GNU bug report logs - #27955
[cuirass] doc: Clarify the relationship of "repo_name" and "name".

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>

Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 15:40:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 27955 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 27955 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#27955; Package guix-patches. (Fri, 04 Aug 2017 15:40:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to guix-patches <at> gnu.org. (Fri, 04 Aug 2017 15:40:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: [cuirass] doc: Clarify the relationship of "repo_name" and "name".
Date: Fri,  4 Aug 2017 11:39:31 -0400
I *think* this patch is correct. I'm currently trying to get started
with Cuirass and this tripped me up.

* doc/cuirass.texi (Specifications): Mention "name".
---
 doc/cuirass.texi | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/doc/cuirass.texi b/doc/cuirass.texi
index 2899ffb..76f1ecc 100644
--- a/doc/cuirass.texi
+++ b/doc/cuirass.texi
@@ -216,7 +216,9 @@ Entries in this table must have values for the following text fields:
 @table @code
 @item repo_name
 This field holds the name of the repository.  This field is also the
-primary key of this table.
+primary key of this table.  Although this field is called
+@code{repo_name} in the database, it's called @code{name} in the
+specification itself.
 
 @item url
 The URL of the repository.
-- 
2.13.3





Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#27955; Package guix-patches. (Mon, 04 Sep 2017 13:12:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 27955 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Cc: 27955 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#27955] [cuirass] doc: Clarify the relationship of
 "repo_name" and "name".
Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2017 15:09:48 +0200
Hey Leo,

Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name> skribis:

> I *think* this patch is correct. I'm currently trying to get started
> with Cuirass and this tripped me up.
>
> * doc/cuirass.texi (Specifications): Mention "name".

I think you’re right, please push!

Thanks,
Ludo’.




Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#27955; Package guix-patches. (Fri, 13 Oct 2017 06:09:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #11 received at 27955 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
To: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Cc: 27955 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#27955] [cuirass] doc: Clarify the relationship of
 "repo_name" and "name".
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 07:07:56 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Mon, 04 Sep 2017 15:09:48 +0200
ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:

> Hey Leo,
> 
> Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name> skribis:
> 
> > I *think* this patch is correct. I'm currently trying to get started
> > with Cuirass and this tripped me up.
> >
> > * doc/cuirass.texi (Specifications): Mention "name".  
> 
> I think you’re right, please push!

Bump. Is this still ready to be merged, as I don't think it has been
merged yet?
[Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#27955; Package guix-patches. (Sun, 15 Oct 2017 03:15:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #14 received at 27955 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
Cc: 27955 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#27955] [cuirass] doc: Clarify the relationship of
 "repo_name" and "name".
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2017 23:14:01 -0400
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 07:07:56AM +0100, Christopher Baines wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Sep 2017 15:09:48 +0200
> ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
> 
> > Hey Leo,
> > 
> > Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name> skribis:
> > 
> > > I *think* this patch is correct. I'm currently trying to get started
> > > with Cuirass and this tripped me up.
> > >
> > > * doc/cuirass.texi (Specifications): Mention "name".  
> > 
> > I think you’re right, please push!
> 
> Bump. Is this still ready to be merged, as I don't think it has been
> merged yet?

Sure, but I can't figure out how to push to this repo. What is the push
URL?
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Reply sent to Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>:
You have taken responsibility. (Sun, 15 Oct 2017 03:21:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Sun, 15 Oct 2017 03:21:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #19 received at 27955-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
Cc: 27955-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#27955] [cuirass] doc: Clarify the relationship of
 "repo_name" and "name".
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2017 23:20:49 -0400
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 11:14:01PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 07:07:56AM +0100, Christopher Baines wrote:
> > On Mon, 04 Sep 2017 15:09:48 +0200
> > ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
> > 
> > > Hey Leo,
> > > 
> > > Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name> skribis:
> > > 
> > > > I *think* this patch is correct. I'm currently trying to get started
> > > > with Cuirass and this tripped me up.
> > > >
> > > > * doc/cuirass.texi (Specifications): Mention "name".  
> > > 
> > > I think you’re right, please push!
> > 
> > Bump. Is this still ready to be merged, as I don't think it has been
> > merged yet?
> 
> Sure, but I can't figure out how to push to this repo. What is the push
> URL?

Never mind, I figure it out and pushed!
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Sun, 12 Nov 2017 12:24:06 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 6 years and 167 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.