GNU logs - #23828, boring messages


Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#23828: unsupported sexp item type #f ```
Resent-From: David Craven <david@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 17:09:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.23828.B.146661532430683 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: report 23828
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: 23828 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Received: via spool by submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B.146661532430683
          (code B ref -1); Wed, 22 Jun 2016 17:09:02 +0000
Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jun 2016 17:08:44 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51385 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1bFldr-0007yo-LO
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 13:08:44 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43090)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <david@HIDDEN>) id 1bFlHD-0007Pj-Gm
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 12:45:19 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <david@HIDDEN>) id 1bFlH5-0007YR-DL
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 12:45:14 -0400
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,T_DKIM_INVALID
 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:47186)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <david@HIDDEN>) id 1bFlH4-0007XV-7O
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 12:45:11 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34043)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <david@HIDDEN>) id 1bFlGx-0007gO-0M
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 12:45:08 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <david@HIDDEN>) id 1bFlGu-0007Td-8u
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 12:45:02 -0400
Received: from mail-yw0-x234.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4002:c05::234]:35573)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <david@HIDDEN>) id 1bFlGt-0007TW-26
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 12:45:00 -0400
Received: by mail-yw0-x234.google.com with SMTP id l125so47257884ywb.2
 for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 09:44:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=craven.ch; s=google;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=ndh6la6DVyg8NsZCpSJVclo+y/waNZNtkLdwTwKT85k=;
 b=AmruzggHGmjHAhbpJj4fHW2So3O4RViWGLaODUilEz6fEGox5naMgGixfhsolyk3DE
 V/SbnsaFFzdUURQNWNKrom/A8dVxMFfy8FNkI+XTNNLEpks3VpEs3ytj9rny7Sm0kGT5
 tgmKpAVDdmupCzL/OBMtWUkkgEBWyoXogX9A8=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=ndh6la6DVyg8NsZCpSJVclo+y/waNZNtkLdwTwKT85k=;
 b=VENNnCHfCeWAnJH9iZfRpCIaJdkWnxJcZL27z41pQw+B8lyekp/N8cnXjHJ6Mm/5SL
 sADXFo4vcFC+4QqBLEagXlzCfh8hEDLg2lVHIKJXR9fYE12r+CcCGt4wjEodw7IFFxZl
 6UFQxthOV+atqQGD/PQv435jgH7iyBUHnoIq3djK5uO93digF3FxzMLqaE2qanPEH/kv
 VAvJ2kMISEP5uLvIeXNOpahpbIknVtGTYLrDzOmgi+GrJ0fn6m6ENIIny3yUGkPbc3kN
 faXjAgQAQVhQxCjdg1rxJBQDbLw2bAM4gno/E6F+koixikaQOvdTrWMhzOH467tEy0KW
 hH5w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJBECIz+6Hi9yjyvFZBUNe4bzi001tnyLbkOXp/cJbo8j1GUlaiRq8pfg2hKaY/9+exS6OpMaVubqQv4g==
X-Received: by 10.13.223.133 with SMTP id i127mr13425637ywe.144.1466613896332; 
 Wed, 22 Jun 2016 09:44:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.106.137 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 09:44:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [151.248.148.210]
From: David Craven <david@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 18:44:55 +0200
Message-ID: <CAL1_imns2U96NP-CWhU3uxN7+MDmnL9MEBPHNym=cGnqZ_2PaA@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x
X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11
X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 13:08:41 -0400
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----)

Maybe not a bug, but I'm getting the same backtrace when trying to run
./guix archive or ./guix package -i guix or ./guix pull.

