GNU bug report logs - #27556
libpng has wrong hash.

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: ng0 <ng0 <at> infotropique.org>

Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2017 20:15:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 27556 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 27556 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox

Report forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#27556; Package guix. (Sun, 02 Jul 2017 20:15:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent to ng0 <ng0 <at> infotropique.org>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix <at> gnu.org. (Sun, 02 Jul 2017 20:15:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ng0 <ng0 <at> infotropique.org>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: libpng has wrong hash.
Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2017 20:13:44 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
I don't know if they moved the file around, renamed it or
whatever, but the hash is now
"0m5nv70n9903x3xzxw9qqc6sgf2rp106ha0x6gix0xf8wcrljaab".
We should use this in icecat as intended (I use it for
firefox nightly I work on) so that these errors get
attention.

@ build-started /gnu/store/l2ajzgighkr23qhyrqzy3qm64gy7v75y-libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz.drv - x86_64-linux /var/log/guix/drvs/l2//ajzgighkr23qhyrqzy3qm64gy7v75y-libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz.drv.bz2

Starting download of /gnu/store/lsgx25nk7cg24hn6cn898jrkhs8aily3-libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz
From http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/libpng-apng/libpng16/1.6.28/libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz...
following redirection to `https://netix.dl.sourceforge.net/project/libpng-apng/libpng16/1.6.28/libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz'...
 ...-apng.patch.gz  11KiB           1.2MiB/s 00:00 [####################] 100.0%
sha256 hash mismatch for output path `/gnu/store/lsgx25nk7cg24hn6cn898jrkhs8aily3-libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz'
  expected: 026r0gbkf6d6v54wca02cdxln8sj4m2c1yk62sj2aasv2ki2ffh5
  actual:   0m5nv70n9903x3xzxw9qqc6sgf2rp106ha0x6gix0xf8wcrljaab
@ build-failed /gnu/store/l2ajzgighkr23qhyrqzy3qm64gy7v75y-libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz.drv - 1 sha256 hash mismatch for output path `/gnu/store/lsgx25nk7cg24hn6cn898jrkhs8aily3-libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz'
  expected: 026r0gbkf6d6v54wca02cdxln8sj4m2c1yk62sj2aasv2ki2ffh5
  actual:   0m5nv70n9903x3xzxw9qqc6sgf2rp106ha0x6gix0xf8wcrljaab
cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/x1dqpvyjz4v25z4al6kll6i3n3whv9h3-libpng-apng-1.6.28.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
guix build: error: build failed: build of `/gnu/store/x1dqpvyjz4v25z4al6kll6i3n3whv9h3-libpng-apng-1.6.28.drv' failed


-- 
ng0
GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
GnuPG: https://n0is.noblogs.org/my-keys
https://www.infotropique.org https://krosos.org

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#27556; Package guix. (Wed, 05 Jul 2017 00:00:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 27556 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: ng0 <ng0 <at> infotropique.org>
Cc: 27556 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#27556: libpng has wrong hash.
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2017 19:59:58 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 08:13:44PM +0000, ng0 wrote:
> I don't know if they moved the file around, renamed it or
> whatever, but the hash is now
> "0m5nv70n9903x3xzxw9qqc6sgf2rp106ha0x6gix0xf8wcrljaab".
> We should use this in icecat as intended (I use it for
> firefox nightly I work on) so that these errors get
> attention.
> 
> @ build-started /gnu/store/l2ajzgighkr23qhyrqzy3qm64gy7v75y-libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz.drv - x86_64-linux /var/log/guix/drvs/l2//ajzgighkr23qhyrqzy3qm64gy7v75y-libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz.drv.bz2
> 
> Starting download of /gnu/store/lsgx25nk7cg24hn6cn898jrkhs8aily3-libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz
> From http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/libpng-apng/libpng16/1.6.28/libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz...
> following redirection to `https://netix.dl.sourceforge.net/project/libpng-apng/libpng16/1.6.28/libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz'...
>  ...-apng.patch.gz  11KiB           1.2MiB/s 00:00 [####################] 100.0%
> sha256 hash mismatch for output path `/gnu/store/lsgx25nk7cg24hn6cn898jrkhs8aily3-libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz'
>   expected: 026r0gbkf6d6v54wca02cdxln8sj4m2c1yk62sj2aasv2ki2ffh5
>   actual:   0m5nv70n9903x3xzxw9qqc6sgf2rp106ha0x6gix0xf8wcrljaab
> @ build-failed /gnu/store/l2ajzgighkr23qhyrqzy3qm64gy7v75y-libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz.drv - 1 sha256 hash mismatch for output path `/gnu/store/lsgx25nk7cg24hn6cn898jrkhs8aily3-libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz'
>   expected: 026r0gbkf6d6v54wca02cdxln8sj4m2c1yk62sj2aasv2ki2ffh5
>   actual:   0m5nv70n9903x3xzxw9qqc6sgf2rp106ha0x6gix0xf8wcrljaab
> cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/x1dqpvyjz4v25z4al6kll6i3n3whv9h3-libpng-apng-1.6.28.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
> guix build: error: build failed: build of `/gnu/store/x1dqpvyjz4v25z4al6kll6i3n3whv9h3-libpng-apng-1.6.28.drv' failed

