Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
Full text available.Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
Full text available.Received: (at 26847) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Oct 2019 19:35:26 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 21 15:35:26 2019 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57859 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iMdSg-0003FW-5j for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 15:35:26 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:50958) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1iMdSe-0003FO-FR for 26847 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 15:35:24 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1iMdSa-0003qy-L6; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 21:35:23 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN> To: Gemini Lasswell <gazally@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#26847: 26.0.50; Using edebug-step-in on a macro switches to go-mode References: <87vapb12k2.fsf@chinook> <87sgnnccy8.fsf@HIDDEN> <8736fmd6bl.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 21:35:20 +0200 In-Reply-To: <8736fmd6bl.fsf@HIDDEN> (Gemini Lasswell's message of "Sun, 20 Oct 2019 22:18:54 -0700") Message-ID: <87lftdq4cn.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Gemini Lasswell <gazally@HIDDEN> writes: > If you use these steps to reproduce, with the same sample code: > > M-x edebug-all-defs RET > M-x eval-buffer RET > M-: (my-try-thing 'a) RET > i > > then the original bug still occurs. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 26847 Cc: 26847 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Gemini Lasswell <gazally@HIDDEN> writes: > If you use these steps to reproduce, with the same sample code: > > M-x edebug-all-defs RET > M-x eval-buffer RET > M-: (my-try-thing 'a) RET > i > > then the original bug still occurs. Yup. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#26847; Package emacs.
Full text available.Received: (at 26847) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Oct 2019 05:19:31 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 21 01:19:31 2019 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55590 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iMQ6M-0002MS-Sr for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 01:19:31 -0400 Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:56430) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <gazally@HIDDEN>) id 1iMQ6K-0002MH-F3 for 26847 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 01:19:29 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=runbox.com; s=rbselector1; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From; bh=J7rxhhseYiv3ZmfAkTC62AHP2hvixq27NL/PJGCa/Ew=; b=gDBBpzBl6a+a51/ykmh5ni7J9K 0KNQGgNQw9IQMdkxfbHjPi7MP9x6Sv2AYE4CUtJRXpxB2SUZWWXz3GuRYCh3gyGaR2ynhiAFrUnvH fD5n1MJKr1DXBz6jGwVdg6Xx7SnSnQ3MbtABSGexP/KeADY0Yy8TIE/4AAFjD8yLyuD+PYkrZwI47 dRkkLFg0SgX2XBoZLjKyAxdOc9a+HfLKNhNGDAetM5tDxqqH83mW4pmfzy6ZfS3qmd6cseRbtLaPy pqw3+dJf1EL7owfY2OKn1JtC458kTntrZH4vYjiiTHOWJH4WHOSNgr0+WT0ezQ2CYmc6iNPcJJik7 iHNeOfWA==; Received: from [10.9.9.202] (helo=mailfront20.runbox) by mailtransmit02.runbox with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from <gazally@HIDDEN>) id 1iMQ6I-0003Ic-48; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 07:19:26 +0200 Received: by mailfront20.runbox with esmtpsa [Authenticated alias (696087)] (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) id 1iMQ62-0006Yt-Uo; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 07:19:11 +0200 From: Gemini Lasswell <gazally@HIDDEN> To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#26847: 26.0.50; Using edebug-step-in on a macro switches to go-mode References: <87vapb12k2.fsf@chinook> <87sgnnccy8.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2019 22:18:54 -0700 In-Reply-To: <87sgnnccy8.fsf@HIDDEN> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sun, 20 Oct 2019 23:41:03 +0200") Message-ID: <8736fmd6bl.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 26847 Cc: 26847 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN> writes: > I'm unable to reproduce this in Emacs 27. When I hit `i', I'm then > edebugging the `push' macro, and then I can step through it, and then > I'm back to stepping through my-try-thing. > > Are you still seeing this bug in Emacs 27? In Emacs 26, eager macro expansion happened when instrumenting code for Edebug using eval-defun. In current master, it's not getting done. Looking at (symbol-function 'my-try-thing) in both versions will show you the difference. The lack of macroexpansion doesn't only happen when instrumenting for Edebug. If you evaluate a function definition with eval-buffer or eval-last-sexp then macroexpansion is done, but if you evaluate it with eval-defun with or without the universal argument, then no macroexpansion happens. This is a change from Emacs 26, and is masking the original bug. If you use these steps to reproduce, with the same sample code: M-x edebug-all-defs RET M-x eval-buffer RET M-: (my-try-thing 'a) RET i then the original bug still occurs.
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#26847; Package emacs.
