Received: (at 24771) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Oct 2016 10:15:52 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 23 06:15:52 2016 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47693 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1byFom-0006NF-Hu for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 06:15:52 -0400 Received: from postout2.mail.lrz.de ([129.187.255.138]:35866) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <uwe.siart@HIDDEN>) id 1byFol-0006N7-1F for 24771 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 06:15:51 -0400 Received: from lxmhs52.srv.lrz.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postout2.mail.lrz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3t1wKf1h7rzySS; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 12:15:50 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: postout.lrz.de (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) reason="pass (just generated, assumed good)" header.d=tum.de DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tum.de; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:mime-version :user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:date:reply-to:references :subject:subject:from:from:received:received; s=postout; t= 1477217749; bh=2lNtYf+KLUFtAhNFBBbs2WYvb4aFU2xvkT6iSaKogyg=; b=R EBPq7F3WjJfAkB/RRdGyPFFVWIbMxt6nwlhSRYm5ZzpauPyPWiIcPUIFCD7CF/rM j7gJUcCW8s7jiUI8PMslc7cIr4zGK8EdkHiMuZ7JmPa7A8daT/NBt+CmYlrIRPK0 11kLWM9K0OEGxPqN/vn6Aqm7C3mS7kZYzq1c0LFaBd3Bsu4siJJq8qbqrHNt2KfG wWzdzBhtaja8yBBVFd1Te8tsLiQDp9COtPxQZjrZnKh9F5r+Ia/JsdE/CGJquoYL m97kNj9K9XXwOYsazSwlyabbZ5r3Jvvj14n63rPfDHEZ8VeZuTg2JaFzQJ5JsWzI Ciz/ExwqPqFQn9ZLsGx5Q== X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at lrz.de in lxmhs52.srv.lrz.de X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.837 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.837 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, GAPPY_SUBJECT=1.954, LRZ_DMARC_TUM_FAIL=0.001, LRZ_DMARC_TUM_REJECT=0.1, LRZ_ENVFROM_TUM_S=0.001, LRZ_FROM_HOSTED_DOMAIN=0.001, LRZ_FROM_PHRASE=0.001, LRZ_FROM_PRE_SUR=0.001, LRZ_FROM_PRE_SUR_PHRASE=0.001, LRZ_FROM_TUM_S=0.001, LRZ_HAS_REPLY_TO=0.001, LRZ_MSGID_AN_AN=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from postout2.mail.lrz.de ([127.0.0.1]) by lxmhs52.srv.lrz.de (lxmhs52.srv.lrz.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 20024) with LMTP id qAaYAeVboxAc; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 12:15:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pegasus (g130.tum.vpn.lrz.de [129.187.100.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by postout2.mail.lrz.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3t1wKd0BmgzySK; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 12:15:48 +0200 (CEST) From: Uwe Siart <uwe.siart@HIDDEN> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mos=E8?= Giordano <mose@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#24771: 11.89.6; C-c C-c misses one LaTeX run in BibTeX documents References: <84bmybjz3k.fsf@HIDDEN> <CAKtYQqTM9TDzS2XmOM8_yL8PMak+RytnfWOOnT+XdzAOVQOJYg@HIDDEN> <580C803B.15528.5BB8378@HIDDEN> <CAKtYQqTUHW7Pt76e_+3s27SmZVmnY78zhpXcYvDqEgYVNn95aA@HIDDEN> Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 12:15:42 +0200 In-Reply-To: <CAKtYQqTUHW7Pt76e_+3s27SmZVmnY78zhpXcYvDqEgYVNn95aA@HIDDEN> (=?iso-8859-1?Q?=22Mos=E8?= Giordano"'s message of "Sun, 23 Oct 2016 11:58:34 +0200") Message-ID: <8460ojjrqp.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (windows-nt) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 24771 Cc: 24771 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Reply-To: uwe.siart@HIDDEN Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hello Mos=E8, Mos=E8 Giordano <mose@HIDDEN> writes: > This is a corner case that I don't know how to deal with. Do you or > someone else have suggestion about what's the best solution? No, I don't have a good suggestion for this. As far as I am concerned I would say that I can live with it. The wrong behaviour of AUCTeX just happens in consequence of a defective document. Once the flaw is fixed AUCTeX also compiles fine again. So I would say it's not a bug but just a lack of robustness. The only trouble is that for the user it takes a while to see the connection. --=20 Uwe
bug-auctex@HIDDEN:bug#24771; Package auctex.
