X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#28510: crash: guix build -S foo --with-source=bla
Resent-From: Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wurmus@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 12:11:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.28510.B.1505823005313 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: report 28510
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords:
To: 28510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Debbugs-Original-To: "'bug-guix@HIDDEN'" <bug-guix@HIDDEN>
Received: via spool by submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B.1505823005313
(code B ref -1); Tue, 19 Sep 2017 12:11:02 +0000
Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Sep 2017 12:10:05 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47407 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1duHLm-00004u-OA
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 08:10:03 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57533)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <Ricardo.Wurmus@HIDDEN>) id 1duHLj-0008Vy-Dq
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 08:10:00 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <Ricardo.Wurmus@HIDDEN>) id 1duHLd-0001PH-8n
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 08:09:54 -0400
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,T_DKIM_INVALID
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:59385)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Ricardo.Wurmus@HIDDEN>)
id 1duHLd-0001PC-5J
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 08:09:53 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48475)
by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <Ricardo.Wurmus@HIDDEN>) id 1duHLb-0004zT-Ri
for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 08:09:52 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <Ricardo.Wurmus@HIDDEN>) id 1duHLW-0001L4-QB
for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 08:09:51 -0400
Received: from venus.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de ([141.80.25.30]:51197)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Ricardo.Wurmus@HIDDEN>)
id 1duHLW-0001Ir-Fm
for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 08:09:46 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by venus.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A656E3809F2
for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 14:09:43 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mdc-berlin.de; h=
content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:mime-version
:message-id:date:date:subject:subject:from:from:user-agent
:received:received:received; s=mdc; t=1505822978; x=1507637379;
bh=boGaToGhixdrF0LObYvSMwYbyuyzbQQsSPo2z70hPPQ=; b=HmffhtXkEDK5
hKSL6KZDK0mVAxLDaMcDYB1v6T2TuHcgyPHvxD3uIRd3XMBpHtFn4vYagqGI0vTl
mSZ+wthCF22RqSSkYvFfID9pmpxAgGolX95DV/12LyuoLXAiQTeTmyemfArZthjC
eoLabj2gx7pg7/gLekuxNiYBE/tMLto=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mdc-berlin.de
Received: from venus.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (venus.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id NeD8m5Setb_n for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>;
Tue, 19 Sep 2017 14:09:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from HTCAONE.mdc-berlin.net (puck.citx.mdc-berlin.de [141.80.36.101])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by venus.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS
for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 14:09:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (141.80.180.135) by HTCAONE.mdc-berlin.net
(141.80.180.125) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.361.1; Tue, 19 Sep
2017 14:09:37 +0200
User-agent: mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.2.1
From: Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wurmus@HIDDEN>
X-URL: https://elephly.net
X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey
X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 14:09:37 +0200
Message-ID: <idjwp4uvqim.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-Originating-IP: [141.80.180.135]
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-11.0.0.4283-8.100.1062-23338.004
X-TM-AS-Result: No-2.076100-0.000000-31
X-TM-AS-MatchedID: 150673-707451-704496-105700-701604-707119-139705-188019-7
04927-705450-701669-703440-703965-705075-700163-704473-702098-703486-703786
-706249-187184-702106-702791-136070-711521-700416-703283-701252-148004-1481
33-10010-42000-42003-63
X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: Yes
X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
[fuzzy]
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x
X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11
X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----)
The command =E2=80=9Cguix build -S guile-git --with-source=3Dguile-git=E2=
=80=9D crashes
instead of failing gracefully:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
rwurmus@bimsb-sys02 in code: git clone https://gitlab.com/guile-git/guile=
-git.git
Cloning into 'guile-git'...
remote: Counting objects: 906, done. =20
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (268/268), done. =20
remote: Total 906 (delta 634), reused 895 (delta 630) =20
Receiving objects: 100% (906/906), 243.62 KiB | 136.00 KiB/s, done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (634/634), done.
rwurmus@bimsb-sys02 in code: cd guile-git
rwurmus@bimsb-sys02 in guile-git: git reset --hard 969514a
HEAD is now at 969514a switch to using set-pointer-finalizer!
rwurmus@bimsb-sys02 in guile-git: cd ..