Clarification: This is libpng-apng, not libpng.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#27556; Package guix. (Wed, 05 Jul 2017 07:58:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #11 received at 27556 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ng0 <ng0 <at> infotropique.org>
To: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Cc: 27556 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, ng0 <ng0 <at> infotropique.org>
Subject: Re: bug#27556: libpng has wrong hash.
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 07:57:25 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Leo Famulari transcribed 2.9K bytes:
> On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 08:13:44PM +0000, ng0 wrote:
> > I don't know if they moved the file around, renamed it or
> > whatever, but the hash is now
> > "0m5nv70n9903x3xzxw9qqc6sgf2rp106ha0x6gix0xf8wcrljaab".
> > We should use this in icecat as intended (I use it for
> > firefox nightly I work on) so that these errors get
> > attention.
> > 
> > @ build-started /gnu/store/l2ajzgighkr23qhyrqzy3qm64gy7v75y-libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz.drv - x86_64-linux /var/log/guix/drvs/l2//ajzgighkr23qhyrqzy3qm64gy7v75y-libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz.drv.bz2
> > 
> > Starting download of /gnu/store/lsgx25nk7cg24hn6cn898jrkhs8aily3-libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz
> > From http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/libpng-apng/libpng16/1.6.28/libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz...
> > following redirection to `https://netix.dl.sourceforge.net/project/libpng-apng/libpng16/1.6.28/libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz'...
> >  ...-apng.patch.gz  11KiB           1.2MiB/s 00:00 [####################] 100.0%
> > sha256 hash mismatch for output path `/gnu/store/lsgx25nk7cg24hn6cn898jrkhs8aily3-libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz'
> >   expected: 026r0gbkf6d6v54wca02cdxln8sj4m2c1yk62sj2aasv2ki2ffh5
> >   actual:   0m5nv70n9903x3xzxw9qqc6sgf2rp106ha0x6gix0xf8wcrljaab
> > @ build-failed /gnu/store/l2ajzgighkr23qhyrqzy3qm64gy7v75y-libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz.drv - 1 sha256 hash mismatch for output path `/gnu/store/lsgx25nk7cg24hn6cn898jrkhs8aily3-libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz'
> >   expected: 026r0gbkf6d6v54wca02cdxln8sj4m2c1yk62sj2aasv2ki2ffh5
> >   actual:   0m5nv70n9903x3xzxw9qqc6sgf2rp106ha0x6gix0xf8wcrljaab
> > cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/x1dqpvyjz4v25z4al6kll6i3n3whv9h3-libpng-apng-1.6.28.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
> > guix build: error: build failed: build of `/gnu/store/x1dqpvyjz4v25z4al6kll6i3n3whv9h3-libpng-apng-1.6.28.drv' failed
> 
> Clarification: This is libpng-apng, not libpng.

Right, my mistake. It still is wrong, and that's
been the case for at least 3 weeks.
-- 
ng0
GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
GnuPG: https://n0is.noblogs.org/my-keys
https://www.infotropique.org https://krosos.org

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#27556; Package guix. (Wed, 12 Jul 2017 15:28:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #14 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ng0 <ng0 <at> infotropique.org>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: Fix for bug#27556
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 15:25:51 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Appended. I haven't asked upstream why it changed
all I know is that I am currently packaging software
which depends on this library and I'd like to drop
my local correction.
-- 
ng0
GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
GnuPG: https://n0is.noblogs.org/my-keys
https://www.infotropique.org https://krosos.org

[0001-gnu-libpng-apng-Correct-the-hash.patch (text/plain, attachment)]
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#27556; Package guix. (Sat, 22 Jul 2017 09:17:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #17 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ng0 <ng0 <at> infotropique.org>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#27556: Fix for bug#27556
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2017 09:15:44 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
ng0 transcribed 3.1K bytes:
> Appended. I haven't asked upstream why it changed
> all I know is that I am currently packaging software
> which depends on this library and I'd like to drop
> my local correction.

I have sent an email to the upstream maintainer, asking why the hash has
been changed in place.

-- 
ng0
GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
GnuPG: https://n0is.noblogs.org/my-keys
https://www.infotropique.org https://krosos.org

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#27556; Package guix. (Sun, 23 Jul 2017 10:17:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #20 received at 27556 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ng0 <ng0 <at> infotropique.org>
To: 27556 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#27556: libpng has wrong hash. [Fwd: Re: why has the hash for
 libpng-apng 1.6.28 changed?]
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2017 10:15:47 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
----- Forwarded message -----

> Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2017 18:21:19 +0900 (JST)
> To: ng0
> Cc: daisuken <at> users.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: why has the hash for libpng-apng 1.6.28 changed?
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I calculated the hash for libpng-apng files on my local orignals.
> 
> md5sum
> 9f2b36bccf89c5f4097111f0f73c1798  libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.README.txt
> fca7c6d87c8352e645facefc2e1dd153  libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz
> 
> sha1sum
> cb620589ecf9c28a4ecc00e6225dd41ca660a959  libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.README.txt
> 4fa952f5ad374fce8d478b7e54ee4298a0b8d159  libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz
> 
> Local file time stamps are
> 2017-01-06 21:02:10.938833896 +0900  libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.README.txt
> 2017-01-06 21:02:10.938833896 +0900  libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz
> 
> That values equals on sourceforge.net.
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/libpng-apng/files/libpng16/1.6.28/
> 
> I don't really understand what happend, but it look just fine.
> 
> Cheers,
> ---
> daisuken <at> users.sourceforge.net
> 
> 
> From: ng0
> Subject: why has the hash for libpng-apng 1.6.28 changed?
> Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2017 09:06:28 +0000
> Message-ID: <20170722090628.rvnmyvafhkgrnl7t <at> abyayala>
> 
> ng0> Hi,
> ng0> 
> ng0> I noticed that the hash for libpng-apng at the source changed, for version 1.6.28.
> ng0> 
> ng0> Can you tell me what happened? As libpng-apng is a recent addition in our
> ng0> system (GNU Guix) I'm not yet aware of any bad or good practices or the
> ng0> lack of them libpng-apng applies.
> ng0> My current guess is that you changed the tarball in place, or that
> ng0> Sourceforge changed it in place. We'll diff the tarball contents and see
> ng0> what changed, but a maintainers reply will also be good.
> ng0> 
> ng0> Greetings,
> ng0> -- 
> ng0> ng0
> ng0> GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
> ng0> GnuPG: https://n0is.noblogs.org/my-keys
> ng0> https://www.infotropique.org https://krosos.org
> 

----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
ng0
GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
GnuPG: https://n0is.noblogs.org/my-keys
https://www.infotropique.org https://krosos.org

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#27556; Package guix. (Tue, 25 Jul 2017 18:50:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #23 received at 27556 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: 27556 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#27556: libpng has wrong hash. [Fwd: Re: why has the hash for
 libpng-apng 1.6.28 changed?]
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 14:49:36 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 10:15:47AM +0000, ng0 wrote:
> ----- Forwarded message -----
> 
> > Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2017 18:21:19 +0900 (JST)
> > To: ng0
> > Cc: daisuken <at> users.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: Re: why has the hash for libpng-apng 1.6.28 changed?
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I calculated the hash for libpng-apng files on my local orignals.
> > 
> > md5sum
> > 9f2b36bccf89c5f4097111f0f73c1798  libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.README.txt
> > fca7c6d87c8352e645facefc2e1dd153  libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz
> > 
> > sha1sum
> > cb620589ecf9c28a4ecc00e6225dd41ca660a959  libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.README.txt
> > 4fa952f5ad374fce8d478b7e54ee4298a0b8d159  libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz
> > 
> > Local file time stamps are
> > 2017-01-06 21:02:10.938833896 +0900  libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.README.txt
> > 2017-01-06 21:02:10.938833896 +0900  libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz
> > 
> > That values equals on sourceforge.net.
> > https://sourceforge.net/projects/libpng-apng/files/libpng16/1.6.28/
> > 
> > I don't really understand what happend, but it look just fine.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > ---
> > daisuken <at> users.sourceforge.net

Okay, this doesn't help us, so we need to inspect the different tarballs
ourselves. Do you have an old copy of the patch you can share?

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#27556; Package guix. (Wed, 26 Jul 2017 06:58:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #26 received at 27556 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ng0 <ng0 <at> infotropique.org>
To: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Cc: 27556 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#27556: libpng has wrong hash. [Fwd: Re: why has the hash for
 libpng-apng 1.6.28 changed?]
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 06:56:51 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Leo Famulari transcribed 2.3K bytes:
> On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 10:15:47AM +0000, ng0 wrote:
> > ----- Forwarded message -----
> > 
> > > Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2017 18:21:19 +0900 (JST)
> > > To: ng0
> > > Cc: daisuken <at> users.sourceforge.net
> > > Subject: Re: why has the hash for libpng-apng 1.6.28 changed?
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > I calculated the hash for libpng-apng files on my local orignals.
> > > 
> > > md5sum
> > > 9f2b36bccf89c5f4097111f0f73c1798  libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.README.txt
> > > fca7c6d87c8352e645facefc2e1dd153  libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz
> > > 
> > > sha1sum
> > > cb620589ecf9c28a4ecc00e6225dd41ca660a959  libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.README.txt
> > > 4fa952f5ad374fce8d478b7e54ee4298a0b8d159  libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz
> > > 
> > > Local file time stamps are
> > > 2017-01-06 21:02:10.938833896 +0900  libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.README.txt
> > > 2017-01-06 21:02:10.938833896 +0900  libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz
> > > 
> > > That values equals on sourceforge.net.
> > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/libpng-apng/files/libpng16/1.6.28/
> > > 
> > > I don't really understand what happend, but it look just fine.
> > > 
> > > Cheers,
> > > ---
> > > daisuken <at> users.sourceforge.net
> 
> Okay, this doesn't help us, so we need to inspect the different tarballs
> ourselves. Do you have an old copy of the patch you can share?

Yes. I mean no. I am not sure. I have libpng-apng git checkout
and also the 1.6.25 extracted tarball directory (but not sure
when I got it), and the tarballs for 1.6.5 and 1.6.28.

