Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Aug 2016 23:42:44 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Aug 12 19:42:44 2016 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55591 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1bYM63-0003Ez-UM for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 19:42:44 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54817) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <Tom_Roche@HIDDEN>) id 1bYM61-0003En-IK for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 19:42:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Tom_Roche@HIDDEN>) id 1bYM5v-00018a-CM for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 19:42:32 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:34179) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Tom_Roche@HIDDEN>) id 1bYM5v-00018U-98 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 19:42:31 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45779) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Tom_Roche@HIDDEN>) id 1bYM5s-0001JC-VU for bug-parted@HIDDEN; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 19:42:29 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Tom_Roche@HIDDEN>) id 1bYM5o-00015c-O1 for bug-parted@HIDDEN; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 19:42:27 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:59719 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Tom_Roche@HIDDEN>) id 1bYM5o-00014M-Hp for bug-parted@HIDDEN; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 19:42:24 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C458334740; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 19:42:22 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to :subject:reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s= sasl; bh=9zCaPxCf3WwMstM07aimo1FRZLY=; b=PZF9glKm+ixkEHN4bVXcXia qAFSwHfQdk5AMbs+bo0NyOoEFoMl8jKFV8Vjyu5yAAvbu3vi1rKxOy8CeLcAhAxy OIRXUdru1QC/AuS/rTidhntYL7DVJd8QiHF6X9arA+xUx6Uo8W0DN/ju084wg6zJ MozwqDFpULhCfolJ2h2Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:subject :reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s= sasl; b=ab8a5cBevwm0PfVvtEnSHYiAIs+SSdUUfmyWt4bH2Ca7ZdRboa2BbhaO WzgECbbnQakMtKfeDt79JykLEQm/zWj6zo7PP9oDyeXOWHO8AndUUNq7edpIv7ns ELvBnsiHbNijkoiUtnP1sAyB+fWrcw/Snsns4fRB4UGv+bQChKc= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCD0B3473F; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 19:42:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from tlrW510.pobox.com (unknown [173.20.44.153]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 169223473E; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 19:42:22 -0400 (EDT) From: Tom Roche <Tom_Roche@HIDDEN> To: bug-parted@HIDDEN, Subject: [NOT A BUG] parted scripting guru? SO question needs answer User-Agent: GNU Emacs 24.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.14.5) Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 16:42:21 -0700 Message-ID: <8737m9ftb6.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 6A3C6E20-60E6-11E6-AA69-89D312518317-07218935!pb-smtp1.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Reply-To: bug-parted@HIDDEN, Tom Roche <Tom_Roche@HIDDEN> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) While researching my own parted scripting problem[1], I noticed this StackOverflow question[2], which asks for but currently lacks a parted-based answer (which I currently lack the chops to provide). FWIW, Tom Roche <Tom_Roche@HIDDEN> [1]: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-parted/2016-08/msg00007.html [2]: http://stackoverflow.com/q/12150116/915044
bug-parted@HIDDEN, Tom Roche <Tom_Roche@HIDDEN>
:bug-parted@HIDDEN
.
Full text available.bug-parted@HIDDEN
:bug#24216
; Package parted
.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.