Full text available.
Received: (at 24771) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Oct 2016 09:59:27 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 23 05:59:27 2016
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47662 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1byFYt-0005y4-2O
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 05:59:27 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59930)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <mose@HIDDEN>) id 1byFYr-0005xs-GX
for 24771 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 05:59:25 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <mose@HIDDEN>) id 1byFYi-0004bI-OM
for 24771 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 05:59:19 -0400
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,GAPPY_SUBJECT,
RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:59821)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mose@HIDDEN>)
id 1byFYi-0004bB-KZ
for 24771 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 05:59:16 -0400
Received: from mail-wm0-f43.google.com ([74.125.82.43]:36551)
by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128)
(Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <mose@HIDDEN>) id 1byFYi-0004HF-5R
for 24771 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 05:59:16 -0400
Received: by mail-wm0-f43.google.com with SMTP id b80so55643880wme.1
for <24771 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 02:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RlfFoqDlKIZIKWxdN3uPX70rrp4Z/G5K8AWA+hPKbmzgwh4xG5C+v2BejqM/FBeYS+RW3M+xy3yZ7lfFw==
X-Received: by 10.28.30.3 with SMTP id e3mr18179287wme.40.1477216755059; Sun,
23 Oct 2016 02:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.194.42.35 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 02:58:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <580C803B.15528.5BB8378@HIDDEN>
References: <84bmybjz3k.fsf@HIDDEN>
<CAKtYQqTM9TDzS2XmOM8_yL8PMak+RytnfWOOnT+XdzAOVQOJYg@HIDDEN>
<580C803B.15528.5BB8378@HIDDEN>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Mos=C3=A8_Giordano?= <mose@HIDDEN>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 11:58:34 +0200
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAKtYQqTUHW7Pt76e_+3s27SmZVmnY78zhpXcYvDqEgYVNn95aA@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <CAKtYQqTUHW7Pt76e_+3s27SmZVmnY78zhpXcYvDqEgYVNn95aA@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#24771: 11.89.6;
C-c C-c misses one LaTeX run in BibTeX documents
To: Uwe Siart <uwe.siart@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e
X-Spam-Score: -3.5 (---)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 24771
Cc: 24771 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.5 (---)
Hi Uwe,
2016-10-23 11:17 GMT+02:00 Uwe Siart <uwe.siart@HIDDEN>:
> By trying to generate the MWE I think I found the culprit. Perhaps
> nothing to do with 11.89.6 but could have happend before as well.
>
> The described behaviour is observed when there are multiply defined
> labels.
>
> When I compile the following MWE by "C-c C-a" it ends up with undefined
> references (one LaTeX run too few):
>
> \documentclass{article}
> \begin{filecontents}{test-a.bib}
> @Article{reed:1958:398,
> author =3D {Reed, John},
> title =3D {The Multiple Branch Waveguide Coupler},
> journal =3D {IRE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn.},
> year =3D {1958},
> volume =3D {6},
> number =3D {4},
> pages =3D {398--403},
> month =3D {Apr},
> }
> \end{filecontents}
> \begin{document}
> Test \cite{reed:1958:398}
> \begin{figure}
> \caption{Caption A}
> \label{fig:A}
> \end{figure}
> \begin{figure}
> \caption{Caption B}
> \label{fig:A}
> \end{figure}
> \bibliographystyle{plain}
> \bibliography{test-a}
> \end{document}
Thanks for the MWE. Indeed, it has nothing to do with the BibTeX
sentinel but with the LaTeX one. The problems pops up only when there
is a BibTeX bibliography by chance.
Your document produces two relevant warnings:
LaTeX Warning: Label `fig:A' multiply defined.
LaTeX Warning: Citation `reed:1958:398' on page 1 undefined on
input line 15.
but `TeX-LaTeX-sentinel' knows only about the second one. When it
finds it, it suggests to directly open the viewer. The problem here
is that LaTeX does not help AUCTeX to decide the right thing to do.
If there weren't the multiple label (or no label at all), there will
be also the warning
LaTeX Warning: Label(s) may have changed. Rerun to get
cross-references right.
that in this case is missing. I would say that AUCTeX is doing the
right thing given the information it has.
