 149 150
151 161
==== Minix R3.3.0 ===
55 58 65 66 70 78 86 95 97 106 113 143 147 156 157 164 168
====

The logs are large (including the 'testsuite.dir'), so attached are links:
http://files.housegordon.org/libtool-2.4.4/libtool-2.4.4-freebsd10-tests.tar.gz
http://files.housegordon.org/libtool-2.4.4/libtool-2.4.4-MinixR330-tests.tar.gz
http://files.housegordon.org/libtool-2.4.4/libtool-2.4.4-netbsd614.tar.gz
http://files.housegordon.org/libtool-2.4.4/libtool-2.4.4-openbsd56.tar.gz

No test failures on GNU-Hurd 0.5 (i386/Debian) and Mac OS X 10.9.5.

Also,
On OpenBSD 5.6, for some reason, after running "./configure", "make" tried to re-build some files using autoconf/automake - which required automake/autoconf despite this being a release tarball. Not sure if this is normal or not.
Log:
http://files.housegordon.org/libtool-2.4.4/openbsd56-configure-log.txt

Regards,
  - Assaf

Message sent:

Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.503 (Entity 5.503)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Assaf Gordon <assafgordon@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#19222: Acknowledgement (Some test failures with LibTool-2.4.4
 on non GNU/Linux systems)
Message-ID: <handler.19222.B.141731258421019.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <547A7932.9010307@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 19222
X-Gnu-PR-Package: libtool
Reply-To: 19222 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2014 01:57:03 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-libtool@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 19222 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
19222: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D19222
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems

Message sent to bug-libtool@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#19222: Some test failures with LibTool-2.4.4 on non GNU/Linux systems
Resent-From: "Gary V. Vaughan" <gary@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-libtool@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 22:06:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.19222.B19222.14176443441831 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: Assaf Gordon <assafgordon@HIDDEN>
Cc: 19222 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\))
From: "Gary V. Vaughan" <gary@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <547A7932.9010307@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 22:05:36 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A0C52FBD-4570-4200-AD86-755328534084@HIDDEN>
References: <547A7932.9010307@HIDDEN>
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

Hi Assaf,

Thanks for the reports and results.

> On Nov 30, 2014, at 1:56 AM, Assaf Gordon <assafgordon@HIDDEN> =
wrote:
>=20
> Hello,
>=20
> Trying the recently released libtool-2.4.4 on non gnu/linux systems =
give some failures.
>=20
> =3D=3D=3D FreeBSD 10.0 =3D=3D=3D=3D
> 95: versioning                                      FAILED =
(versioning.at:153)
> 169: Run tests with low max_cmd_len                  FAILED =
(cmdline_wrap.at:48)
> =3D=3D=3D=3D NetBSD 6.1.4 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>  55: debug tracing                                   FAILED =
(help.at:159)
> 65: Link order test                                 FAILED =
(link-order.at:89)
> 66: Link order of deplibs                           FAILED =
(link-order2.at:138)
> 70: static linking flags for programs               FAILED =
(static.at:196)
> 86: deplib in subdir                                FAILED =
(deplib-in-subdir.at:126)
> 95: versioning                                      FAILED =
(versioning.at:179)
> 97: DESTDIR with in-package deplibs                 FAILED =
(destdir.at:101)
> 143: C++ exception handling                          FAILED =
(exceptions.at:392)
> 164: deplibs without file command                    FAILED =
(deplibs-mingw.at:64)
> 169: Run tests with low max_cmd_len                  FAILED =
(cmdline_wrap.at:48)
> =3D=3D=3D=3D OpenBSD 5.6 =3D=3D=3D=3D
> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 26 27 28 29 30 31 33 34 =
35 36
> 38 39 40 41 42 48 49 50 51 52 98 99 100 101 102 117 118 119 120 121
> 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 133 134 135 144 145 146 148 149 150
> 151 161
> =3D=3D=3D=3D Minix R3.3.0 =3D=3D=3D
> 55 58 65 66 70 78 86 95 97 106 113 143 147 156 157 164 168
> =3D=3D=3D=3D
>=20
> The logs are large (including the 'testsuite.dir'), so attached are =
links:
> =
http://files.housegordon.org/libtool-2.4.4/libtool-2.4.4-freebsd10-tests.t=
ar.gz
> =
http://files.housegordon.org/libtool-2.4.4/libtool-2.4.4-MinixR330-tests.t=
ar.gz
> =
http://files.housegordon.org/libtool-2.4.4/libtool-2.4.4-netbsd614.tar.gz
> =
http://files.housegordon.org/libtool-2.4.4/libtool-2.4.4-openbsd56.tar.gz

