Received: (at 25752) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Oct 2023 07:46:17 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Oct 17 03:46:17 2023 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58453 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1qsemO-00079H-TP for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 03:46:17 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x32c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::32c]:39155) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>) id 1qsemJ-000780-0p for 25752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 03:46:11 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-x32c.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-406532c49dcso17212545e9.0 for <25752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 00:45:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1697528740; x=1698133540; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ZVUk1umOGshc0qyOJTqXK59/1VafqHrcUBMGmpSIGH8=; b=W4beVfMOGGGCocpNeuCAtqTzmDw7LNaYbiQJphAdR2c5neADjChM9O46xn1MVPFBun NyqkxXuyCsvlG8fpLzWiUImNJ2G3ttvMDD++/w3xM3T7z6Qt1t1gtKSOvfDUFjMF9SJm k6WlOm/UlPCIDohjd+TMpT3uj6DdjKghB1p2jayYeGtCQbkiiC3K7fcnqtDc5lrON0qc bE0s0m5Epi1oZhhrqs99Dm9fWRIjVLMRsIEnE+bRW1Ns1+pci0I7vTSCR24q0crQO2I4 zF2y72/URGnEpILCKpq3UUxbjZQE44OxopDbc3yySlKiKiHwIojIqJLwHdEn9/qq/7he BITQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1697528740; x=1698133540; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=ZVUk1umOGshc0qyOJTqXK59/1VafqHrcUBMGmpSIGH8=; b=wKCbadpzFsIk+EXL5gW+KnkhDDFfQIRw6QAYsltXgQZ6c1bgfOjApskQw+hHKQ3zOo 2IGh1zutVQzNvhTO4OV8b4h4g1iAPl8E1ijdrzQYeNYldbSy0wBbuz5zl5Fy4cYCRwxt 08wX6qweBnwLNdg8tZ2t5MKpvQj9ey5aNLhiQx9aXXZ0SjWfw/GV4TBc6v2j7mo6F3/o iUV3lc8Im3FLXi28EZlPJWs728ztN+WeFATcGZpFhOI7RJBudOOsbxIFMVQLJTOpx8AW oCwQU5iRkSzlnlOLU9B3BeIJn5hgyZS+jiTonDJFF0G8+ZUPVdPLfC5ZbvbNeqXKlJ0A AcAg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxhvlXgx/q8Xjj3LZjWlkVdH7Lbf0XrJ/q14nyHMg++Pf+ygzpv NLs3bW8a2arMEoKNK+4VosE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGCWK0hpjsIka6zAncqHTuWy/3lXdH20HHx4Kf6/ZbWC7WlbX1oTBvLLYJxv2I24On2r5VXUg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:150c:b0:405:38d1:621 with SMTP id b12-20020a05600c150c00b0040538d10621mr1052119wmg.3.1697528739942; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 00:45:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g23-20020a7bc4d7000000b004065e235417sm8981355wmk.21.2023.10.17.00.45.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 17 Oct 2023 00:45:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> To: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#25752: go incremental builds broken References: <CAD4UWkjnkSBYmAfk+E5QAvO9H29Y1xS2vu_h8eB3ZypJ=7NHwg@HIDDEN> <handler.25752.B.14872575426869.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org> <CAD4UWkjG0POAOYM-E90k2UDFFhnro1s5wd3qT1=pZPMqhOLTXw@HIDDEN> <20170225155814.GB3227@jasmine> <86mtyavq9d.fsf@HIDDEN> <X90fuo+5BdnG7q8P@HIDDEN> <86zgsftp3c.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> <86h6zqb9ku.fsf@HIDDEN> <2fd2b8b4-0c0c-6689-0ca3-316ad12acb80@HIDDEN> <86tu3o73xt.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 00:44:46 +0200 In-Reply-To: <86tu3o73xt.fsf@HIDDEN> (zimoun's message of "Fri, 28 Oct 2022 10:22:38 +0200") Message-ID: <86sf6ap4pt.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 1.1 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Go team, I was reviewing the status of old bugs and I find bug#25752 https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/25752 Content analysis details: (1.1 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (zimon.toutoune[at]gmail.com) -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [2a00:1450:4864:20:0:0:0:32c listed in] [list.dnswl.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.1 DATE_IN_PAST_06_12 Date: is 6 to 12 hours before Received: date X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25752 Cc: 25752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Hank Donnay <hdonnay@HIDDEN>, cox.katherine.e+guix@HIDDEN, Efraim Flashner <efraim@HIDDEN>, Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) Hi Go team, I was reviewing the status of old bugs and I find bug#25752 https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/25752 Since I am not a Go user, is it possible that Go team says if this bug is still worth keeping open? On Fri, 28 Oct 2022 at 10:22, zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> wrote: > On Thu, 27 Oct 2022 at 12:21, Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN> wrote: > >> A reproducer was given in >> <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/25752#0>: >> >> guix environment --ad-hoc go -- bash -c 'export t=$(mktemp -d); cd >> $t && export GOPATH=$(pwd) GOBIN=$(pwd)/bin && go install cmd/go; cd >> && rm -rf $t' > > $ guix shell -C go bash coreutils -- bash -c 'export t=$(mktemp -d); cd $t && export GOPATH=$(pwd) GOBIN=$(pwd)/bin && go install cmd/go; cd && echo $t' > [...] > > # runtime/cgo > cgo: C compiler "gcc" not found: exec: "gcc": executable file not found in $PATH > /tmp/tmp.srzPbcMLCc > > $ guix shell -C go bash coreutils gcc-toolchain -- bash -c 'export t=$(mktemp -d); cd $t && export GOPATH=$(pwd) GOBIN=$(pwd)/bin && go install cmd/go; cd && echo $t' > [...] > > go install cmd/go: copying /tmp/go-build1675975230/b001/exe/a.out: open /gnu/store/82adn4rx1h5fc7zms5g0ymwr8dk060nh-go-1.19.1/lib/go/bin/go: read-only file system > /tmp/tmp.qOfxzeZDxH > > Well, as I am not a Go user, what is the expected result of the command? > > > Efraim commented: > > I actually spent a bit of time on this today/yesterday. I > modified the go-build-system to copy the pkg and src folders > from build to build (instead of just the src folders) and the > pkg folders were ignored. Upstream documentation isn't clear > about when the pkg folder is used and when it is ignored. > > <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/25752#7> Well, as I previously mentioned, I do not know what is the expected result of the reproduced. :-) Cheers, simon
bug-guix@HIDDEN
:bug#25752
; Package guix
.
Full text available.Received: (at 25752) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Oct 2022 08:47:42 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Oct 28 04:47:42 2022 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60349 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1ooL1h-00024b-Ro for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2022 04:47:42 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f54.google.com ([209.85.128.54]:52997) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>) id 1ooL1d-00023I-Ua for 25752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2022 04:47:38 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f54.google.com with SMTP id l32so2625766wms.2 for <25752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 28 Oct 2022 01:47:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=nTGLvOvMknu7jNus+OOR1p0N7qi9RU9iu6i8OznT960=; b=XPNCJKGLQrAI4ULhhbmN8MaNsuIgzZe2ZEFEqJ2S7KWSNG/cbiqEchQW5hiTZLjC6D 9bkCVODWt/5aE8au/ilB02x7Xt5LHlpFuuNdgdROyXNsEBxwXqEcThcwi8IlexZPFsKh CE55XuvYhPe9AHwTD2IPkgcPaKf25nDvwZmjYjMa/uL9qzGRLqkgFw3+2nq8nCN1I05M 3LgxNMb1fW/gVrGv0rSYsca4uipUVf8ZMciPgKU6EPbAuPtMgw4RQgakaz8/Sw5JTO++ wrL6V/ogp5chqPl/hwDklH+x9JzygZz4v0j88Q7QGeg7OpT5xDtbI+Pd9L40MYhKPEtC E34w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=nTGLvOvMknu7jNus+OOR1p0N7qi9RU9iu6i8OznT960=; b=jPLR5CJ4dDDvz4aHYQ2IxWb6B49HrF5BY+DujducFXmo/zkMzDgq7AEsxM8QpzYKmg XjnGmSdJyqcTedlq27M2XJcsUBvutRg1km1Fzg45ZRhPwPxRCbY/nNwUR6WPHk1gAjXo OpXtB1iVAGusq66elEavAVmrSzskDxNoRBEI4SMK22wenPBbDaDGGJYxk84bPvI0lMuv en2YTuyCgAGgAvptkV/MLhNg6p7kaBjV1fP+/M5/d7dWVlNLt0rDzatGz99UE8uoifGV Zme1D0Zig2qS4f7eGJ5/mTGfhDMkTWiQv1WUksgJHfS0h1CsC0fRZUcUJb79tYfGDM5a XqwQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf008zxBnmhgX2VmZVhkPCuNsEowDolcG3KFqLqKsBqHs/5DKKxc IzbdczEH9Cng2SBjBK8pLOTsVQurfwk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM570Ml93GdS0MQTenmhmO9I+UqtE3YbzvD86pr1PQhODrdC4VJYVvh1ROvE8F/D9MwWWxxifw== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:2507:0:b0:3b3:3681:f774 with SMTP id l7-20020a1c2507000000b003b33681f774mr8825225wml.134.1666946852394; Fri, 28 Oct 2022 01:47:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n4-20020a056000170400b002302dc43d77sm3326284wrc.115.2022.10.28.01.47.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 28 Oct 2022 01:47:32 -0700 (PDT) From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> To: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN>, Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#25752: go incremental builds broken In-Reply-To: <2fd2b8b4-0c0c-6689-0ca3-316ad12acb80@HIDDEN> References: <CAD4UWkjnkSBYmAfk+E5QAvO9H29Y1xS2vu_h8eB3ZypJ=7NHwg@HIDDEN> <handler.25752.B.14872575426869.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org> <CAD4UWkjG0POAOYM-E90k2UDFFhnro1s5wd3qT1=pZPMqhOLTXw@HIDDEN> <20170225155814.GB3227@jasmine> <86mtyavq9d.fsf@HIDDEN> <X90fuo+5BdnG7q8P@HIDDEN> <86zgsftp3c.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> <86h6zqb9ku.fsf@HIDDEN> <2fd2b8b4-0c0c-6689-0ca3-316ad12acb80@HIDDEN> Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 10:22:38 +0200 Message-ID: <86tu3o73xt.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25752 Cc: 25752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Hank Donnay <hdonnay@HIDDEN>, Efraim Flashner <efraim@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, On Thu, 27 Oct 2022 at 12:21, Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN> wrote: > A reproducer was given in > <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/25752#0>: > > guix environment --ad-hoc go -- bash -c 'export t=$(mktemp -d); cd > $t && export GOPATH=$(pwd) GOBIN=$(pwd)/bin && go install cmd/go; cd > && rm -rf $t' --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ guix shell -C go bash coreutils -- bash -c 'export t=$(mktemp -d); cd $t && export GOPATH=$(pwd) GOBIN=$(pwd)/bin && go install cmd/go; cd && echo $t' [...] # runtime/cgo cgo: C compiler "gcc" not found: exec: "gcc": executable file not found in $PATH /tmp/tmp.srzPbcMLCc $ guix shell -C go bash coreutils gcc-toolchain -- bash -c 'export t=$(mktemp -d); cd $t && export GOPATH=$(pwd) GOBIN=$(pwd)/bin && go install cmd/go; cd && echo $t' [...] go install cmd/go: copying /tmp/go-build1675975230/b001/exe/a.out: open /gnu/store/82adn4rx1h5fc7zms5g0ymwr8dk060nh-go-1.19.1/lib/go/bin/go: read-only file system /tmp/tmp.qOfxzeZDxH --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Well, as I am not a Go user, what is the expected result of the command? Efraim commented: I actually spent a bit of time on this today/yesterday. I modified the go-build-system to copy the pkg and src folders from build to build (instead of just the src folders) and the pkg folders were ignored. Upstream documentation isn't clear about when the pkg folder is used and when it is ignored. <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/25752#7> Cheers, simon
bug-guix@HIDDEN
:bug#25752
; Package guix
.