But I think I found our problem:

user <at> shadownet ~/re-src$ guix hash tarballs/libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz
0m5nv70n9903x3xzxw9qqc6sgf2rp106ha0x6gix0xf8wcrljaab
user <at> shadownet ~/re-src$ guix hash tarballs/libpng-1.6.25-apng.patch.gz
026r0gbkf6d6v54wca02cdxln8sj4m2c1yk62sj2aasv2ki2ffh5

(inputs
 `(("apng" ,(origin
    (method url-fetch)
     (uri
     (string-append "mirror://sourceforge/libpng-apng/libpng16/"
     version "/libpng-" version "-apng.patch.gz"))
     (sha256
     (base32
     "026r0gbkf6d6v54wca02cdxln8sj4m2c1yk62sj2aasv2ki2ffh5"))))))

My really strong guess is that we never updated the hash for
libpng-apng when the libpng was updated fron which libpng-apng
inherits its version.

I don't have the time to look at our git history right now,
but you could do that, look at wether libpng-apng was touched
since 1.6.25->1.6.28 update of libpng.

user <at> shadownet ~/re-src$ ls -al *png* ; ls -al tarballs/*png*
libpng-1.6.25:
total 3416
drwxr-xr-x   8 user users   4096 Mar 24 14:51 ./
drwxr-xr-x 282 user users  12288 Jul 22 09:39 ../
-rw-r--r--   1 user users  44739 Sep  1  2016 aclocal.m4
-rw-r--r--   1 user users   1207 Sep  1  2016 ANNOUNCE
drwxr-xr-x   2 user users   4096 Mar 24 14:51 arm/
-rwxr-xr-x   1 user users   7979 Aug  3  2015 autogen.sh
-rw-r--r--   1 user users 285838 Sep  1  2016 CHANGES
-rw-r--r--   1 user users  30349 Sep  1  2016 CMakeLists.txt
-rwxr-xr-x   1 user users   7333 Feb 21  2015 compile
-rwxr-xr-x   1 user users  42938 Feb 21  2015 config.guess
-rw-r--r--   1 user users   3307 Sep  1  2016 config.h.in
-rwxr-xr-x   1 user users  35987 Feb 21  2015 config.sub
-rwxr-xr-x   1 user users 477565 Sep  1  2016 configure
-rw-r--r--   1 user users  14688 Sep  1  2016 configure.ac
drwxr-xr-x  15 user users   4096 Mar 24 14:51 contrib/
-rwxr-xr-x   1 user users  23566 Feb 21  2015 depcomp
-rw-r--r--   1 user users  40303 Sep  1  2016 example.c
-rw-r--r--   1 user users  17971 Sep  1  2016 INSTALL
-rwxr-xr-x   1 user users  14675 Feb 21  2015 install-sh
-rw-r--r--   1 user users 270700 Sep  1  2016 libpng.3
-rw-r--r--   1 user users   2396 Sep  1  2016 libpng-config.in
-rw-r--r--   1 user users 228244 Sep  1  2016 libpng-manual.txt
-rw-r--r--   1 user users    293 Sep  1  2016 libpng.pc.in
-rw-r--r--   1 user users    764 Sep  1  2016 libpngpf.3
-rw-r--r--   1 user users   4937 Sep  1  2016 LICENSE
-rw-r--r--   1 user users 324089 Sep  1  2016 ltmain.sh
-rw-r--r--   1 user users  13620 Sep  1  2016 Makefile.am
-rw-r--r--   1 user users  89190 Sep  1  2016 Makefile.in
drwxr-xr-x   2 user users   4096 Mar 24 14:51 mips/
-rwxr-xr-x   1 user users   6872 Feb 21  2015 missing
-rw-r--r--   1 user users   2432 Sep  1  2016 png.5
-rw-r--r--   1 user users   2498 Jul 12  2000 pngbar.jpg
-rw-r--r--   1 user users   2399 Jul 12  2000 pngbar.png
-rw-r--r--   1 user users 155048 Sep  1  2016 png.c
-rw-r--r--   1 user users  22842 Sep  1  2016 pngconf.h
-rw-r--r--   1 user users   5368 Sep  1  2016 pngdebug.h
-rw-r--r--   1 user users  29224 Sep  1  2016 pngerror.c
-rw-r--r--   1 user users  33379 Sep  1  2016 pngget.c
-rw-r--r--   1 user users 143481 Sep  1  2016 png.h
-rw-r--r--   1 user users  12343 Sep  1  2016 pnginfo.h
-rw-r--r--   1 user users   8353 Sep  1  2016 pngmem.c
-rw-r--r--   1 user users   2069 Aug 26  2004 pngnow.png
-rw-r--r--   1 user users  31617 Sep  1  2016 pngpread.c
-rw-r--r--   1 user users  83266 Sep  1  2016 pngpriv.h
-rw-r--r--   1 user users 141254 Sep  1  2016 pngread.c
-rw-r--r--   1 user users   3956 Sep  1  2016 pngrio.c
-rw-r--r--   1 user users 168573 Sep  1  2016 pngrtran.c
-rw-r--r--   1 user users 142873 Sep  1  2016 pngrutil.c
-rw-r--r--   1 user users  49969 Sep  1  2016 pngset.c
-rw-r--r--   1 user users  20036 Sep  1  2016 pngstruct.h
-rw-r--r--   1 user users  61255 Sep  1  2016 pngtest.c
-rw-r--r--   1 user users   8695 Jan  6  2013 pngtest.png
-rw-r--r--   1 user users  25150 Sep  1  2016 pngtrans.c
-rw-r--r--   1 user users    497 Sep  1  2016 pngusr.dfa
-rw-r--r--   1 user users   5655 Sep  1  2016 pngwio.c
-rw-r--r--   1 user users  76028 Sep  1  2016 pngwrite.c
-rw-r--r--   1 user users  15391 Sep  1  2016 pngwtran.c
-rw-r--r--   1 user users  80139 Sep  1  2016 pngwutil.c
drwxr-xr-x   5 user users   4096 Mar 24 14:51 projects/
-rw-r--r--   1 user users  11403 Sep  1  2016 README
drwxr-xr-x   2 user users   4096 Mar 24 14:51 scripts/
-rwxr-xr-x   1 user users   4640 Feb 21  2015 test-driver
drwxr-xr-x   2 user users   4096 Mar 24 14:51 tests/
-rw-r--r--   1 user users   1252 Aug 15  2016 TODO

