GNU logs - #19581, boring messages


Message sent to bug-guile@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#19581: 'sleep' return value is incorrectly rounded
Resent-From: ludo@HIDDEN (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guile@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 12:59:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.19581.B.142115390129458 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: report 19581
X-GNU-PR-Package: guile
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: 19581 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guile@HIDDEN
Received: via spool by submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B.142115390129458
          (code B ref -1); Tue, 13 Jan 2015 12:59:02 +0000
Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jan 2015 12:58:21 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55040 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1YB136-0007f3-Kh
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 07:58:21 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57877)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1YB133-0007el-Pe
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 07:58:18 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1YB12x-0000Bf-Ly
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 07:58:12 -0500
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:53667)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1YB12x-0000Bb-J8
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 07:58:11 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59598)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1YB12w-0006x6-NX
 for bug-guile@HIDDEN; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 07:58:11 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1YB12s-0000Ak-O2
 for bug-guile@HIDDEN; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 07:58:10 -0500
Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([2a01:474::1]:38420)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1YB12s-0000AU-Gk
 for bug-guile@HIDDEN; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 07:58:06 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A8EE44A1
 for <bug-guile@HIDDEN>; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 13:58:05 +0100 (CET)
Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id gNlxFwyNRCEq for <bug-guile@HIDDEN>;
 Tue, 13 Jan 2015 13:58:05 +0100 (CET)
Received: from pluto (pluto.bordeaux.inria.fr [193.50.110.57])
 by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EE2224495
 for <bug-guile@HIDDEN>; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 13:58:04 +0100 (CET)
From: ludo@HIDDEN (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/
X-Revolutionary-Date: 24 =?UTF-8?Q?Niv=C3=B4se?= an 223 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?=
X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4
X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA  D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4
X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 13:58:04 +0100
Message-ID: <87a91mkfc3.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address
 (bad octet value).
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address
 (bad octet value).
X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11
X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----)

I just noticed that =E2=80=98sleep=E2=80=99 essentially always rounds down =
its return
value, which makes it unreliable, as in this example:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ time guile -c '(sigaction SIGINT +) (call-with-new-thread (lambda () (let=
 loop () (kill (getpid) SIGINT) (loop)))) (let loop ((n 3)) (when (> n 0) (=
loop (sleep (pk "s" n)))))'

;;; ("s" 3)

;;; ("s" 2)

;;; ("s" 1)

real	0m0.039s
user	0m0.052s
sys	0m0.017s
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Here =E2=80=98loop=E2=80=99 is meant to assure we sleep for roughly 3 secon=
ds, but
because of the incorrect rounding, we end up not sleeping at all.

Ludo=E2=80=99.




Message sent:


Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.503 (Entity 5.503)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: ludo@HIDDEN (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: bug#19581: Acknowledgement ('sleep' return value is incorrectly
 rounded)
Message-ID: <handler.19581.B.142115390129458.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <87a91mkfc3.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 19581
X-Gnu-PR-Package: guile
Reply-To: 19581 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 12:59:02 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-guile@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 19581 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
19581: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D19581
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems


