GNU bug report logs -
#26016
Regarding how to link gzip
Previous Next
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 26016 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 26016 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-gzip <at> gnu.org
:
bug#26016
; Package
gzip
.
(Tue, 07 Mar 2017 16:07:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Sarthak Jain <Sarthak.Jain <at> microfocus.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-gzip <at> gnu.org
.
(Tue, 07 Mar 2017 16:07:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi,
I am Sarthak Jain working as a Software Developer at Novell, India.
We are using gzip library in our product and I was upgrading the library to the latest version 1.8. While building, we saw that is it using '/usr/bin/ld' for linking. But on our build machine, we want to link it with 'gcc'.
Is there any flag we need to pass while configuring to tell it to link using 'gcc' instead of '/usr/bin/ld'.
I tried to see in the configure script but I was not able to get one. Can you please share some info on this?
Thanks
Sarthak
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-gzip <at> gnu.org
:
bug#26016
; Package
gzip
.
(Sat, 11 Mar 2017 03:40:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 26016 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
tags 26016 moreinfo
done
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 4:07 AM, Sarthak Jain
<Sarthak.Jain <at> microfocus.com> wrote:
> We are using gzip library in our product and I was upgrading the library to the latest version 1.8. While building, we saw that is it using '/usr/bin/ld' for linking. But on our build machine, we want to link it with 'gcc'.
> Is there any flag we need to pass while configuring to tell it to link using 'gcc' instead of '/usr/bin/ld'.
>
> I tried to see in the configure script but I was not able to get one. Can you please share some info on this?
We may be able to help, but only if you first tell us more about your problem:
- what precise commands you ran (starting from the pristine unpacked
gzip-1.8 tarball)
- what output they produced
- describe your system, i.e., Fedora 25, Solaris 11, Debian unstable, etc.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gzip <at> gnu.org
:
bug#26016
; Package
gzip
.
(Thu, 16 Mar 2017 15:08:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 26016 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi,
We have followed the following shell commands-
CFLAGS := -gdwarf-2
gunzip gzip-1.8.tar.gz && tar -xf gzip-1.8.tar
export CFLAGS
./configure --prefix=<some-dir>
make all
make install
These are the commands we have executed. Please find the attached output of './configure'. Our build machine is (x86_64 SuSE10SP4)
Thanks
Sarthak
-----Original Message-----
From: meyering <at> gmail.com [mailto:meyering <at> gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jim Meyering
Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2017 9:09 AM
To: Sarthak Jain <Sarthak.Jain <at> microfocus.com>
Cc: 26016 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#26016: Regarding how to link gzip
tags 26016 moreinfo
done
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 4:07 AM, Sarthak Jain <Sarthak.Jain <at> microfocus.com> wrote:
> We are using gzip library in our product and I was upgrading the library to the latest version 1.8. While building, we saw that is it using '/usr/bin/ld' for linking. But on our build machine, we want to link it with 'gcc'.
> Is there any flag we need to pass while configuring to tell it to link using 'gcc' instead of '/usr/bin/ld'.
>
> I tried to see in the configure script but I was not able to get one. Can you please share some info on this?
We may be able to help, but only if you first tell us more about your problem:
- what precise commands you ran (starting from the pristine unpacked
gzip-1.8 tarball)
- what output they produced
- describe your system, i.e., Fedora 25, Solaris 11, Debian unstable, etc.
[output-configure.txt (text/plain, attachment)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-gzip <at> gnu.org
:
bug#26016
; Package
gzip
.
(Thu, 16 Mar 2017 15:08:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 26016 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Somehow the newlines in the commands I mentioned got removed which is making it clumsy. Please find the commands as:
CFLAGS := -gdwarf-2
gunzip gzip-1.8.tar.gz && tar -xf gzip-1.8.tar
export CFLAGS
./configure --prefix=<some-dir>
make all
make install
-----Original Message-----
From: Sarthak Jain
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2017 2:34 PM
To: 'Jim Meyering' <jim <at> meyering.net>
Cc: 26016 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: RE: bug#26016: Regarding how to link gzip
Hi,
We have followed the following shell commands-
CFLAGS := -gdwarf-2
gunzip gzip-1.8.tar.gz && tar -xf gzip-1.8.tar export CFLAGS ./configure --prefix=<some-dir> make all make install
These are the commands we have executed. Please find the attached output of './configure'. Our build machine is (x86_64 SuSE10SP4)
Thanks
Sarthak
-----Original Message-----
From: meyering <at> gmail.com [mailto:meyering <at> gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jim Meyering
Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2017 9:09 AM
To: Sarthak Jain <Sarthak.Jain <at> microfocus.com>
Cc: 26016 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#26016: Regarding how to link gzip
tags 26016 moreinfo
done
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 4:07 AM, Sarthak Jain <Sarthak.Jain <at> microfocus.com> wrote:
> We are using gzip library in our product and I was upgrading the library to the latest version 1.8. While building, we saw that is it using '/usr/bin/ld' for linking. But on our build machine, we want to link it with 'gcc'.
> Is there any flag we need to pass while configuring to tell it to link using 'gcc' instead of '/usr/bin/ld'.
>
> I tried to see in the configure script but I was not able to get one. Can you please share some info on this?
