GNU logs - #24099, boring messages

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#24099: A policy on how to choose the installed documentation formats.
Resent-From: ng0 <ng0@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 15:32:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.24099.B.146971987415278 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 24099 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: ng0 <ng0@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 10:21:48 +0000
Message-ID: <87zip23vwj.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

I don't think we have what this thread talks about covered in the
manual.

If we do have though, consider this bug obsolete.

https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-01/msg00603.html

> > Info > HTML > man > txt > PDF > PS ?

> Roughly, yes.

Not the same message, but in the thread:

>     What about installing only HTML?
>
>     I find that HTML (and Info, and man) is more convenient to read on-line
>     than PDFs.  We rarely include PDF documentation in packages.
>
>     Of course, avoiding PDF/PS/DVI allows us to remove the dependency
>     on TeX Live.  Last, from discussions I heard at the Reproducible
>     Build Summit, I think DVIs and maybe PS/PDFs are not
>     bit-reproducible out-of-the-box.
>
>     WDYT?
>
>     Maybe we should have a policy on how to choose the installed
>     documentation formats.
>
>     Ludo’.

-- 
♥Ⓐ  ng0
Current Keys: https://we.make.ritual.n0.is/ng0.txt
For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org

Message sent:

Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: ng0 <ng0@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#24099: Acknowledgement (A policy on how to choose the
 installed documentation formats.)
Message-ID: <handler.24099.B.146971987415278.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <87zip23vwj.fsf@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 24099
X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix
Reply-To: 24099 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 15:32:02 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-guix@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 24099 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
24099: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D24099
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems

Message received at control <at> debbugs.gnu.org:

Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jan 2017 22:14:46 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jan 11 17:14:46 2017
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50295 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1cRRAM-0005Y0-AU
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 17:14:46 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34519)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1cRRAL-0005Xn-0Y
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 17:14:45 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1cRRAB-0005Zk-Ut
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 17:14:39 -0500
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:57297)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1cRRAB-0005Zg-Rq
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 17:14:35 -0500
Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:39060 helo=ribbon)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1cRRAB-0001BG-9D
 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 17:14:35 -0500
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 23:14:33 +0100
Message-Id: <87shoputva.fsf@HIDDEN>
To: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
From: ludo@HIDDEN (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: control message for bug #24099
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e
X-Spam-Score: -8.2 (--------)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -8.2 (--------)

severity 24099 minor

Last modified: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 12:00:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.