GNU bug report logs -
#27549
[PATCH] gnu: vpnc: Update to 0.5.3, revision-550.
Previous Next
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 27549 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 27549 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#27549
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Sat, 01 Jul 2017 14:49:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Jelle Licht <jlicht <at> fsfe.org>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
.
(Sat, 01 Jul 2017 14:49:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hello Guix,
Having tried to get `vpnc' working with my university's vpn system, and
failing, I looked into other distributions and how they got it to work.
It seems that most people use an updated version of the bundled
`vpnc-script' to make it work.
This patch updates `vpnc' to make use of the latest revision of the public
Subversion repo. It also includes the updated `vpnc-script'. To note,
our old `vpnc' (and its included `vpnc-script') crashed when trying to
conn
ect to any vpn.
Regards,
Jelle
[0001-gnu-vpnc-Update-to-0.5.3-revision-550.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#27549
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Sat, 01 Jul 2017 14:56:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 27549 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Jelle Licht <jlicht <at> fsfe.org> writes:
[ .. ]
And now with the actual commit message that I intended to have here. Apologies for the noise.
[0001-gnu-vpnc-Update-to-0.5.3-revision-550.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#27549
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Sat, 01 Jul 2017 17:17:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 27549 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Jelle,
On 01/07/17 16:48, Jelle Licht wrote:
> Hello Guix,
>
> Having tried to get `vpnc' working with my university's vpn system, and
> failing, I looked into other distributions and how they got it to work.
> It seems that most people use an updated version of the bundled
> `vpnc-script' to make it work.
Indeed.
I'd started on packaging those updated vpnc-scripts, but that kind of
fell through all kind of cracks.
I don't think I needed to bundle anything. I'll dig them up and see how
far I got.
Kind regards,
T G-R
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#27549
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Sun, 02 Jul 2017 15:15:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 27549 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi!
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr> skribis:
> On 01/07/17 16:48, Jelle Licht wrote:
>> Hello Guix,
>>
>> Having tried to get `vpnc' working with my university's vpn system, and
>> failing, I looked into other distributions and how they got it to work.
>> It seems that most people use an updated version of the bundled
>> `vpnc-script' to make it work.
>
> Indeed.
>
> I'd started on packaging those updated vpnc-scripts, but that kind of
> fell through all kind of cracks.
>
> I don't think I needed to bundle anything. I'll dig them up and see how
> far I got.
Indeed, that would be nice.
In the meantime, could you apply Jelle’s patch if it looks right to you?
It’s a bit sad that upstream hasn’t made new releases.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#27549
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Mon, 03 Jul 2017 05:18:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at 27549 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Jelle,
On 01/07/17 19:18, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
> I'd started on packaging those updated vpnc-scripts, [...]
> I'll dig them up and see how far I got.
Found 'em! If you have some spare time, could you give the attached
patches a try? They look finished[0], but I don't have a VPN to test.
I hope we can avoid relying on the copy of vpnc-scripts bundled with vpnc:
- the bundled copy still lags behind upstream[1], even in trunk
- unbundling allows using a stable release of the vpnc client instead
of a subversion checkout, while still easily updating the scripts
- and shaves ~50MiB from our openconnect package.
Of course, it has to actually work for you first :-)
Kind regards,
T G-R
[0]: I don't like the look of 'wrap-keys, but I don't know a better way.
[1]: http://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/vpnc-scripts.git
[0002-gnu-vpnc-Use-newer-vpnc-scripts.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
[0001-gnu-Add-vpnc-scripts.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#27549
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Wed, 05 Jul 2017 21:48:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #20 received at 27549 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Tobias,
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr> writes:
> Jelle,
>
> On 01/07/17 19:18, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
>> I'd started on packaging those updated vpnc-scripts, [...]
>> I'll dig them up and see how far I got.
>
> Found 'em! If you have some spare time, could you give the attached
> patches a try? They look finished[0], but I don't have a VPN to test.
>
> I hope we can avoid relying on the copy of vpnc-scripts bundled with vpnc:
>
> - the bundled copy still lags behind upstream[1], even in trunk
> - unbundling allows using a stable release of the vpnc client instead
> of a subversion checkout, while still easily updating the scripts
> - and shaves ~50MiB from our openconnect package.
Fair enough, this seems like a good reason to apply your patches ;-).
>
> Of course, it has to actually work for you first :-)
Good news! Your patches work, I verified this with my university vpn.
Why are we using this specific versions of the vpnc-scripts?
What is the problem regarding `wrap-keys' (wrap-program?) exactly?
Regards,
Jelle
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#27549
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Wed, 18 Oct 2017 22:13:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #23 received at 27549 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Ricardo,
Ricardo Wurmus wrote on 18/10/17 at 23:35:
> What’s the current status here?
I'd arranged for someone else with access to such a VPN to (also) test
these patches, but never got an answer. I'm afraid I lost track of this
issue in the meantime.
I'll look into it after some much-needed rest.
Kind regards,
T G-R
Owner recorded as Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>.
Request was from
Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Thu, 19 Oct 2017 05:24:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#27549
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Sat, 21 Oct 2017 01:42:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #28 received at 27549 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi Jelle, hi Tobias,
> Tobias,
>
>
> Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr> writes:
>
>> Jelle,
>>
>> On 01/07/17 19:18, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
>>> I'd started on packaging those updated vpnc-scripts, [...]
>>> I'll dig them up and see how far I got.
>>
>> Found 'em! If you have some spare time, could you give the attached
>> patches a try? They look finished[0], but I don't have a VPN to test.
>>
>> I hope we can avoid relying on the copy of vpnc-scripts bundled with vpnc:
>>
>> - the bundled copy still lags behind upstream[1], even in trunk
>> - unbundling allows using a stable release of the vpnc client instead
>> of a subversion checkout, while still easily updating the scripts
>> - and shaves ~50MiB from our openconnect package.
> Fair enough, this seems like a good reason to apply your patches ;-).
>
>>
>> Of course, it has to actually work for you first :-)
>
> Good news! Your patches work, I verified this with my university vpn.
> Why are we using this specific versions of the vpnc-scripts?
>
> What is the problem regarding `wrap-keys' (wrap-program?) exactly?
It looks like these patches were dropped. What’s the current status
here? Can we apply them or are they no longer needed?
--
Ricardo
GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC
https://elephly.net
Reply sent
to
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Wed, 29 Nov 2017 15:13:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Jelle Licht <jlicht <at> fsfe.org>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Wed, 29 Nov 2017 15:13:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #33 received at 27549-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> It looks like these patches were dropped.
Down 6 flights of very cracked stairs.
Finally pushed as 06d91fd944e58ce787048f5c1b7804b210ad1f82 et al.
Kind regards,
T G-R
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Thu, 28 Dec 2017 12:24:04 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 6 years and 92 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.