GNU bug report logs - #26295
[PATCH] 'Debugging Build Failures' subsection

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 26295 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 26295 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Catonano <catonano <at> gmail.com>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] 'Debugging Build Failures' subsection
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 12:06:47 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

This is my first attempt at editing the manual

The line in the git log is completely made up, I couldn't find an example
of logging edits to the manual

I managed to compile it without warning and errors and I even managed to
see it rendered in html (thanks ng0 !!)

Also, I'm not sure about the language style.

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

[series.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

Message #10 received at 26295-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Catonano <catonano <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 26295-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#26295: [PATCH] 'Debugging Build Failures' subsection
Date: Wed, 03 May 2017 23:53:31 +0200

Hi Catonano, and apologies for the delay!

Catonano <catonano <at> gmail.com> skribis:

> From 55b9fab0c6f218b73fdf1804c606a4bdcf2ddda4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: humanitiesNerd <catonano <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:43:55 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] gnu: Add 'Debugging Build Failures' subsection to
>  'Invoking guix build'
>
> * doc/guix.texi (Debugging Build Failures): New subsection.

I ended up editing it somewhat and adding cross-references (hope that’s
OK!) and pushed a revised version of this patch as
fc06b15e86d40549dc30097621a2c7c6bcd69f2e (modified text below.)

Thank you!

Ludo’.


When defining a new package (*note Defining Packages::), you will
probably find yourself spending some time debugging and tweaking the
build until it succeeds.  To do that, you need to operate the build
commands yourself in an environment as close as possible to the one the
build daemon uses.

   To that end, the first thing to do is to use the ‘--keep-failed’ or
‘-K’ option of ‘guix build’, which will keep the failed build tree in
‘/tmp’ or whatever directory you specified as ‘TMPDIR’ (*note
‘--keep-failed’: Invoking guix build.).

   From there on, you can ‘cd’ to the failed build tree and source the
‘environment-variables’ file, which contains all the environment
variable definitions that were in place when the build failed.  So let’s
say you’re debugging a build failure in package ‘foo’; a typical session
would look like this:

     $ guix build foo -K
     ... build fails
     $ cd /tmp/guix-build-foo.drv-0
     $ source ./environment-variables
     $ cd foo-1.2

   Now, you can invoke commands as if you were the daemon (almost) and
troubleshoot your build process.

   Sometimes it happens that, for example, a package’s tests pass when
you run them manually but they fail when the daemon runs them.  This can
happen because the daemon runs builds in containers where, unlike in our
environment above, network access is missing, ‘/bin/sh’ does not exist,
etc.  (*note Build Environment Setup::).

   In such cases, you may need to run inspect the build process from
within a container similar to the one the build daemon creates:

     $ guix build -K foo
     ...
     $ cd /tmp/guix-build-foo.drv-0
     $ guix environment -C foo --ad-hoc strace gdb
     [env]# source ./environment-variables
     [env]# cd foo-1.2

   Here, ‘guix environment -C’ creates a container and spawns a new
shell in it (*note Invoking guix environment::).  The ‘--ad-hoc strace
gdb’ part adds the ‘strace’ and ‘gdb’ commands to the container, which
would may find handy while debugging.

   To get closer to a container like that used by the build daemon, we
can remove ‘/bin/sh’:

     [env]# rm /bin/sh

   (Don’t worry, this is harmless: this is all happening in the
throw-away container created by ‘guix environment’.)

   The ‘strace’ command is probably not in the search path, but we can
run:

     [env]# $GUIX_ENVIRONMENT/bin/strace -f -o log make check

   In this way, not only you will have reproduced the environment
variables the daemon uses, you will also be running the build process in
a container similar to the one the daemon uses.

Message #13 received at 26295-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Catonano <catonano <at> gmail.com>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 26295-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#26295: [PATCH] 'Debugging Build Failures' subsection
Date: Thu, 4 May 2017 07:35:02 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

2017-05-03 23:53 GMT+02:00 Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>:

> Hi Catonano, and apologies for the delay!
>
> Catonano <catonano <at> gmail.com> skribis:
>
> > From 55b9fab0c6f218b73fdf1804c606a4bdcf2ddda4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: humanitiesNerd <catonano <at> gmail.com>
> > Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:43:55 +0200
> > Subject: [PATCH 1/1] gnu: Add 'Debugging Build Failures' subsection to
> >  'Invoking guix build'
> >
> > * doc/guix.texi (Debugging Build Failures): New subsection.
>
> I ended up editing it somewhat and adding cross-references (hope that’s
> OK!) and pushed a revised version of this patch as
> fc06b15e86d40549dc30097621a2c7c6bcd69f2e (modified text below.)
>
> Thank you!
>

Thanks !

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.