GNU logs - #21463, boring messages

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#21463: 25.0.50; lisp-indent-line indents wrongly for multiline sexps
Resent-From: Artur Malabarba <bruce.connor.am@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 21:00:03 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.21463.B.144200514610128 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 21463 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Reply-To: bruce.connor.am@HIDDEN
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 21:58:58 +0100
Message-ID: <CAAdUY-LboQhV2fhehNK3M5fqc7V9XBTjgtYi7rWWuV4yGyBAog@HIDDEN>
From: Artur Malabarba <bruce.connor.am@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

This is how the following sexp gets indented by lisp-indent-line

((x
  y) a
  2)

This is how (I believe) it should be indented

((x
  y) a
 2)


This affects emacs-lisp and any other mode that derives from lisp-mode.

Message sent:

Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.503 (Entity 5.503)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: bruce.connor.am@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#21463: Acknowledgement (25.0.50; lisp-indent-line indents
 wrongly for multiline sexps)
Message-ID: <handler.21463.B.144200514610128.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <CAAdUY-LboQhV2fhehNK3M5fqc7V9XBTjgtYi7rWWuV4yGyBAog@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 21463
X-Gnu-PR-Package: emacs
Reply-To: 21463 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 21:00:04 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 21463 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
21463: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D21463
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#21463: 25.0.50; lisp-indent-line indents wrongly for multiline sexps
Resent-From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2015 01:05:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.21463.B21463.14420198425145 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: Artur Malabarba <bruce.connor.am@HIDDEN>
Cc: 21463 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <jwvegi4ihjs.fsf-monnier+emacsbugs@HIDDEN>
References: <CAAdUY-LboQhV2fhehNK3M5fqc7V9XBTjgtYi7rWWuV4yGyBAog@HIDDEN>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 21:03:59 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAAdUY-LboQhV2fhehNK3M5fqc7V9XBTjgtYi7rWWuV4yGyBAog@HIDDEN>
 (Artur Malabarba's message of "Fri, 11 Sep 2015 21:58:58 +0100")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

> This is how the following sexp gets indented by lisp-indent-line
> ((x
>   y) a
>   2)
>
> This is how (I believe) it should be indented
>
> ((x
>   y) a
>  2)

I'd argue that for Scheme, it should be

  ((x
    y) a
       2)

But in either case, the current indentation indeed looks wrong.


        Stefan

Message sent to bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#21463: 25.0.50; lisp-indent-line indents wrongly for multiline sexps
Resent-From: Artur Malabarba <bruce.connor.am@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2015 16:29:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.21463.B21463.144207528527343 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
Cc: 21463 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Reply-To: bruce.connor.am@HIDDEN
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <jwvegi4ihjs.fsf-monnier+emacsbugs@HIDDEN>
References: <CAAdUY-LboQhV2fhehNK3M5fqc7V9XBTjgtYi7rWWuV4yGyBAog@HIDDEN>
 <jwvegi4ihjs.fsf-monnier+emacsbugs@HIDDEN>
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2015 17:28:01 +0100
Message-ID: <CAAdUY-+9bmkeVPj0Vx7+qCSp2qC49-sNTvOE7+jiPS6Kyg9+dg@HIDDEN>
From: Artur Malabarba <bruce.connor.am@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

> I'd argue that for Scheme, it should be
>
>   ((x
>     y) a
>        2)

I see. In Clojure, the 2 would be on the second column. So I guess
there's no catch all solution here.
Should this be a var for the mode to set, then?

> But in either case, the current indentation indeed looks wrong.

Yes.

Last modified: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 12:00:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.