rwurmus@bimsb-sys02 in code: guix build -S guile-git --with-source=3Dguil=
e-git
Backtrace:
9 (primitive-load "/gnu/store/04gdnvw7k8mnpzs9ig5kwmblzvgkxm4a=
-guix-0.13.0-1.a6d7=E2=80=A6")
In guix/ui.scm:
1331:12 8 (run-guix-command _ . _)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
837:9 7 (catch _ _ #<procedure 7f11d55d88c0 at guix/ui.scm:448:2 (ke=
y c)> _)
837:9 6 (catch _ _ #<procedure 7f11d55d88d8 at guix/ui.scm:536:6 (ke=
y proc format-stri=E2=80=A6> =E2=80=A6)
In guix/scripts/build.scm:
725:14 5 (_)
In guix/ui.scm:
633:8 4 (show-what-to-build #<build-daemon 256.97 2832e10> ("/gnu/st=
ore/07g069ka7l45f=E2=80=A6") =E2=80=A6)
In guix/derivations.scm:
307:18 3 (substitution-oracle #<build-daemon 256.97 2832e10> ("/gnu/s=
tore/07g069ka7l45=E2=80=A6") =E2=80=A6)
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
466:18 2 (fold #<procedure 4028de0 at guix/derivations.scm:307:24 (dr=
v result)> () ("/g=E2=80=A6"))
In guix/derivations.scm:
308:38 1 (_ "/gnu/store/07g069ka7l45f91npb8qv4j1kvi0y7m7-guile-git" (=
))
606:7 0 (derivation->output-paths "/gnu/store/07g069ka7l45f91npb8qv4=
j1kvi0y7m7-guile-git")
guix/derivations.scm:606:7: In procedure derivation->output-paths:
guix/derivations.scm:606:7: In procedure struct_vtable: Wrong type argume=
nt in position 1 (expecting struct): "/gnu/store/07g069ka7l45f91npb8qv4j1=
kvi0y7m7-guile-git"
rwurmus@bimsb-sys02 in code:=20
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
-- Ricardo
Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wurmus@HIDDEN> Subject: bug#28510: Acknowledgement (crash: guix build -S foo --with-source=bla) Message-ID: <handler.28510.B.1505823005313.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org> References: <idjwp4uvqim.fsf@HIDDEN> X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 28510 X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix Reply-To: 28510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 12:11:02 +0000 Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): bug-guix@HIDDEN If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please send it to 28510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org. Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. --=20 28510: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D28510 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#28510: crash: guix build -S foo --with-source=bla
Resent-From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 00:41:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.28510.B28510.161421362414708 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28510
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords:
To: Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wurmus@HIDDEN>
Cc: 28510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 28510-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B28510.161421362414708
(code B ref 28510); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 00:41:01 +0000
Received: (at 28510) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Feb 2021 00:40:24 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36289 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1lF4hb-0003pA-So
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 19:40:24 -0500
Received: from mail-wm1-f42.google.com ([209.85.128.42]:53249)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>) id 1lF4hZ-0003ot-Qg
for 28510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 19:40:22 -0500
Received: by mail-wm1-f42.google.com with SMTP id x16so3252718wmk.3
for <28510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 16:40:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id
:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=ahHrdKhXneqetDnXldPALve7ynbmsVaL6u465jo9O1E=;
b=JjDLDSOHExXgrb3QwrwnyzOegj8kB4bRHXGwLLlXX6+xM/pClfk0DJp0JGcE14ppd0
a7Z/SgQVByKp26k3zxRw533JP18340PKcH7hbdrOv9XlrWem+XNp1zLT0r6eT+G0NPzo
mRp61XoDHl9JsF547zUuhYhjDfCIb5c1L51b9LxyGg1JL/foix5NZUgbKam0PiNm7IxO
Hf7IrUIMWrDwmDHW6IYPsLjXgllSfUb8MQrAiiyUnfR+Xo6rZKn4SLHkoferHdiOcqb8
29zaq0ZDeyQWNx9vx/0rc8ayVT7Pj7/hSUJn8Qe6VbO39G8mcO0C470RDnUlSqfMTIH7
M74A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to
:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=ahHrdKhXneqetDnXldPALve7ynbmsVaL6u465jo9O1E=;
b=O34BNST6+l6hWbsFZBYJvf9a/aJRnHLdMw71+mD+uUrGT7KOqCFInvgW+tbeSfoc4p
9/cPXZhcxocDKH6gHiygvaBQJpzd15wDi1BA/JWWL9BXt4Xj//QtaQFvWX7rzHt/L/FX
2vKTbSl2OFP7sB4muNxD4wqGwIHLzCc5BE4BbPj/CkjuKh8x6g8WpXJbJa8Q0qbqE/Ol
ZD3uk0A1frQ7UftFN6E7s4ijPOWfg2QJO7v3DGQ6UGFYBb+8UYDnBn8SCPh+SXdOJ5yW
vMsPz7STQOi6sJLRpetOR8+DaNaq70p+z8FIluUd6vawFEU+/OU0MMlO5ZallOWlk1Ev
6vlg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532QiNsGEFAGv7sZ+L06698KJtxJHZUhaL/CsomePdsUbw2eI7db
4Kbugq9o7UK/qtHTLZlfM0ZmnkMF//g=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx/wL+IZ6ZJcNaqvRAKDxrw4NqDemRI3uzkqq7CWVFetzGCNy78EC+/zjAM8JkIxuiL5/juZg==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:203:: with SMTP id 3mr554741wmi.187.1614213615840;
Wed, 24 Feb 2021 16:40:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f2sm2363816wrq.34.2021.02.24.16.40.14
(version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
Wed, 24 Feb 2021 16:40:15 -0800 (PST)
From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
References: <idjwp4uvqim.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 01:34:38 +0100
In-Reply-To: <idjwp4uvqim.fsf@HIDDEN> (Ricardo Wurmus's
message of "Tue, 19 Sep 2017 14:09:37 +0200")
Message-ID: <86a6rtkmsh.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
Hi,
On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 at 14:09, Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wurmus@HIDDEN>=
wrote:
> The command =E2=80=9Cguix build -S guile-git --with-source=3Dguile-git=E2=
=80=9D crashes
> instead of failing gracefully:
>
> rwurmus@bimsb-sys02 in code: git clone https://gitlab.com/guile-git/guile=
-git.git
[...]