Trying to install guix 0.10.0 binary tarball on nixos.

```nix
users.users = {
    guixbuild1 = {
      isSystemUser = true;
      group = "guixbuild";
    };
  };

  users.groups.guixbuild = {};
```

```sh
bin  sudo ./guix archive --authorize < ../share/guix/hydra.gnu.org.pub

/gnu/store/3g6zn8y5sfwywr4pqiwqrab735a0x4zl-guix-0.10.0/bin
warning: failed to install locale: Invalid argument
Backtrace:
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
 157: 17 [catch #t #<catch-closure 18097a0> ...]
In unknown file:
   ?: 16 [apply-smob/1 #<catch-closure 18097a0>]
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
  63: 15 [call-with-prompt prompt0 ...]
In ice-9/eval.scm:
 432: 14 [eval # #]
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
2401: 13 [save-module-excursion #<procedure 1826940 at
ice-9/boot-9.scm:4045:3 ()>]
4050: 12 [#<procedure 1826940 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:4045:3 ()>]
1724: 11 [%start-stack load-stack ...]
1729: 10 [#<procedure 183eea0 ()>]
In unknown file:
   ?: 9 [primitive-load
"/gnu/store/3g6zn8y5sfwywr4pqiwqrab735a0x4zl-guix-0.10.0/bin/.guix-real"]
In guix/ui.scm:
1188: 8 [run-guix-command archive "--authorize"]
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
 157: 7 [catch srfi-34 #<procedure 276d1c0 at guix/ui.scm:419:2 ()> ...]
 157: 6 [catch system-error ...]
In guix/scripts/archive.scm:
 328: 5 [#<procedure 276c7b0 at guix/scripts/archive.scm:318:2 ()>]
 303: 4 [authorize-key]
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
 702: 3 [map #<procedure sexp->canonical-sexp (sexp)> (#f)]
In guix/pk-crypto.scm:
 375: 2 [sexp->canonical-sexp #f]
In unknown file:
   ?: 1 [call-with-output-string #<procedure 27704a0 at
guix/pk-crypto.scm:376:5 (port)>]
   ?: 0 [scm-error misc-error #f "~A ~S" ("unsupported sexp item type" #f) #f]

ERROR: In procedure scm-error:
ERROR: unsupported sexp item type #f
```




Message sent:


Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: David Craven <david@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#23828: Acknowledgement (unsupported sexp item type #f ```)
Message-ID: <handler.23828.B.146661532430683.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <CAL1_imns2U96NP-CWhU3uxN7+MDmnL9MEBPHNym=cGnqZ_2PaA@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 23828
X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix
Reply-To: 23828 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 17:09:02 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-guix@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 23828 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
23828: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D23828
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems


Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#23828: unsupported sexp item type #f ```
Resent-From: ludo@HIDDEN (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 21:29:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.23828.B23828.146663090329223 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23828
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: David Craven <david@HIDDEN>
Cc: 23828 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 23828-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B23828.146663090329223
          (code B ref 23828); Wed, 22 Jun 2016 21:29:02 +0000
Received: (at 23828) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jun 2016 21:28:23 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51570 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1bFph9-0007bH-Jq
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 17:28:23 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58834)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1bFph7-0007b4-V5
 for 23828 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 17:28:22 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1bFpgz-0003Kn-4K
 for 23828 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 17:28:16 -0400
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:47692)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1bFpgz-0003Jf-0b; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 17:28:13 -0400
Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:49656 helo=pluto)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1bFpgw-000741-My; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 17:28:11 -0400
From: ludo@HIDDEN (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
References: <CAL1_imns2U96NP-CWhU3uxN7+MDmnL9MEBPHNym=cGnqZ_2PaA@HIDDEN>
X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/
X-Revolutionary-Date: 5 Messidor an 224 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?=
X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5
X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4  0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5
X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 23:28:08 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAL1_imns2U96NP-CWhU3uxN7+MDmnL9MEBPHNym=cGnqZ_2PaA@HIDDEN>
 (David Craven's message of "Wed, 22 Jun 2016 18:44:55 +0200")
Message-ID: <87mvmclxqv.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e
X-Spam-Score: -6.5 (------)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -6.5 (------)

Hi,

David Craven <david@HIDDEN> skribis:

> Maybe not a bug, but I'm getting the same backtrace when trying to run
> ./guix archive or ./guix package -i guix or ./guix pull.

Do you really type =E2=80=9C./guix=E2=80=9D?  From which directory?