Full text available.Received: (at 25752) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Oct 2022 10:21:39 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Oct 27 06:21:39 2022 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56222 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1oo014-0003yr-NG for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2022 06:21:39 -0400 Received: from andre.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.132.53]:53220) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <maximedevos@HIDDEN>) id 1oo012-0003yh-AH for 25752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2022 06:21:37 -0400 Received: from [192.168.156.79] ([188.188.173.72]) by andre.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id cyMZ280091a576c01yMZEp; Thu, 27 Oct 2022 12:21:34 +0200 Message-ID: <2fd2b8b4-0c0c-6689-0ca3-316ad12acb80@HIDDEN> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 12:21:32 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.3.1 Content-Language: en-US To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>, Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> References: <CAD4UWkjnkSBYmAfk+E5QAvO9H29Y1xS2vu_h8eB3ZypJ=7NHwg@HIDDEN> <handler.25752.B.14872575426869.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org> <CAD4UWkjG0POAOYM-E90k2UDFFhnro1s5wd3qT1=pZPMqhOLTXw@HIDDEN> <20170225155814.GB3227@jasmine> <86mtyavq9d.fsf@HIDDEN> <X90fuo+5BdnG7q8P@HIDDEN> <86zgsftp3c.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> <86h6zqb9ku.fsf@HIDDEN> From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#25752: go incremental builds broken In-Reply-To: <86h6zqb9ku.fsf@HIDDEN> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------FTFFmoabtkwZfVnIFR9aqPyx" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telenet.be; s=r22; t=1666866094; bh=LWGbfrV0TxnPKfex+QIWZSZU4IG5irDcAlCXrH0ZaBc=; h=Date:To:Cc:References:From:Subject:In-Reply-To; b=eo+DPHeigHKnc4YUdVQa44Kne5uyKbQHqu43V6sJ21ohTXMWExDNeIOoN+L5n07e8 FeZ7dbOabwk23Xg8QZsihb1i7znpMsOeRdsIou0buKpPUCBGupdrDPbOsLh+hdjEik 2Sw298v8OJOA89p1T32cVawL3m19IKhNyuLb/oglevKvNnSVzjZ+1G8Xj6x6UnpmMZ hKA4/VQ7aVcnq4l71DqeMLseF/PTGo6p685HeQvLgMjWbjZmzY3g4SD8SpERrD+YQu /OSRNPP/wnreHAo9h7k+MfnoSONZCdswom5hYTzIfoaY4pTVK6gB2cExLMJFOzK1v9 t99JgDC3rIMoQ== X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25752 Cc: 25752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Hank Donnay <hdonnay@HIDDEN>, Efraim Flashner <efraim@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -3.5 (---) This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --------------FTFFmoabtkwZfVnIFR9aqPyx Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------9hTKsRi7lPWYXonYGZGHLOOa"; protected-headers="v1" From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN> To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>, Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> Cc: 25752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Hank Donnay <hdonnay@HIDDEN>, Efraim Flashner <efraim@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <2fd2b8b4-0c0c-6689-0ca3-316ad12acb80@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#25752: go incremental builds broken References: <CAD4UWkjnkSBYmAfk+E5QAvO9H29Y1xS2vu_h8eB3ZypJ=7NHwg@HIDDEN> <handler.25752.B.14872575426869.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org> <CAD4UWkjG0POAOYM-E90k2UDFFhnro1s5wd3qT1=pZPMqhOLTXw@HIDDEN> <20170225155814.GB3227@jasmine> <86mtyavq9d.fsf@HIDDEN> <X90fuo+5BdnG7q8P@HIDDEN> <86zgsftp3c.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> <86h6zqb9ku.fsf@HIDDEN> In-Reply-To: <86h6zqb9ku.fsf@HIDDEN> --------------9hTKsRi7lPWYXonYGZGHLOOa Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------ire0yQx67NOlYMYT34Bo19o4" --------------ire0yQx67NOlYMYT34Bo19o4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 DQoNCk9uIDI2LTEwLTIwMjIgMjI6NDIsIHppbW91biB3cm90ZToNCj4gSGksDQo+IA0KPiBP biBUdWUsIDE0IFNlcCAyMDIxIGF0IDEyOjQzLCB6aW1vdW4gPHppbW9uLnRvdXRvdW5lQGdt YWlsLmNvbT4gd3JvdGU6DQo+PiBPbiBGcmksIDE4IERlYyAyMDIwIGF0IDE2OjMxLCBMZW8g RmFtdWxhcmkgPGxlb0BmYW11bGFyaS5uYW1lPiB3cm90ZToNCj4+PiBPbiBGcmksIERlYyAx OCwgMjAyMCBhdCAwOTowMDoxNFBNICswMTAwLCB6aW1vdW4gd3JvdGU6DQo+Pj4+IEkgc3Vz cGVjdCBjbG9zaW5nIHRoaXMgYnVnIGhhZCBiZWVuIGZvcmdvdHRlbi4gIElmIHllcywgZmVl bCBmcmVlIHRvDQo+Pj4+IGNsb3NlIGl0LiAgT3RoZXJ3aXNlLCBJIGRvIG5vdCB1bmRlcnN0 YW5kIHdoYXQgaXMgdGhlIG5leHQgYWN0aW9uYWJsZQ0KPj4+PiBzdGVwLg0KPj4+DQo+Pj4g SSBkb24ndCB0aGluayB0aGlzIGJ1ZyBoYXMgYmVlbiBmaXhlZCwgYWx0aG91Z2ggSSBoYXZl IG5vdCBjaGVja2VkLg0KPj4+IEN1cnJlbnRseSwgR28gaW5jcmVtZW50YWwgYnVpbGRzIGFu ZCBsaWJyYXJ5IHJlLXVzZSBpcyBub3QgZnVuY3Rpb25hbCBpbg0KPj4+IEd1aXgsIHVubGVz cyBJIG1pc3NlZCBhIG5ldyBkZXZlbG9wbWVudC4NCj4+DQo+PiBXaGF0IGlzIHRoZSBzdGF0 dXMgb2YgdGhpcyBidWc/ICBTaW5jZSBJIGFtIG5vdCB1c2luZyBHbyBhdCBhbGwsIGl0IGlz DQo+PiBoYXJkIGZvciBtZSB0byBoYXZlIGEgcmVwcm9kdWNlci4gIElzIGl0IHBvc3NpYmxl IHRvIHByb3ZpZGUgYQ0KPj4gcmVwcm9kdWNlcj8gIFRoYW5rcy4gWy4uLl0NCg0KQSByZXBy b2R1Y2VyIHdhcyBnaXZlbiBpbg0KPGh0dHBzOi8vaXNzdWVzLmd1aXguZ251Lm9yZy8yNTc1 MiMwPjoNCg0KZ3VpeCBlbnZpcm9ubWVudCAtLWFkLWhvYyBnbyAtLSBiYXNoIC1jICdleHBv cnQgdD0kKG1rdGVtcCAtZCk7IGNkDQokdCAmJiBleHBvcnQgR09QQVRIPSQocHdkKSBHT0JJ Tj0kKHB3ZCkvYmluICYmIGdvIGluc3RhbGwgY21kL2dvOyBjZA0KJiYgcm0gLXJmICR0Jw0K DQpndWl4IGVudmlyb25tZW50IC0tYWQtaG9jIGdvIC0tIGJhc2ggLWMgJ2V4cG9ydCB0PSQo bWt0ZW1wIC1kKTsgY2QNCiR0ICYmIGV4cG9ydCBHT1BBVEg9JChwd2QpIEdPQklOPSQocHdk KS9iaW4gJiYgZ28gbGlzdCAtZiAnXCcne3tqb2luDQouRGVwcyAiXG4ifX0nXCcnIGNtZC9n byB8IHhhcmdzIC1uMSBnbyBsaXN0IC1mICdcJyd7e2lmDQouU3RhbGV9fXt7LkltcG9ydFBh dGh9fToge3suU3RhbGVSZWFzb259fXt7ZW5kfX0nXCcnOyBjZCAmJiBybSAtcmYgJHQnDQoN CkkgZG9uJ3Qga25vdyBpZiB0aGlzIHJlcHJvZHVjZXIgc3RpbGwgd29ya3MvZmFpbHMuDQoN CkdyZWV0aW5ncywNCk1heGltZS4NCg== --------------ire0yQx67NOlYMYT34Bo19o4 Content-Type: application/pgp-keys; name="OpenPGP_0x49E3EE22191725EE.asc" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="OpenPGP_0x49E3EE22191725EE.