> rwurmus@bimsb-sys02 in code: guix build -S guile-git --with-source=3Dguil=
e-git
> Backtrace:
Still failing. In =E2=80=99compute-derivation=E2=80=99, this=20
(s
(list (package-source-derivation store s)))))
returns a list of string instead of a derivation, so then
(for-each show-derivation-outputs drv)
fails because it expects a derivation or a derivation-input (see in
(guix ui)).
Well, I am not sure where the error should be handled. In (guix ui) and
in (guix scripts build)? WDYT?
Cheers,
simon
Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Mar 2021 22:09:29 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 24 18:09:29 2021 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36292 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1lPBgv-0006cP-1r for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 18:09:29 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f45.google.com ([209.85.221.45]:42633) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>) id 1lPBgu-0006c9-D6 for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 18:09:28 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f45.google.com with SMTP id x13so304436wrs.9 for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 15:09:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:message-id:to:from:subject; bh=ERRg5KsgwhLPSZvmeuEHqgI6z0cNa/eZ1LbMl5Egagk=; b=jxVzjJHat66Jcpi0dFplHnD8Pe3o+yj2FgAT0xVFQUYwxmRlaFla7d2eLo3IC3CXiE vUd0KeLevyONAPbUfikCrNQvIRTNBFLHubXtN2eC5qME8O/ufGh/MHE4+MSx3Opcmwgh eoePbo+h+2tZJLlEqwlPz24fCL89moxPNZ4a/JmN0caBDe9DHjA2VOBkVS2R/qKQfF5S lVly61MQst2XkZ8qRWRNquvzqdJ5kzK9weeEIuX1PLo7eFuZe5NjLpJLktoMKAfzDCA2 MUupCHOzNP2AQOee15v5wgtCZix6aufqgRh1OW++37ihUtrsONk/TS6OfbA6mghPQHBU tsjA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:message-id:to:from:subject; bh=ERRg5KsgwhLPSZvmeuEHqgI6z0cNa/eZ1LbMl5Egagk=; b=VJynEPwgaoplsfqMumzMWRwGutypCeLD06KP6WT6ktYUrPqekocSJhyE1UiWYQ/YWT IBUXVoEG72cEf5lw/a5vDc8RVPQ0tMcvUZKkzQDtZNyZb/P+hYZ82w+B8LRFyOC7MUZG U2g8xLGxURu4TbGHK5hnMZ9jhKViFaCoH3Nz94zefvgPWUwdFUNcmOdlkEPWIIYfd5pM nZqrphQmscIJKvy1U6peJgL/j0Z35KDY3wOFGmksV65zztZwz3/YOtpXaIQpYi88n0v4 96NA6Ei7//E14xTyzRqP0HH4lAbDXlOMrOHkThDeZ/Ss7LPLX5T1wKxRZiuga/HWr5aK 9Tnw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530nSVD3/PkGT19NGnFTVjlswTSZCdIkyfaFmWzhnX2vkP3WOY+0 SP5tG8FQyQugM8lV+t4IAqk+7XkSlzk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzfFyPyqamQFeSYtvo+tfPIV9XU5LIhgaqGs28Gu4YcTkkd4Hjv4kAKR04tEcwJUredfUtb2w== X-Received: by 2002:adf:c70b:: with SMTP id k11mr5678649wrg.165.1616623762564; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 15:09:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 135sm3991311wma.44.2021.03.24.15.09.21 for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 24 Mar 2021 15:09:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 22:59:05 +0100 Message-Id: <864kh0b4d2.fsf@HIDDEN> To: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> Subject: control message for bug #28510 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 28510 + easy quit
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#28510: crash: guix build -S foo --with-source=bla
References: <idjwp4uvqim.fsf@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <idjwp4uvqim.fsf@HIDDEN>
Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=A9r=C3=A9my?= Korwin-Zmijowski <jeremy@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 17:39:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.28510.B28510.166360909613198 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28510
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: easy
To: 28510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 28510-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B28510.166360909613198
(code B ref 28510); Mon, 19 Sep 2022 17:39:01 +0000
Received: (at 28510) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Sep 2022 17:38:16 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55129 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1oaKil-0003Qn-Nm
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 13:38:16 -0400
Received: from relay10.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.230]:57307)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <jeremy@HIDDEN>) id 1oaKij-0003QZ-Ly
for 28510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 13:38:14 -0400
Received: (Authenticated sender: jeremy@HIDDEN)
by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 132B424000B
for <28510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 17:38:06 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="------------95QrARgW0poGece9j0HMeFi0"
Message-ID: <d566d759-38d7-849e-d067-35e207359210@HIDDEN>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 19:38:05 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.11.0
Content-Language: en-US
From: =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=A9r=C3=A9my?= Korwin-Zmijowski
<jeremy@HIDDEN>