I can see immediately that most of the failures on your OpenBSD system =
are caused
by not having a GNU M4 installed on the path for libtoolize.  I should =
have been a
lot more vocal about that change rather than hiding it in the 2.4.3 =
release notes,
as it has tripped a lot of people up.  The latest master revision now =
checks for a
suitable M4 at configure time, and complains if there is nothing =
suitable on your
command search PATH, which I think will help.

May I ask if you would kindly rerun then test suite on that machine and =
reply with a
link to the updated logs, after having installed GNU M4 first of course =
:)

I'll look into the logs of the other failing machines in the days =
ahead...

> No test failures on GNU-Hurd 0.5 (i386/Debian) and Mac OS X 10.9.5.

Great!  Thanks :)

> Also,
> On OpenBSD 5.6, for some reason, after running "./configure", "make" =
tried to re-build some files using autoconf/automake - which required =
automake/autoconf despite this being a release tarball. Not sure if this =
is normal or not.
> Log:
> http://files.housegordon.org/libtool-2.4.4/openbsd56-configure-log.txt

No that's not normal, and is usually caused either by clock-skew on a =
network filesystem,
low clock resolution in the build filesystem (so that tar unpacks files =
with the same
timestamp when in fact those files were a fraction of a second apart), =
or even a buggy
tar program mangling the timestamps during unpack.

Cheers,
--=20
Gary V. Vaughan (gary AT gnu DOT org)

Message sent to bug-libtool@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#19222: Some test failures with LibTool-2.4.4 on non GNU/Linux systems
Resent-From: "Gary V. Vaughan" <gary@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-libtool@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 14:01:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.19222.B19222.1417701647581 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: Assaf Gordon <assafgordon@HIDDEN>
Cc: 19222 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\))
From: "Gary V. Vaughan" <gary@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <547A7932.9010307@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 14:00:33 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <10CCE60F-E2D0-4683-AC0C-952BE198E365@HIDDEN>
References: <547A7932.9010307@HIDDEN>
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

Hi Assaf,

> On Nov 30, 2014, at 1:56 AM, Assaf Gordon <assafgordon@HIDDEN> =
wrote:
>=20
> Trying the recently released libtool-2.4.4 on non gnu/linux systems =
give some failures.
>=20
> =3D=3D=3D FreeBSD 10.0 =3D=3D=3D=3D
> 95: versioning                                      FAILED =
(versioning.at:153)
> 169: Run tests with low max_cmd_len                  FAILED =
(cmdline_wrap.at:48)

I think current master fixes these.  Please let me know if not, as I =
plan to put out
another release fairly quickly for this and a couple of other issues =
with 2.4.4.