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP public key Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- xjMEX4ch6BYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdANPb/d6MrGnGi5HyvODCkBUJPRjiFQcRU5V+m xvMaAa/NL01heGltZSBEZXZvcyA8bWF4aW1lLmRldm9zQHN0dWRlbnQua3VsZXV2 ZW4uYmU+wpAEExYIADgWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCX4ch6AIbAwUL CQgHAwUVCgkICwUWAgMBAAIeAQIXgAAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7japAQC3opZ2KGWzWmRc /gIWSu0AAcfMwyinFEEPa/QhUt2CogD/e2RdF4CYAgaRHJJmZ9WU7piKbLZ7llB4 LzgezVDHggzNJU1heGltZSBEZXZvcyA8bWF4aW1lZGV2b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZT7C kAQTFggAOBYhBMHzPuIMUo/bfdcBH0nj7iIZFyXuBQJf56ycAhsDBQsJCAcDBRUK CQgLBRYCAwEAAh4BAheAAAoJEEnj7iIZFyXujpQBAKV1SwDDl4f24rXciDlB9L8W ycZt30CgbewMSRQk4mvbAP9dFMbVVixYBd6C8cfhR+NsOBGiOJnQABlUmgNuqGFJ Dc44BF+HIegSCisGAQQBl1UBBQEBB0BOlzIWiJzgobMF6/cqwLaLk7jIcFSZ++c0 k9cCNT6YXwMBCAfCeAQYFggAIBYhBMHzPuIMUo/bfdcBH0nj7iIZFyXuBQJfhyHo AhsMAAoJEEnj7iIZFyXuMr0BAJc8cl5PGvVmVuSQVKjleNl4DK1/XAaPAYPe34AE fZJPAP9IqLCQhH/FeJanHqBP8gNdGNI2qn8RnnLVfRJgUjZ1BA=3D=3D =3DOVqp -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- --------------ire0yQx67NOlYMYT34Bo19o4-- --------------9hTKsRi7lPWYXonYGZGHLOOa-- --------------FTFFmoabtkwZfVnIFR9aqPyx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="OpenPGP_signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="OpenPGP_signature" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wnsEABYIACMWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCY1pbrQUDAAAAAAAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7hbH APwOSg4vlfjDJczft5aWajQap5ySus8mgANIXKY6qAOsTQEA18BZJfgObn99SHu5WzHmasPdRZPp YiQs/c/MykZSKAs= =3fhd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------FTFFmoabtkwZfVnIFR9aqPyx--
bug-guix@HIDDEN
:bug#25752
; Package guix
.
Full text available.Received: (at 25752) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Oct 2022 22:53:24 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 26 18:53:24 2022 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55487 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1onpH1-0002iJ-U0 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2022 18:53:24 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f52.google.com ([209.85.221.52]:37552) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>) id 1onpGq-0002hD-Gl for 25752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2022 18:53:12 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f52.google.com with SMTP id bs21so13054596wrb.4 for <25752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 26 Oct 2022 15:53:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=uTEt3Anq03CvXFQxwGPQqiI89iLCVdedgchXzHfu2mE=; b=GuP5xGbeNNheQ6UlQB1fDsUjJVRnTtms8lZlGHkuLJNt4fcr666R6jPgJ74/I8lbW4 RfdBaLpAhy2nYP/YGf3DR8+i4gw/TJzm0CaJA+f3vx45AozkWze9/jQaJYfjVYg9jiaD mNRWLwbcHLJ5GUB7eODeg9KjsbDD3KPxdepZQb2JIQhx+aUV5hWYVd7Xj6aCgKij1UfV OTSfoDI//V+m0A5O5FJtBnDPi+B9YcK44gJjlS1IDKeybcInlxXrgjdl3g5QdZ2t03rq hGe77dAoZ97RqFhmfxaUQoGedXzDUDIXhGg4q907vD0vJfrNyZbYjQiEkAO9WzNhq846 LXLA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=uTEt3Anq03CvXFQxwGPQqiI89iLCVdedgchXzHfu2mE=; b=FgyagqQ73jO2axZelP7ALRqdtS2/W6hbjTJXB4p8LpDXaQH+dPFVdvz18HLGEzxoNe 15iSUPva4ytf02RTE7xzqVVSy2oXqrw+iC09Bd/y21CB7rtvJJoDT9tzBKhXMhTRy4gq fpRvgx8oTSXA1zmCzS3HNl6GUdbVz4/131QpAG+w/cFcBA8+23G9c8LNYJ+zPcH9/iB2 ywkXQyzrbJpiJGWfBdRVh7MKsNPTNzUG0NYOFEzfceQIkiW70Kt1kWlLJ+m0h/84+ruF rSdSQlbsDV5b9z4q7JgKaG555kPixJaVoiJQ2u518WMrxD+W+Pi8bpi+CE/WZJOGJ9EV jXkA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf0pF8cvCi2i8NH0T8GRWm2bNF2PHb6vrqbix5LEUMYj0iL9VBNh M0aCU1vsje01PpFQBjKzFHg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6qeKYUnSBU6znovDwsnCgatTgkfCEf3TUY0FBqz7Bakr45v7h1jRIXWYV/2EOIz0y2Wwm0MA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1842:b0:22e:7bbf:c75 with SMTP id c2-20020a056000184200b0022e7bbf0c75mr30132259wri.547.1666824785721; Wed, 26 Oct 2022 15:53:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s11-20020adfbc0b000000b0022e035a4e93sm6456028wrg.87.2022.10.26.15.53.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 26 Oct 2022 15:53:05 -0700 (PDT) From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> To: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#25752: go incremental builds broken References: <CAD4UWkjnkSBYmAfk+E5QAvO9H29Y1xS2vu_h8eB3ZypJ=7NHwg@HIDDEN> <handler.25752.B.14872575426869.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org> <CAD4UWkjG0POAOYM-E90k2UDFFhnro1s5wd3qT1=pZPMqhOLTXw@HIDDEN> <20170225155814.GB3227@jasmine> <86mtyavq9d.fsf@HIDDEN> <X90fuo+5BdnG7q8P@HIDDEN> <86zgsftp3c.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 22:42:41 +0200 In-Reply-To: <86zgsftp3c.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> (zimoun's message of "Tue, 14 Sep 2021 12:43:03 +0200") Message-ID: <86h6zqb9ku.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25752 Cc: 25752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Hank Donnay <hdonnay@HIDDEN>, Efraim Flashner <efraim@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, On Tue, 14 Sep 2021 at 12:43, zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> wrote: > On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 at 16:31, Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 09:00:14PM +0100, zimoun wrote: >>> I suspect closing this bug had been forgotten. If yes, feel free to >>> close it. Otherwise, I do not understand what is the next actionable >>> step. >> >> I don't think this bug has been fixed, although I have not checked. >> Currently, Go incremental builds and library re-use is not functional in >> Guix, unless I missed a new development. > > What is the status of this bug? Since I am not using Go at all, it is > hard for me to have a reproducer. Is it possible to provide a > reproducer? Thanks. > PS: I asked the same thing 13 weeks ago. Therefore, without any answer > and giving this bug is really old not so much commented, I propose to > close it. Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2021 23:38:50 +0200 (1 year, 19 weeks, 5 days ago) Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 02:12:36 +0100 (47 weeks, 5 days, 19 hours ago) Go incremental is still not functional but is it worth to keep this report open? Giving the none activity of this bug and no reply about the status after waiting a long time, I will close it if no objection. Cheers, simon
bug-guix@HIDDEN
:bug#25752
; Package guix
.