This is a corner case that I don't know how to deal with. Do you or
someone else have suggestion about what's the best solution?
Bye,
Mos=C3=A8
bug-auctex@HIDDEN:bug#24771; Package auctex.
Full text available.
Received: (at 24771) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Oct 2016 09:17:54 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 23 05:17:53 2016
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47534 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1byEuf-0004vZ-P1
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 05:17:53 -0400
Received: from postout1.mail.lrz.de ([129.187.255.137]:37352)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <uwe.siart@HIDDEN>) id 1byEud-0004vO-LS
for 24771 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 05:17:52 -0400
Received: from lxmhs51.srv.lrz.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by postout1.mail.lrz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3t1v2k318PzyTj;
Sun, 23 Oct 2016 11:17:50 +0200 (CEST)
Authentication-Results: postout.lrz.de (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
reason="pass (just generated,
assumed good)" header.d=tum.de
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tum.de; h=
content-description:content-transfer-encoding:content-type
:content-type:x-mailer:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject
:subject:mime-version:date:date:from:from:received:received; s=
postout; t=1477214270; bh=Gbdk1KtIUEbE/ZI0NOyZnr7VuKJKPTnFykUAY5
ke0BQ=; b=xstL1SrlCsTTZ5EOqei6F1pmAVM3gFwzJeujtXVz08CZETp5n89KEK
h5chvVm7FUGnxkkijxVjO1vD+fWHjhlLH5+/TYWL5PcujvAf5YrTsmswl3Qm2DX7
GsQjLStko6TFw56USHfNkeKpJO3FseL+UKc+vDv82I25QrOMaTE/jaI2kKLpuZKa
oD/9CR1HOKEgY78t/JEUMtJbh7tAknsN+3dPBFxmfRbIWt4UU0WWfAGabRNvB/jV
WQa0C0WBRW7WHma2n5tAaul9m5Jjx0ZVhn4DLg/6DoQG2a4fUmsHcpF6xdZLsfkk
/bkaWSca8+8rpJHPp1dWejGCCdEZ1ojg==
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at lrz.de in lxmhs51.srv.lrz.de
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.838
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.838 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, GAPPY_SUBJECT=1.954,
LRZ_DMARC_TUM_FAIL=0.001, LRZ_DMARC_TUM_REJECT=0.1,
LRZ_ENVFROM_TUM_S=0.001, LRZ_FROM_AP_PHRASE=0.001,
LRZ_FROM_HOSTED_DOMAIN=0.001, LRZ_FROM_PHRASE=0.001,
LRZ_FROM_PRE_SUR=0.001, LRZ_FROM_PRE_SUR_PHRASE=0.001,
LRZ_FROM_TUM_S=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from postout1.mail.lrz.de ([127.0.0.1])
by lxmhs51.srv.lrz.de (lxmhs51.srv.lrz.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
port 20024)
with LMTP id Mr79y3Xa0nGY; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 11:17:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [129.187.212.213] (o213.tum.vpn.lrz.de [129.187.212.213])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by postout1.mail.lrz.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3t1v2j5RD0zyTB;
Sun, 23 Oct 2016 11:17:49 +0200 (CEST)
From: "Uwe Siart" <uwe.siart@HIDDEN>
To: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mos=E8_Giordano?=" <mose@HIDDEN>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 11:17:47 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: bug#24771: 11.89.6;
C-c C-c misses one LaTeX run in BibTeX documents
Message-ID: <580C803B.15528.5BB8378@HIDDEN>
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <CAKtYQqTM9TDzS2XmOM8_yL8PMak+RytnfWOOnT+XdzAOVQOJYg@HIDDEN>
References: <84bmybjz3k.fsf@HIDDEN>,
<CAKtYQqTM9TDzS2XmOM8_yL8PMak+RytnfWOOnT+XdzAOVQOJYg@HIDDEN>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.72.572)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: Quoted-printable
Content-description: Mail message body
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 24771
Cc: 24771 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
On 23 Oct 2016 at 10:28, Mos=E8 Giordano wrote:
> Hi Uwe,
>
> 2016-10-23 9:36 GMT+02:00 Uwe Siart <uwe.siart@HIDDEN>:
> > When I compile documents that use BibTeX by "C-c C-c" or by "C-c C-a"
> > AUCTeX 11.89.6 calls the viewer before all citations are resolved. In
> > other words, "C-c C-c" calls the command "View" even after the warning
> > "There were unresolved citations". AFAIR it worke well in 11.89.5.