Cheers,
--=20
Gary V. Vaughan (gary AT gnu DOT org)=

Message sent to bug-libtool@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#19222: Some test failures with LibTool-2.4.4 on non GNU/Linux systems
Resent-From: Assaf Gordon <assafgordon@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-libtool@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 21:25:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.19222.B19222.141772828510736 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19222
X-GNU-PR-Package: libtool
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: "Gary V. Vaughan" <gary@HIDDEN>
Cc: 19222 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 19222-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B19222.141772828510736
          (code B ref 19222); Thu, 04 Dec 2014 21:25:02 +0000
Received: (at 19222) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Dec 2014 21:24:45 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54043 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1XwdtF-0002n6-58
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 16:24:45 -0500
Received: from mail-qa0-f48.google.com ([209.85.216.48]:41310)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80)
 (envelope-from <assafgordon@HIDDEN>) id 1XwdtD-0002my-VQ
 for 19222 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 16:24:44 -0500
Received: by mail-qa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id v10so12363897qac.7
 for <19222 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 13:24:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject
 :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=BDKuJa043Y4NAqdSLCXidRZBaSBo32BMUv5Rr54zM+I=;
 b=bOMOKd5cyNjTx70hpDgxCL7QgFrKXOoC8qsSLAXxK2wKKUYJIOPUX6lAMbAtu8CFGo
 ixfuHQrJxbBU5zv98LQ1IBVXMbGEEBBjKqpAHwiXswYpFrwLC39mDGpS//K5VC39bWs6
 PxYLduzqn1ZpjjVgOTLItRvBGKMWBxMvuExk7nCw17y2W/JAomxT39b2dbAlMoJFsr2J
 gSWuSjrNWieLz24IF8ds+gWsmHn9KAOExkJS6xsdjlw98e5Vk5j20MO0eF05vKwW2ZJO
 0DUo24JXIMdkj/0UNJDVIw/H9AprAfdslcNtMgQG7R04ZUgiCu/VcLZvrLHCvMJtK8qs
 AtnQ==
X-Received: by 10.224.167.209 with SMTP id r17mr20056981qay.18.1417728282210; 
 Thu, 04 Dec 2014 13:24:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from disco.wi.mit.edu ([18.4.1.144])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id s2sm5532517qam.45.2014.12.04.13.24.41
 for <multiple recipients>
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Thu, 04 Dec 2014 13:24:41 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <5480D11B.2030408@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 16:24:43 -0500
From: Assaf Gordon <assafgordon@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <547A7932.9010307@HIDDEN>
 <10CCE60F-E2D0-4683-AC0C-952BE198E365@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <10CCE60F-E2D0-4683-AC0C-952BE198E365@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)

On 12/04/2014 09:00 AM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>> On Nov 30, 2014, at 1:56 AM, Assaf Gordon <assafgordon@HIDDEN> wrote:
>>
>> Trying the recently released libtool-2.4.4 on non gnu/linux systems give some failures.
>>
>> === FreeBSD 10.0 ====
>> 95: versioning                                      FAILED (versioning.at:153)
>> 169: Run tests with low max_cmd_len                  FAILED (cmdline_wrap.at:48)
>
> I think current master fixes these.  Please let me know if not, as I plan to put out
> another release fairly quickly for this and a couple of other issues with 2.4.4.
>

With the latest git revision ( 2.4.4.8-9f52 ), no test failures on FreeBSD 10 and FreeBSD 9.3,

when building from tarball (that is:  'git clone && bootstrap && make dist' on a GNU/Linux box, then 'configure && make && make check' on the FreeBSD VM.

- Assaf

Message sent to bug-libtool@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#19222: Some test failures with LibTool-2.4.4 on non GNU/Linux systems
Resent-From: Assaf Gordon <assafgordon@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-libtool@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 21:34:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.19222.B19222.141772880311598 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19222
X-GNU-PR-Package: libtool
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: "Gary V. Vaughan" <gary@HIDDEN>
Cc: 19222 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 19222-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B19222.141772880311598
          (code B ref 19222); Thu, 04 Dec 2014 21:34:02 +0000
Received: (at 19222) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Dec 2014 21:33:23 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54048 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1Xwe1a-00030z-DI
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 16:33:22 -0500
Received: from mail-qc0-f179.google.com ([209.85.216.179]:61651)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80)
 (envelope-from <assafgordon@HIDDEN>) id 1Xwe1Y-00030q-0Z
 for 19222 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 16:33:20 -0500
Received: by mail-qc0-f179.google.com with SMTP id c9so13252249qcz.24
 for <19222 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 13:33:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject
 :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=tVEPXz6pQJF7WDg/R/8YBkh+IsFGWKkz+lUyAoO/dT8=;
 b=GR6XB2SAbh+/73mGq3Js0hnLyDtQjg5wTRRr3TLJDcFIfFaxJifDRyhOmmxRcDg6in
 1U9XwcaCpzaCoXUMFqOS0oMkkzs5+iKd+d/EpSjpodgAr/Kx0LfLFpoBet5LVOfhvdVd
 l6o0b5lJPgORwM9AuS4y1wkvThTdFPEhMw55qqzsV6+3SxN/ITKmrfGfeKP9zoYoL5uf
 wMlTErq0N/2VC1PBIy8mZkSNO7hy2pzPVviHorJyKDTWkKNW4IFEtQZwDlCs23vZ3xaZ
 CWz3ACKCUskT3SDV5ju8sDXRPt+5DXPi1Pnql162b5+Hf/xP6CSDH3NTdXhp8RT+MlbO
 8MCQ==
X-Received: by 10.140.38.102 with SMTP id s93mr19578714qgs.18.1417728799488;
 Thu, 04 Dec 2014 13:33:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from disco.wi.mit.edu ([18.4.1.144])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id j10sm27832463qai.18.2014.12.04.13.33.18
 for <multiple recipients>
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Thu, 04 Dec 2014 13:33:18 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <5480D321.9020103@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 16:33:21 -0500
From: Assaf Gordon <assafgordon@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <547A7932.9010307@HIDDEN>
 <A0C52FBD-4570-4200-AD86-755328534084@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <A0C52FBD-4570-4200-AD86-755328534084@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)


