Received: (at 21181) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jun 2016 08:28:34 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jun 24 04:28:34 2016 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53353 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1bGMTa-0001uv-0C for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 04:28:34 -0400 Received: from pb-sasl1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.66]:52629 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <wingo@HIDDEN>) id 1bGMTY-0001uo-Qc for 21181 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 04:28:33 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5643018EA6; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 04:28:30 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=tIgG+x/pfT0qvYQja+PZt37W9eo=; b=BZim4N qIxoVfbdSbdMAdJYFMsb/esdGFVBQKcj4qvr0SEUguM8FSUxu7mb5s/YLkevNYhJ QG7q570t3Q9qSjivI3yQZf4LzitYJ5kwEQGV4PzMc37gbqiRWse1zIcm8JXwqaFw 4+gPCaUp5+FQaameLNJnl9OuW7rbCLs3Xl82k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=j9715rjeqtZ6R3A0VMgKj3NwnDdGL3B9 Z/fmspRrzZtWp5nSnTNbmSD854YTKjlKcU2I3VZf+d+kw49f3esRxyKpYHW83cY+ 9CtxnVf4LbIFWyuwbQcBVo2hF9UTiizgcvDNElSxRgfLPC7ZvTfSzGehRuoPcPC1 nNsG5cPWZ7Q= Received: from pb-sasl1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E79D18EA3; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 04:28:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from clucks (unknown [88.160.190.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5D81318EA2; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 04:28:29 -0400 (EDT) From: Andy Wingo <wingo@HIDDEN> To: mhw@HIDDEN Subject: Re: bug#21181: Possible bug in test-group References: <87d1z56ogp.fsf@HIDDEN> <87a8u96o4j.fsf@HIDDEN> <87614x6nq1.fsf@HIDDEN> <8738016llm.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 10:28:22 +0200 In-Reply-To: <8738016llm.fsf@HIDDEN> (Rob Browning's message of "Sun, 02 Aug 2015 23:29:25 -0500") Message-ID: <87oa6rgfdl.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: A12FAFC8-39E5-11E6-8FD6-C1836462E9F6-02397024!pb-sasl1.pobox.com X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21181 Cc: 21181 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) Mark, do you have any thoughts on this one? A On Mon 03 Aug 2015 06:29, Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN> writes: > Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN> writes: > >> To follow up, it does look like it might be broken, but you can ignore >> my suggested fix. > > I'm not that familiar with srfi-64, but it looks like the problem (if > it's not expected) is that test-group doesn't handle the case where it's > creating the first group, i.e. no prior test-begin. > > In that situation it appears that test-runner-current returns #f, > causing test-result-alist! to fail. > > Hope this helps
bug-guile@HIDDEN:bug#21181; Package guile.
Full text available.ludo@HIDDEN (Ludovic Courtès)
to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
Full text available.Received: (at 21181) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Aug 2015 04:29:30 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Aug 03 00:29:30 2015 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37691 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1ZM7NS-0003P8-BD for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 00:29:30 -0400 Received: from defaultvalue.org ([70.85.129.156]:58170) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <rlb@HIDDEN>) id 1ZM7NQ-0003P0-8u for 21181 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 00:29:28 -0400 Received: from trouble.defaultvalue.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: rlb@HIDDEN) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E29F8200F0 for <21181 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 2 Aug 2015 23:29:26 -0500 (CDT) Received: by trouble.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A387414E08D; Sun, 2 Aug 2015 23:29:25 -0500 (CDT) From: Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN> To: 21181 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#21181: Possible bug in test-group In-Reply-To: <87614x6nq1.fsf@HIDDEN> References: <87d1z56ogp.fsf@HIDDEN> <87a8u96o4j.fsf@HIDDEN> <87614x6nq1.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2015 23:29:25 -0500 Message-ID: <8738016llm.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21181 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN> writes: > To follow up, it does look like it might be broken, but you can ignore > my suggested fix. I'm not that familiar with srfi-64, but it looks like the problem (if it's not expected) is that test-group doesn't handle the case where it's creating the first group, i.e. no prior test-begin. In that situation it appears that test-runner-current returns #f, causing test-result-alist! to fail. Hope this helps -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
bug-guile@HIDDEN:bug#21181; Package guile.
