Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 May 2017 18:55:28 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 18 14:55:28 2017 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53803 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1dBQa7-0000Hi-9I for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 May 2017 14:55:28 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56331) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <trashman@HIDDEN>) id 1dBQPI-0008Se-7x for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 May 2017 14:44:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <trashman@HIDDEN>) id 1dBQPC-0007Xe-9k for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 May 2017 14:44:11 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:50934) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <trashman@HIDDEN>) id 1dBQPC-0007XW-6Q for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 May 2017 14:44:10 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47291) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <trashman@HIDDEN>) id 1dBQPA-0001jm-Jg for bug-guile@HIDDEN; Thu, 18 May 2017 14:44:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <trashman@HIDDEN>) id 1dBQP7-0007Vm-BP for bug-guile@HIDDEN; Thu, 18 May 2017 14:44:08 -0400 Received: from gproxy4-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com ([69.89.23.142]:47680 helo=gproxy4.mail.unifiedlayer.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <trashman@HIDDEN>) id 1dBQP7-0007PZ-4L for bug-guile@HIDDEN; Thu, 18 May 2017 14:44:05 -0400 Received: from cmgw4 (unknown [10.0.90.85]) by gproxy4.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A6DF179159 for <bug-guile@HIDDEN>; Thu, 18 May 2017 12:19:13 -0600 (MDT) Received: from box443.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.243]) by cmgw4 with id MuK91v0015Ejslx01uKCYk; Thu, 18 May 2017 12:19:13 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=QdwWhoTv c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=/JUv2DnxK4pQW9WQq9F1Lg==:117 a=/JUv2DnxK4pQW9WQq9F1Lg==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=tJ8p9aeEuA8A:10 a=xtERp6CFAAAA:8 a=zzRhQJ4H_d7F32iytv4A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=uTX1C-N1hsUA:10 a=O-G6f6ZMCz8A:10 Received: from c-73-37-149-62.hsd1.mn.comcast.net ([73.37.149.62]:38722 helo=crud.chemoelectric.org) by box443.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from <trashman@HIDDEN>) id 1dBQ0y-0006Si-QD for bug-guile@HIDDEN; Thu, 18 May 2017 12:19:08 -0600 Received: by crud.chemoelectric.org (Postfix, from userid 1501) id BF64B5A6F4DD; Thu, 18 May 2017 13:19:07 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 13:19:07 -0500 From: Barry Schwartz <chemoelectric@HIDDEN> To: bug-guile@HIDDEN Subject: Seeming regressions in Guile 2.2 relative to Guile 2.0 Message-ID: <20170518181907.GA7227@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.2 (2017-04-18) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box443.bluehost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - gnu.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - chemoelectric.org X-BWhitelist: no X-Source-IP: 73.37.149.62 X-Exim-ID: 1dBQ0y-0006Si-QD X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: c-73-37-149-62.hsd1.mn.comcast.net (crud.chemoelectric.org) [73.37.149.62]:38722 X-Source-Auth: crudfactory@HIDDEN X-Email-Count: 1 X-Source-Cap: Y3J1ZGZhY3Q7Y3J1ZGZhY3Q7Ym94NDQzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ== X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.5 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 18 May 2017 14:55:26 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -4.5 (----) I do not have time or resources to do it myself, or even to make a real bug report, but those interested in improving Guile 2.2 might want to figure out why it cannot compile https://bitbucket.org/sortsmill/sortsmill-core-guile. Guile 2.0 has no trouble. (One needs https://bitbucket.org/sortsmill/sortsmill-core to build it.) (Core Guile also presents an example of automatically compiling Guile sources in dependency order, in case one is interested in that.)
Barry Schwartz <chemoelectric@HIDDEN>:bug-guile@HIDDEN.
Full text available.bug-guile@HIDDEN:bug#26985; Package guile.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.