Full text available.Received: (at 25752) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Nov 2021 01:21:18 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Nov 25 20:21:18 2021 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58303 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1mqPvR-0003Xk-OA for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 20:21:18 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f44.google.com ([209.85.128.44]:53234) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>) id 1mqPvM-0003XE-TA for 25752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 20:21:16 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f44.google.com with SMTP id o29so6864754wms.2 for <25752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 17:21:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6k54YfdAItGg78/dcBI8k0bOK6M8na/Rbsy8EbfI/ns=; b=RAqp8VG00xuwshnlwPRapx55mvZDFs5rKNNfIYkn4j8eSislBmOg6CzBZ6WS0OzFJA RqUeFofpP4+WRv4I+4F2omLm1TXkKGpM2XKE9b+SvgX/dQTzKvrbNfB8nwKqhrXBNUIG NvxQoUjB8tK88aAv/3Ujh9006Q4ZbFLNtDb4NYiLHj7v51EqrDwpnwln2gRxcig+fJMD gLcId9CcQ7DbzxRjuOyfub1g6IJWU4GOQIPYPkiS+wsTEmrs18PCvekzoWCMtoTX181J K8R0NgN4LEzGnYPhfEj8hyAvg62hBQqi9FHt3M8/OWbm+cudyfCOBB0om1WFz8l8dZse f+EQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6k54YfdAItGg78/dcBI8k0bOK6M8na/Rbsy8EbfI/ns=; b=OBfMlEDAP1l5wDtzyiCiJkCQuiKzX29HwYsVhwltnZCIDVaGRAvvr9vHW4TQjPBifj yugdniJ/yavuDTZ7qWonZAeEM9W3HRd4zoHOvrm78QJ8/oBzKm9pZexOM0EH9KYeXFK2 2oXMns8VCIaFyDcgvdYIxG2ICYGKBg3ooVHM8DhMMtSN6wMXK5B0NavIRwOK+GWlxaLV 1o2ZVatskyKw2xzgualab5oL5q+aotKKg+wRlPU/GxXwKw2rk9BtdMi2Ek41grm5lFOj mrF2768rfl0XGqd+2nNisYMbH4V02o1UjLAh8cuO3zHw9AkcUrmfESgR8Nw3c6usY9oe Gxww== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530DTpVPfiyUKXrSdsXz0aaoMlJAThQ1i9Ch74ANI4Pa6pAvNe/7 K0j9394j+vijUDSiAWHAsgc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyPCg+AypXHAreJIDKkvvDdk32zeu8RgJdOJGvo9HEU3cTeVwWnf5rS9xay9C8Oohq0MdGYyw== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cf0f:: with SMTP id l15mr12153909wmg.92.1637889667111; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 17:21:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r8sm5607268wrz.43.2021.11.25.17.21.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 25 Nov 2021 17:21:06 -0800 (PST) From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> To: Efraim Flashner <efraim@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#25752: Acknowledgement (go incremental builds broken) References: <CAD4UWkjnkSBYmAfk+E5QAvO9H29Y1xS2vu_h8eB3ZypJ=7NHwg@HIDDEN> <handler.25752.B.14872575426869.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org> <CAD4UWkjG0POAOYM-E90k2UDFFhnro1s5wd3qT1=pZPMqhOLTXw@HIDDEN> <20170225155814.GB3227@jasmine> <86mtyavq9d.fsf@HIDDEN> <X90fuo+5BdnG7q8P@HIDDEN> <86im83tzd3.fsf@HIDDEN> <X/yujodIHrnX0s3T@3900XT> Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 02:12:36 +0100 In-Reply-To: <X/yujodIHrnX0s3T@3900XT> (Efraim Flashner's message of "Mon, 11 Jan 2021 22:01:18 +0200") Message-ID: <86fsrjsosb.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25752 Cc: 25752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Hank Donnay <hdonnay@HIDDEN>, Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 at 22:01, Efraim Flashner <efraim@HIDDEN> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 01:46:48PM +0100, zimoun wrote: >> On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 at 16:31, Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> wrote: >> >> > I don't think this bug has been fixed, although I have not checked. >> > Currently, Go incremental builds and library re-use is not functional = in >> > Guix, unless I missed a new development. >> >> Thanks. Could you provide a Go example for reproducing? Well, a >> reproducer to track what could be wrong on the grafting mechanism for >> Go. If I understand correctly. >> > > I actually spent a bit of time on this today/yesterday. I modified the > go-build-system to copy the pkg and src folders from build to build > (instead of just the src folders) and the pkg folders were ignored. > Upstream documentation isn't clear about when the pkg folder is used and > when it is ignored. > > One thing I did try was to set the pkgdir to (string-append (getenv > "GOROOT") "/pkg"), but then it didn't find the pkg folder from go:out. I > didn't try copying go:out/pkg to GOROOT/pkg to see if that would fix it; > I assumed that even if it did work we wouldn't want to propagate all of > go with the go packages. What is the status of this old bug [1]? It is marked =E2=80=99moreinfo=E2= =80=99 because it misses a reproducer to be able to act on. Therefore, I am going to close it. Cheers, simon
bug-guix@HIDDEN
:bug#25752
; Package guix
.
Full text available.zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
Full text available.Received: (at 25752) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Sep 2021 12:47:04 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Sep 14 08:47:03 2021 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47895 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1mQ7q3-0007pQ-A8 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 08:47:03 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f54.google.com ([209.85.221.54]:44872) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>) id 1mQ7px-0007fp-PS for 25752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 08:46:58 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f54.google.com with SMTP id d6so19986684wrc.11 for <25752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 05:46:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=FpkoLT3kFGCWvSFX4hS73cL+84vfwfF+nAmEko1ygao=; b=dPm82v3Dmgl4wcTDmqYCxl7zrgAfuZYSwFWPe9b7f7fkI7TeQKOjQG/+cJbdHb8OXT e3L6FKtc+lnb3BjXpbad9o2rFUXNtPDriebu7koW/OYCfCnoOBgya1LN/6/AJ7R/ILZA OKjWJw/dZE1itaXx0U4Ew5IzlctrkxM1S4AzOGH0V42BPliZyc8afd0A7MCNsd+JUPzv hl+30I6ef+izqR7St4Xl6w/OpXykS0X8VZFvoYLsKuT/46A7wbuPBlMArzEuNvu+rLXH NxhbBZ4ZItqgueV7c3poQDvDPgZuy2qPHE54w1nGlOPt5eZtRCcUxmztcis/df93/XPn G9Jw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=FpkoLT3kFGCWvSFX4hS73cL+84vfwfF+nAmEko1ygao=; b=JGuQcGucpyZIuigTqfDlq5VZRKiFnkDcBoW6A2aJbkS/QZpOcdoKcHVwZ+QoIs0rmY 6WHjbYkZYzP6U4vNTu4QMleyfmLEDe9g8K4HeYnlaxi25hvfryO2VG7vGdmBYfR0N4sP k5+jy/2bPaFGEqN9lIyMDGdW6iRf6KRv28vosTZ+VUNlFfsnsm/Bqg5+UcuO/38R/kcI /pBHHl2828zdkCmcnKZN6WGEPIpBxgYztt0JxQhzNQMCAb3NGsWpTUO0ehavRZDIkvBR Kk0E1w5y74Drxa1Ec+rww7Q6DDW5y0txl5FB2wFKYV2IQp4PvcwBUM318ROQCe3WGhDl JaQw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530O/0EidtG9M+nT7/M7jkNckWI/OvHo5EDvmXlIrnSiBm/fhfK4 Z7FidrziVcQ7FV66Gr/exe0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJysqryz4YV9zHNNqnYKI5yy6hlr3cqgkqZmGvdOrzFNjBCixpQeRsHC3cxf0O6mmvxlvPSh5g== X-Received: by 2002:adf:df0c:: with SMTP id y12mr18657895wrl.155.1631623612088; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 05:46:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lili (roam-nat-fw-prg-194-254-61-46.net.univ-paris-diderot.fr. [194.254.61.46]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9sm12931046wrb.36.2021.09.14.05.46.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 14 Sep 2021 05:46:51 -0700 (PDT) From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> To: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> Subject: bug#25752: go incremental builds broken References: <CAD4UWkjnkSBYmAfk+E5QAvO9H29Y1xS2vu_h8eB3ZypJ=7NHwg@HIDDEN> <handler.25752.B.14872575426869.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org> <CAD4UWkjG0POAOYM-E90k2UDFFhnro1s5wd3qT1=pZPMqhOLTXw@HIDDEN> <20170225155814.GB3227@jasmine> <86mtyavq9d.fsf@HIDDEN> <X90fuo+5BdnG7q8P@HIDDEN> Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 12:43:03 +0200 In-Reply-To: <X90fuo+5BdnG7q8P@HIDDEN> (Leo Famulari's message of "Fri, 18 Dec 2020 16:31:38 -0500") Message-ID: <86zgsftp3c.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25752 Cc: 25752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Hank Donnay <hdonnay@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 at 16:31, Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 09:00:14PM +0100, zimoun wrote: >> I suspect closing this bug had been forgotten. If yes, feel free to >> close it. Otherwise, I do not understand what is the next actionable >> step. > > I don't think this bug has been fixed, although I have not checked. > Currently, Go incremental builds and library re-use is not functional in > Guix, unless I missed a new development. What is the status of this bug? Since I am not using Go at all, it is hard for me to have a reproducer. Is it possible to provide a reproducer? Thanks. Cheers, simon PS: I asked the same thing 13 weeks ago. Therefore, without any answer and giving this bug is really old not so much commented, I propose to close it.
bug-guix@HIDDEN
:bug#25752
; Package guix
.