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------95QrARgW0poGece9j0HMeFi0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Hello,
Today, I followed this steps to try to reproduce :
jeko@slim guix ±|master ✗|→ git pull
jeko@slim guix ±|master ✗|→ guix shell -D guix help2man git strace --pure
[dev] jeko@slim guix ±|master ✗|→ make
[dev] jeko@slim guix ±|master ✗|→ git clone
https://gitlab.com/guile-git/guile-git.git /tmp/guile-git
[dev] jeko@slim guix ±|master ✗|→ ./pre-inst-env guix build -S guile-git
--with-source=/tmp/guile-git
Backtrace:
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
1752:10 16 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _)
In unknown file:
15 (apply-smob/0 #<thunk 7f7b1c56f2e0>)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
724:2 14 (call-with-prompt _ _ #<procedure default-prompt-handle?>)
In ice-9/eval.scm:
619:8 13 (_ #(#(#<directory (guile-user) 7f7b1c574c80>)))
In guix/ui.scm:
2263:7 12 (run-guix . _)
2226:10 11 (run-guix-command _ . _)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
1752:10 10 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _)
In guix/status.scm:
815:4 9 (call-with-status-report _ _)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
1752:10 8 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _)
In guix/store.scm:
656:37 7 (thunk)
1295:8 6 (call-with-build-handler _ _)
1295:8 5 (call-with-build-handler #<procedure 7f7b19ae5c90 at g?> ?)
In guix/scripts/build.scm:
808:26 4 (_)
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
634:9 3 (for-each #<procedure show-derivation-outputs (derivat?> ?)
In guix/ui.scm:
907:2 2 (show-derivation-outputs _)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
1685:16 1 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
1685:16 0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
ice-9/boot-9.scm:1685:16: In procedure raise-exception:
Throw to key `match-error' with args `("match" "no matching pattern"
"/gnu/store/wgxcw7j7d45n3z3g5rswjj1hf393abl0-guile-git")'.
So, still failing but I don't get the same error… Is it valid according
to the bug declaration ? I'm not sure haha
--
Jérémy Korwin-Zmijowski
GPG: 036B 4D54 B7B4 D6C8 DA62 2746 700F 5E0C CBB2 E2D1
--------------95QrARgW0poGece9j0HMeFi0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>Hello,<br>
<br>
Today, I followed this steps to try to reproduce :<br>
<br>
jeko@slim guix ±|master ✗|→ git pull<br>
jeko@slim guix ±|master ✗|→ guix shell -D guix help2man git strace
--pure<br>
[dev] jeko@slim guix ±|master ✗|→ make<br>
[dev] jeko@slim guix ±|master ✗|→ git clone
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://gitlab.com/guile-git/guile-git.git">https://gitlab.com/guile-git/guile-git.git</a> /tmp/guile-git<br>
[dev] jeko@slim guix ±|master ✗|→ ./pre-inst-env guix build -S
guile-git --with-source=/tmp/guile-git<br>
Backtrace:<br>
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:<br>
1752:10 16 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _)<br>
In unknown file:<br>
15 (apply-smob/0 #<thunk 7f7b1c56f2e0>)<br>
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:<br>
724:2 14 (call-with-prompt _ _ #<procedure
default-prompt-handle?>)<br>
In ice-9/eval.scm:<br>
619:8 13 (_ #(#(#<directory (guile-user)
7f7b1c574c80>)))<br>
In guix/ui.scm:<br>
2263:7 12 (run-guix . _)<br>
2226:10 11 (run-guix-command _ . _)<br>
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:<br>
1752:10 10 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _)<br>
In guix/status.scm:<br>
815:4 9 (call-with-status-report _ _)<br>
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:<br>
1752:10 8 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _)<br>
In guix/store.scm:<br>
656:37 7 (thunk)<br>
1295:8 6 (call-with-build-handler _ _)<br>
1295:8 5 (call-with-build-handler #<procedure 7f7b19ae5c90
at g?> ?)<br>
In guix/scripts/build.scm:<br>
808:26 4 (_)<br>
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:<br>
634:9 3 (for-each #<procedure show-derivation-outputs
(derivat?> ?)<br>
In guix/ui.scm:<br>
907:2 2 (show-derivation-outputs _)<br>
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:<br>
1685:16 1 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)<br>
1685:16 0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)<br>
<br>
ice-9/boot-9.scm:1685:16: In procedure raise-exception:<br>
Throw to key `match-error' with args `("match" "no matching
pattern"
"/gnu/store/wgxcw7j7d45n3z3g5rswjj1hf393abl0-guile-git")'.<br>
<br>
So, still failing but I don't get the same error… Is it valid
according to the bug declaration ? I'm not sure haha<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Jérémy Korwin-Zmijowski
GPG: 036B 4D54 B7B4 D6C8 DA62 2746 700F 5E0C CBB2 E2D1</pre>
<div id="grammalecte_menu_main_button_shadow_host" style="width:
0px; height: 0px;"></div>
</body>
</html>
--------------95QrARgW0poGece9j0HMeFi0--
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#28510: crash: guix build -S foo --with-source=bla
