GNU logs - #20746, boring messages


Message sent to bug-parted@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#20746: problem with non-LBA fat16
Resent-From: George Hicken <george.hicken@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-parted@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 17:53:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.20746.B.14335267604464 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: report 20746
X-GNU-PR-Package: parted
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: 20746 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-parted@HIDDEN
Received: via spool by submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B.14335267604464
          (code B ref -1); Fri, 05 Jun 2015 17:53:01 +0000
Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jun 2015 17:52:40 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42049 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1Z0vnL-00019u-3m
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 13:52:40 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38340)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80)
 (envelope-from <george.hicken@HIDDEN>) id 1Z0vXP-0000ln-7t
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 13:36:11 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <george.hicken@HIDDEN>) id 1Z0vXJ-0004Kq-0b
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 13:36:05 -0400
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,
 HTML_MESSAGE,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:37572)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <george.hicken@HIDDEN>) id 1Z0vXI-0004Kh-UZ
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 13:36:04 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51832)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <george.hicken@HIDDEN>) id 1Z0vXH-0008CP-NG
 for bug-parted@HIDDEN; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 13:36:04 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <george.hicken@HIDDEN>) id 1Z0vXG-0004K2-Hd
 for bug-parted@HIDDEN; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 13:36:03 -0400
Received: from mail-ig0-x234.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c05::234]:37690)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <george.hicken@HIDDEN>) id 1Z0vXG-0004Jt-7I
 for bug-parted@HIDDEN; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 13:36:02 -0400
Received: by igbsb11 with SMTP id sb11so19898800igb.0
 for <bug-parted@HIDDEN>; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 10:36:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
 bh=o4tmJDK/hhQFMQDkqBxlWsqUXTGkO6MVe1VZ42l8Q8s=;
 b=pYPI6dXZzWIew0U5zkfiBs6DSqZ1dsJ6n2p9h4dGBUzs5Yhf3PB0EfsvXGShfzY8v4
 JwFqYdIJuDeM4fUrax3ygTvUhT/FzkIjYD28gJ+e4oG2AR0+kZlEtWGSVqU5g2wnTfoi
 OsGKzGdkYaBqwqRmt42pI7GWPJZUhHC6uG+rwzQdVffCCcY9UuhOooCacgAh8PcE7O6E
 Y/oA9pB/kyST7OZa0fKmWi1gszi5j7FzC/KakkgP62a9K0gPhkBw6a8Wv/WzqLg26+E+
 F+XhQ6WTYNvkovya9+Iq312nRuXsrSgjOdfozlwP2z8JLcH8uD5Y2A2FUTAzPg6PT1OL
 YFSg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.4.67 with SMTP id i3mr13690023igi.47.1433525761341; Fri,
 05 Jun 2015 10:36:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.54.195 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Jun 2015 10:36:01 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 10:36:01 -0700
Message-ID: <CANBE-PKnQRmuukbTXHDdMYsuc5KXnR1or7Lqvf24cj4gTP+1Pg@HIDDEN>
From: George Hicken <george.hicken@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2a13ec801600517c8b97a
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address
 (bad octet value).
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address
 (bad octet value).
X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11
X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 13:52:36 -0400
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----)

--001a11c2a13ec801600517c8b97a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Requested output prior to partitioning

Error: /dev/sdb: unrecognised disk label
Error: /dev/sdb: unrecognised disk label
Error: /dev/sdb: unrecognised disk label
Model: VMware Virtual disk (scsi)
Disk /dev/sdb: 8590MB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: unknown
Disk Flags:
Model: VMware Virtual disk (scsi)
Disk /dev/sdb: 16777216s
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: unknown
Disk Flags:
Model: VMware Virtual disk (scsi)
Disk /dev/sdb: 1044,85,0
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
BIOS cylinder,head,sector geometry: 1044,255,63.  Each cylinder is 8225kB.
Partition Table: unknown
Disk Flags:

Using the parted supplied with tinycorelinux 6.x (reports as 3.1) to create
an MBT, create a primary fat16 parition with non-lba addressing
   /usr/local/sbin/parted -a cylinder -s /dev/sdb --  mklabel msdos mkpart
primary fat16 1cyl 40MiB

This produces a partition of type 0xe, but otherwise it's what we want -
interestingly parted print command doesn't detail the parition type, it's
all blank. Using "set 1 lba off" then does something entirely unexpected.
Using fdisk to inspect the partition table the type has switched to 0x83.

