X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#22496: why does the parted math look wrong - Q1 ? Resent-From: Chris Johnson <cj@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-CC: bug-parted@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 22:48:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.22496.B.1454194028882 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: report 22496 X-GNU-PR-Package: parted X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 22496 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-parted@HIDDEN Received: via spool by submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B.1454194028882 (code B ref -1); Sat, 30 Jan 2016 22:48:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jan 2016 22:47:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42371 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1aPeIO-0000E9-00 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jan 2016 17:47:08 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45666) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <cj@HIDDEN>) id 1aPcVt-0005wR-AY for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jan 2016 15:52:57 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <cj@HIDDEN>) id 1aPcVm-0000hw-OX for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jan 2016 15:52:51 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:58639) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <cj@HIDDEN>) id 1aPcVm-0000hn-LQ for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jan 2016 15:52:50 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36634) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <cj@HIDDEN>) id 1aPcVl-00058U-Iu for bug-parted@HIDDEN; Sat, 30 Jan 2016 15:52:50 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <cj@HIDDEN>) id 1aPcVg-0000c9-GB for bug-parted@HIDDEN; Sat, 30 Jan 2016 15:52:49 -0500 Received: from mout.perfora.net ([74.208.4.196]:55517) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <cj@HIDDEN>) id 1aPcVg-0000c1-AR for bug-parted@HIDDEN; Sat, 30 Jan 2016 15:52:44 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.6] ([108.28.57.123]) by mrelay.perfora.net (mreueus001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MQPKk-1aVARS1zES-00TxHh for <bug-parted@HIDDEN>; Sat, 30 Jan 2016 21:52:42 +0100 Message-ID: <56AD21AC.1060401@HIDDEN> Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 15:48:44 -0500 From: Chris Johnson <cj@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; SunOS i86pc; rv:10.0.6esrpre) Gecko/20120731 Thunderbird/10.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010503040505010102090305" X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:1ps4ZhxzCcJs+2kKjfJfBHLqy+e2n8fWBdcg95d0VpWwplP64rH wu4zotVG+0bOcgH/MNwpZf8sbOFE7gdWrYPCoMNhIcXwyT1HK/AeKQbP58yeBW18Qh4/a9/ JBp6gWNFiBwqqsQlJDuZQLhox1sUyNCyq2kO1+44VSfRt+PWa/HAwQs9Jhx/YDSINFxfI5q fGIEMIs5jyNJ0+Wp27PaA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:XaYD75Lj3AI=:PwoPS2jtjlgjAX/HUqx3uP W1WdyDVLKRDZTk2LPiyTNfg0GIsxXyHff4K6hIh8e6MzFSg1MrCYjMm8GDDZu+Z2xNxua2U1B ZACTNkN/Yy89S3g1PSHn9/lrI3PsDp+YDB7D/iEr6a1uMbir/xmyNLFkv7IP6MpcnJvyJy794 4WHdCYp7TeGryVkvv/M+DMJCI3luXVNA98sr54n4VWIJU0u+z4O0Qkpc4n7TRz/D0srJf8oHy IMSl2fu2JLXIGjYMRYHElLD9vRbS9yTQ5yLGKOETJT88ZW0S3Eh65SlTfj3viuoSpmT5DAsdC IvYXB9slMvwN3NWkbIzvAjgIw0jI6EKk3mlPLIG53118pP49zuHG9fj9L3iZdS/SuXoqGzVBx /QdPUstl4pyGHMdLHG3QM4u35DyutSM1KJKwmjO0lvxnqjnvLCWyQCwjJ2xblnzcM5JOP56oY LZoJi8v+ZxIqmdpf0MeZc8XMSaQoIz9kuX8vKD5yfpmK2iCh7I+OVzaZjc7qVITUcVuyvAudd hj9vNlW4hUmd1aVLf3pQXQBMUuYSWORM+vz22B3YoZXBXJFspRcqlYnQCJfSp/U8kDWobvTOh ca5DoVSkPwDVslCBdshebgpk77OUZCfxZ6y6BvXnYMf3shxT15Vl4bcJKDrzyG2Q/qtFaTAlG EKhCQINnLlKPiZPSHqWuxQXte+yWxFKsJzOn9Sbc5a8ZiGiP4C0HI3WsCcYyAF9JJQ7I8JqFn gE2ttlcbpXrvAOSZ X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 17:47:07 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------010503040505010102090305 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, I need some education on how parted is doing math. ;-) The drive is 1 TB. # parted /dev/rdsk/c7t1d0p0 GNU Parted 2.3.0 Using /dev/rdsk/c7t1d0p0 Welcome to GNU Parted! Type 'help' to view a list of commands. (parted) unit cyl unit cyl (parted) p p Model: Generic Ide (ide) Disk /dev/rdsk/c7t1d0p0: 121601cyl Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B BIOS cylinder,head,sector geometry: 121601,255,63. Each cylinder is 8225kB. Partition Table: gpt Number Start End Size File system Name Flags 1 0cyl 121600cyl 121600cyl zfs 9 121600cyl 121601cyl 1cyl * Question 1)* Based on the parted value 8225KB per cylinder, I would think that sectors per cylinder could be calculated thus 8225 KB/cyl * 1024 Bytes/KB = 8422400 Bytes/cyl and 8422400 Bytes/cyl / 512 Bytes/sector = 16450 sectors per cylinder However, I would also think that sectors per cylinder could be calculated thus: 255 * 63 = 16065 sectors per cylinder Obviously these numbers do not match. Just for the heck of it, in case when parted says 1 KB it means 1,000 bytes not 1,024 bytes, I did this math. 8225 * 1000 = 8225000 / 512 = 16064.4531 sectors per cylinder which is certainly closer to the value you get from 255 * 63 but it really doesn't make any sense to me to be thinking that we are getting a fractional number of sectors in a given cylinder. Thanks for your insight. --------------010503040505010102090305 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <html> <head> <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"> </head> <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> <font face="Courier New, Courier, monospace">Hi,<br> <br> I need some education on how parted is doing math. ;-)<br> <br> The drive is 1 TB.