GNU bug report logs -
#21103
24.5; LaTeX input mode: add more blackboard bold characters
Previous Next
Reported by: Ansgar Burchardt <ansgar <at> 43-1.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 15:32:02 UTC
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Found in version 24.5
Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 21103 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 21103 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#21103
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 21 Jul 2015 15:32:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Ansgar Burchardt <ansgar <at> 43-1.org>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
.
(Tue, 21 Jul 2015 15:32:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
1. Enable LaTeX input mode: C-\ "TeX" RETURN
2. Typing \Bbb{R} should now result in ℝ,
but (for example) \Bbb{C} does not result in ℂ.
I miss at least ℂ (field of complex numbers), 𝔽 (generic field), 𝕂
(generic field, German), ℍ (quaternions), 𝕀 (identity map), ℚ (field of
rational numbers), ℤ (ring of integers). Others might miss a few more
that are in common use, see [1].
The attached patch adds all blackboard bold capital characters and "1"
and "2" using the codepoints from the referenced Wikipedia article.
Ansgar
[1] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackboard_bold>
In GNU Emacs 24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.16.4)
of 2015-06-28 on trouble, modified by Debian
Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11701000
System Description: Debian GNU/Linux testing (stretch)
[0001-Add-more-blackboard-bold-characters.patch (text/x-diff, attachment)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#21103
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 23 Feb 2016 09:39:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 21103 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Ansgar Burchardt <ansgar <at> 43-1.org> writes:
> I miss at least ℂ (field of complex numbers), 𝔽 (generic field), 𝕂
> (generic field, German), ℍ (quaternions), 𝕀 (identity map), ℚ (field of
> rational numbers), ℤ (ring of integers). Others might miss a few more
> that are in common use, see [1].
>
> The attached patch adds all blackboard bold capital characters and "1"
> and "2" using the codepoints from the referenced Wikipedia article.
[...]
> This patch adds all capital blackboard bold letters and those for "1"
> and "2". Most characters are in common use in mathematics, but it does
> not seem useful to exclude the few not widely used.
It does seem more consistent to add them all, yes...
> - ("\\Bbb{N}" ?ℕ) ; AMS commands for blackboard bold
> - ("\\Bbb{P}" ?ℙ) ; Also sometimes \mathbb.
> + ("\\Bbb{A}" ?𝔸) ; AMS commands for blackboard bold
> + ("\\Bbb{B}" ?𝔹) ; Also sometimes \mathbb.
> + ("\\Bbb{C}" ?ℂ)
> + ("\\Bbb{D}" ?𝔻)
> + ("\\Bbb{E}" ?𝔼)
> + ("\\Bbb{F}" ?𝔽)
> + ("\\Bbb{G}" ?𝔾)
> + ("\\Bbb{H}" ?ℍ)
(etc)
A question to the other Emacs maintainers -- would a change like this,
which is more than 15 lines, require a copyright assignment? It's not
very "code-ey"...
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#21103
; Package
emacs
.
(Mon, 20 Jan 2020 20:42:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 21103 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> writes:
> Ansgar Burchardt <ansgar <at> 43-1.org> writes:
>
>> I miss at least ℂ (field of complex numbers), 𝔽 (generic field), 𝕂
>> (generic field, German), ℍ (quaternions), 𝕀 (identity map), ℚ (field of
>> rational numbers), ℤ (ring of integers). Others might miss a few more
>> that are in common use, see [1].
>>
>> The attached patch adds all blackboard bold capital characters and "1"
>> and "2" using the codepoints from the referenced Wikipedia article.
>
> [...]
>
>> This patch adds all capital blackboard bold letters and those for "1"
>> and "2". Most characters are in common use in mathematics, but it does
>> not seem useful to exclude the few not widely used.
>
> It does seem more consistent to add them all, yes...
>
>> - ("\\Bbb{N}" ?ℕ) ; AMS commands for blackboard bold
>> - ("\\Bbb{P}" ?ℙ) ; Also sometimes \mathbb.
>> + ("\\Bbb{A}" ?𝔸) ; AMS commands for blackboard bold
>> + ("\\Bbb{B}" ?𝔹) ; Also sometimes \mathbb.
>> + ("\\Bbb{C}" ?ℂ)
>> + ("\\Bbb{D}" ?𝔻)
>> + ("\\Bbb{E}" ?𝔼)
>> + ("\\Bbb{F}" ?𝔽)
>> + ("\\Bbb{G}" ?𝔾)
>> + ("\\Bbb{H}" ?ℍ)
>
> (etc)
>
> A question to the other Emacs maintainers -- would a change like this,
> which is more than 15 lines, require a copyright assignment? It's not
> very "code-ey"...
I searched online, and found the following:
https://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ33.pdf
Familiar symbols and designs, or a simple combination of a few familiar symbols or designs, are
uncopyrightable and cannot be registered with the Office. However, a work of authorship that
incorporates one or more familiar symbols or designs into a larger design may be registered if the
work as a whole contains a sufficient amount of creative expression.
