Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Dec 2015 16:33:49 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 15 11:33:49 2015 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52865 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1a8sXp-0007C0-Ck for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 11:33:49 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47648) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <Ankur.Tank@HIDDEN>) id 1a8mrQ-0005ZB-2K for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 05:29:37 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Ankur.Tank@HIDDEN>) id 1a8mrJ-0004Ww-KS for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 05:29:30 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:34393) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Ankur.Tank@HIDDEN>) id 1a8mrJ-0004Ws-Hs for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 05:29:29 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57635) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Ankur.Tank@HIDDEN>) id 1a8mrI-0002VN-Jj for bug-parted@HIDDEN; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 05:29:29 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Ankur.Tank@HIDDEN>) id 1a8mrF-0004Vp-Ah for bug-parted@HIDDEN; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 05:29:28 -0500 Received: from mailout1.ltindia.com ([203.199.60.132]:42247) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Ankur.Tank@HIDDEN>) id 1a8mr5-0004LB-4y for bug-parted@HIDDEN; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 05:29:25 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO POCITMSEXHUB04.LntUniverse.com) ([10.2.1.69]) by mailout1.ltindia.com with ESMTP; 15 Dec 2015 15:55:51 +0530 Received: from POCITMSEXMB04.LntUniverse.com ([fe80::f983:a4ef:f76c:f6f1]) by POCITMSEXHUB04.LntUniverse.com ([fe80::8c5f:9589:e5d5:ce78%11]) with mapi id 14.03.0181.006; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 15:55:32 +0530 From: Ankur Tank <Ankur.Tank@HIDDEN> To: "bug-parted@HIDDEN" <bug-parted@HIDDEN> Subject: Partition alignment using parted Thread-Topic: Partition alignment using parted Thread-Index: AdE3IvL3L6MoQ8TzTayv6wL3800kcA== Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 10:25:42 +0000 Message-ID: <CFB3B8F56DDE9F45B45EBDEBED372A66512F25@HIDDEN> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.2.1.199] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 11:33:44 -0500 Cc: "artfri2@HIDDEN" <artfri2@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) Hi Parted Experts, I am working on am335x based board. We are using eMMC and as a storage medium and parted for partitioning eMMC. I am not able to use "optimal" alignment option with parted when partitioni= ng eMMC. I get following error messages when I use "optimal" alignment Warning: The resulting partition is not properly aligned for best performan= ce. Warning: The resulting partition is not properly aligned for best performan= ce. Warning: The resulting partition is not properly aligned for best performan= ce. 1. Do we have to worry about this message ? I have put question on Unix & Linux Stackexchange also below is the link fo= r the same http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/248939/how-to-achieve-optimal-align= ment-for-emmc-partition Now parted reports logical and physical sector size as same. "Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B" 2. Now my question is, is physical size reported by parted is physical sect= or size or emulated physical sector size? 3. How can we achieve optimal alignment ? Any suggestions? Thank you, Regards, Ankur L&T Technology Services Ltd www.LntTechservices.com<http://www.lnttechservices.com/> This Email may contain confidential or privileged information for the inten= ded recipient (s). If you are not the intended recipient, please do not use= or disseminate the information, notify the sender and delete it from your = system.
Ankur Tank <Ankur.Tank@HIDDEN>
:bug-parted@HIDDEN
.
Full text available.bug-parted@HIDDEN
:bug#22179
; Package parted
.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.