> bin  sudo ./guix archive --authorize < ../share/guix/hydra.gnu.org.pub
>
> /gnu/store/3g6zn8y5sfwywr4pqiwqrab735a0x4zl-guix-0.10.0/bin
> warning: failed to install locale: Invalid argument
> Backtrace:
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>  157: 17 [catch #t #<catch-closure 18097a0> ...]
> In unknown file:
>    ?: 16 [apply-smob/1 #<catch-closure 18097a0>]
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>   63: 15 [call-with-prompt prompt0 ...]
> In ice-9/eval.scm:
>  432: 14 [eval # #]
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 2401: 13 [save-module-excursion #<procedure 1826940 at
> ice-9/boot-9.scm:4045:3 ()>]
> 4050: 12 [#<procedure 1826940 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:4045:3 ()>]
> 1724: 11 [%start-stack load-stack ...]
> 1729: 10 [#<procedure 183eea0 ()>]
> In unknown file:
>    ?: 9 [primitive-load
> "/gnu/store/3g6zn8y5sfwywr4pqiwqrab735a0x4zl-guix-0.10.0/bin/.guix-real"]
> In guix/ui.scm:
> 1188: 8 [run-guix-command archive "--authorize"]
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>  157: 7 [catch srfi-34 #<procedure 276d1c0 at guix/ui.scm:419:2 ()> ...]
>  157: 6 [catch system-error ...]
> In guix/scripts/archive.scm:
>  328: 5 [#<procedure 276c7b0 at guix/scripts/archive.scm:318:2 ()>]
>  303: 4 [authorize-key]
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>  702: 3 [map #<procedure sexp->canonical-sexp (sexp)> (#f)]
> In guix/pk-crypto.scm:
>  375: 2 [sexp->canonical-sexp #f]
> In unknown file:
>    ?: 1 [call-with-output-string #<procedure 27704a0 at
> guix/pk-crypto.scm:376:5 (port)>]
>    ?: 0 [scm-error misc-error #f "~A ~S" ("unsupported sexp item type" #f=
) #f]
>
> ERROR: In procedure scm-error:
> ERROR: unsupported sexp item type #f

Could it be that /etc/guix/acl contains bogus data?

Could you try, as root:

  rm -f /etc/guix/acl
  guix archive --authorize < /path/to/hydra.gnu.org.pub

?

Thanks for the report,
Ludo=E2=80=99.




Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#23828: unsupported sexp item type #f ```
Resent-From: David Craven <david@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 03:39:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.23828.B23828.14666530863662 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23828
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
Cc: 23828 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 23828-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B23828.14666530863662
          (code B ref 23828); Thu, 23 Jun 2016 03:39:01 +0000
Received: (at 23828) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jun 2016 03:38:06 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51683 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1bFvSw-0000wz-Hg
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 23:38:06 -0400
Received: from mail-yw0-f177.google.com ([209.85.161.177]:36328)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <david@HIDDEN>) id 1bFvSv-0000wU-Pl
 for 23828 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 23:38:06 -0400
Received: by mail-yw0-f177.google.com with SMTP id b72so61003829ywa.3
 for <23828 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 20:38:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=craven.ch; s=google;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=p3WXlQk5B0WvnmT4i/D96LRcLECYl9u7Ck8oZlYZj9c=;
 b=YV00gtuKv9AG+bKMpNwVbl+S2C/0JsHlBe53KK3g9Q9N/Gf5B7bvdHvoZWQ4geVup3
 +SYvXDSXCrz5FwAAhFGn7sCm8OiSMRkV3Vua1rsrwR1+5ou2UqtB7gy7eaGx/UvWNDe5
 RiK1uLihmBfzOtEtxC5TT6z7migcCycnke3k4=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=p3WXlQk5B0WvnmT4i/D96LRcLECYl9u7Ck8oZlYZj9c=;
 b=OUbJMD9SRiXygmoHs4tV6LEeh6F3zemGG3Vb60z007BmAQESutOzmOcEWyBMu/UYlZ
 QOKZ/3P7f2WPe25OAjKSbI1vaZjf/1RL+fFAj52lRD7Stj1etWlCejhzOb/+mxx1L4PA
 1iMP8yJFXskW+upjjmsMw4wZXxyDGknvbR3RCZavHMPWnJCah9f036x2EaixQQzMlC/i
 3sd6GOUvpVu987jh21KqRxJv6W0+kywis13yGMSZ36pio548aMq1bOvq3c8P4BfH8F2D
 1DQWGaIEEMhyDfz6RX7Ckv2a6Iks/ioo8OKtqWUmNFnyFyVjVO1e1gOpB3VN0W1UuZrA
 syFQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKtEvNhzhjxge6mGgdyXV5izz8q9FTcToW6C1YNeDKBZbpl7zrJplJguAYX7lySt93SK1l0bpnX8EC85g==
X-Received: by 10.37.205.196 with SMTP id d187mr3917641ybf.90.1466653079895;
 Wed, 22 Jun 2016 20:37:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.106.137 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 20:37:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [151.248.148.210]
In-Reply-To: <87mvmclxqv.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <CAL1_imns2U96NP-CWhU3uxN7+MDmnL9MEBPHNym=cGnqZ_2PaA@HIDDEN>
 <87mvmclxqv.fsf@HIDDEN>
From: David Craven <david@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 05:37:59 +0200
Message-ID: <CAL1_immTgxUvhD1LUC6p0AJoyRZ+GcPNeqchbJrtAb7N_8TChg@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)