On 12/03/2014 05:05 PM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>> On Nov 30, 2014, at 1:56 AM, Assaf Gordon <assafgordon@HIDDEN> wrote:

<...>

> I can see immediately that most of the failures on your OpenBSD system are caused
> by not having a GNU M4 installed on the path for libtoolize.  I should have been a
> lot more vocal about that change rather than hiding it in the 2.4.3 release notes,
> as it has tripped a lot of people up.  The latest master revision now checks for a
> suitable M4 at configure time, and complains if there is nothing suitable on your
> command search PATH, which I think will help.
>
> May I ask if you would kindly rerun then test suite on that machine and reply with a
> link to the updated logs, after having installed GNU M4 first of course :)

On OpenBSD 5.6, with GNU M4 installed as "/usr/local/bin/gm4",

-1-
Building the latest git ( 2.4.4.8-9f52 ) from a tarball (that is, "git clone && bootstrap && configure && make dist" on a GNU/Linux box, then "configure && make && make check" on the OpenBSD VM), two tests fail:
===
   33: demo.at:548        hardcoding library path
       libtoolize automake autoconf
  101: old-ltdl-iface.at:35 Makefile.inc
       libtoolize automake autoconf
===

log here:
http://files.housegordon.org/libtool/openbsd56-libtool-2.4.4.8-9f52.tar.gz

-2-
When bootstrapping on the OpenBSD VM (i.e. "git clone && bootstrap etc") there are more errors, indicating perhaps some bad code generation?

===
$ make check
...
32: force non-PIC objects                          /tmp/libtool/tests/testsuite: /tmp/libtool/tests/testsuite.dir/at-groups/32/test-source[70]: syntax error: `}' unexpected
testsuite: WARNING: unable to parse test group: 32
testsuite: WARNING: A failure happened in a test group before any test could be
testsuite: WARNING: run. This means that test suite is improperly designed.  Please
testsuite: WARNING: report this failure to <bug-libtool@HIDDEN>.
...
====

Logs are here:
http://files.housegordon.org/libtool/openbsd56-libtool-git.make-check.log
http://files.housegordon.org/libtool/openbsd56-libtool-git-9f52.tar.gz

- Assaf

Message sent to bug-libtool@HIDDEN:

X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#19222: Some test failures with LibTool-2.4.4 on non GNU/Linux systems
Resent-From: "Gary V. Vaughan" <gary@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-libtool@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 11:36:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.19222.B19222.141777930930104 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19222
X-GNU-PR-Package: libtool
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Assaf Gordon <assafgordon@HIDDEN>
Cc: 19222 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 19222-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B19222.141777930930104
          (code B ref 19222); Fri, 05 Dec 2014 11:36:02 +0000
Received: (at 19222) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Dec 2014 11:35:09 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54280 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1XwrAC-0007pU-IL
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Dec 2014 06:35:08 -0500
Received: from sub3.mail.dreamhost.com ([69.163.253.7]:37042
 helo=homiemail-a15.g.dreamhost.com)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80)
 (envelope-from <gary@HIDDEN>) id 1XwrA8-0007pK-RY
 for 19222 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Dec 2014 06:35:06 -0500
Received: from homiemail-a15.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by homiemail-a15.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F31B976C06B;
 Fri,  5 Dec 2014 03:35:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.3] (176.126.115.87.dyn.plus.net [87.115.126.176])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 (Authenticated sender: gary@HIDDEN)
 by homiemail-a15.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5C1BD76C065;
 Fri,  5 Dec 2014 03:35:03 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\))
From: "Gary V. Vaughan" <gary@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <5480D321.9020103@HIDDEN>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2014 11:35:01 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2435F55F-3027-4C3C-9E5A-8EF3977528B2@HIDDEN>
References: <547A7932.9010307@HIDDEN>
 <A0C52FBD-4570-4200-AD86-755328534084@HIDDEN>
 <5480D321.9020103@HIDDEN>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993)
X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+)

Hi Assaf,

Thanks for the feedback.

On Dec 4, 2014, at 9:33 PM, Assaf Gordon <assafgordon@HIDDEN> wrote:
> On 12/03/2014 05:05 PM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>>> On Nov 30, 2014, at 1:56 AM, Assaf Gordon <assafgordon@HIDDEN> =
wrote:
>=20
> <...>
>=20
>> I can see immediately that most of the failures on your OpenBSD =
system are caused
>> by not having a GNU M4 installed on the path for libtoolize.  I =
should have been a
>> lot more vocal about that change rather than hiding it in the 2.4.3 =
release notes,
>> as it has tripped a lot of people up.  The latest master revision now =
checks for a
>> suitable M4 at configure time, and complains if there is nothing =
suitable on your
>> command search PATH, which I think will help.
>>=20
>> May I ask if you would kindly rerun then test suite on that machine =
and reply with a
>> link to the updated logs, after having installed GNU M4 first of =
course :)
>=20
> On OpenBSD 5.6, with GNU M4 installed as "/usr/local/bin/gm4",
>=20
> -1-
> Building the latest git ( 2.4.4.8-9f52 ) from a tarball (that is, "git =
clone && bootstrap && configure && make dist" on a GNU/Linux box, then =
"configure && make && make check" on the OpenBSD VM), two tests fail:
> =3D=3D=3D
>  33: demo.at:548        hardcoding library path
>      libtoolize automake autoconf
> 101: old-ltdl-iface.at:35 Makefile.inc
>      libtoolize automake autoconf
> =3D=3D=3D
>=20
> log here:
> =
http://files.housegordon.org/libtool/openbsd56-libtool-2.4.4.8-9f52.tar.gz=


According to the comment at the top of old-ltdl-iface.at, I'm supposed =
to have
removed that test already, so you can safely ignore that failure :->

It's not at all obvious from the logs why the test cases are not working =
here :(
But...

> -2-
> When bootstrapping on the OpenBSD VM (i.e. "git clone && bootstrap =
etc") there are more errors, indicating perhaps some bad code =
generation?
>=20
> =3D=3D=3D
> $ make check
> ...
> 32: force non-PIC objects                          =
/tmp/libtool/tests/testsuite: =
/tmp/libtool/tests/testsuite.dir/at-groups/32/test-source[70]: syntax =
error: `}' unexpected
> testsuite: WARNING: unable to parse test group: 32
> testsuite: WARNING: A failure happened in a test group before any test =
could be
> testsuite: WARNING: run. This means that test suite is improperly =
designed.  Please
> testsuite: WARNING: report this failure to <bug-libtool@HIDDEN>.
> ...
> =3D=3D=3D=3D
>=20
> Logs are here:
> =
http://files.housegordon.org/libtool/openbsd56-libtool-git.make-check.log
> http://files.housegordon.org/libtool/openbsd56-libtool-git-9f52.tar.gz

This looks like the bootstrap process and/or Autotest is making =
assumptions about
the shell utilities that are not true with the OpenBSD implementations.

You might be able to figure out where that is by diffing the generated =
testsuite
files between a Linux bootstrap and an OpenBSD bootstrapped version.

Cheers,
--=20
Gary V. Vaughan (gary AT gnu DOT org)=

Last modified: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 12:00:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.