libpng-apng-code:
total 2764
drwxr-xr-x   6 user users   4096 Jul 22 08:53 ./
drwxr-xr-x 282 user users  12288 Jul 22 09:39 ../
-rw-r--r--   1 user users 322880 Jul 22 08:53 aclocal.m4
-rw-r--r--   1 user users   1728 Jul 22 08:53 ANNOUNCE
-rwxr-xr-x   1 user users    877 Jul 22 08:53 autogen.sh
-rw-r--r--   1 user users 141161 Jul 22 08:53 CHANGES
-rw-r--r--   1 user users  12406 Jul 22 08:53 CMakeLists.txt
-rwxr-xr-x   1 user users  44941 Jul 22 08:53 config.guess
-rw-r--r--   1 user users   2218 Jul 22 08:53 config.h.in
-rwxr-xr-x   1 user users  34423 Jul 22 08:53 config.sub
-rwxr-xr-x   1 user users 411663 Jul 22 08:53 configure
-rw-r--r--   1 user users   3862 Jul 22 08:53 configure.ac
drwxr-xr-x   7 user users   4096 Jul 22 08:53 contrib/
-rwxr-xr-x   1 user users  18615 Jul 22 08:53 depcomp
-rw-r--r--   1 user users  30668 Jul 22 08:53 example.c
drwxr-xr-x   8 user users   4096 Jul 22 08:53 .git/
-rw-r--r--   1 user users   5175 Jul 22 08:53 INSTALL
-rwxr-xr-x   1 user users  13663 Jul 22 08:53 install-sh
-rw-r--r--   1 user users 141280 Jul 22 08:53 libpng-1.4.8.txt
-rw-r--r--   1 user users 184598 Jul 22 08:53 libpng.3
-rwxr-xr-x   1 user users   2379 Jul 22 08:53 libpng-config.in
-rw-r--r--   1 user users    293 Jul 22 08:53 libpng.pc.in
-rw-r--r--   1 user users  19036 Jul 22 08:53 libpngpf.3
-rw-r--r--   1 user users   4192 Jul 22 08:53 LICENSE
-rwxr-xr-x   1 user users 253153 Jul 22 08:53 ltmain.sh
-rw-r--r--   1 user users   4541 Jul 22 08:53 Makefile.am
-rw-r--r--   1 user users  60025 Jul 22 08:53 Makefile.in
-rwxr-xr-x   1 user users  11419 Jul 22 08:53 missing
-rw-r--r--   1 user users   2408 Jul 22 08:53 png.5
-rw-r--r--   1 user users   2498 Jul 22 08:53 pngbar.jpg
-rw-r--r--   1 user users   2399 Jul 22 08:53 pngbar.png
-rw-r--r--   1 user users  26634 Jul 22 08:53 png.c
-rw-r--r--   1 user users  47082 Jul 22 08:53 pngconf.h
-rw-r--r--   1 user users  12267 Jul 22 08:53 pngerror.c
-rw-r--r--   1 user users  28616 Jul 22 08:53 pngget.c
-rw-r--r--   1 user users 124654 Jul 22 08:53 png.h
-rw-r--r--   1 user users  16821 Jul 22 08:53 pngmem.c
-rw-r--r--   1 user users   2069 Jul 22 08:53 pngnow.png
-rw-r--r--   1 user users  54513 Jul 22 08:53 pngpread.c
-rw-r--r--   1 user users  37962 Jul 22 08:53 pngpriv.h
-rw-r--r--   1 user users  45779 Jul 22 08:53 pngread.c
-rw-r--r--   1 user users   5313 Jul 22 08:53 pngrio.c
-rw-r--r--   1 user users 141155 Jul 22 08:53 pngrtran.c
-rw-r--r--   1 user users 107313 Jul 22 08:53 pngrutil.c
-rw-r--r--   1 user users  39242 Jul 22 08:53 pngset.c
-rw-r--r--   1 user users  54601 Jul 22 08:53 pngtest.c
-rw-r--r--   1 user users   8608 Jul 22 08:53 pngtest.png
-rw-r--r--   1 user users  20655 Jul 22 08:53 pngtrans.c
-rw-r--r--   1 user users   7648 Jul 22 08:53 pngwio.c
-rw-r--r--   1 user users  47855 Jul 22 08:53 pngwrite.c
-rw-r--r--   1 user users  16934 Jul 22 08:53 pngwtran.c
-rw-r--r--   1 user users  89100 Jul 22 08:53 pngwutil.c
drwxr-xr-x   6 user users   4096 Jul 22 08:53 projects/
-rw-r--r--   1 user users  13273 Jul 22 08:53 README
drwxr-xr-x   2 user users   4096 Jul 22 08:53 scripts/
-rwxr-xr-x   1 user users     43 Jul 22 08:53 test-pngtest.sh
-rw-r--r--   1 user users   1443 Jul 22 08:53 TODO
-rw-r--r-- 1 user users  10720 Jan 10  2017 tarballs/libpng-1.6.25-apng.patch.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 user users 982204 Jan 10  2017 tarballs/libpng-1.6.25.tar.xz
-rw-r--r-- 1 user users    819 Jan 10  2017 tarballs/libpng-1.6.25.tar.xz.asc
-rw-r--r-- 1 user users  10766 Jan 10  2017 tarballs/libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz

-- 
ng0
GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
GnuPG: https://n0is.noblogs.org/my-keys
https://www.infotropique.org https://krosos.org

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#27556; Package guix. (Wed, 26 Jul 2017 08:41:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #29 received at 27556 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
To: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>, 27556 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#27556: libpng has wrong hash. [Fwd: Re: why has the hash for
 libpng-apng 1.6.28 changed?]
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 11:40:41 +0300

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 06:56:51AM +0000, ng0 wrote:
> Leo Famulari transcribed 2.3K bytes:
> > On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 10:15:47AM +0000, ng0 wrote:
> > > ----- Forwarded message -----
> > > 
> > > > Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2017 18:21:19 +0900 (JST)
> > > > To: ng0
> > > > Cc: daisuken <at> users.sourceforge.net
> > > > Subject: Re: why has the hash for libpng-apng 1.6.28 changed?
> > > > 
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > I calculated the hash for libpng-apng files on my local orignals.
> > > > 
> > > > md5sum
> > > > 9f2b36bccf89c5f4097111f0f73c1798  libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.README.txt
> > > > fca7c6d87c8352e645facefc2e1dd153  libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz
> > > > 
> > > > sha1sum
> > > > cb620589ecf9c28a4ecc00e6225dd41ca660a959  libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.README.txt
> > > > 4fa952f5ad374fce8d478b7e54ee4298a0b8d159  libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz
> > > > 
> > > > Local file time stamps are
> > > > 2017-01-06 21:02:10.938833896 +0900  libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.README.txt
> > > > 2017-01-06 21:02:10.938833896 +0900  libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz
> > > > 
> > > > That values equals on sourceforge.net.
> > > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/libpng-apng/files/libpng16/1.6.28/
> > > > 
> > > > I don't really understand what happend, but it look just fine.
> > > > 
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > ---
> > > > daisuken <at> users.sourceforge.net
> > 
> > Okay, this doesn't help us, so we need to inspect the different tarballs
> > ourselves. Do you have an old copy of the patch you can share?
> 
> Yes. I mean no. I am not sure. I have libpng-apng git checkout
> and also the 1.6.25 extracted tarball directory (but not sure
> when I got it), and the tarballs for 1.6.5 and 1.6.28.
> 
> But I think I found our problem:
> 
> user <at> shadownet ~/re-src$ guix hash tarballs/libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz
> 0m5nv70n9903x3xzxw9qqc6sgf2rp106ha0x6gix0xf8wcrljaab
> user <at> shadownet ~/re-src$ guix hash tarballs/libpng-1.6.25-apng.patch.gz
> 026r0gbkf6d6v54wca02cdxln8sj4m2c1yk62sj2aasv2ki2ffh5
> 
> (inputs
>  `(("apng" ,(origin
>     (method url-fetch)
>      (uri
>      (string-append "mirror://sourceforge/libpng-apng/libpng16/"
>      version "/libpng-" version "-apng.patch.gz"))
>      (sha256
>      (base32
>      "026r0gbkf6d6v54wca02cdxln8sj4m2c1yk62sj2aasv2ki2ffh5"))))))
> 
> My really strong guess is that we never updated the hash for
> libpng-apng when the libpng was updated fron which libpng-apng
> inherits its version.
> 
> I don't have the time to look at our git history right now,
> but you could do that, look at wether libpng-apng was touched
> since 1.6.25->1.6.28 update of libpng.
> 

git blame shows that back in February I updated libpng to 1.6.28 from
1.6.25, but that the last time libpng-apng was touched was by ng0 back
in January.

