GNU bug report logs -
#22881
25.0.50; Add more granularity to `save-silently'
Previous Next
Reported by: Oleh Krehel <oleh <at> oremacs.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 16:06:02 UTC
Severity: wishlist
Tags: wontfix
Found in version 25.0.50
Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 22881 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 22881 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22881
; Package
emacs
.
(Wed, 02 Mar 2016 16:06:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Oleh Krehel <oleh <at> oremacs.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
.
(Wed, 02 Mar 2016 16:06:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
I'd like to configure `save-silently' to customize the message of
`save-buffer'.
Here's the part I don't want to have:
Saving file /usr/local/foo...
Here's the part I want to keep:
Wrote /usr/local/foo
Both messages are emitted in `basic-save-buffer-2', which checks
`save-silently' twice whether to emit each message. But so far, it's an
all-or-nothing deal.
I would suggest modifying `save-silently' to be a verbosity level:
- 0 or nil means nothing gets printed.
- 1 means "Wrote ..." is printed.
- 2 means both messages are printed.
The main reason why I want to skip the "Saving file..." is that both
messages are printed in quick succession, and what's worse, sometimes
the first message takes more than one line because of the long file
name. And then I get a 0.1s window re-size by one line flicker.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22881
; Package
emacs
.
(Mon, 29 Jul 2019 13:26:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 22881 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Oleh Krehel <oleh <at> oremacs.com> writes:
> I'd like to configure `save-silently' to customize the message of
> `save-buffer'.
>
> Here's the part I don't want to have:
>
> Saving file /usr/local/foo...
>
> Here's the part I want to keep:
>
> Wrote /usr/local/foo
(I'm going through old Emacs bug reports that haven't received any
response.)
Which reminds me -- that's a pretty odd set of messages. Most places in
Emacs, we use
Doing whatever...
Doing whatever...done
Shouldn't we do that here, too?
Saving file /usr/local/foo...
Saving file /usr/local/foo...done
?
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22881
; Package
emacs
.
(Mon, 29 Jul 2019 14:44:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 22881 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
> Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 15:25:19 +0200
> Cc: 22881 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bruce.connor.am <at> gmail.com
>
> > Here's the part I don't want to have:
> >
> > Saving file /usr/local/foo...
> >
> > Here's the part I want to keep:
> >
> > Wrote /usr/local/foo
>
> (I'm going through old Emacs bug reports that haven't received any
> response.)
>
> Which reminds me -- that's a pretty odd set of messages. Most places in
> Emacs, we use
>
> Doing whatever...
> Doing whatever...done
>
> Shouldn't we do that here, too?
These two lines come from very different places in the code.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#22881
; Package
emacs
.
(Thu, 08 Jul 2021 01:07:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 22881 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Oleh Krehel <oleh <at> oremacs.com> writes:
> I'd like to configure `save-silently' to customize the message of
> `save-buffer'.
>
> Here's the part I don't want to have:
>
> Saving file /usr/local/foo...
>
> Here's the part I want to keep:
>
> Wrote /usr/local/foo
In more recent Emacs versions, this can be controlled by
`set-message-function' -- you can match on the message you want to
suppress, which is a more general functionality than the `save-silently'
functionality. So I'm closing this bug report.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
Added tag(s) wontfix.
Request was from
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Thu, 08 Jul 2021 01:07:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
bug closed, send any further explanations to
22881 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and Oleh Krehel <oleh <at> oremacs.com>
Request was from
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Thu, 08 Jul 2021 01:07:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Thu, 05 Aug 2021 11:24:05 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 237 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.