>
> Could you please share a minimal working example (TeX document +
> BibTeX bibliography) reproducing this error? Between 11.89.5 and
> 11.89.6 I did play with the BibTeX sentinel in order to fix a problem
> similar to the one you're reporting now when bibtex issues warnings.
> Have I messed up something else?
By trying to generate the MWE I think I found the culprit. Perhaps
nothing to do with 11.89.6 but could have happend before as well.
The described behaviour is observed when there are multiply defined
labels.
When I compile the following MWE by "C-c C-a" it ends up with undefined
references (one LaTeX run too few):
\documentclass{article}
\begin{filecontents}{test-a.bib}
@Article{reed:1958:398,
author =3D {Reed, John},
title =3D {The Multiple Branch Waveguide Coupler},
journal =3D {IRE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn.},
year =3D {1958},
volume =3D {6},
number =3D {4},
pages =3D {398--403},
month =3D {Apr},
}
\end{filecontents}
\begin{document}
Test \cite{reed:1958:398}
\begin{figure}
\caption{Caption A}
\label{fig:A}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}
\caption{Caption B}
\label{fig:A}
\end{figure}
\bibliographystyle{plain}
\bibliography{test-a}
\end{document}
--
Uwe
bug-auctex@HIDDEN:bug#24771; Package auctex.
Full text available.Received: (at 24771) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Oct 2016 08:29:13 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 23 04:29:13 2016 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47384 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1byE9Z-0003h6-Kb for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 04:29:13 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44408) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <mose@HIDDEN>) id 1byE9Y-0003gs-Fv for 24771 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 04:29:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mose@HIDDEN>) id 1byE9Q-0002Es-4w for 24771 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 04:29:07 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,GAPPY_SUBJECT, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:59009) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mose@HIDDEN>) id 1byE9Q-0002Eo-1G for 24771 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 04:29:04 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f47.google.com ([74.125.82.47]:32882) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <mose@HIDDEN>) id 1byE9P-0003FF-L5 for 24771 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 04:29:03 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f47.google.com with SMTP id c78so8354094wme.0 for <24771 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 01:29:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvcFYpx8jpe13NM/EnTTJ/9Qn4ZPuyp+fRJsRGdg6l4oPrZUpW4quRhC4t/FqelOI3V9U660lkkPTGk84Q== X-Received: by 10.194.84.40 with SMTP id v8mr8255209wjy.51.1477211342439; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 01:29:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.42.35 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 01:28:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <84bmybjz3k.fsf@HIDDEN> References: <84bmybjz3k.fsf@HIDDEN> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Mos=C3=A8_Giordano?= <mose@HIDDEN> Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 10:28:21 +0200 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAKtYQqTM9TDzS2XmOM8_yL8PMak+RytnfWOOnT+XdzAOVQOJYg@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <CAKtYQqTM9TDzS2XmOM8_yL8PMak+RytnfWOOnT+XdzAOVQOJYg@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#24771: 11.89.6; C-c C-c misses one LaTeX run in BibTeX documents To: Uwe Siart <uwe.siart@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -3.5 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 24771 Cc: 24771 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.5 (---) Hi Uwe, 2016-10-23 9:36 GMT+02:00 Uwe Siart <uwe.siart@HIDDEN>: > When I compile documents that use BibTeX by "C-c C-c" or by "C-c C-a" > AUCTeX 11.89.6 calls the viewer before all citations are resolved. In > other words, "C-c C-c" calls the command "View" even after the warning > "There were unresolved citations". AFAIR it worke well in 11.89.5. Could you please share a minimal working example (TeX document + BibTeX bibliography) reproducing this error? Between 11.89.5 and 11.89.6 I did play with the BibTeX sentinel in order to fix a problem similar to the one you're reporting now when bibtex issues warnings. Have I messed up something else? Bye, Mos=C3=A8
bug-auctex@HIDDEN:bug#24771; Package auctex.
Full text available.
Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Oct 2016 07:37:23 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 23 03:37:23 2016
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47256 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1byDLO-0002R6-TB
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 03:37:23 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38942)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <uwe.siart@HIDDEN>) id 1byDLN-0002Qt-79
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 03:37:21 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <uwe.siart@HIDDEN>) id 1byDLG-0001y7-U7
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 03:37:15 -0400
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,GAPPY_SUBJECT,
T_DKIM_INVALID,T_FILL_THIS_FORM_SHORT autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:34090)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <uwe.siart@HIDDEN>) id 1byDLG-0001y1-Qk
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 03:37:14 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58135)
by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <uwe.siart@HIDDEN>) id 1byDLF-00040x-CL
for bug-auctex@HIDDEN; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 03:37:14 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <uwe.siart@HIDDEN>) id 1byDLC-0001wk-9O
for bug-auctex@HIDDEN; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 03:37:13 -0400
Received: from postout1.mail.lrz.de ([129.187.255.137]:32788)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <uwe.siart@HIDDEN>) id 1byDLB-0001sg-Of
for bug-auctex@HIDDEN; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 03:37:10 -0400
Received: from lxmhs51.srv.lrz.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by postout1.mail.lrz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3t1rpL4cRGzyTF
for <bug-auctex@HIDDEN>; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 09:36:58 +0200 (CEST)
Authentication-Results: postout.lrz.de (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
reason="pass (just generated,
assumed good)" header.d=tum.de
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tum.de; h=
content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:mime-version
:message-id:date:date:subject:subject:from:from:received
:received; s=postout; t=1477208218; bh=rG1dan9h5GYwLIfCMCe4N856L
De00jNUvgkt13tTBTY=; b=j9tz+SHmzZMRjDNif6vXTZ5FGOEYb3xZKgMSdVDDo
kux28VmKtUJ4MJ/EjvGs66GQKwG8X2Wya2AOV2XMf4E0cstBE2GnLtr1kFBxoLaK
2TuFMji5Ti4d29ODSddqLMclVrPfZysG1Uy06WP87CNQ/tuqwnox/gmxSzBDsdkT
mQtOA94oVxPj0pN3rlPL5sURD8B1FiMwTXr0i7NGm09j/SKmuHanVfIVymXtGU8j
5HqBqnKNSjo1LC8BboZeJDndg+ED41KSjfCpK0SKVcQ5T2ZMOAZj0PNO42oF1+C0
5JT7EVExG7poE7WG1Tdx5/P64LC++ZIlaFghKkZuMoqXQ==
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at lrz.de in lxmhs51.srv.lrz.de
Received: from postout1.mail.lrz.de ([127.0.0.1])
by lxmhs51.srv.lrz.de (lxmhs51.srv.lrz.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
port 20024) with LMTP id w19O93gQh5vY for <bug-auctex@HIDDEN>;
Sun, 23 Oct 2016 09:36:58 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from pegasus (p5DD3D76B.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.211.215.107])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by postout1.mail.lrz.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3t1rpK5hxyzyT5
for <bug-auctex@HIDDEN>; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 09:36:57 +0200 (CEST)
From: Uwe Siart <uwe.siart@HIDDEN>
To: bug-auctex@HIDDEN
Subject: 11.89.6; C-c C-c misses one LaTeX run in BibTeX documents
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 09:36:47 +0200
Message-ID: <84bmybjz3k.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x
X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11
X-Spam-Score: -3.7 (---)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.7 (---)
Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and
what in fact did happen.
Be sure to consult the FAQ section in the manual before submitting
a bug report. In addition check if the bug is reproducable with an
up-to-date version of AUCTeX. So please upgrade to the version
available from http://www.gnu.org/software/auctex/ if your
installation is older than the one available from the web site.
If the bug is triggered by a specific (La)TeX file, you should try
to produce a minimal sample file showing the problem and include it
in your report.
Your report will be posted for the auctex package at the GNU bug
tracker. Visit http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=3Dauctex
to browse existing AUCTeX bugs.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
When I compile documents that use BibTeX by "C-c C-c" or by "C-c C-a"
AUCTeX 11.89.6 calls the viewer before all citations are resolved. In
other words, "C-c C-c" calls the command "View" even after the warning
"There were unresolved citations". AFAIR it worke well in 11.89.5.