commit: 864738baaa7bb75c08647ccfc684736479e67f7f

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#27556; Package guix. (Sun, 30 Jul 2017 09:38:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #32 received at 27556 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ng0 <ng0 <at> infotropique.org>
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
Cc: 27556 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Subject: Re: bug#27556: libpng has wrong hash. [Fwd: Re: why has the hash for
 libpng-apng 1.6.28 changed?]
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2017 09:37:22 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Efraim Flashner transcribed 4.1K bytes:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 06:56:51AM +0000, ng0 wrote:
> > Leo Famulari transcribed 2.3K bytes:
> > > On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 10:15:47AM +0000, ng0 wrote:
> > > > ----- Forwarded message -----
> > > > 
> > > > > Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2017 18:21:19 +0900 (JST)
> > > > > To: ng0
> > > > > Cc: daisuken <at> users.sourceforge.net
> > > > > Subject: Re: why has the hash for libpng-apng 1.6.28 changed?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > 
> > > > > I calculated the hash for libpng-apng files on my local orignals.
> > > > > 
> > > > > md5sum
> > > > > 9f2b36bccf89c5f4097111f0f73c1798  libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.README.txt
> > > > > fca7c6d87c8352e645facefc2e1dd153  libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz
> > > > > 
> > > > > sha1sum
> > > > > cb620589ecf9c28a4ecc00e6225dd41ca660a959  libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.README.txt
> > > > > 4fa952f5ad374fce8d478b7e54ee4298a0b8d159  libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz
> > > > > 
> > > > > Local file time stamps are
> > > > > 2017-01-06 21:02:10.938833896 +0900  libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.README.txt
> > > > > 2017-01-06 21:02:10.938833896 +0900  libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz
> > > > > 
> > > > > That values equals on sourceforge.net.
> > > > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/libpng-apng/files/libpng16/1.6.28/
> > > > > 
> > > > > I don't really understand what happend, but it look just fine.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > ---
> > > > > daisuken <at> users.sourceforge.net
> > > 
> > > Okay, this doesn't help us, so we need to inspect the different tarballs
> > > ourselves. Do you have an old copy of the patch you can share?
> > 
> > Yes. I mean no. I am not sure. I have libpng-apng git checkout
> > and also the 1.6.25 extracted tarball directory (but not sure
> > when I got it), and the tarballs for 1.6.5 and 1.6.28.
> > 
> > But I think I found our problem:
> > 
> > user <at> shadownet ~/re-src$ guix hash tarballs/libpng-1.6.28-apng.patch.gz
> > 0m5nv70n9903x3xzxw9qqc6sgf2rp106ha0x6gix0xf8wcrljaab
> > user <at> shadownet ~/re-src$ guix hash tarballs/libpng-1.6.25-apng.patch.gz
> > 026r0gbkf6d6v54wca02cdxln8sj4m2c1yk62sj2aasv2ki2ffh5
> > 
> > (inputs
> >  `(("apng" ,(origin
> >     (method url-fetch)
> >      (uri
> >      (string-append "mirror://sourceforge/libpng-apng/libpng16/"
> >      version "/libpng-" version "-apng.patch.gz"))
> >      (sha256
> >      (base32
> >      "026r0gbkf6d6v54wca02cdxln8sj4m2c1yk62sj2aasv2ki2ffh5"))))))
> > 
> > My really strong guess is that we never updated the hash for
> > libpng-apng when the libpng was updated fron which libpng-apng
> > inherits its version.
> > 
> > I don't have the time to look at our git history right now,
> > but you could do that, look at wether libpng-apng was touched
> > since 1.6.25->1.6.28 update of libpng.
> > 
> 
> git blame shows that back in February I updated libpng to 1.6.28 from
> 1.6.25, but that the last time libpng-apng was touched was by ng0 back
> in January.
> 
> commit: 864738baaa7bb75c08647ccfc684736479e67f7f

Okay, so I will send the update for libpng-apng (which due to its
inheritance of libpng is just the hash) and I will also add a second
commit which adds a comment above libpng that we must update libpng-apng
when we update libpng, if that's already possible (libpng-apng might not
immediately be up to date, but we don't update libpng immediately aswell
due to it being a core-updates candidate).

> 
> -- 
> Efraim Flashner   <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>   אפרים פלשנר
> GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
> Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted



-- 
ng0
GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
GnuPG: https://n0is.noblogs.org/my-keys
https://www.infotropique.org https://krosos.org

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#27556; Package guix. (Mon, 31 Jul 2017 14:35:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #35 received at 27556 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>, 27556 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 ng0 <ng0 <at> infotropique.org>
Subject: Re: bug#27556: libpng has wrong hash. [Fwd: Re: why has the hash for
 libpng-apng 1.6.28 changed?]
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 10:34:20 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 09:37:22AM +0000, ng0 wrote:
> Efraim Flashner transcribed 4.1K bytes:
> > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 06:56:51AM +0000, ng0 wrote:
> > > My really strong guess is that we never updated the hash for
> > > libpng-apng when the libpng was updated fron which libpng-apng
> > > inherits its version.

[...]

> > git blame shows that back in February I updated libpng to 1.6.28 from
> > 1.6.25, but that the last time libpng-apng was touched was by ng0 back
> > in January.
> > 
> > commit: 864738baaa7bb75c08647ccfc684736479e67f7f

Aha, that must be it!

> Okay, so I will send the update for libpng-apng (which due to its
> inheritance of libpng is just the hash) and I will also add a second
> commit which adds a comment above libpng that we must update libpng-apng
> when we update libpng, if that's already possible (libpng-apng might not
> immediately be up to date, but we don't update libpng immediately aswell
> due to it being a core-updates candidate).