<br> <br> # parted /dev/rdsk/c7t1d0p0<br> GNU Parted 2.3.0<br> Using /dev/rdsk/c7t1d0p0<br> Welcome to GNU Parted! Type 'help' to view a list of commands.<br> (parted) unit cyl <br> unit cyl<br> (parted) p <br> p<br> Model: Generic Ide (ide)<br> Disk /dev/rdsk/c7t1d0p0: 121601cyl<br> Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B<br> BIOS cylinder,head,sector geometry: 121601,255,63. Each cylinder is 8225kB.<br> Partition Table: gpt<br> <br> Number Start End Size File system Name Flags<br> 1 0cyl 121600cyl 121600cyl zfs<br> 9 121600cyl 121601cyl 1cyl<br> <br> </font><font face="Courier New, Courier, monospace"><b><br> Question 1)</b><br> <br> Based on the parted value 8225KB per cylinder, I would think that sectors per cylinder could be calculated thus<br> <br> 8225 KB/cyl * 1024 Bytes/KB = 8422400 Bytes/cyl <br> <br> </font><font face="Courier New, Courier, monospace">and 8422400 Bytes/cyl / 512 Bytes/sector = 16450 sectors per cylinder<br> <br> </font><font face="Courier New, Courier, monospace">However, I would also think that sectors per cylinder could be calculated thus:<br> 255 * 63 = 16065 sectors per cylinder<br> <br> Obviously these numbers do not match.<br> <br> Just for the heck of it, in case when parted says 1 KB it means 1,000 bytes not 1,024 bytes, I did this math.<br> <br> 8225 * 1000 = 8225000 / 512 = 16064.4531 sectors per cylinder<br> <br> which is certainly closer to the value you get from 255 * 63 but it really doesn't make any sense to me to be thinking that we are getting a fractional number of sectors in a given cylinder.<br> <br> <br> </font><font face="Courier New, Courier, monospace">Thanks for your insight. </font><br> </body> </html> --------------010503040505010102090305--
Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Chris Johnson <cj@HIDDEN> Subject: bug#22496: Acknowledgement (why does the parted math look wrong - Q1 ?) Message-ID: <handler.22496.B.1454194028882.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org> References: <56AD21AC.1060401@HIDDEN> X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 22496 X-Gnu-PR-Package: parted Reply-To: 22496 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 22:48:02 +0000 Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): bug-parted@HIDDEN If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please send it to 22496 <at> debbugs.gnu.org. Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. --=20 22496: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D22496 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#22496: why does the parted math look wrong - Q1 ? References: <56AD21AC.1060401@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <56AD21AC.1060401@HIDDEN> Resent-From: Narcis Garcia <debianbugs@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-CC: bug-parted@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 18:40:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.22496.B.14542655545095 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22496 X-GNU-PR-Package: parted X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 22496 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-parted@HIDDEN Received: via spool by submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B.14542655545095 (code B ref -1); Sun, 31 Jan 2016 18:40:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jan 2016 18:39:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43431 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1aPwu1-0001K6-G0 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 31 Jan 2016 13:39:14 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34135) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <debianbugs@HIDDEN>) id 1aPvcl-0007oN-P7 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 31 Jan 2016 12:17:20 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <debianbugs@HIDDEN>) id 1aPvcf-000223-RU for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 31 Jan 2016 12:17:14 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:57925) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <debianbugs@HIDDEN>) id 1aPvcf-00021m-NI for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 31 Jan 2016 12:17:13 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53322) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <debianbugs@HIDDEN>) id 1aPvce-0001TY-GF for bug-parted@HIDDEN; Sun, 31 Jan 2016 12:17:13 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <debianbugs@HIDDEN>) id 1aPvca-0001v7-5i for bug-parted@HIDDEN; Sun, 31 Jan 2016 12:17:12 -0500 Received: from ns3003043.ip-151-80-42.eu ([151.80.42.189]:41550) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <debianbugs@HIDDEN>) id 1aPvcZ-0001pU-VC for bug-parted@HIDDEN; Sun, 31 Jan 2016 12:17:08 -0500 From: Narcis Garcia <debianbugs@HIDDEN> Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 18:16:48 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x Message-ID: <E1aPvcZ-0001pU-VC@HIDDEN> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 13:39:12 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) I see inconsistent data when printing table. It shoud be: Number Start End Size File