Full text available.Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN>
to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
Full text available.Received: (at 26847) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Oct 2019 21:41:08 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 20 17:41:08 2019 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55393 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iMIwm-00086s-Gu for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 17:41:08 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:56688) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1iMIwl-00086l-Fx for 26847 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 17:41:08 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <larsi@HIDDEN>) id 1iMIwi-0007xo-1C; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 23:41:06 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@HIDDEN> To: Gemini Lasswell <gazally@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#26847: 26.0.50; Using edebug-step-in on a macro switches to go-mode References: <87vapb12k2.fsf@chinook> Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2019 23:41:03 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87vapb12k2.fsf@chinook> (Gemini Lasswell's message of "Mon, 08 May 2017 14:06:21 -0700") Message-ID: <87sgnnccy8.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Gemini Lasswell <gazally@HIDDEN> writes: > edebug-step-in doesn't behave well when you try to use it on a > macro. For an example, enter the following code in *scratch*: > > (setq my-things nil) > (defun my-try-thing (thing) > (push thing my [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 26847 Cc: 26847 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Gemini Lasswell <gazally@HIDDEN> writes: > edebug-step-in doesn't behave well when you try to use it on a > macro. For an example, enter the following code in *scratch*: > > (setq my-things nil) > (defun my-try-thing (thing) > (push thing my-things)) > > Then: > > M-x eval-buffer RET > navigate to my-try-thing and C-u C-M-x > M-: (my-try-thing 'a) RET > i > > Result: Edebug exits and code runs to completion, result printed in > minibuffer. I'm unable to reproduce this in Emacs 27. When I hit `i', I'm then edebugging the `push' macro, and then I can step through it, and then I'm back to stepping through my-try-thing. Are you still seeing this bug in Emacs 27? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#26847; Package emacs.
Full text available.Received: (at 26847) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 May 2017 22:23:55 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 09 18:23:55 2017 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34724 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1d8DXu-0001M1-Qt for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 May 2017 18:23:54 -0400 Received: from mail-wr0-f196.google.com ([209.85.128.196]:34485) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <raaahh@HIDDEN>) id 1d8DXs-0001Lo-Nf for 26847 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 May 2017 18:23:53 -0400 Received: by mail-wr0-f196.google.com with SMTP id 6so3685164wrb.1 for <26847 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 09 May 2017 15:23:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1U0JoRmbKiMFh/vPlsi05o00YLgQ67i/8yHD+YfCgws=; b=gU/wm3lecjM3cRVVIQvWdyyXrVUaOrjn1Vznb1RLuHp3GNUpKWdnhZXWnIxcvaoCj5 jzk8+odX6yZ+5y1Ei4YFiWZqtcNbKncvUhflU+ULqz3GvT5EBDrhnKLUjHzzszhqCtUZ x1Ug/RTBScegh7bPzVMEZX8omBNhvXSGRD/olqnmdObay7FkNaGSKfRekx+p2sBQDU4l uUKItDzPr0FVJ4MYLIRWfSc8FdTxR4VI64bi1tW8UJVusrJJGj3yjv7JhnpXRLcXem6c UQmsVEZ4Rub5PRSdssCsTZyYuWX4nHCkl5tlG8+T43ct1KwrZPWAyOE2+D9MffV35cju W2CQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=1U0JoRmbKiMFh/vPlsi05o00YLgQ67i/8yHD+YfCgws=; b=TGmmknx6c2LzZILGlmWHRAI+kdKHXOCiLpEEoodUqyB3vpy1k3wahqjH+ljvPwJ7DR MUp/qioIq4lgkbHoiLL941qDqx+4CBamF5CYDhR+Js5OEEgEt4HI/Zt2H45Q6cJ/HOqF 1sLyFTPIRuIU3eXcfmObwG5pB9v8ZKjFlWuSz3dDklCMckfXnuZNKg4ixkhImQxY1hPx 3HtAq6CfLKtm8Y4cae5CEbWcSKxBfdATIHykJxQL/t9hQ3e2iCJjzqD9tW4AD6F1xveH SSvLOXmwHlY+kYfPGQ13cN7sV5D7OOrChSGAsHDkKsbXkFFRqVTCnnZhIXUY6rhjmpAf cE+w== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcATXFfIXUTSIyoVCMu0tccNhazzYbWO/dvvl+x1cU2Jtz+U2uMD J2YPapR0qvnp2gtASuQ= X-Received: by 10.28.54.165 with SMTP id y37mr2419323wmh.29.1494368626659; Tue, 09 May 2017 15:23:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([185.105.173.156]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id n49sm1411428wrn.30.2017.05.09.15.23.44 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 09 May 2017 15:23:45 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: bug#26847: 26.0.50; Using edebug-step-in on a macro switches to go-mode To: Gemini Lasswell <gazally@HIDDEN>, 26847 <at> debbugs.gnu.org References: <87vapb12k2.fsf@chinook> From: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <3aa02b7a-3031-73f3-a344-3a10f95d0171@HIDDEN> Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 01:23:39 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:53.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/53.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87vapb12k2.fsf@chinook> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 26847 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) On 09.05.2017 0:06, Gemini Lasswell wrote: > Stepping into macros would have made sense before eager > macro-expansion, but now by the time Edebug instruments the code the > macro has already run. Probably the simplest thing to do here is to > have edebug-step-in signal an error if asked to step into a macro. The > documentation for edebug-step-in also should be updated to remove > mention of stepping into macros. Since nobody has complained about this problem by now, it's probably the easiest solution indeed. However, I wonder if we could inhibit eager macro-expansion when a function is being instrumented by edebug. Its definition is being re-evaluated at that time, right? I don't know if we have a good way to do that, though. Or if adding one ends up being easy to maintain.
bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#26847; Package emacs.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 May 2017 21:07:11 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 08 17:07:11 2017 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60323 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1d7ps7-0000PC-E4 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 May 2017 17:07:11 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60272) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <gazally@HIDDEN>) id 1d7ps5-0000P0-6Z for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 May 2017 17:07:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <gazally@HIDDEN>) id 1d7prz-00066u-8o for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 May 2017 17:07:04 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:54813) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <gazally@HIDDEN>) id 1d7prz-00066q-5V for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 May 2017 17:07:03 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51221) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <gazally@HIDDEN>) id 1d7pry-0003Jb-4v for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Mon, 08 May 2017 17:07:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <gazally@HIDDEN>) id 1d7pru-00065q-6M for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Mon, 08 May 2017 17:07:02 -0400 Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:34182) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <gazally@HIDDEN>) id 1d7prt-00065d-SJ for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Mon, 08 May 2017 17:06:58 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=runbox.com; s=rbselector1; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From; bh=TTdVnv9u7y92YJcCCnEDMkj2iVjPdekM/XYSXR+EEpI=; b=DW25rNVmaYRQXLG40T/v2suGC Ds7l8S6Q/JX1F8uXgvPAmTdCbYZLssdLLJcCmxh2bTZumQaKjWWqWy3amAGFBremFyA+XMSFybEGJ P9upIa4EW5TeNMg0p4x/J9N6F7QfBj2CV/oG6fqbpnSUIi8Y6aep0c9cFzk0IZt0kxD4tdcwYeKik G6ea4uwyhJPD5wbilEupJfh2jvrSuumCfD6+e2KKJIXFfqTs5GOe0n6v9CLg74wEHgwVjaGIUyuzD Dr44vjymAs8CcaOHaekXFC+FCUuPW5Hy7Zlj3Kn5LQ+7F0M35F9Tpi+eY/oTrc87XSiRdN2/nxIUk hvIPxnF+A==; Received: from [10.9.9.211] (helo=mailfront11.runbox.com) by mailtransmit03.runbox with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from <gazally@HIDDEN>) id 1d7prp-0003Nf-S1 for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Mon, 08 May 2017 23:06:53 +0200 Received: from c-24-22-244-161.hsd1.wa.comcast.net ([24.22.244.161] helo=chinook) by mailfront11.runbox.com with esmtpsa (uid:179284 ) (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) id 1d7prd-0006sL-Hy for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Mon, 08 May 2017 23:06:41 +0200 From: Gemini Lasswell <gazally@HIDDEN> To: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN Subject: 26.0.50; Using edebug-step-in on a macro switches to go-mode Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 14:06:21 -0700 Message-ID: <87vapb12k2.fsf@chinook> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) edebug-step-in doesn't behave well when you try to use it on a macro. For an example, enter the following code in *scratch*: (setq my-things nil) (defun my-try-thing (thing) (push thing my-things)) Then: M-x eval-buffer RET navigate to my-try-thing and C-u C-M-x M-: (my-try-thing 'a) RET i Result: Edebug exits and code runs to completion, result printed in minibuffer. Then navigate to my-try-thing again and C-M-x Result: Edebug activates with the debugger prompt in `push'. Stepping into macros would have made sense before eager macro-expansion, but now by the time Edebug instruments the code the macro has already run. Probably the simplest thing to do here is to have edebug-step-in signal an error if asked to step into a macro. The documentation for edebug-step-in also should be updated to remove mention of stepping into macros.
Gemini Lasswell <gazally@HIDDEN>:bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN.
Full text available.bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN:bug#26847; Package emacs.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.