I think we should give libpng-apng its own version because, as you said,
libpng-apng may not be developed at the same pace as libpng. This way,
we won't end up with a broken libpng-apng again.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#27556; Package guix. (Mon, 31 Jul 2017 14:41:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #38 received at 27556 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ng0 <ng0 <at> infotropique.org>
To: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Cc: 27556 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>,
 ng0 <ng0 <at> infotropique.org>
Subject: Re: bug#27556: libpng has wrong hash. [Fwd: Re: why has the hash for
 libpng-apng 1.6.28 changed?]
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 14:39:32 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Leo Famulari transcribed 2.2K bytes:
> On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 09:37:22AM +0000, ng0 wrote:
> > Efraim Flashner transcribed 4.1K bytes:
> > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 06:56:51AM +0000, ng0 wrote:
> > > > My really strong guess is that we never updated the hash for
> > > > libpng-apng when the libpng was updated fron which libpng-apng
> > > > inherits its version.
> 
> [...]
> 
> > > git blame shows that back in February I updated libpng to 1.6.28 from
> > > 1.6.25, but that the last time libpng-apng was touched was by ng0 back
> > > in January.
> > > 
> > > commit: 864738baaa7bb75c08647ccfc684736479e67f7f
> 
> Aha, that must be it!
> 
> > Okay, so I will send the update for libpng-apng (which due to its
> > inheritance of libpng is just the hash) and I will also add a second
> > commit which adds a comment above libpng that we must update libpng-apng
> > when we update libpng, if that's already possible (libpng-apng might not
> > immediately be up to date, but we don't update libpng immediately aswell
> > due to it being a core-updates candidate).
> 
> I think we should give libpng-apng its own version because, as you said,
> libpng-apng may not be developed at the same pace as libpng. This way,
> we won't end up with a broken libpng-apng again.

I agree. Does someone of you want to make the patches and commits,
or should I prepare and send some?

-- 
ng0
GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
GnuPG: https://n0is.noblogs.org/my-keys
https://www.infotropique.org https://krosos.org

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#27556; Package guix. (Tue, 01 Aug 2017 15:48:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #41 received at 27556 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ng0 <ng0 <at> infotropique.org>
To: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>,
 Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>, 27556 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#27556: libpng has wrong hash. [Fwd: Re: why has the hash for
 libpng-apng 1.6.28 changed?]
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 15:47:08 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
ng0 transcribed 2.5K bytes:
> Leo Famulari transcribed 2.2K bytes:
> > On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 09:37:22AM +0000, ng0 wrote:
> > > Efraim Flashner transcribed 4.1K bytes:
> > > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 06:56:51AM +0000, ng0 wrote:
> > > > > My really strong guess is that we never updated the hash for
> > > > > libpng-apng when the libpng was updated fron which libpng-apng
> > > > > inherits its version.
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> > > > git blame shows that back in February I updated libpng to 1.6.28 from
> > > > 1.6.25, but that the last time libpng-apng was touched was by ng0 back
> > > > in January.
> > > > 
> > > > commit: 864738baaa7bb75c08647ccfc684736479e67f7f
> > 
> > Aha, that must be it!
> > 
> > > Okay, so I will send the update for libpng-apng (which due to its
> > > inheritance of libpng is just the hash) and I will also add a second
> > > commit which adds a comment above libpng that we must update libpng-apng
> > > when we update libpng, if that's already possible (libpng-apng might not
> > > immediately be up to date, but we don't update libpng immediately aswell
> > > due to it being a core-updates candidate).
> > 
> > I think we should give libpng-apng its own version because, as you said,
> > libpng-apng may not be developed at the same pace as libpng. This way,
> > we won't end up with a broken libpng-apng again.

I appended a patch how I understood your idea.
-- 
ng0
GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
GnuPG: https://n0is.noblogs.org/my-keys
https://www.infotropique.org https://krosos.org

[0001-gnu-libpng-apng-Update-to-1.6.28.patch (text/plain, attachment)]
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Reply sent to Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>:
You have taken responsibility. (Wed, 02 Aug 2017 15:26:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
Notification sent to ng0 <ng0 <at> infotropique.org>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Wed, 02 Aug 2017 15:26:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #46 received at 27556-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: 27556-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#27556: libpng has wrong hash. [Fwd: Re: why has the hash for
 libpng-apng 1.6.28 changed?]
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 11:25:51 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 03:47:08PM +0000, ng0 wrote:
> From 4326cad38700df43909eb6f430217fdfa4eca89f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: ng0 <ng0 <at> infotropique.org>
> Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 15:37:28 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: libpng-apng: Update to 1.6.28.
> 
> Fixes <https://bugs.gnu.org/27556>.
> 
> * gnu/packages/image.scm (libpng-apng): Update to 1.6.28.
> Remove inherit of 'libpng'.
> (version): Use own version, remove 'package-version libpng'.
> (source): Add it.
> (arguments): Update hash of libpng-apng source.

Thanks! Pushed as e0958c2df833a5eb3b6ecfb66f8d971cd44dd49b

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Thu, 31 Aug 2017 11:24:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 6 years and 238 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.