system Name Flags 1 0cyl 121600cyl** 121601cyl* zfs 9 121600cyl** 121601cyl 2cyl* * Starting cylinder should be the first cylinder and count in the amount ** Strange ending at same cylinder that other partition begins. The problem may be partitions aren't created in cylinders (but sectors), and you try to calculate numbers based on a worng unit now. On 30/01/16 21:48, Chris Johnson wrote: > Hi, > > I need some education on how parted is doing math. ;-) > > The drive is 1 TB. > > # parted /dev/rdsk/c7t1d0p0 > GNU Parted 2.3.0 > Using /dev/rdsk/c7t1d0p0 > Welcome to GNU Parted! Type 'help' to view a list of commands. > (parted) unit cyl > unit cyl > (parted) p > p > Model: Generic Ide (ide) > Disk /dev/rdsk/c7t1d0p0: 121601cyl > Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B > BIOS cylinder,head,sector geometry: 121601,255,63. Each cylinder is 8225kB. > Partition Table: gpt > > Number Start End Size File system Name Flags > 1 0cyl 121600cyl 121600cyl zfs > 9 121600cyl 121601cyl 1cyl > > * > Question 1)* > > Based on the parted value 8225KB per cylinder, I would think that > sectors per cylinder could be calculated thus > > 8225 KB/cyl * 1024 Bytes/KB = 8422400 Bytes/cyl > > and 8422400 Bytes/cyl / 512 Bytes/sector = 16450 sectors per cylinder > > However, I would also think that sectors per cylinder could be > calculated thus: > > > 255 * 63 = 16065 sectors per cylinder > > Obviously these numbers do not match. > > Just for the heck of it, in case when parted says 1 KB it means 1,000 > bytes not 1,024 bytes, I did this math. > > 8225 * 1000 = 8225000 / 512 = 16064.4531 sectors per cylinder > > which is certainly closer to the value you get from 255 * 63 but it > really doesn't make any sense to me to be thinking that we are getting a > fractional number of sectors in a given cylinder. > > > Thanks for your insight.
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#22496: why does the parted math look wrong - Q1 ? Resent-From: "Brian C. Lane" <bcl@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-CC: bug-parted@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 17:05:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.22496.B.145434628832157 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22496 X-GNU-PR-Package: parted X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 22496 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Cc: cj@HIDDEN X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-parted@HIDDEN Reply-To: parted-devel@HIDDEN Received: via spool by submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B.145434628832157 (code B ref -1); Mon, 01 Feb 2016 17:05:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2016 17:04:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45392 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1aQHuC-0008Ma-H7 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 12:04:48 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57779) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <bcl@HIDDEN>) id 1aQHuB-0008MD-J1 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 12:04:48 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <bcl@HIDDEN>) id 1aQHtv-0007ai-JI for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 12:04:36 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:56528) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <bcl@HIDDEN>) id 1aQHtv-0007ae-Ga for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 12:04:31 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48745) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <bcl@HIDDEN>) id 1aQHts-0000Xp-A0 for bug-parted@HIDDEN; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 12:04:31 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <bcl@HIDDEN>) id 1aQHtn-0007a5-Jt for bug-parted@HIDDEN; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 12:04:28 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:43898) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <bcl@HIDDEN>) id 1aQHtn-0007Zq-EG for bug-parted@HIDDEN; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 12:04:23 -0500 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6586830C7D2; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 17:04:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lister.brianlane.com ([10.3.113.18]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u11H4K3W026069 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 1 Feb 2016 12:04:21 -0500 Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 09:04:20 -0800 From: "Brian C. Lane" <bcl@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <20160201170420.GA9409@HIDDEN> References: <56AD21AC.1060401@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56AD21AC.1060401@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.27 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 03:48:44PM -0500, Chris Johnson wrote: > Hi, > > I need some education on how parted is doing math. ;-) It would probably be better to have this discussion on the devel list, not the bug tracker: parted-devel@HIDDEN AFAIK nobody uses cylinders for anything these days. I certainly haven't used them for over a decade. Why aren't you using sectors? As far as understanding the math, you're probably going to have to look at the code :) -- Brian C. Lane | Anaconda Team | IRC: bcl #anaconda | Port Orchard, WA (PST8PDT)
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.