Resent-From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 18:45:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.28510.B28510.166361304720609 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28510
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: easy
To: =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=A9r=C3=A9my?= Korwin-Zmijowski <jeremy@HIDDEN>, 28510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 28510-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B28510.166361304720609
(code B ref 28510); Mon, 19 Sep 2022 18:45:01 +0000
Received: (at 28510) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Sep 2022 18:44:07 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55217 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1oaLkV-0005ML-7V
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 14:44:07 -0400
Received: from andre.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.132.53]:54340)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <maximedevos@HIDDEN>) id 1oaLkT-0005MD-IJ
for 28510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 14:44:06 -0400
Received: from [192.168.81.79] ([213.251.124.117])
by andre.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp
id Muk32800j2Y5aml01uk4zC; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 20:44:04 +0200
Message-ID: <229c1399-ce4b-b942-1bae-deea501f1c48@HIDDEN>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 20:44:03 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.12.0
Content-Language: en-US
References: <idjwp4uvqim.fsf@HIDDEN>
<d566d759-38d7-849e-d067-35e207359210@HIDDEN>
From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <d566d759-38d7-849e-d067-35e207359210@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
boundary="------------PJlafg2a6qsRx0WNDEfxEwZC"
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telenet.be; s=r22;
t=1663613044; bh=bmO88tu68mNJlWaJyZxRS+8sguC2945CxnSX12ACJk4=;
h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To;
b=LkEMukBTsTJ/6qzIXlZ/vThhRu3fLTwf6SsFMVYJChhpg1JWNriyBZ86mBIM9SEyE
0l6yXvDS9VPPC3vGJedvS3prky6Ky9RmyIR9z+UH4cwNOyTjHSI7wSkVCLXiXpu1iV
DMaxwUPownLogUYhBbBfiR6TadP8IRyQ2uK5IJL3UJFblMKfopr5ayFwKQJ1O481sE
s2S4AGg2fmqAqNeO/lkn7GATM09KzWQTYp1B6+zClSD2OqLLwDE2PlZbEmv+fuNnbL
VU5VeB1IV8LVZHxc4lwBBiOH2pbKfY60TZRqi//2vHFjKYB2ZP6W4QpHj63Yhijmx+
VLuIQNnehjzIw==
X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -3.5 (---)
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--------------PJlafg2a6qsRx0WNDEfxEwZC
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------oKj8VYC6lLILqhRrRxiAuz2T";
protected-headers="v1"
From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?J=c3=a9r=c3=a9my_Korwin-Zmijowski?=
<jeremy@HIDDEN>, 28510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Message-ID: <229c1399-ce4b-b942-1bae-deea501f1c48@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#28510: crash: guix build -S foo --with-source=bla
References: <idjwp4uvqim.fsf@HIDDEN>
<d566d759-38d7-849e-d067-35e207359210@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <d566d759-38d7-849e-d067-35e207359210@HIDDEN>
--------------oKj8VYC6lLILqhRrRxiAuz2T
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------cxQra7nnI0kyujFW0Yk0vqnX"
--------------cxQra7nnI0kyujFW0Yk0vqnX
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64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--------------cxQra7nnI0kyujFW0Yk0vqnX
Content-Type: application/pgp-keys; name="OpenPGP_0x49E3EE22191725EE.asc"
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="OpenPGP_0x49E3EE22191725EE.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP public key
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
xjMEX4ch6BYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdANPb/d6MrGnGi5HyvODCkBUJPRjiFQcRU5V+m
xvMaAa/NL01heGltZSBEZXZvcyA8bWF4aW1lLmRldm9zQHN0dWRlbnQua3VsZXV2
ZW4uYmU+wpAEExYIADgWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCX4ch6AIbAwUL
CQgHAwUVCgkICwUWAgMBAAIeAQIXgAAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7japAQC3opZ2KGWzWmRc
/gIWSu0AAcfMwyinFEEPa/QhUt2CogD/e2RdF4CYAgaRHJJmZ9WU7piKbLZ7llB4
LzgezVDHggzNJU1heGltZSBEZXZvcyA8bWF4aW1lZGV2b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZT7C
kAQTFggAOBYhBMHzPuIMUo/bfdcBH0nj7iIZFyXuBQJf56ycAhsDBQsJCAcDBRUK
CQgLBRYCAwEAAh4BAheAAAoJEEnj7iIZFyXujpQBAKV1SwDDl4f24rXciDlB9L8W
ycZt30CgbewMSRQk4mvbAP9dFMbVVixYBd6C8cfhR+NsOBGiOJnQABlUmgNuqGFJ
Dc44BF+HIegSCisGAQQBl1UBBQEBB0BOlzIWiJzgobMF6/cqwLaLk7jIcFSZ++c0
k9cCNT6YXwMBCAfCeAQYFggAIBYhBMHzPuIMUo/bfdcBH0nj7iIZFyXuBQJfhyHo
AhsMAAoJEEnj7iIZFyXuMr0BAJc8cl5PGvVmVuSQVKjleNl4DK1/XAaPAYPe34AE
fZJPAP9IqLCQhH/FeJanHqBP8gNdGNI2qn8RnnLVfRJgUjZ1BA=3D=3D
=3DOVqp
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
--------------cxQra7nnI0kyujFW0Yk0vqnX--
--------------oKj8VYC6lLILqhRrRxiAuz2T--
--------------PJlafg2a6qsRx0WNDEfxEwZC
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="OpenPGP_signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="OpenPGP_signature"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
wnsEABYIACMWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCYyi4cwUDAAAAAAAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7luY
AQC9MI4BnuGCGnFKares7CwsiIjAwr6hskccRmwcraRvvQD/YOSCrF5Nh3KUz0qYCFXt6JCE/nSo
zq+QaHQkmVOrygU=
=4OQh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--------------PJlafg2a6qsRx0WNDEfxEwZC--
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#28510: crash: guix build -S foo --with-source=bla
Resent-From: Josselin Poiret <dev@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 09:20:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.28510.B28510.166366558111111 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28510
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: easy
To: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN>, =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=A9r=C3=A9my?= Korwin-Zmijowski <jeremy@HIDDEN>, 28510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 28510-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B28510.166366558111111
(code B ref 28510); Tue, 20 Sep 2022 09:20:02 +0000
Received: (at 28510) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Sep 2022 09:19:41 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56083 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1oaZPp-0002t9-8L
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 05:19:41 -0400
Received: from jpoiret.xyz ([206.189.101.64]:60036)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <dev@HIDDEN>) id 1oaZPn-0002t0-D8
for 28510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 05:19:40 -0400
Received: from authenticated-user (jpoiret.xyz [206.189.101.64])
by jpoiret.xyz (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2878C184BCF;
Tue, 20 Sep 2022 09:19:36 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jpoiret.xyz; s=dkim;
t=1663665576;
h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
bh=was+lOdiCsW1NYT+V/FbuOX04brnrDwN29sZ00d6kqM=;
b=gAMyn4F2kVI9J/u+Ykzm0dRO8RefsACRRcumJQwaTab29bZTLGapw6tzTC73N7wpDxGbII
aKaDVuOrkzQJEBY5Is9JkE0XbV+kDReUsqXW/xVgeTpAwE/m2TbmK/y5l22yUj7n5Itv12
4ysN0EO0SY192OBl2XGy1///ocd7ynyySHkX4TBnjMXMVhScpLVk0wwCx6IabaARrgAOhw
5KGn+Ymn1bHeIERVHuY6Q+f/T+UqOFXXiRym0Svfu8roIMyNVJEwKA0+iEjDD6DC4runSM
+6FqsDFJDJRS+9XxsML8ZJHASNT94jC/iGe5v6sSTyfkbAqjIp0Oc5+Ke5+TWA==
From: Josselin Poiret <dev@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <229c1399-ce4b-b942-1bae-deea501f1c48@HIDDEN>
References: <idjwp4uvqim.fsf@HIDDEN>
<d566d759-38d7-849e-d067-35e207359210@HIDDEN>
<229c1399-ce4b-b942-1bae-deea501f1c48@HIDDEN>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 11:19:35 +0200
Message-ID: <87k05y2yjc.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Authentication-Results: jpoiret.xyz;
auth=pass smtp.auth=jpoiret@HIDDEN smtp.mailfrom=dev@HIDDEN
X-Spamd-Bar: /
X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Hi everyone, Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN> writes:
> Here is a simpler reproducer for that error: > > file a.scm: > (use-modules
(gnu packages) (guix packages) (guix gexp)) > (package > (inherit (specifica
[...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs
[URI: jpoiret.xyz (xyz)]
-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record
0.0 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Hi everyone, Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN> writes:
> Here is a simpler reproducer for that error: > > file a.scm: > (use-modules
(gnu packages) (guix packages) (guix gexp)) > (package > (inherit (specifica
[...]
Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs
[URI: jpoiret.xyz (xyz)]
-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record
1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD
0.0 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD
-1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
manager
Hi everyone,
Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN> writes:
> Here is a simpler reproducer for that error:
>
> file a.scm:
> (use-modules (gnu packages) (guix packages) (guix gexp))
> (package
> (inherit (specification->package "hello"))
> (source (local-file "a.scm")))
>
> guix build -f a.scm --source
The issue is that package-source-derivation in guix/packages.scm doesn't
actually always yield a derivation, since lower-object isn't guaranteed
to do that: here the gexp compiler for local-file only returns a string
denoting the file path of the interned store file. `guix build` relies
on the (wrong) assumption that everything that it will build will end up
being a derivation in some way or another, so just calls
show-derivation-outputs on that, which then errors as above.
build-derivations, contrary to its name, can also pass simple file names
to build-things, and since the file will already be interned in the
store at that point, it won't need to do anything, and there won't be
any errors there.