Thanks and regards,
Uwe
Emacs : GNU Emacs 25.1.50.1 (i686-pc-mingw32)
of 2016-10-19
Package: 11.89.6
current state:
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
(setq
AUCTeX-date "2016-10-14"
window-system 'w32
LaTeX-version "2e"
TeX-style-path '("~/.emacs.d/auctex" "c:/Dokumente und Einstellungen/siart=
/.emacs.d/elpa/auctex-11.89.6/style"
"c:/Dokumente und Einstellungen/siart/.emacs.d/auctex/aut=
o"
"c:/Dokumente und Einstellungen/siart/.emacs.d/auctex/sty=
le" "auto" "style")
TeX-auto-save t
TeX-parse-self t
TeX-master t
TeX-command-list '(("TeX" "%(PDF)%(tex) %(file-line-error) %(extraopts) %`=
%S%(PDFout)%(mode)%' %t" TeX-run-TeX nil
(plain-tex-mode ams-tex-mode texinfo-mode) :help "Run =
plain TeX")
("LaTeX" "%`%l%(mode)%' %t" TeX-run-TeX nil (latex-mode=
doctex-mode) :help "Run LaTeX")
("Makeinfo" "makeinfo %(extraopts) %t" TeX-run-compile =
nil (texinfo-mode) :help
"Run Makeinfo with Info output")
("Makeinfo HTML" "makeinfo %(extraopts) --html %t" TeX-=
run-compile nil (texinfo-mode) :help
"Run Makeinfo with HTML output")
("AmSTeX" "amstex %(PDFout) %(extraopts) %`%S%(mode)%' =
%t" TeX-run-TeX nil (ams-tex-mode) :help
"Run AMSTeX")
("ConTeXt" "%(cntxcom) --once --texutil %(extraopts) %(=
execopts)%t" TeX-run-TeX nil (context-mode)
:help "Run ConTeXt once")
("ConTeXt Full" "%(cntxcom) %(extraopts) %(execopts)%t"=
TeX-run-TeX nil (context-mode) :help
"Run ConTeXt until completion")
("BibTeX" "bibtex %s" TeX-run-BibTeX nil t :help "Run B=
ibTeX")
("Biber" "biber %s" TeX-run-Biber nil t :help "Run Bibe=
r")
("View" "%V" TeX-run-discard-or-function t t :help "Run=
Viewer")
("Print" "%p" TeX-run-command t t :help "Print the file=
")
("Queue" "%q" TeX-run-background nil t :help "View the =
printer queue" :visible TeX-queue-command)
("File" "%(o?)dvips %d -o %f " TeX-run-dvips t t :help =
"Generate PostScript file")
("Dvips" "%(o?)dvips %d -o %f " TeX-run-dvips nil t :he=
lp "Convert DVI file to PostScript")
("Dvipdfmx" "dvipdfmx %d" TeX-run-dvipdfmx nil t :help =
"Convert DVI file to PDF with dvipdfmx")
("Ps2pdf" "ps2pdf %f" TeX-run-ps2pdf nil t :help "Conve=
rt PostScript file to PDF")
("Index" "makeindex %s" TeX-run-index nil t :help "Run =
makeindex to create index file")
("Xindy" "texindy %s" TeX-run-command nil t :help "Run =
xindy to create index file")
("Check" "lacheck %s" TeX-run-compile nil (latex-mode) =
:help "Check LaTeX file for correctness")
("ChkTeX" "chktex -v6 %s" TeX-run-compile nil (latex-mo=
de) :help
"Check LaTeX file for common mistakes")
("Spell" "(TeX-ispell-document \"\")" TeX-run-function =
nil t :help "Spell-check the document")
("Clean" "TeX-clean" TeX-run-function nil t :help "Dele=
te generated intermediate files")
("Clean All" "(TeX-clean t)" TeX-run-function nil t :he=
lp
"Delete generated intermediate and output files")
("Other" "" TeX-run-command t t :help "Run an arbitrary=
command"))
)
--=20
Dr.-Ing. Uwe Siart
Chair of High-Frequency Engineering
Technical University of Munich (TUM)
Arcisstr. 21, 80333 M=FCnchen, Germany
Email: uwe.siart@HIDDEN
Tel.: +49.89.289.23374
Fax: +49.89.289.23365
Uwe Siart <uwe.siart@HIDDEN>:bug-auctex@HIDDEN.
Full text available.bug-auctex@HIDDEN:bug#24771; Package auctex.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.