I'm running guix from
`/gnu/store/3g6zn8y5sfwywr4pqiwqrab735a0x4zl-guix-0.10.0/bin` since I
don't have my profile/PATH setup correctly yet. I was under the
impression that `./guix package -i guix` would create the right
symlinks in `/var/guix/profiles/per-user`.

Weird, `/etc/guix/acl` doesn't contain anything but `/etc/nix/acl` does:
```
sudo cat /etc/nix/acl
(acl
 (entry
  ()
  (tag
   (guix import)
   )
  )
 )
```

After `sudo rm -f /etc/nix/acl` guix or guix-daemon recreates the same
file and exits with the same stack trace.

Thank you
David

On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:28 PM, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@HIDDEN> wrote=
:
> Hi,
>
> David Craven <david@HIDDEN> skribis:
>
>> Maybe not a bug, but I'm getting the same backtrace when trying to run
>> ./guix archive or ./guix package -i guix or ./guix pull.
>
> Do you really type =E2=80=9C./guix=E2=80=9D?  From which directory?
>
>> bin  sudo ./guix archive --authorize < ../share/guix/hydra.gnu.org.pub
>>
>> /gnu/store/3g6zn8y5sfwywr4pqiwqrab735a0x4zl-guix-0.10.0/bin
>> warning: failed to install locale: Invalid argument
>> Backtrace:
>> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>>  157: 17 [catch #t #<catch-closure 18097a0> ...]
>> In unknown file:
>>    ?: 16 [apply-smob/1 #<catch-closure 18097a0>]
>> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>>   63: 15 [call-with-prompt prompt0 ...]
>> In ice-9/eval.scm:
>>  432: 14 [eval # #]
>> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>> 2401: 13 [save-module-excursion #<procedure 1826940 at
>> ice-9/boot-9.scm:4045:3 ()>]
>> 4050: 12 [#<procedure 1826940 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:4045:3 ()>]
>> 1724: 11 [%start-stack load-stack ...]
>> 1729: 10 [#<procedure 183eea0 ()>]
>> In unknown file:
>>    ?: 9 [primitive-load
>> "/gnu/store/3g6zn8y5sfwywr4pqiwqrab735a0x4zl-guix-0.10.0/bin/.guix-real"=
]
>> In guix/ui.scm:
>> 1188: 8 [run-guix-command archive "--authorize"]
>> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>>  157: 7 [catch srfi-34 #<procedure 276d1c0 at guix/ui.scm:419:2 ()> ...]
>>  157: 6 [catch system-error ...]
>> In guix/scripts/archive.scm:
>>  328: 5 [#<procedure 276c7b0 at guix/scripts/archive.scm:318:2 ()>]
>>  303: 4 [authorize-key]
>> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>>  702: 3 [map #<procedure sexp->canonical-sexp (sexp)> (#f)]
>> In guix/pk-crypto.scm:
>>  375: 2 [sexp->canonical-sexp #f]
>> In unknown file:
>>    ?: 1 [call-with-output-string #<procedure 27704a0 at
>> guix/pk-crypto.scm:376:5 (port)>]
>>    ?: 0 [scm-error misc-error #f "~A ~S" ("unsupported sexp item type" #=
f) #f]
>>
>> ERROR: In procedure scm-error:
>> ERROR: unsupported sexp item type #f
>
> Could it be that /etc/guix/acl contains bogus data?
>
> Could you try, as root:
>
>   rm -f /etc/guix/acl
>   guix archive --authorize < /path/to/hydra.gnu.org.pub
>
> ?
>
> Thanks for the report,
> Ludo=E2=80=99.




Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#23828: unsupported sexp item type #f ```
Resent-From: ludo@HIDDEN (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 08:07:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.23828.B23828.146666919328584 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23828
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: David Craven <david@HIDDEN>
Cc: 23828 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 23828-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B23828.146666919328584
          (code B ref 23828); Thu, 23 Jun 2016 08:07:01 +0000
Received: (at 23828) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jun 2016 08:06:33 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51740 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1bFzei-0007Qy-RG
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 04:06:33 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51404)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1bFzeh-0007Qm-Jl
 for 23828 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 04:06:31 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1bFzeZ-0002eA-AV
 for 23828 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 04:06:26 -0400
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:57885)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1bFzeZ-0002e6-6m; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 04:06:23 -0400
Received: from pluto.bordeaux.inria.fr ([193.50.110.57]:49316 helo=pluto)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1bFzeY-0000TQ-0A; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 04:06:22 -0400
From: ludo@HIDDEN (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
References: <CAL1_imns2U96NP-CWhU3uxN7+MDmnL9MEBPHNym=cGnqZ_2PaA@HIDDEN>
 <87mvmclxqv.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <CAL1_immTgxUvhD1LUC6p0AJoyRZ+GcPNeqchbJrtAb7N_8TChg@HIDDEN>
X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/
X-Revolutionary-Date: 6 Messidor an 224 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?=
X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5
X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4  0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5
X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 10:06:18 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAL1_immTgxUvhD1LUC6p0AJoyRZ+GcPNeqchbJrtAb7N_8TChg@HIDDEN>
 (David Craven's message of "Thu, 23 Jun 2016 05:37:59 +0200")
Message-ID: <87d1n8s51h.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e
X-Spam-Score: -6.5 (------)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -6.5 (------)

David Craven <david@HIDDEN> skribis:

> I'm running guix from
> `/gnu/store/3g6zn8y5sfwywr4pqiwqrab735a0x4zl-guix-0.10.0/bin` since I
> don't have my profile/PATH setup correctly yet. I was under the
> impression that `./guix package -i guix` would create the right
> symlinks in `/var/guix/profiles/per-user`.

OK.

> Weird, `/etc/guix/acl` doesn't contain anything but `/etc/nix/acl` does:
> ```
> sudo cat /etc/nix/acl
> (acl
>  (entry
>   ()
>   (tag
>    (guix import)
>    )
>   )
>  )
> ```

This is clearly bogus (the =E2=80=9C()=E2=80=9D above).  Guix only creates =
and uses
/etc/guix/acl, not /etc/nix/acl.

Could it be that /etc/guix is a symlink to /etc/nix, or something like
that?

> After `sudo rm -f /etc/nix/acl` guix or guix-daemon recreates the same
> file and exits with the same stack trace.

By default, Guix ensures that at least your own key, if it exists, is
part of the ACL; this happens in =E2=80=98ensure-acl=E2=80=99, in guix/pki.=
scm.

I suspect that in your case /etc/guix/signing-key.pub is not a valid
key, which is why =E2=80=98ensure-acl=E2=80=99 ends up adding =E2=80=9C()=
=E2=80=9D.  Could you post the
contents of /etc/guix/signing-key.pub?  (It=E2=80=99s a public key, so doin=
g it
is OK.)

Possibly this has to do with /etc/guix pointing to /etc/nix, and
/etc/nix/signing-key.pub being a public key in the format that Nix uses,
which is a completely different format.

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.




Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#23828: unsupported sexp item type #f ```
Resent-From: ludo@HIDDEN (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 12:55:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.23828.B23828.146668649629147 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23828
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: David Craven <david@HIDDEN>
Cc: 23828 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, request <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 23828-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B23828.146668649629147
          (code B ref 23828); Thu, 23 Jun 2016 12:55:02 +0000
Received: (at 23828) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jun 2016 12:54:56 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51909 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1bG49o-0007a3-4M
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 08:54:56 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41211)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1bG49m-0007Zm-Ru
 for 23828 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 08:54:55 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1bG49e-0008Ro-Pj
 for 23828 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 08:54:49 -0400
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:34881)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1bG49S-0008Pu-Le; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 08:54:34 -0400
Received: from pluto.bordeaux.inria.fr ([193.50.110.57]:52114 helo=pluto)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1bG49R-0003bb-S4; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 08:54:34 -0400
From: ludo@HIDDEN (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
References: <CAL1_imns2U96NP-CWhU3uxN7+MDmnL9MEBPHNym=cGnqZ_2PaA@HIDDEN>
 <87mvmclxqv.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <CAL1_immTgxUvhD1LUC6p0AJoyRZ+GcPNeqchbJrtAb7N_8TChg@HIDDEN>
 <87d1n8s51h.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <CAL1_imkqvVf_usHcp54PmNfLPb5aPQB5sFe+gPkyw2KBz+dGUQ@HIDDEN>
X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/
X-Revolutionary-Date: 6 Messidor an 224 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?=
X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5
X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4  0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5
X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 14:54:31 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAL1_imkqvVf_usHcp54PmNfLPb5aPQB5sFe+gPkyw2KBz+dGUQ@HIDDEN>
 (David Craven's message of "Thu, 23 Jun 2016 10:26:09 +0200")
Message-ID: <87wplgoyk8.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e
X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------)

merge 23828 22459
thanks

David Craven <david@HIDDEN> skribis:

> The usage of NIX environment variables is a problem when trying to
> coexist with nix on nixos.
> ```
> (define %config-directory
>   ;; This must match `NIX_CONF_DIR' as defined in `nix/local.mk'.
>   (or (getenv "NIX_CONF_DIR") "@guix_sysconfdir@/guix"))
> ```

Oh, good point.  I assume this was the root of the problems, right?

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.




Message received at control <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jun 2016 23:18:00 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jun 24 19:18:00 2016
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54744 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1bGaMK-0002Xy-EP
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 19:18:00 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42320)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1bGaMI-0002Xg-F7
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 19:17:58 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1bGaMA-0002DZ-8o
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 19:17:53 -0400
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:41055)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1bGaMA-0002DG-5y
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 19:17:50 -0400
Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:41184 helo=pluto)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1bGaM8-0005qQ-EU
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 19:17:48 -0400
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2016 01:17:46 +0200
Message-Id: <87y45urxb9.fsf@HIDDEN>
To: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: ludo@HIDDEN (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: control message for bug #23828
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e
X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------)

merge 23828 22459




Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#23828: unsupported sexp item type #f ```
Resent-From: ludo@HIDDEN (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2016 22:16:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.23828.B23828.146697933426518 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23828
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: David Craven <david@HIDDEN>
Cc: 22459 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 23828 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 23828-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B23828.146697933426518
          (code B ref 23828); Sun, 26 Jun 2016 22:16:02 +0000
Received: (at 23828) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jun 2016 22:15:34 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57104 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1bHIL0-0006te-8i
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 18:15:34 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58461)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1bHIKz-0006tS-9m
 for 23828 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 18:15:33 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1bHIKq-0004Qb-2H
 for 23828 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 18:15:27 -0400
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:49502)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1bHIKp-0004QQ-VX; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 18:15:23 -0400
Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:42900 helo=pluto)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1bHIKo-0007nM-VS; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 18:15:23 -0400
From: ludo@HIDDEN (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
References: <CAL1_imns2U96NP-CWhU3uxN7+MDmnL9MEBPHNym=cGnqZ_2PaA@HIDDEN>
 <87mvmclxqv.fsf@HIDDEN>
 <CAL1_immTgxUvhD1LUC6p0AJoyRZ+GcPNeqchbJrtAb7N_8TChg@HIDDEN>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 00:15:20 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAL1_immTgxUvhD1LUC6p0AJoyRZ+GcPNeqchbJrtAb7N_8TChg@HIDDEN>
 (David Craven's message of "Thu, 23 Jun 2016 05:37:59 +0200")
Message-ID: <87vb0violj.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e
X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------)

This issue is partly addressed with your patch pushed as
9dd674db017dbdc451cfd35da2dc3ce08db0726a, which renames =E2=80=98NIX_CONF_D=
IR=E2=80=99
to =E2=80=98GUIX_CONFIGURATION_DIRECTORY=E2=80=99.

Ludo=E2=80=99.





Last modified: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 12:00:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.