The simple fix would be to add another band-aid cond at the
show-derivation-outputs call in build.scm, but it doesn't seem to be
enough in the long term.
What do people think?
--
Josselin Poiret
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#28510: crash: guix build -S foo --with-source=bla
Resent-From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 17:36:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.28510.B28510.166369532912228 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28510
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: easy
To: Josselin Poiret <dev@HIDDEN>, Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN>, =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=A9r=C3=A9my?= Korwin-Zmijowski <jeremy@HIDDEN>, 28510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 28510-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B28510.166369532912228
(code B ref 28510); Tue, 20 Sep 2022 17:36:02 +0000
Received: (at 28510) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Sep 2022 17:35:29 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59546 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1oah9c-0003B9-TY
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 13:35:29 -0400
Received: from mail-wm1-f52.google.com ([209.85.128.52]:33717)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>) id 1oah9Z-0003Ar-Il
for 28510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 13:35:27 -0400
Received: by mail-wm1-f52.google.com with SMTP id
ay7-20020a05600c1e0700b003b49861bf48so1335736wmb.0
for <28510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 10:35:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references
:in-reply-to:subject:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date;
bh=aQRAgPpgU64PZvYW2wWDSKJLX4P97FVhjR/CD2rUfJ0=;
b=eeMijzdIG6M6FrEDGTfEEcvqYvXsjNHgzjTtlVvKDlg19vDcRX2i8j5ZCzEyPZhdgx
0EFa3/QRZu4fnNBk0/xxkJLfBWCLgeTx3vWko5KVPUs+wxHaJdGvkpNYcxyzU1XwfUjU
iYtWgS+7pN8bx1LDxeGBP7OVVNFBdtb1+UudX+H6A8hl5WLgZldYGTKsZSUnXbXKlLYT
iKiHB5jBum/p+G48aUei+nZ3ZAGimjSASfoOT2zSfH+6iu+1sSH3r6sLZSAK/VC6bxsc
CwhIk6Y3YzvGh9Ro86fJp1LHtSTyhGWVoOc8/5uygd9ZjvkYqdfKWQY9L5ghdYoCP/Np
20GA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references
:in-reply-to:subject:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject
:date;
bh=aQRAgPpgU64PZvYW2wWDSKJLX4P97FVhjR/CD2rUfJ0=;
b=RV76cFQxTpx56pit93BnXzo5/zK0qNiQKxwTPYc7R/76fM+Nwu62tLxVTnbVxhhUTD
C2iacJ6CyCeVkj5BIy88Uj5AUzthLe/gmSnZTrfiQCt4Qx1FoYqet68dQW+la0/nHSre
OTOK7ZpugSWXFTe4nvMlEVcgjg/7H63oK/2G2d9zEe8/FYQ+1b/NYPp69j8d8Dm47T+d
QHCgdGnoxipNnZCZ9j9KbOVH/F740TsaEJ9DEKwCHkebBFr3jcYlrCTB89M3V+i758bB
DF+7/dUlpoA2BmgPxVvR+gtOZ9GguKM/fCBxdNT77WSGuAGytFS+gjLUBbqvcz/pOQ2e
kAOA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf3ERhbidCJ9xFbcR/H9g5y3rl5ke5EIXy4mJ+Lq/PbChXRfqBX8
psM5mtk8jgQmmxQer22VtnqNlejbtig=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4OOzr2w3OtP7Es5mqa+ep4mO5MSR2MuTRLj+W08fzloa+n1kagysBlPK0+jjmN896+1uYF3w==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3d0e:b0:3b4:9bd1:10be with SMTP id
bh14-20020a05600c3d0e00b003b49bd110bemr3224242wmb.101.1663695319125;
Tue, 20 Sep 2022 10:35:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
h2-20020adffa82000000b0022584c82c80sm437308wrr.19.2022.09.20.10.35.17
(version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
Tue, 20 Sep 2022 10:35:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87k05y2yjc.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <idjwp4uvqim.fsf@HIDDEN>
<d566d759-38d7-849e-d067-35e207359210@HIDDEN>
<229c1399-ce4b-b942-1bae-deea501f1c48@HIDDEN>
<87k05y2yjc.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 19:25:04 +0200
Message-ID: <86a66u0xhr.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
Hi,
On Tue, 20 Sep 2022 at 11:19, Josselin Poiret via Bug reports for GNU Guix =
<bug-guix@HIDDEN> wrote:
> The simple fix would be to add another band-aid cond at the
> show-derivation-outputs call in build.scm, but it doesn't seem to be
> enough in the long term.
Well, I would add an error handler; as proposed [1]. :-) Because does
=E2=80=9Cguix build foo --source --with-source=3Dbla=E2=80=9D make sense? =
What is the
use-case for such command?