Full text available.Received: (at 25752) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jun 2021 21:43:54 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 09 17:43:54 2021 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34802 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1lr5zN-0003ZD-Uo for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 17:43:54 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f49.google.com ([209.85.128.49]:36624) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>) id 1lr5zL-0003Ym-5g for 25752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 17:43:51 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f49.google.com with SMTP id h11-20020a05600c350bb02901b59c28e8b4so4750760wmq.1 for <25752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 14:43:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=AFkhNmPbuWHSnWwmadpY1n1GL0Cb7YWbJUW1U4DsPTo=; b=hr+h/I+CuI4E6fZhx3RojGRYNxkx2dvWCS+OMGNywtIq1DS3OAp7SDzZ/ZZJcKHrBO 9KwRs9Aj/7ejbHx280dQ77uxWNylf9zpmxyDs/7SKYgUKYysVXRGDz+cqCwuwQwWEvux mWH/ots1YcmsSvr4M1MaIcde4Mki9ran6hnZe/4hDZ7NnoKLmOQUaFzQV+zfggNmBoBC y60ADoE8CeZ8jC4IUPxKxfkY0O1cOpPLaWVwrQBnEquxcUg6Dt2ryfl6PTPAvIyFvw9O uZAUzR38hjQWEtPq5RpI2/em5K+jE+oMB9zfe423R2DC4evcw6UzThURJvKkbQtV6dVf Bz2Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=AFkhNmPbuWHSnWwmadpY1n1GL0Cb7YWbJUW1U4DsPTo=; b=Xn8B4T5471vf8bzxstYSZU/5/W/kqsmFxYdtZf4RnAsBVI2fwf2vc2/By+MhveSWu/ Qsp+aHbkyH4RVQzSnlrnLuTn/CJUb/o6bebqcThRfL+3fdQR23w1PHz3+vPjAOmAAZyR FUHmp/eFJwBhRPMz6PCz+0nJiv6FxGErSoQlaKeEUKugg0pdHTpa9xcZShbRoMaYL4gm U4AQC4fGQQAE11SW/Kwg/s/1F2A4wk+k3hcdup5nOd3ODVHlovcI5/qxtBuTme0I8nVK tE2+rziPWReYvZGtDGKNWyhHj1v16JqOaTsIV1+FfUvvdbdmB73YWlnSE+r8MpLpzTpZ swUw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530+DMPB+vFVg/UCN/E+V28p9R6aH13n5uxWyuS93vu221xZkRy1 nbRBeZZSWl7MSKClJPS1ibI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyWIjK5aRmpZvj1nKtjh4SNKd4WLzKpdDsncSuruSKu1EbQPdho+4OCoyBwgE6cBc8scsd+9Q== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:190c:: with SMTP id j12mr1876578wmq.42.1623275025426; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 14:43:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f13sm4510143wmg.7.2021.06.09.14.43.44 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 09 Jun 2021 14:43:45 -0700 (PDT) From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> To: Efraim Flashner <efraim@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#25752: Acknowledgement (go incremental builds broken) References: <CAD4UWkjnkSBYmAfk+E5QAvO9H29Y1xS2vu_h8eB3ZypJ=7NHwg@HIDDEN> <handler.25752.B.14872575426869.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org> <CAD4UWkjG0POAOYM-E90k2UDFFhnro1s5wd3qT1=pZPMqhOLTXw@HIDDEN> <20170225155814.GB3227@jasmine> <86mtyavq9d.fsf@HIDDEN> <X90fuo+5BdnG7q8P@HIDDEN> <86im83tzd3.fsf@HIDDEN> <X/yujodIHrnX0s3T@3900XT> Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2021 23:38:50 +0200 In-Reply-To: <X/yujodIHrnX0s3T@3900XT> (Efraim Flashner's message of "Mon, 11 Jan 2021 22:01:18 +0200") Message-ID: <86v96mlnv9.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25752 Cc: 25752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Hank Donnay <hdonnay@HIDDEN>, Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 at 22:01, Efraim Flashner <efraim@HIDDEN> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 01:46:48PM +0100, zimoun wrote: >> On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 at 16:31, Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> wrote: >> >> > I don't think this bug has been fixed, although I have not checked. >> > Currently, Go incremental builds and library re-use is not functional in >> > Guix, unless I missed a new development. >> >> Thanks. Could you provide a Go example for reproducing? Well, a >> reproducer to track what could be wrong on the grafting mechanism for >> Go. If I understand correctly. >> > > I actually spent a bit of time on this today/yesterday. I modified the > go-build-system to copy the pkg and src folders from build to build > (instead of just the src folders) and the pkg folders were ignored. > Upstream documentation isn't clear about when the pkg folder is used and > when it is ignored. > > One thing I did try was to set the pkgdir to (string-append (getenv > "GOROOT") "/pkg"), but then it didn't find the pkg folder from go:out. I > didn't try copying go:out/pkg to GOROOT/pkg to see if that would fix it; > I assumed that even if it did work we wouldn't want to propagate all of > go with the go packages. What is the status of this bug? Since I am not using Go at all, it is hard for me to have a reproducer. Is it possible to provide a reproducer? Thanks. Cheers, simon
bug-guix@HIDDEN
:bug#25752
; Package guix
.
Full text available.Received: (at 25752) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jan 2021 20:02:10 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jan 11 15:02:10 2021 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58332 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1kz3OD-0003zC-QG for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 15:02:10 -0500 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:53732) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <efraim@HIDDEN>) id 1kz3OB-0003yf-85 for 25752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 15:02:08 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [5.102.238.249]) by flashner.co.il (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D1399401FA; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 20:02:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 22:01:18 +0200 From: Efraim Flashner <efraim@HIDDEN> To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#25752: Acknowledgement (go incremental builds broken) Message-ID: <X/yujodIHrnX0s3T@3900XT> References: <CAD4UWkjnkSBYmAfk+E5QAvO9H29Y1xS2vu_h8eB3ZypJ=7NHwg@HIDDEN> <handler.25752.B.14872575426869.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org> <CAD4UWkjG0POAOYM-E90k2UDFFhnro1s5wd3qT1=pZPMqhOLTXw@HIDDEN> <20170225155814.GB3227@jasmine> <86mtyavq9d.fsf@HIDDEN> <X90fuo+5BdnG7q8P@HIDDEN> <86im83tzd3.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="I5Swi6x/WluWq40r" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86im83tzd3.fsf@HIDDEN> X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x41AAE7DCCA3D8351 X-PGP-Key: https://flashner.co.il/~efraim/efraim_flashner.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25752 Cc: 25752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Hank Donnay <hdonnay@HIDDEN>, Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --I5Swi6x/WluWq40r Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 01:46:48PM +0100, zimoun wrote: > Hi Leo, >=20 > On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 at 16:31, Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> wrote: >=20 > > I don't think this bug has been fixed, although I have not checked. > > Currently, Go incremental builds and library re-use is not functional in > > Guix, unless I missed a new development. >=20 > Thanks. Could you provide a Go example for reproducing? Well, a > reproducer to track what could be wrong on the grafting mechanism for > Go. If I understand correctly. >=20 I actually spent a bit of time on this today/yesterday. I modified the go-build-system to copy the pkg and src folders from build to build (instead of just the src folders) and the pkg folders were ignored. Upstream documentation isn't clear about when the pkg folder is used and when it is ignored. One thing I did try was to set the pkgdir to (string-append (getenv "GOROOT") "/pkg"), but then it didn't find the pkg folder from go:out. I didn't try copying go:out/pkg to GOROOT/pkg to see if that would fix it; I assumed that even if it did work we wouldn't want to propagate all of go with the go packages. --=20 Efraim Flashner <efraim@HIDDEN> =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --I5Swi6x/WluWq40r Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAl/8rosACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1EbwxAAvkZuax5OBUTzbjtqMxsU7f8NDTekN5HccR6A4/W2OcGQst5wW2K22jEK jtDXThHCzPPmap44RXs4il5J+23Ypy0qf8YlaFi5ieVMVSS9jgM4HiWcBuBZBTM2 N+4YL7Bu9jNpucYINIJtLY+4+cDIdsEMce0Re7MkD4+QAdlTchh4PxEmyf9iiCCa TKkBsWehlw/j22dTCjpPUrQp109fyE+No1qFUQ+ie6dkq96BsNJMWKF1QcSIdkxm hQ//eESzcJUWeJfr0uaaesEl1YYHumot0nor5RI1P5e+VCC2SkRpEhasubrSlpxq QnPvjjQactm6krM0QWqzCK7Gkj+U9ThuXILAFNSyvzIH4QueMWXtYLM/PdmzFItY zSZ/C8/vMqh0XvqLDDyjGejcA3o95MaASo+hGrK4NlXdiyeLOOqH3Fj9dG0ipV3P iE72yS3lxrWK5x6zre2FNv3Gv04tLsKRtdQ7bzcumQ1eiDOq/ReHQf1vT41XKA2q DNVR35Q85wqP8OHHFoCSJ4BIg1O5gn69iHresmo7+TK03ul2IIfHpxTQEpxIZVhM HqRcsKEPjNgx++7vUyAoSOOMJxJTL+Feto3tNMrwmukfiE58/rEn6sLsi4WFa2YW Qpaj5Jql8G7lF7RiFJO58HOS1G3TQKuG+x/gWGvLBF6uBoDp9n4= =Clx4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --I5Swi6x/WluWq40r--
bug-guix@HIDDEN
:bug#25752
; Package guix
.