I took a quick look at the code and 0x83 appears to be the default fstype
if none is set. Why this happens when setting lba off on a fat16 partition
I have no idea.

Thanks.

George

--001a11c2a13ec801600517c8b97a
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Requested output prior to partitioning<div><br><div><div>E=
rror: /dev/sdb: unrecognised disk label</div><div>Error: /dev/sdb: unrecogn=
ised disk label</div><div>Error: /dev/sdb: unrecognised disk label</div><di=
v>Model: VMware Virtual disk (scsi)</div><div>Disk /dev/sdb: 8590MB</div><d=
iv>Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B</div><div>Partition Table: unk=
nown</div><div>Disk Flags:</div><div>Model: VMware Virtual disk (scsi)</div=
><div>Disk /dev/sdb: 16777216s</div><div>Sector size (logical/physical): 51=
2B/512B</div><div>Partition Table: unknown</div><div>Disk Flags:</div><div>=
Model: VMware Virtual disk (scsi)</div><div>Disk /dev/sdb: 1044,85,0</div><=
div>Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B</div><div>BIOS cylinder,head,=
sector geometry: 1044,255,63.=C2=A0 Each cylinder is 8225kB.</div><div>Part=
ition Table: unknown</div><div>Disk Flags:</div></div><div><br></div></div>=
<div>Using the parted supplied with tinycorelinux 6.x (reports as 3.1) to c=
reate an MBT, create a primary fat16 parition with non-lba addressing</div>=
<div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0/usr/local/sbin/parted -a cylinder -s /dev/sdb -- =C2=A0m=
klabel msdos mkpart primary fat16 1cyl 40MiB=C2=A0<br></div><div><br></div>=
<div>This produces a partition of type 0xe, but otherwise it&#39;s what we =
want - interestingly parted print command doesn&#39;t detail the parition t=
ype, it&#39;s all blank. Using &quot;set 1 lba off&quot; then does somethin=
g entirely unexpected. Using fdisk to inspect the partition table the type =
has switched to 0x83.</div><div><br></div><div>I took a quick look at the c=
ode and 0x83 appears to be the default fstype if none is set. Why this happ=
ens when setting lba off on a fat16 partition I have no idea.</div><div><br=
></div><div>Thanks.</div><div><br></div><div>George</div></div>

--001a11c2a13ec801600517c8b97a--




Message sent:


Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.503 (Entity 5.503)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: George Hicken <george.hicken@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#20746: Acknowledgement (problem with non-LBA fat16)
Message-ID: <handler.20746.B.14335267604464.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <CANBE-PKnQRmuukbTXHDdMYsuc5KXnR1or7Lqvf24cj4gTP+1Pg@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 20746
X-Gnu-PR-Package: parted
Reply-To: 20746 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 17:53:02 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-parted@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 20746 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
20746: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D20746
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems


Message sent to bug-parted@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#20746: problem with non-LBA fat16
Resent-From: Phil Susi <psusi@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-parted@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 18:30:05 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.20746.B20746.143387456818590 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20746
X-GNU-PR-Package: parted
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: George Hicken <george.hicken@HIDDEN>, 20746 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 20746-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B20746.143387456818590
          (code B ref 20746); Tue, 09 Jun 2015 18:30:05 +0000
Received: (at 20746) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jun 2015 18:29:28 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46462 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1Z2OH9-0004pk-Qg
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2015 14:29:28 -0400
Received: from mail-yh0-f68.google.com ([209.85.213.68]:33407)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80)
 (envelope-from <phillsusi@HIDDEN>) id 1Z2OH8-0004pX-5W
 for 20746 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2015 14:29:26 -0400
Received: by yhab6 with SMTP id b6so2245557yha.0
 for <20746 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 09 Jun 2015 11:29:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject
 :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=qXHWWFyEZp4iwtCFk/pWSfMjNon3235B5v6PzpHBilE=;
 b=MkEPjQEjcCZkm9u7IV65NPsxPY4erCF63XF1ewUGqFhoRSln4hXFE6tcJ/WtEaRGB0
 cAg/H607zx33EU0hC9pZ4gNoji9dfQ9GhP5pFrAN7OV6S95sJPEfaHRBWe5TUTqjJp3+
 gxARKoA15xpYsaPp+Nv03xemS+cbshXhx5HYK0qDml1Ottb9q5wIPJl0M2q7ApXCcOUq
 qMyGypUTWfc89QHfYmvBE2mLuOC5BamteXe9WqDqJDPtVPU7BwkKXkE6pA+QfU+/F3Sf
 awyzJ7PwQfuLImVlzhKGgGiH5avUua5U9mySeD4OL7jsw0T1TkuF22SwgCdlrHzpqoM/
 d2LA==
X-Received: by 10.13.199.195 with SMTP id j186mr24969172ywd.112.1433874121706; 
 Tue, 09 Jun 2015 11:22:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.1.1.233] (fl-67-77-88-12.sta.embarqhsd.net. [67.77.88.12])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
 a127sm4708744ywc.19.2015.06.09.11.22.01
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Tue, 09 Jun 2015 11:22:01 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <55772E93.2000301@HIDDEN>
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 14:21:07 -0400
From: Phil Susi <psusi@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CANBE-PKnQRmuukbTXHDdMYsuc5KXnR1or7Lqvf24cj4gTP+1Pg@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <CANBE-PKnQRmuukbTXHDdMYsuc5KXnR1or7Lqvf24cj4gTP+1Pg@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)

On 6/5/2015 1:36 PM, George Hicken wrote:
> Requested output prior to partitioning
>
> Error: /dev/sdb: unrecognised disk label
> Error: /dev/sdb: unrecognised disk label
> Error: /dev/sdb: unrecognised disk label
> Model: VMware Virtual disk (scsi)
> Disk /dev/sdb: 8590MB
> Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
> Partition Table: unknown
> Disk Flags:
> Model: VMware Virtual disk (scsi)
> Disk /dev/sdb: 16777216s
> Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
> Partition Table: unknown
> Disk Flags:
> Model: VMware Virtual disk (scsi)
> Disk /dev/sdb: 1044,85,0
> Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
> BIOS cylinder,head,sector geometry: 1044,255,63.  Each cylinder is 8225kB.
> Partition Table: unknown
> Disk Flags:

What are the exact commands that lead to this?  What does parted 
/dev/sdb print show?  What does fdisk show?

> Using the parted supplied with tinycorelinux 6.x (reports as 3.1) to create

Please try again with 3.2.

> an MBT, create a primary fat16 parition with non-lba addressing
>     /usr/local/sbin/parted -a cylinder -s /dev/sdb --  mklabel msdos mkpart
> primary fat16 1cyl 40MiB

Do you mean to say that this is the command that produced the above output?

> This produces a partition of type 0xe, but otherwise it's what we want -
> interestingly parted print command doesn't detail the parition type, it's
> all blank. Using "set 1 lba off" then does something entirely unexpected.
> Using fdisk to inspect the partition table the type has switched to 0x83.
>
> I took a quick look at the code and 0x83 appears to be the default fstype
> if none is set. Why this happens when setting lba off on a fat16 partition
> I have no idea.

This is because as you noted, 0x83 is the default type.  Since you did 
not actually format a fat16 filesystem within the partition, parted 
can't detect any filesystem there and so does not know that it should 
use the type code for fat16.





Last modified: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 12:00:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.