GNU bug report logs - #24216
[NOT A BUG] parted scripting guru? SO question needs answer

Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.

Package: parted; Reported by: bug-parted@HIDDEN, Tom Roche <Tom_Roche@HIDDEN>; dated Fri, 12 Aug 2016 23:43:01 UTC; Maintainer for parted is bug-parted@HIDDEN.

Message received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Aug 2016 23:42:44 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Aug 12 19:42:44 2016
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55591 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1bYM63-0003Ez-UM
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 19:42:44 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54817)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Tom_Roche@HIDDEN>) id 1bYM61-0003En-IK
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 19:42:38 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Tom_Roche@HIDDEN>) id 1bYM5v-00018a-CM
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 19:42:32 -0400
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,T_DKIM_INVALID
 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:34179)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Tom_Roche@HIDDEN>) id 1bYM5v-00018U-98
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 19:42:31 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45779)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Tom_Roche@HIDDEN>) id 1bYM5s-0001JC-VU
 for bug-parted@HIDDEN; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 19:42:29 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Tom_Roche@HIDDEN>) id 1bYM5o-00015c-O1
 for bug-parted@HIDDEN; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 19:42:27 -0400
Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:59719
 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Tom_Roche@HIDDEN>) id 1bYM5o-00014M-Hp
 for bug-parted@HIDDEN; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 19:42:24 -0400
Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1])
 by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C458334740;
 Fri, 12 Aug 2016 19:42:22 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to
 :subject:reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=
 sasl; bh=9zCaPxCf3WwMstM07aimo1FRZLY=; b=PZF9glKm+ixkEHN4bVXcXia
 qAFSwHfQdk5AMbs+bo0NyOoEFoMl8jKFV8Vjyu5yAAvbu3vi1rKxOy8CeLcAhAxy
 OIRXUdru1QC/AuS/rTidhntYL7DVJd8QiHF6X9arA+xUx6Uo8W0DN/ju084wg6zJ
 MozwqDFpULhCfolJ2h2Y=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:subject
 :reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=
 sasl; b=ab8a5cBevwm0PfVvtEnSHYiAIs+SSdUUfmyWt4bH2Ca7ZdRboa2BbhaO
 WzgECbbnQakMtKfeDt79JykLEQm/zWj6zo7PP9oDyeXOWHO8AndUUNq7edpIv7ns
 ELvBnsiHbNijkoiUtnP1sAyB+fWrcw/Snsns4fRB4UGv+bQChKc=
Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1])
 by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCD0B3473F;
 Fri, 12 Aug 2016 19:42:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tlrW510.pobox.com (unknown [173.20.44.153])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 169223473E;
 Fri, 12 Aug 2016 19:42:22 -0400 (EDT)
From: Tom Roche <Tom_Roche@HIDDEN>
To: bug-parted@HIDDEN, 
Subject: [NOT A BUG] parted scripting guru? SO question needs answer
User-Agent: GNU Emacs 24.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.14.5)
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 16:42:21 -0700
Message-ID: <8737m9ftb6.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 6A3C6E20-60E6-11E6-AA69-89D312518317-07218935!pb-smtp1.pobox.com
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
 [fuzzy]
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x
X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11
X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: bug-parted@HIDDEN, Tom Roche <Tom_Roche@HIDDEN>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----)


While researching my own parted scripting problem[1], I noticed this StackOverflow question[2], which asks for but currently lacks a parted-based answer (which I currently lack the chops to provide).

FWIW, Tom Roche <Tom_Roche@HIDDEN>

[1]: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-parted/2016-08/msg00007.html
[2]: http://stackoverflow.com/q/12150116/915044




Acknowledgement sent to bug-parted@HIDDEN, Tom Roche <Tom_Roche@HIDDEN>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-parted@HIDDEN. Full text available.
Report forwarded to bug-parted@HIDDEN:
bug#24216; Package parted. Full text available.
Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.
Last modified: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 12:00:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.