Full text available.Received: (at 25752) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jan 2021 12:56:57 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jan 11 07:56:57 2021 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56012 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1kywkj-0004sa-I4 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 07:56:57 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f45.google.com ([209.85.221.45]:46194) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>) id 1kywkg-0004sH-RX for 25752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 07:56:55 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f45.google.com with SMTP id d13so16256255wrc.13 for <25752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 04:56:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=qi+zVeHkfKAiU+dLEnCbqvl6KH1QdvshYqFcywu7mJ8=; b=nACQ5ta4RyBOxX4O+CGHCjRdnTXkQov/EIFABJqs5o864hIka4Aalsee8JJbzPcDYM fuS9xeIjUXW0wVmXV+lgVSRPVINHv1RRgbExVrlOK7rLXjKGb6iv65oyh7rDFBH2tG4C J/0Z5F+oDnQQvsu+rG7Cyugf6asCfEWPkQSFxeEtN0Hq0UQDQnoVYZ4mw9t4MWLGyJqz kQcmtGwTpRqb85OKlWo+Ybr3RC8KwExJEMmo0WDQpxB65LyZIAaSzLxVtd2tvQVcbLo+ nfbSwp70iKBwSLdW/zL1p+ERgg2FaJRcPIuOKAr3p1uzuzw/WJDjQ2UFziSogPl/43VT WjhQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=qi+zVeHkfKAiU+dLEnCbqvl6KH1QdvshYqFcywu7mJ8=; b=nXDk+hF94oIdNPv5MCtE0LlHTYZbxHTCw11LTLgfoYBwAP6UoG+2szF1b6nqx6ABR+ 7ulFsUiAY3CEHqQU3gaZeUSHsMaNfouRfPszZiqBDsHhCwGywTNMN6AsWTIcRrgUDwKD r8FqWho55CM0FK+3wwHJJaN8iFskFrppQ/oVMF6FslmTPOBMNxKn212jtws6pyqXWSvi kO2t1oUDgVYCGKQaDoRyKZsPsdsgxkrZW3OM0JgWafPYyI6DyZb3frUHn+IccLSQkPO2 BVKz/eNfNeKzdP6cBIvbdj5OdMRu1O0eYH6YCarJTWiQom44PS/jbN3TP+FMKY9H6fPn qpvg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531ivRQJ2p1ydEjaiWtL3r8Kc8ywBUrGX4CmUI3eVyAgF9y94cEH 4hXf8MtEmiOMfY01HBKhm00= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxVdztOINg67/OWwCyPFGtjq+fPuir34hynMuZgNSos+zckw/kQG9Cl3bHvwoqqouy1ZXkI/g== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6944:: with SMTP id r4mr15989084wrw.134.1610369808974; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 04:56:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r16sm26264673wrx.36.2021.01.11.04.56.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 11 Jan 2021 04:56:48 -0800 (PST) From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> To: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#25752: Acknowledgement (go incremental builds broken) References: <CAD4UWkjnkSBYmAfk+E5QAvO9H29Y1xS2vu_h8eB3ZypJ=7NHwg@HIDDEN> <handler.25752.B.14872575426869.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org> <CAD4UWkjG0POAOYM-E90k2UDFFhnro1s5wd3qT1=pZPMqhOLTXw@HIDDEN> <20170225155814.GB3227@jasmine> <86mtyavq9d.fsf@HIDDEN> <X90fuo+5BdnG7q8P@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 13:46:48 +0100 In-Reply-To: <X90fuo+5BdnG7q8P@HIDDEN> (Leo Famulari's message of "Fri, 18 Dec 2020 16:31:38 -0500") Message-ID: <86im83tzd3.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25752 Cc: 25752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Hank Donnay <hdonnay@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Leo, On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 at 16:31, Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> wrote: > I don't think this bug has been fixed, although I have not checked. > Currently, Go incremental builds and library re-use is not functional in > Guix, unless I missed a new development. Thanks. Could you provide a Go example for reproducing? Well, a reproducer to track what could be wrong on the grafting mechanism for Go. If I understand correctly. All the best, simon
bug-guix@HIDDEN
:bug#25752
; Package guix
.
Full text available.Received: (at 25752) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Dec 2020 21:31:47 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 18 16:31:47 2020 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40178 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1kqNLn-0007Jp-HG for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 16:31:47 -0500 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:54529) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <leo@HIDDEN>) id 1kqNLl-0007JX-NI for 25752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 16:31:45 -0500 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FB9A5C00E5; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 16:31:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 18 Dec 2020 16:31:40 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=mcSGZmlirsTMLqa78NTCPpsY JODEXxqeK9GoJAxL3uc=; b=q84uYL/V9G8L5H2IO6WQFrulaeCP7nTaTuDQlqhw ncOE5cWKdE5jUnh/lgw6l5bZHU9Xa1z1Qm0ExpNmLEljsokGB8ZeNQLGK+7PbLs1 twXkaZU6iLzZAoSu8BmCsDa11aPtsKFyldg3K7R09bnnIGQCrAmbx57C8dTJ88Dj +EI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=mcSGZm lirsTMLqa78NTCPpsYJODEXxqeK9GoJAxL3uc=; b=cg9yl5VwuFnzF1qT0WdecV 7awCPKba381OTIX3gL6jTeHf5sHulm/K0BwlRP+LXUDR7j39LBstOV9DjDiKhe8Y GDp0hyDX8BqS07uPhyjkWVCcdWuPJQ0PEvEAn2/ODVSsWvXk1qfFf5p4/DRRKCMh 9FrU2NuxNR34zrWdR6P4a/AYHaYllZpaLiTr+t1vCZM/Yeim45ZkMaMXdgoPstx7 QU7XvzbT+EF5gUMwZh4mUx1TjHz/WXSyonbtHSTurGYC8tVSJniX3ZK2jZhUPpGb 0jXTHTQ/jZL0v9TJkbF55CWrRjYmsYNCNRNeL5whbcKWIbFwkHiiSp08AcV8CaWg == X-ME-Sender: <xms:vB_dX3rRGE2LlkrrLL08ovLDSMtVEoDl-tANtVam969fiUywWeaPjA> <xme:vB_dXxrpMlA46Et3iyDHVLGD_oHMXEzg_Oj3xrNjSMiJVYGU-HiPwwNtNPYVk3uOb kSPM0u1453VSC-cNw> X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrudeliedgudehudcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcu hfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepueekkedtffdvtddugeejgedtvefhueefiedvjeeitdeigedtveejvdejheff vefgnecukfhppeejfedrudeguddruddvjedrudegieenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpe dtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:vB_dX0P0ckofiP6QFVxIR1fICs1gBvzR3bHgb7xX6EcQ57LAgYoNtQ> <xmx:vB_dX66eDYebptsypohv-iuQEDfdzZCjy1h3dE4v5Wr5-MEor2cx7g> <xmx:vB_dX26oCCYlxv7--p6SqubmGEJs8Mx3JKkO2GELjXHv7KgLJIT0aw> <xmx:vB_dX7g2gxGEgrgd14sj6sBvczxMzDSg1tg8CUStrG3ludSCvuEB3w> Received: from localhost (c-73-141-127-146.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [73.141.127.146]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5260C108005F; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 16:31:40 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 16:31:38 -0500 From: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#25752: Acknowledgement (go incremental builds broken) Message-ID: <X90fuo+5BdnG7q8P@HIDDEN> References: <CAD4UWkjnkSBYmAfk+E5QAvO9H29Y1xS2vu_h8eB3ZypJ=7NHwg@HIDDEN> <handler.25752.B.14872575426869.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org> <CAD4UWkjG0POAOYM-E90k2UDFFhnro1s5wd3qT1=pZPMqhOLTXw@HIDDEN> <20170225155814.GB3227@jasmine> <86mtyavq9d.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86mtyavq9d.fsf@HIDDEN> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25752 Cc: 25752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Hank Donnay <hdonnay@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 09:00:14PM +0100, zimoun wrote: > I suspect closing this bug had been forgotten. If yes, feel free to > close it. Otherwise, I do not understand what is the next actionable > step. I don't think this bug has been fixed, although I have not checked. Currently, Go incremental builds and library re-use is not functional in Guix, unless I missed a new development.
bug-guix@HIDDEN
:bug#25752
; Package guix
.