We may be able to help, but only if you first tell us more about your problem:
- what precise commands you ran (starting from the pristine unpacked
gzip-1.8 tarball)
- what output they produced
- describe your system, i.e., Fedora 25, Solaris 11, Debian unstable, etc.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gzip <at> gnu.org
:
bug#26016
; Package
gzip
.
(Mon, 20 Mar 2017 09:58:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at 26016 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Can I please expect some reply from my previous email? I am running out of time.
Thank you!
-----Original Message-----
From: Sarthak Jain
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2017 2:36 PM
To: 'Jim Meyering' <jim <at> meyering.net>
Cc: '26016 <at> debbugs.gnu.org' <26016 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Subject: RE: bug#26016: Regarding how to link gzip
Somehow the newlines in the commands I mentioned got removed which is making it clumsy. Please find the commands as:
CFLAGS := -gdwarf-2
gunzip gzip-1.8.tar.gz && tar -xf gzip-1.8.tar
export CFLAGS
./configure --prefix=<some-dir>
make all
make install
-----Original Message-----
From: Sarthak Jain
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2017 2:34 PM
To: 'Jim Meyering' <jim <at> meyering.net>
Cc: 26016 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: RE: bug#26016: Regarding how to link gzip
Hi,
We have followed the following shell commands-
CFLAGS := -gdwarf-2
gunzip gzip-1.8.tar.gz && tar -xf gzip-1.8.tar export CFLAGS ./configure --prefix=<some-dir> make all make install
These are the commands we have executed. Please find the attached output of './configure'. Our build machine is (x86_64 SuSE10SP4)
Thanks
Sarthak
-----Original Message-----
From: meyering <at> gmail.com [mailto:meyering <at> gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jim Meyering
Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2017 9:09 AM
To: Sarthak Jain <Sarthak.Jain <at> microfocus.com>
Cc: 26016 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#26016: Regarding how to link gzip
tags 26016 moreinfo
done
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 4:07 AM, Sarthak Jain <Sarthak.Jain <at> microfocus.com> wrote:
> We are using gzip library in our product and I was upgrading the library to the latest version 1.8. While building, we saw that is it using '/usr/bin/ld' for linking. But on our build machine, we want to link it with 'gcc'.
> Is there any flag we need to pass while configuring to tell it to link using 'gcc' instead of '/usr/bin/ld'.
>
> I tried to see in the configure script but I was not able to get one. Can you please share some info on this?
We may be able to help, but only if you first tell us more about your problem:
- what precise commands you ran (starting from the pristine unpacked
gzip-1.8 tarball)
- what output they produced
- describe your system, i.e., Fedora 25, Solaris 11, Debian unstable, etc.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gzip <at> gnu.org
:
bug#26016
; Package
gzip
.
(Mon, 20 Mar 2017 13:52:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #20 received at 26016 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 2:03 AM, Sarthak Jain
<Sarthak.Jain <at> microfocus.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> We have followed the following shell commands-
>
> CFLAGS := -gdwarf-2
> gunzip gzip-1.8.tar.gz && tar -xf gzip-1.8.tar
> export CFLAGS
> ./configure --prefix=<some-dir>
> make all
> make install
>
> These are the commands we have executed. Please find the attached output of './configure'. Our build machine is (x86_64 SuSE10SP4)
>
> Thanks
> Sarthak
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: meyering <at> gmail.com [mailto:meyering <at> gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jim Meyering
> Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2017 9:09 AM
> To: Sarthak Jain <Sarthak.Jain <at> microfocus.com>
> Cc: 26016 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: bug#26016: Regarding how to link gzip
>
> tags 26016 moreinfo
> done
>
> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 4:07 AM, Sarthak Jain <Sarthak.Jain <at> microfocus.com> wrote:
>> We are using gzip library in our product and I was upgrading the library to the latest version 1.8. While building, we saw that is it using '/usr/bin/ld' for linking. But on our build machine, we want to link it with 'gcc'.
>> Is there any flag we need to pass while configuring to tell it to link using 'gcc' instead of '/usr/bin/ld'.
>>
>> I tried to see in the configure script but I was not able to get one. Can you please share some info on this?
>
> We may be able to help, but only if you first tell us more about your problem:
> - what precise commands you ran (starting from the pristine unpacked
> gzip-1.8 tarball)
> - what output they produced
> - describe your system, i.e., Fedora 25, Solaris 11, Debian unstable, etc.
Please do not top-post on technical mailing lists.
Your commands start with an invalid "CFLAGS := -gdwarf-2". That would
evoke an error for any bourne shell. If you actually did something
else, please include the *precise* commands that you ran and all
output. Did you actually type "CFLAGS=-gdwarf-2" ? You make it
unnecessarily hard to debug your problem when we have to guess things
like this.
Nothing about your configure output suggests there is a problem, and
you included no output from the "make" commands. I suggest that you
run "make V=1 > out 2>&1" and attach that "out" file if there is some
failure.
bug closed, send any further explanations to
26016 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and Sarthak Jain <Sarthak.Jain <at> microfocus.com>
Request was from
Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Fri, 01 Apr 2022 06:48:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Fri, 29 Apr 2022 11:24:05 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 356 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.