GNU logs - #23301, boring messages


Message sent to bug-parted@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#23301: I found a bug in GNU Parted 3.2
Resent-From: Luca Coianiz <luca@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-parted@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 17:31:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.23301.B.14608278263091 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: report 23301
X-GNU-PR-Package: parted
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: 23301 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-parted <bug-parted@HIDDEN>
Reply-To: Luca Coianiz <luca@HIDDEN>
Received: via spool by submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B.14608278263091
          (code B ref -1); Sat, 16 Apr 2016 17:31:01 +0000
Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Apr 2016 17:30:26 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37600 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1arU38-0000nn-Ad
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 13:30:26 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49552)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <luca@HIDDEN>) id 1arPW6-0002NQ-Fd
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 08:40:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <luca@HIDDEN>) id 1arPW0-00007m-0x
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 08:39:57 -0400
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,XPRIO
 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:38369)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <luca@HIDDEN>) id 1arPVz-00007c-Uc
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 08:39:55 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40514)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <luca@HIDDEN>) id 1arPVy-0003RE-DK
 for bug-parted@HIDDEN; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 08:39:55 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <luca@HIDDEN>) id 1arPVv-00006p-1L
 for bug-parted@HIDDEN; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 08:39:54 -0400
Received: from hostingsmtp89.register.it ([81.88.62.178]:41590
 helo=hostingsmtp.register.it) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <luca@HIDDEN>) id 1arPVu-00006b-Mg
 for bug-parted@HIDDEN; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 08:39:50 -0400
Received: from popper02.register.it ([81.88.56.99]) by paganini36 with 
 id j0fm1s00A28SfA9010fmbr; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 14:39:47 +0200
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 14:39:46 +0200 (CEST)
From: Luca Coianiz <luca@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <1925355535.697161.1460810386216.JavaMail.open-xchange@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Medium
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.6.2-Rev49
X-Originating-IP: 213.203.165.77
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not
 recognized.
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x
X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11
X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 13:30:25 -0400
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----)

 Premise: I thought my 2 disks, 1 TB each, which I assembled into a software
RAID1 /dev/md0, was not correctly added to the RAID, in details: /dev/sdb5
wasn't added as linux-swap unlike /dev/sda5, so I was trying to use parted to
make sdb5 recognized as swap, to later add it to the RAID1.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[...]
(parted) select /dev/sda                                                  
Using /dev/sda
(parted) print 5                                                          
(parted) print devices                                                    
/dev/sda (1000GB)
/dev/sdb (1000GB)
/dev/md0 (998GB)
/dev/sdb5 (2123MB)
(parted) print                                                            
Model: ATA Hitachi HDT72101 (scsi)
Disk /dev/sda: 1000GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: msdos
Disk Flags: 

Number  Start   End     Size    Type      File system     Flags
 1      1049kB  998GB   998GB   primary                   boot, raid
 2      998GB   1000GB  2123MB  extended
 5      998GB   1000GB  2123MB  logical   linux-swap(v1)

(parted) help mkpart
  mkpart PART-TYPE [FS-TYPE] START END     make a partition

	PART-TYPE is one of: primary, logical, extended
        FS-TYPE is one of: zfs, btrfs, nilfs2, ext4, ext3, ext2, fat32, fat16,
hfsx, hfs+, hfs, jfs, swsusp, linux-swap(v1), linux-swap(v0), ntfs, reiserfs,
freebsd-ufs, hp-ufs, sun-ufs, xfs, apfs2, apfs1, asfs, amufs5, amufs4, amufs3,
amufs2, amufs1, amufs0, amufs,
        affs7, affs6, affs5, affs4, affs3, affs2, affs1, affs0, linux-swap,
linux-swap(new), linux-swap(old)
        START and END are disk locations, such as 4GB or 10%.  Negative values
count from the end of the disk.  For example, -1s specifies exactly the last
sector.
        
        'mkpart' makes a partition without creating a new file system on the
partition.  FS-TYPE may be specified to set an appropriate partition ID.
(parted) print                                                      
Backtrace has 11 calls on stack:
  11: /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(ped_assert+0x51) [0xb76aadc1]
  10: /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(+0x1de36) [0xb76bfe36]
  9: /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(+0x1df46) [0xb76bff46]
  8: /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(+0x1fc38) [0xb76c1c38]
  7: /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(+0xe424) [0xb76b0424]
  6: /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(ped_disk_set_flag+0x6e) [0xb76b0b5e]
  5: parted() [0x804e755]
  4: parted(interactive_mode+0x101) [0x80536c1]
  3: parted(main+0x10f4) [0x804cb14]
  2: /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf3)
[0xb74a4a63]
  1: parted() [0x804cb67]


You found a bug in GNU Parted! Here's what you have to do:

Don't panic! The bug has most likely not affected any of your data.
Help us to fix this bug by doing the following:

Check whether the bug has already been fixed by checking
the last version of GNU Parted that you can find at:

	http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/parted/

Please check this version prior to bug reporting.

If this has not been fixed yet or if you don't know how to check,
please visit the GNU Parted website:

	http://www.gnu.org/software/parted

for further information.

Your report should contain the version of this release (3.2)
along with the error message below, the output of

	parted DEVICE unit co print unit s print

and the following history of commands you entered.
Also include any additional information about your setup you
consider important.

Assertion (part->disk->dev->sector_size % PED_SECTOR_SIZE_DEFAULT == 0) at
../../../libparted/labels/dos.c:589 in function probe_filesystem_for_geom()
failed.

Aborted                                                                   
root@home:~# parted /dev/sdb5 unit co print unit s print
Error: /dev/sdb5: unrecognised disk label
Model: Unknown (unknown)                                                  
Disk /dev/sdb5: 2123MB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: unknown
Disk Flags: 
Error: /dev/sdb5: unrecognised disk label
Model: Unknown (unknown)                                                  
Disk /dev/sdb5: 4147200s
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: unknown
Disk Flags: 
root@home:~# uname -a
Linux home 3.16.0-4-686-pae #1 SMP Debian 3.16.7-ckt25-1 (2016-03-06) i686
GNU/Linux
root@home:~# 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I sent this mail to the bug-parted ML, as requested, but I've not subscribed the
ML itself, so I'm available for further investigations on direct mail basis.

Luca Coianiz




Message sent:


Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Luca Coianiz <luca@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#23301: Acknowledgement (I found a bug in GNU Parted 3.2)
Message-ID: <handler.23301.B.14608278263091.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <1925355535.697161.1460810386216.JavaMail.open-xchange@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 23301
X-Gnu-PR-Package: parted
Reply-To: 23301 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 17:31:02 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-parted@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 23301 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
23301: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D23301
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems



Last modified: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 12:00:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.