Full text available.Received: (at 25752) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Dec 2020 20:03:02 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 18 15:03:02 2020 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40043 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1kqLxu-0002vM-3h for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 15:03:02 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f47.google.com ([209.85.128.47]:40432) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>) id 1kqLxk-0002uV-D0 for 25752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 15:02:52 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f47.google.com with SMTP id r4so3874741wmh.5 for <25752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 12:02:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=LI2hKvPd96zr5x+BcRbul71VolO9o/Ohno2bdAvfkRk=; b=qCCNz/X61qkB5u3QK21GAjF4zDM/rmtunM6rihhOLf5NGCPuyv35NF3hHR6FHMPGGa mg9/Vo8s7xhoT6W6fyn5qNugqFxkwXqu271l2aA2wYNmiszf9iJDIw6OvJi4afVsk5zg 1Wp/ZnIGp6A+LxAToc7g66OBwPFIr5AbujDJsmt66Tpk0FRh/Ra8H+BYwf0VYMHU8CKk zlWn/QsRbaAxXQdY8oWoF9kw0/Z3Qn4Jludhw/6TOmLP/a/AkY6TlkqEAdkcdX5n81gY Ili642FGihTSd/o4/gp80YbSHtcHMfZskYJcAC/p9XfZcx0P483b1+h0rEm2KaC0ovqo 1Wbw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=LI2hKvPd96zr5x+BcRbul71VolO9o/Ohno2bdAvfkRk=; b=Hu1TgnKa8bmliMUXuOqT+zFpEcQYRxeh4kWsL2KiVvLo0ZNOPNeBz3FbQQ8QOOaZLe q7sSDzUhymttXsukfZitfFiB6GfLrcvOCNM9sS6XFmBZvbtbaK5cjMMhP1TXmNuNnB27 fJ+xwWlxUH/Fwt4r4MMBommlu/skf+Q5Zo7ImLdk0/tYMc8yiMVAqqUQwHX3cUZjzqaU 1GQOuUgakULuJ8+k/3SJvTeRsDXgL+NfmUZZQRrLae1621iS2UHnAWKCet9+GbQ3lcxR xr/H0OFcaUppzZwMmX2pOq0IGX/9ZbMy5k850UdwHl02g3aMUcAC5XVfA6A2CpIWRhG2 /wYA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Ai7U6RfgnAWZLIfOaU1L3WbuC1SO2yJCQqiRrfudnGrDYvEbm LnA+EQe3hjhI8rdryzHgAqLX4R/F9tE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyvZMGgK0X1P3fSLglm4iUjBFW3itlXmxQXk+UBMqex7XpG9q7td7C1chsUjCKCyrXtk31hUg== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:204e:: with SMTP id g75mr5718277wmg.100.1608321766856; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 12:02:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o8sm14680697wrm.17.2020.12.18.12.02.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 18 Dec 2020 12:02:46 -0800 (PST) From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> To: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#25752: Acknowledgement (go incremental builds broken) References: <CAD4UWkjnkSBYmAfk+E5QAvO9H29Y1xS2vu_h8eB3ZypJ=7NHwg@HIDDEN> <handler.25752.B.14872575426869.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org> <CAD4UWkjG0POAOYM-E90k2UDFFhnro1s5wd3qT1=pZPMqhOLTXw@HIDDEN> <20170225155814.GB3227@jasmine> Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 21:00:14 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20170225155814.GB3227@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Sat, 25 Feb 2017 10:58:14 -0500") Message-ID: <86mtyavq9d.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25752 Cc: 25752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Hank Donnay <hdonnay@HIDDEN> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 at 10:58, Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 02:50:10PM -0500, Hank Donnay wrote: >> After talking on IRC, it seems like grafts are the problem. Adding >> `--no-grafts` to the above commands has them succeed. >> >> The GOROOT (store location, in this case) gets encoded in the >> generated source by the 'dist' tool, so changing that is going to >> cause issues. >> >> Is there a way to disable grafts on a per-package basis, in the definition? > > You can disable them on the command-line for any tool that builds > things, using the '--no-grafts' option, which is a "Common build option" > [0]. For example, `guix environment --ad-hoc go --no-grafts`. > > If you do this, you should understand that the ungrafted Go package will > contain some serious security vulnerabilities, since we only use grafts > to fix vulnerabilities in core packages. [1] > > We should figure out why this issue manifests when go is grafted, and > fix the root cause. I suspect closing this bug had been forgotten. If yes, feel free to close it. Otherwise, I do not understand what is the next actionable step. <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/25752> All the best, simon
bug-guix@HIDDEN
:bug#25752
; Package guix
.
Full text available.Received: (at 25752) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Mar 2017 21:50:14 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Mar 07 16:50:14 2017 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45111 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1clMzm-0006l5-Ia for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 16:50:14 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46788) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1clMzk-0006kr-Hj for 25752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 16:50:12 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1clMzc-0002c4-5r for 25752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 16:50:07 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:44399) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1clMzc-0002bw-25; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 16:50:04 -0500 Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:39146 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1clMzb-0005iT-C8; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 16:50:03 -0500 From: ludo@HIDDEN (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Hank Donnay <hdonnay@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#25752: go incremental builds broken References: <CAD4UWkjnkSBYmAfk+E5QAvO9H29Y1xS2vu_h8eB3ZypJ=7NHwg@HIDDEN> Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 22:50:00 +0100 In-Reply-To: <CAD4UWkjnkSBYmAfk+E5QAvO9H29Y1xS2vu_h8eB3ZypJ=7NHwg@HIDDEN> (Hank Donnay's message of "Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:05:27 -0500") Message-ID: <87fuiorc3b.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25752 Cc: 25752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Hello, Hank Donnay <hdonnay@HIDDEN> skribis: > The function for determining staleness is here (after the giant > comment explaining the reasoning): > https://golang.org/src/cmd/go/pkg.go#L1111 This method relies on the build ID to, which is defined like this (info "(ld) Options"): `--build-id' `--build-id=3DSTYLE' Request the creation of a `.note.gnu.build-id' ELF note section or a `.buildid' COFF section. The contents of the note are unique bits identifying this linked file. STYLE can be `uuid' to use 128 random bits, `sha1' to use a 160-bit SHA1 hash on the normative parts of the output contents, `md5' to use a 128-bit MD5 hash on the normative parts of the output contents, or `0xHEXSTRING' to use a chosen bit string specified as an even number of hexadecimal digits (`-' and `:' characters between digit pairs are ignored). If STYLE is omitted, `sha1' is used. The `md5' and `sha1' styles produces an identifier that is always the same in an identical output file, but will be unique among all nonidentical output files. It is not intended to be compared as a checksum for the file's contents. A linked file may be changed later by other tools, but the build ID bit string identifying the original linked file does not change. Passing `none' for STYLE disables the setting from any `--build-id' options earlier on the command line. I suppose Go uses one of md5 or sha1, which is a good thing since it allows for reproducible builds. However, grafting breaks this, similarly to <https://bugs.gnu.org/19973> since they change file contents without recomputing the build ID. Having Go use --build-id=3Duuid would work around the problem, but it would also prevent bit-reproducible builds. Perhaps our grafting code will have to handle .note.gnu.build-id specially. Thoughts? Thanks for reporting the issue, Ludo=E2=80=99.
bug-guix@HIDDEN
:bug#25752
; Package guix
.
Full text available.Received: (at 25752) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Feb 2017 15:58:18 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sat Feb 25 10:58:18 2017 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55912 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1cheji-0001ZQ-LN for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Feb 2017 10:58:18 -0500 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:54139) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <leo@HIDDEN>) id 1chejg-0001ZH-Kl for 25752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Feb 2017 10:58:17 -0500 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD2B420772; Sat, 25 Feb 2017 10:58:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 25 Feb 2017 10:58:15 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h= cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=MKPEO2AIlrs1gHKuuskyJojN4uU=; b=LRpBS1 1gZ8B0RhaLzOFgANA6nWAvrBLeMHFtnlnO2Y89l5OGwiGIiQjjVOGOSKTdMBblos RRt6xglIcQ6Xl86jMMQlcqDHnpa59KE9Q9voHdD6Hqgnt1Hkpq5J1gne7jkiJluR KmGyXNE7Bq4ClLoh7P3ZPeBEKJwDgWdPVBytE= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=MKPEO2AIlrs1gH KuuskyJojN4uU=; b=fe+qYfwIw7qdHlu54rVV2rstooki8nknC6hAD/l7FXEodF lZ5ZPargyaNb6FwJ5CCkkkdrAXnZh3iKkYW0NfPhSs5hF25qAkxN5k+/L+T6sLpn a4VYlXPAVQZ3BARYLaliJGowbdBpIPBep1IIEsW3/Vnktb3PE4nEnqDu9aGPY= X-ME-Sender: <xms:l6mxWCDMrwOquv-noPTwN2dEj5dtAAy4Oo2gKp4Dp6716CTFNk5b3w> X-Sasl-enc: Xc3ECilMw/UovNDwOrsyiHPML2f7y9xMHLywstlHfPZo 1488038295 Received: from localhost (c-73-188-17-148.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [73.188.17.148]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A62E37E2C2; Sat, 25 Feb 2017 10:58:15 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2017 10:58:14 -0500 From: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> To: Hank Donnay <hdonnay@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#25752: Acknowledgement (go incremental builds broken) Message-ID: <20170225155814.GB3227@jasmine> References: <CAD4UWkjnkSBYmAfk+E5QAvO9H29Y1xS2vu_h8eB3ZypJ=7NHwg@HIDDEN> <handler.25752.B.14872575426869.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org> <CAD4UWkjG0POAOYM-E90k2UDFFhnro1s5wd3qT1=pZPMqhOLTXw@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <CAD4UWkjG0POAOYM-E90k2UDFFhnro1s5wd3qT1=pZPMqhOLTXw@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26) X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25752 Cc: 25752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 02:50:10PM -0500, Hank Donnay wrote: > After talking on IRC, it seems like grafts are the problem. Adding > `--no-grafts` to the above commands has them succeed. > > The GOROOT (store location, in this case) gets encoded in the > generated source by the 'dist' tool, so changing that is going to > cause issues. > > Is there a way to disable grafts on a per-package basis, in the definition? You can disable them on the command-line for any tool that builds things, using the '--no-grafts' option, which is a "Common build option" [0]. For example, `guix environment --ad-hoc go --no-grafts`. If you do this, you should understand that the ungrafted Go package will contain some serious security vulnerabilities, since we only use grafts to fix vulnerabilities in core packages. [1] We should figure out why this issue manifests when go is grafted, and fix the root cause. [0] https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/html_node/Common-Build-Options.html [1] https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/html_node/Security-Updates.html
bug-guix@HIDDEN
:bug#25752
; Package guix
.