Message sent to bug-guile@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#19581: 'sleep' return value is incorrectly rounded
Resent-From: Andy Wingo <wingo@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guile@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 09:03:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.19581.B19581.14666725761440 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19581
X-GNU-PR-Package: guile
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: ludo@HIDDEN (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Cc: 19581 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 19581-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B19581.14666725761440
          (code B ref 19581); Thu, 23 Jun 2016 09:03:02 +0000
Received: (at 19581) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jun 2016 09:02:56 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51777 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1bG0XI-0000NA-Hi
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 05:02:56 -0400
Received: from pb-sasl1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.66]:54974
 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <wingo@HIDDEN>) id 1bG0XH-0000N3-LT
 for 19581 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 05:02:55 -0400
Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1])
 by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28AD920723;
 Thu, 23 Jun 2016 05:02:53 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc
 :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version
 :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=/pflHFfB+fqo
 tTs2B3bhdJNo1R4=; b=cakfC/gelNU3Rc7Kj2fsznbPKRyU89E7bEMddSX/FxN1
 yA4NOo1oWfIe/064ycVN30ovkkpB9Yq3PVooUHL69eQIKh1xvDaKuF787uM3Qey/
 q2SKIwAsvB5Fu6S7n34Vn9V3g9HeV3dD+nX6jS10//V6vGQw6ekr205jimDhOnk=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc
 :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version
 :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=KU6J3c
 9I6qmOhPwOSDGfJ3JxPeC1PCzWuQRiayx6q4ljmiWpx3oXPiIPt6J5AiRv27rN4Z
 EEPxo5HnDK75ZuwFdN9u/6Uq1MzF1tlL0n8WBth96mg561i9+UPe/mCXvRGwfO4J
 eRTlTBlddfLtMRdYQ/MG1OeKqaUpxKXI/fayI=
Received: from pb-sasl1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1])
 by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2082720721;
 Thu, 23 Jun 2016 05:02:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from clucks (unknown [88.160.190.192])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 693E320720;
 Thu, 23 Jun 2016 05:02:52 -0400 (EDT)
From: Andy Wingo <wingo@HIDDEN>
References: <87a91mkfc3.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 11:02:45 +0200
In-Reply-To: <87a91mkfc3.fsf@HIDDEN> ("Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?="'s message of "Tue, 13 Jan 2015 13:58:04 +0100")
Message-ID: <87shw4p9ai.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 4464AED4-3921-11E6-BAB6-C1836462E9F6-02397024!pb-sasl1.pobox.com
X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-)

Hi :)

On Tue 13 Jan 2015 13:58, ludo@HIDDEN (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes:

> I just noticed that =E2=80=98sleep=E2=80=99 essentially always rounds dow=
n its return
> value, which makes it unreliable, as in this example:
>
> $ time guile -c '(sigaction SIGINT +) (call-with-new-thread (lambda () (l=
et loop () (kill (getpid) SIGINT) (loop)))) (let loop ((n 3)) (when (> n 0)=
 (loop (sleep (pk "s" n)))))'
>
> ;;; ("s" 3)
>
> ;;; ("s" 2)
>
> ;;; ("s" 1)
>
> real	0m0.039s
> user	0m0.052s
> sys	0m0.017s
>
> Here =E2=80=98loop=E2=80=99 is meant to assure we sleep for roughly 3 sec=
onds, but
> because of the incorrect rounding, we end up not sleeping at all.

Hummmmmmmmmm.

I don't think we can change anything in 2.0.  Right?

In master, how about (1) we allow sleep to take any real number, in
seconds; (2) sleep returns an inexact real number.  Then we can
deprecate usleep and "standardize" on sleeping in units of seconds.
Internally we refactor scm_std_usleep/* to take a 64-bit double for the
number of seconds to sleep and return a double for the time remaining.

WDYT?

Andy




Message sent to bug-guile@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#19581: 'sleep' return value is incorrectly rounded
Resent-From: ludo@HIDDEN (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guile@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 13:10:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.19581.B19581.14666873754282 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19581
X-GNU-PR-Package: guile
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Andy Wingo <wingo@HIDDEN>
Cc: 19581 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 19581-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B19581.14666873754282
          (code B ref 19581); Thu, 23 Jun 2016 13:10:01 +0000
Received: (at 19581) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jun 2016 13:09:35 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51926 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1bG4Nz-00016z-DK
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 09:09:35 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45904)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1bG4Nx-00016m-K6
 for 19581 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 09:09:33 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1bG4Np-0004B2-98
 for 19581 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 09:09:28 -0400
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:35195)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1bG4Np-0004Ay-5M; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 09:09:25 -0400
Received: from pluto.bordeaux.inria.fr ([193.50.110.57]:52118 helo=pluto)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1bG4No-0006YT-Fb; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 09:09:24 -0400
From: ludo@HIDDEN (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
References: <87a91mkfc3.fsf@HIDDEN> <87shw4p9ai.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/
X-Revolutionary-Date: 6 Messidor an 224 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?=
X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5
X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4  0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5
X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:09:22 +0200
In-Reply-To: <87shw4p9ai.fsf@HIDDEN> (Andy Wingo's message of "Thu, 23 Jun
 2016 11:02:45 +0200")
Message-ID: <87fus4oxvh.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e
X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------)

Hello,

Andy Wingo <wingo@HIDDEN> skribis:

> On Tue 13 Jan 2015 13:58, ludo@HIDDEN (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes:
>
>> I just noticed that =E2=80=98sleep=E2=80=99 essentially always rounds do=
wn its return
>> value, which makes it unreliable, as in this example:
>>
>> $ time guile -c '(sigaction SIGINT +) (call-with-new-thread (lambda () (=
let loop () (kill (getpid) SIGINT) (loop)))) (let loop ((n 3)) (when (> n 0=
) (loop (sleep (pk "s" n)))))'
>>
>> ;;; ("s" 3)
>>
>> ;;; ("s" 2)
>>
>> ;;; ("s" 1)
>>
>> real	0m0.039s
>> user	0m0.052s
>> sys	0m0.017s
>>
>> Here =E2=80=98loop=E2=80=99 is meant to assure we sleep for roughly 3 se=
conds, but
>> because of the incorrect rounding, we end up not sleeping at all.
>
> Hummmmmmmmmm.
>
> I don't think we can change anything in 2.0.  Right?
>
> In master, how about (1) we allow sleep to take any real number, in
> seconds; (2) sleep returns an inexact real number.  Then we can
> deprecate usleep and "standardize" on sleeping in units of seconds.
> Internally we refactor scm_std_usleep/* to take a 64-bit double for the
> number of seconds to sleep and return a double for the time remaining.

Sounds like a plan.  There could be programs that will break if =E2=80=98sl=
eep=E2=80=99
gives them an inexact instead of an integer.  Maybe we can assume this
is an unlikely situation, though.

Thoughts?

Ludo=E2=80=99.




Message sent to bug-guile@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#19581: [PATCH] Allow giving floating point values to (sleep).
Resent-From: Andy Wingo <wingo@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guile@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 08:11:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.19581.B19581.146701502332540 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19581
X-GNU-PR-Package: guile
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_bab@HIDDEN>
Cc: guile-devel@HIDDEN, arne.babenhauserheide@HIDDEN, 19581 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 19581-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B19581.146701502332540
          (code B ref 19581); Mon, 27 Jun 2016 08:11:01 +0000
Received: (at 19581) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jun 2016 08:10:23 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57447 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1bHRcd-0008Sm-47
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 04:10:23 -0400
Received: from pb-sasl1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.66]:63275
 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <wingo@HIDDEN>) id 1bHRcc-0008Sf-E0
 for 19581 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 04:10:22 -0400
Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1])
 by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13AB7206B7;
 Mon, 27 Jun 2016 04:10:22 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc
 :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version
 :content-type; s=sasl; bh=IHSo1nwFOcIGjqGiHH0e9W7eoiw=; b=a5/OeA
 ze3wa2VNusNrTvoWV+8rI+cQY67MpeVubIGqrBsXqexa5z/4KnfRxeT5ea62zD05
 a5GMBYzZOUk/bNfsW71ArSNlug0GNVhL62qa+6N+/rq3zb83HtWXIK8TMz241+8Z
 9WdMMJspmSqjJDwzgu3zWTEa1euBbaH8/0WLE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc
 :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version
 :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=RrrA0eTBJ8Q9fl+xQdyGuqHOo+VeyzjZ
 7DVw2LvkJm4DdX2CpMSTLYPDXIXcw1kfDAmRQoL7hW1y+3MxqAp9//Liq/SVPu4D
 FEMlypAUK3anfV9NIhMPVm67sStK0z0XwcBRewA21/wToN4SBzPHK4Bo/fGaQKIv
 q2O+tbSnXpg=
Received: from pb-sasl1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1])
 by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A41E206B6;
 Mon, 27 Jun 2016 04:10:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from clucks (unknown [88.160.190.192])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 27264206B4;
 Mon, 27 Jun 2016 04:10:21 -0400 (EDT)
From: Andy Wingo <wingo@HIDDEN>
References: <8c8510a889e2d3b9f57f.1463767657@HIDDEN>
 <871t3j3a44.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 10:10:13 +0200
In-Reply-To: <871t3j3a44.fsf@HIDDEN> (Arne Babenhauserheide's message of "Sun, 
 26 Jun 2016 23:37:15 +0200")
Message-ID: <87mvm7832y.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 97D6265E-3C3E-11E6-ACCA-C1836462E9F6-02397024!pb-sasl1.pobox.com
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

On Sun 26 Jun 2016 23:37, Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_bab@HIDDEN> writes:

> ping?

Let's follow up on bug #19581.

Thanks,

Andy





Last modified: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 12:00:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.