Examples of familiar symbols and designs include but are not limited to
• Letters, punctuation, or symbols on a keyboard
• Abbreviations
• Musical notation
• Numbers and mathematical and currency symbols
• Arrows and other directional or navigational symbols
• Common symbols and shapes, such as a spade, club, heart, diamond, star, yin yang, or
fleur de lys
• Common patterns, such as standard chevron, polka dot, checkerboard, or houndstooth
• Well-known and commonly used symbols that contain a minimal amount of expression or
are in the public domain, such as the peace symbol, gender symbols, or simple emoticons
• Industry designs, such as the caduceus, barber pole, food labeling symbols, or hazard
warning symbols
• Familiar religious symbols
• Common architecture moldings
Given the above, I think this is fine to install with the
Copyright-paperwork-exempt tag.
We could perhaps contact assign <at> gnu.org if we feel unsure about this,
to hear what they have to say. Does anyone think we should do that
first, or have any other comments? Otherwise, I think we should just
install it.
Best regards,
Stefan Kangas
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#21103
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 21 Jan 2020 18:20:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 21103 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>
> Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 21:41:30 +0100
> Cc: 21103 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Ansgar Burchardt <ansgar <at> 43-1.org>
>
> >> - ("\\Bbb{N}" ?ℕ) ; AMS commands for blackboard bold
> >> - ("\\Bbb{P}" ?ℙ) ; Also sometimes \mathbb.
> >> + ("\\Bbb{A}" ?𝔸) ; AMS commands for blackboard bold
> >> + ("\\Bbb{B}" ?𝔹) ; Also sometimes \mathbb.
> >> + ("\\Bbb{C}" ?ℂ)
> >> + ("\\Bbb{D}" ?𝔻)
> >> + ("\\Bbb{E}" ?𝔼)
> >> + ("\\Bbb{F}" ?𝔽)
> >> + ("\\Bbb{G}" ?𝔾)
> >> + ("\\Bbb{H}" ?ℍ)
> >
> > (etc)
> >
> > A question to the other Emacs maintainers -- would a change like this,
> > which is more than 15 lines, require a copyright assignment? It's not
> > very "code-ey"...
>
> I searched online, and found the following:
> https://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ33.pdf
>
> Familiar symbols and designs, or a simple combination of a few familiar symbols or designs, are
> uncopyrightable and cannot be registered with the Office. However, a work of authorship that
> incorporates one or more familiar symbols or designs into a larger design may be registered if the
> work as a whole contains a sufficient amount of creative expression.
>
> Examples of familiar symbols and designs include but are not limited to
> • Letters, punctuation, or symbols on a keyboard
> • Abbreviations
> • Musical notation
> • Numbers and mathematical and currency symbols
> • Arrows and other directional or navigational symbols
> • Common symbols and shapes, such as a spade, club, heart, diamond, star, yin yang, or
> fleur de lys
> • Common patterns, such as standard chevron, polka dot, checkerboard, or houndstooth
> • Well-known and commonly used symbols that contain a minimal amount of expression or
> are in the public domain, such as the peace symbol, gender symbols, or simple emoticons
> • Industry designs, such as the caduceus, barber pole, food labeling symbols, or hazard
> warning symbols
> • Familiar religious symbols
> • Common architecture moldings
>
> Given the above, I think this is fine to install with the
> Copyright-paperwork-exempt tag.
>
> We could perhaps contact assign <at> gnu.org if we feel unsure about this,
> to hear what they have to say. Does anyone think we should do that
> first, or have any other comments? Otherwise, I think we should just
> install it.
Richard, are there any reasons to be more lenient with this kind of
changes, wrt to the maximum number of lines we are allowed to accept
without a copyright assignment? The original patch is here:
https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=21103#5
You can download the patch itself with this URL:
https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?msg=5;filename=0001-Add-more-blackboard-bold-characters.patch;att=1;bug=21103
Reply sent
to
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Fri, 31 Jan 2020 10:25:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Ansgar Burchardt <ansgar <at> 43-1.org>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Fri, 31 Jan 2020 10:25:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #19 received at 21103-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 20:18:59 +0200
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
> Cc: 21103 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, larsi <at> gnus.org, ansgar <at> 43-1.org
>
> > Given the above, I think this is fine to install with the
> > Copyright-paperwork-exempt tag.
> >
> > We could perhaps contact assign <at> gnu.org if we feel unsure about this,
> > to hear what they have to say. Does anyone think we should do that
> > first, or have any other comments? Otherwise, I think we should just
> > install it.
>
> Richard, are there any reasons to be more lenient with this kind of
> changes, wrt to the maximum number of lines we are allowed to accept
> without a copyright assignment? The original patch is here:
>
> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=21103#5
>
> You can download the patch itself with this URL:
>
> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?msg=5;filename=0001-Add-more-blackboard-bold-characters.patch;att=1;bug=21103
Discussion with Richard indicated that such changes don't need any
copyright assignments, since they introduce code that is not
copyrightable. So I've pushed this to the emacs-27 branch, and I'm
closing the bug.
Thanks.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Fri, 28 Feb 2020 12:24:04 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 4 years and 52 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.