Full text available.Received: (at 25752) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Feb 2017 19:50:18 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 24 14:50:18 2017 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54957 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1chLsg-0002iH-8i for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 14:50:18 -0500 Received: from mail-qt0-f181.google.com ([209.85.216.181]:35859) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <hdonnay@HIDDEN>) id 1chLse-0002hz-Ik for 25752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 14:50:16 -0500 Received: by mail-qt0-f181.google.com with SMTP id r45so25127268qte.3 for <25752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 11:50:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=DPRvYMBKbnvBu6Y/Ry7mpykJWNDWg65gR/2/aL+bcU0=; b=OuV5uIKxKNGbMeEuW5ayOQrbMAyQ/KF+vE+TWW+Zeo6a+a7bArZSdRhCpE/6xxD5Qp rj23NDy3op0VLrcXnGMT/i0GVGyp/rZ58RCVBnHaU3RfPbI+0rsQWHjVtpujLZ5t37V7 YONLOuj9aBoxh2Hz3lvFKN/eJvFKf6H/h2gapWJ9VozSppWD5poruLYKYtK10jZE1ZZW US1xQ5JoqgQSgcf62ISiqkmt1pz8ZoYGQ1KwTj2aQp2dS+x602Wms0KOcwKezSPquPhS k/ovzeyhi6PMzxmhuq09HJcsYULHJydxUElZ4vV9EvBxSPIo7gJOoOtpGZSlxhKLpiab ygKA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=DPRvYMBKbnvBu6Y/Ry7mpykJWNDWg65gR/2/aL+bcU0=; b=Ho8p1KmL2C4D2At5psIq/uDlxd3/6FsQMXYPgrANVpcgODd9VcyvpiFIgnaSv4ENLe uyOR3eFj+h2c+UAw9zRWzgEbK4+g0kuYH34dggr9aDy+c3zG7wgGtD5ktVJZopl6IcFg obfd3XyOj/TSl+hCV6sDScYEL1bRdZgOgvhZb/tZ8wmplz/HBhTfcf7lrgDW3xAMYj6T Rinmwz93EIFh7VsDTSKgo2wyw+H7oRmbP6NZu+1YBvw7VaivLggh8f3a7xalUNRiLZv4 GnCzdxNjvjAFj6J1Vi73gEqAO+Tj4DmViCzu3sd/6fWCVi7HlXDtaL9ymbt5d5euWEvH 9DUQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39m4fMuTDfqFKGSt9fINtP9HeE7FdD/PCUorp4CF0QZY/eNZZiuqDuwGIYmfDp6zxS4p6Y92M3FmYkVTyg== X-Received: by 10.200.37.199 with SMTP id f7mr4630647qtf.186.1487965810510; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 11:50:10 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.12.158.31 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 11:50:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <handler.25752.B.14872575426869.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org> References: <CAD4UWkjnkSBYmAfk+E5QAvO9H29Y1xS2vu_h8eB3ZypJ=7NHwg@HIDDEN> <handler.25752.B.14872575426869.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org> From: Hank Donnay <hdonnay@HIDDEN> Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 14:50:10 -0500 Message-ID: <CAD4UWkjG0POAOYM-E90k2UDFFhnro1s5wd3qT1=pZPMqhOLTXw@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#25752: Acknowledgement (go incremental builds broken) To: 25752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25752 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/) After talking on IRC, it seems like grafts are the problem. Adding `--no-grafts` to the above commands has them succeed. The GOROOT (store location, in this case) gets encoded in the generated source by the 'dist' tool, so changing that is going to cause issues. Is there a way to disable grafts on a per-package basis, in the definition? On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:06 AM, GNU bug Tracking System <help-debbugs@HIDDEN> wrote: > Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org. > > This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message > has been received. > > Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other > interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course. > > Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): > bug-guix@HIDDEN > > If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please > send it to 25752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org. > > Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish > to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. > > -- > 25752: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=25752 > GNU Bug Tracking System > Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems
bug-guix@HIDDEN
:bug#25752
; Package guix
.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Feb 2017 15:05:42 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 16 10:05:42 2017 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42345 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1ceNcr-0001mi-P2 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:05:41 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41233) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <hdonnay@HIDDEN>) id 1ceNcq-0001mW-Ql for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:05:41 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <hdonnay@HIDDEN>) id 1ceNck-0005bp-FF for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:05:35 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:43414) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <hdonnay@HIDDEN>) id 1ceNck-0005bh-6v for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:05:34 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60429) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <hdonnay@HIDDEN>) id 1ceNci-0003vp-CZ for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:05:33 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <hdonnay@HIDDEN>) id 1ceNcg-0005ai-1e for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:05:32 -0500 Received: from mail-qk0-x22c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22c]:36284) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <hdonnay@HIDDEN>) id 1ceNcf-0005aR-PD for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:05:29 -0500 Received: by mail-qk0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id 11so17640041qkl.3 for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 07:05:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=PDdKUPpf6irNUPhMFy6mNQw+1Texo15i5oBf7RowFBE=; b=gKOHA8dEx/UwmXlgMgVTSlUCxzcwWEb3BYRp3dzH0TrKzgbEi8RmRdaYmOfQH460DZ 19Q4z21adZvOpD9F59/GmtdECQ+f8zK2WGxyX+M21BoCsOn1VzFqsrYSgEUSdmPuGD1o NdpbiIh7PZuzcRWf82HS11SVQ/Qsvq4OHKXLimPrA/5lB+8trqNM59e5/0S4RecpjsQG +e0Mayxuy/hNFAWNq3De3y6nNMooTIfocRNpYGP7V5JecJRMYVYeJ7yJ5ewn3GXlenPK ldvbhXcVTpvwmDcxIVTQKby6kdTnpDTVNhdZPmBy36ebIUcE4jChJMd12KJHSl77hlwS 3SUw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=PDdKUPpf6irNUPhMFy6mNQw+1Texo15i5oBf7RowFBE=; b=EsVYbXUy3winFAPo3E5LC33guBEDL26RGr8B7/OEfup46+PyDiTHWkVlU47fEkotan 4rczJ2JpO0yvcQe0BhCmGRVDr7V844AojExuHC49ztFamZXpynAkF5MP4xFwqM11EbNQ Gthh+WxtiYb4/DDuY5CTVTc9iV4KK6qIGuHMn0ZUysBGWhjowTv3hs7HjUNev5qjy5oF mKiS5mcMGwtv32ldK2sL98bA/t8WpHtbb1NmVcHHFkVRKZ97HOdga4XLpVedFfDGRHxL IpQ82Fo94O89PcQZ9pprZ+QVfokQMQ2hXF6S0GK5srkGFIz80s/SSbCrR7hCg0pSioWy si+g== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39k2R4rct/Pk/q1nhz9sytl0JWyFLzPgj+N0M5//NUOSlrZHVAwrPtQhoF0S7/0omGMdIlahgAlZY+5QzQ== X-Received: by 10.55.164.70 with SMTP id n67mr1098007qke.95.1487257527445; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 07:05:27 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.12.148.145 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 07:05:27 -0800 (PST) From: Hank Donnay <hdonnay@HIDDEN> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:05:27 -0500 Message-ID: <CAD4UWkjnkSBYmAfk+E5QAvO9H29Y1xS2vu_h8eB3ZypJ=7NHwg@HIDDEN> Subject: go incremental builds broken To: bug-guix@HIDDEN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) Hello, It seems the guix's go package is broken when the go tool is used for incremental builds. Any attempt to use 'install' or 'build -i' results in an attempt to write to the store. A one-liner: guix environment --ad-hoc go -- bash -c 'export t=$(mktemp -d); cd $t && export GOPATH=$(pwd) GOBIN=$(pwd)/bin && go install cmd/go; cd && rm -rf $t' Another command reports that (seemingly) the entire stdlib is marked as stale: guix environment --ad-hoc go -- bash -c 'export t=$(mktemp -d); cd $t && export GOPATH=$(pwd) GOBIN=$(pwd)/bin && go list -f '\''{{join .Deps "\n"}}'\'' cmd/go | xargs -n1 go list -f '\''{{if .Stale}}{{.ImportPath}}: {{.StaleReason}}{{end}}'\''; cd && rm -rf $t' The function for determining staleness is here (after the giant comment explaining the reasoning): https://golang.org/src/cmd/go/pkg.go#L1111 I don't see anything wrong with the package definition, but could be missing something. My only hunch at this point is that something might be modifying src/runtime/internal/sys/zversion.go, as that entire file is included in the build ID computation. Thanks,
Hank Donnay <hdonnay@HIDDEN>
:bug-guix@HIDDEN
.
Full text available.bug-guix@HIDDEN
:bug#25752
; Package guix
.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.