Full text available.Received: (at 21181) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Aug 2015 03:43:38 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Aug 02 23:43:38 2015 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37643 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1ZM6f4-0002J7-3i for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Aug 2015 23:43:38 -0400 Received: from defaultvalue.org ([70.85.129.156]:58162) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <rlb@HIDDEN>) id 1ZM6f2-0002Iz-5V for 21181 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Aug 2015 23:43:36 -0400 Received: from trouble.defaultvalue.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: rlb@HIDDEN) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 826CA2001A for <21181 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 2 Aug 2015 22:43:35 -0500 (CDT) Received: by trouble.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 19C4314E08D; Sun, 2 Aug 2015 22:43:35 -0500 (CDT) From: Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN> To: 21181 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#21181: Possible bug in test-group In-Reply-To: <87a8u96o4j.fsf@HIDDEN> References: <87d1z56ogp.fsf@HIDDEN> <87a8u96o4j.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2015 22:43:34 -0500 Message-ID: <87614x6nq1.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21181 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN> writes: > Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN> writes: > >> With 2.0.11(-deb+1-9): >> >> scheme@(guile-user)> (use-modules (srfi srfi-64)) >> scheme@(guile-user)> (test-group "foo" 13) >> <unnamed port>:2:0: In procedure #<procedure 1ca9e80 at <current input>:2:0 ()>: >> <unnamed port>:2:0: In procedure struct_vtable: Wrong type argument in position 1 (expecting struct): #f >> >> Changing the syntax-case to use "body ..." instead of ". body" appears >> to fix the problem. > > Hmm, this may be a local issue. Feel free to ignore it for now. To follow up, it does look like it might be broken, but you can ignore my suggested fix. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
bug-guile@HIDDEN:bug#21181; Package guile.
Full text available.Received: (at 21181) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Aug 2015 03:34:56 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Aug 02 23:34:56 2015 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37639 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1ZM6We-00026n-3i for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Aug 2015 23:34:56 -0400 Received: from defaultvalue.org ([70.85.129.156]:58156) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <rlb@HIDDEN>) id 1ZM6Wb-00026f-Rb for 21181 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Aug 2015 23:34:54 -0400 Received: from trouble.defaultvalue.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: rlb@HIDDEN) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EF45C20127 for <21181 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 2 Aug 2015 22:34:52 -0500 (CDT) Received: by trouble.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9FF3014E08D; Sun, 2 Aug 2015 22:34:52 -0500 (CDT) From: Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN> To: 21181 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#21181: Possible bug in test-group In-Reply-To: <87d1z56ogp.fsf@HIDDEN> References: <87d1z56ogp.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2015 22:34:52 -0500 Message-ID: <87a8u96o4j.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21181 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN> writes: > With 2.0.11(-deb+1-9): > > scheme@(guile-user)> (use-modules (srfi srfi-64)) > scheme@(guile-user)> (test-group "foo" 13) > <unnamed port>:2:0: In procedure #<procedure 1ca9e80 at <current input>:2:0 ()>: > <unnamed port>:2:0: In procedure struct_vtable: Wrong type argument in position 1 (expecting struct): #f > > Changing the syntax-case to use "body ..." instead of ". body" appears > to fix the problem. Hmm, this may be a local issue. Feel free to ignore it for now. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
bug-guile@HIDDEN:bug#21181; Package guile.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Aug 2015 03:27:45 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Aug 02 23:27:45 2015 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37634 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1ZM6Ph-0001vJ-5R for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Aug 2015 23:27:45 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52774) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <rlb@HIDDEN>) id 1ZM6Pf-0001v9-5f for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Aug 2015 23:27:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <rlb@HIDDEN>) id 1ZM6Pd-0002VK-19 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Aug 2015 23:27:41 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:59868) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <rlb@HIDDEN>) id 1ZM6Pc-0002VG-UT for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Aug 2015 23:27:40 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38048) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <rlb@HIDDEN>) id 1ZM6Pc-0001IZ-0Q for bug-guile@HIDDEN; Sun, 02 Aug 2015 23:27:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <rlb@HIDDEN>) id 1ZM6PY-0002Uw-0U for bug-guile@HIDDEN; Sun, 02 Aug 2015 23:27:39 -0400 Received: from defaultvalue.org ([70.85.129.156]:57236) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <rlb@HIDDEN>) id 1ZM6PX-0002Ur-S4 for bug-guile@HIDDEN; Sun, 02 Aug 2015 23:27:35 -0400 Received: from trouble.defaultvalue.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: rlb@HIDDEN) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF18C20127 for <bug-guile@HIDDEN>; Sun, 2 Aug 2015 22:27:34 -0500 (CDT) Received: by trouble.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5DDC214E08D; Sun, 2 Aug 2015 22:27:34 -0500 (CDT) From: Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN> To: bug-guile@HIDDEN Subject: Possible bug in test-group User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2015 22:27:34 -0500 Message-ID: <87d1z56ogp.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) With 2.0.11(-deb+1-9): scheme@(guile-user)> (use-modules (srfi srfi-64)) scheme@(guile-user)> (test-group "foo" 13) <unnamed port>:2:0: In procedure #<procedure 1ca9e80 at <current input>:2:0 ()>: <unnamed port>:2:0: In procedure struct_vtable: Wrong type argument in position 1 (expecting struct): #f Changing the syntax-case to use "body ..." instead of ". body" appears to fix the problem. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
Rob Browning <rlb@HIDDEN>:bug-guile@HIDDEN.
Full text available.bug-guile@HIDDEN:bug#21181; Package guile.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.