1: <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/28510/#1>
Cheers,
simon
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#28510: crash: guix build -S foo --with-source=bla
Resent-From: Josselin Poiret <dev@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 19:43:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.28510.B28510.16637029681285 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28510
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: easy
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>, Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN>, =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=A9r=C3=A9my?= Korwin-Zmijowski <jeremy@HIDDEN>, 28510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 28510-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B28510.16637029681285
(code B ref 28510); Tue, 20 Sep 2022 19:43:02 +0000
Received: (at 28510) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Sep 2022 19:42:48 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59771 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1oaj8q-0000Kf-4g
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 15:42:48 -0400
Received: from jpoiret.xyz ([206.189.101.64]:60428)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <dev@HIDDEN>) id 1oaj8l-0000KU-UM
for 28510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 15:42:46 -0400
Received: from authenticated-user (jpoiret.xyz [206.189.101.64])
by jpoiret.xyz (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D944D184BCF;
Tue, 20 Sep 2022 19:42:41 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jpoiret.xyz; s=dkim;
t=1663702962;
h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:
in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
bh=YL2VqyAY0VoBOXWfpxADWiCkOMd0cPEQ0qpT/TKoaIc=;
b=FBLQrEY/OaWcVXLUYg/jeIDiuxLDnjW1YBryYwcwgf4Y2GMm2QdoZWGPF7RmSrSzb3SCJ1
lDQZCV8qbQ/oOhb/b0oKJV5tLMauKComjxtCOfwzveseOkMUCmbRAhyEFwXDFSIF6VlCyf
1w4g71PDDwWV611RqAcydHIOikDMGQCuEQjpZsYP3DGKN1pw9Qe/gL29YLRxzkDlEQooyW
DY8vMGBPloEwdtxVmkZyXNWhamJo+h+c2QYwFlXHfB1rewaYyOMD9fy5dDLxFlw8EGZ9JK
sEdLZSBgOklO09vU+0OoSKD0Jn5ziU5RASDTA6m9B465hrrYRbierj3XdYtMMQ==
From: Josselin Poiret <dev@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <86a66u0xhr.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <idjwp4uvqim.fsf@HIDDEN>
<d566d759-38d7-849e-d067-35e207359210@HIDDEN>
<229c1399-ce4b-b942-1bae-deea501f1c48@HIDDEN>
<87k05y2yjc.fsf@HIDDEN> <86a66u0xhr.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 21:42:41 +0200
Message-ID: <87h7113k9a.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Authentication-Results: jpoiret.xyz;
auth=pass smtp.auth=jpoiret@HIDDEN smtp.mailfrom=dev@HIDDEN
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spamd-Bar: +
X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Hi Simon, zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> writes: > Well,
I would add an error handler; as proposed [1]. :-) Because does > =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=9Cguix?=
build foo --source =?UTF-8?Q?--with-source=3Dbla=E2=80=9D?= make sense? What is the > use-case
for such command?
Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs
[URI: jpoiret.xyz (xyz)]
-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record
0.0 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Hi Simon, zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> writes: > Well,
I would add an error handler; as proposed [1]. :-) Because does > =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=9Cguix?=
build foo --source =?UTF-8?Q?--with-source=3Dbla=E2=80=9D?= make sense? What is the > use-case
for such command?
Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs
[URI: jpoiret.xyz (xyz)]
-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record
1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD
0.0 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD
-1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
manager
Hi Simon,
zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> writes:
> Well, I would add an error handler; as proposed [1]. :-) Because does
> =E2=80=9Cguix build foo --source --with-source=3Dbla=E2=80=9D make sense?=
What is the
> use-case for such command?
My bad, I didn't see the previous discussion on the subject. To me, the
lack of generality would be unexpected: if I have a package with a
source, I expect to be able to get that source, whatever the source may
be. Maxime's minimal example shows that it could happen for a variety
of different reasons, not just a --with-source=3D flag. I don't know what
a proper fix for it would be though, since we're passing things around
that we pretend are derivations but are not, and in many places.
Best,
--=20
Josselin Poiret
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#28510: crash: guix build -S foo --with-source=bla
Resent-From: jeremy@HIDDEN
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2022 08:42:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.28510.B28510.166513211925886 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28510
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: easy
To: Josselin Poiret <dev@HIDDEN>
Cc: 28510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN>, zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
Received: via spool by 28510-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B28510.166513211925886
(code B ref 28510); Fri, 07 Oct 2022 08:42:01 +0000
Received: (at 28510) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2022 08:41:59 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34312 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1ogivf-0006jS-F3
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2022 04:41:59 -0400
Received: from relay11.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.231]:42355)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <jeremy@HIDDEN>) id 1ogivd-0006jE-P5
for 28510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2022 04:41:58 -0400
Received: (Authenticated sender: jeremy@HIDDEN)
by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 709FB100005;
Fri, 7 Oct 2022 08:41:50 +0000 (UTC)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2022 10:41:50 +0200
From: jeremy@HIDDEN
In-Reply-To: <87h7113k9a.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <idjwp4uvqim.fsf@HIDDEN>
<d566d759-38d7-849e-d067-35e207359210@HIDDEN>
<229c1399-ce4b-b942-1bae-deea501f1c48@HIDDEN>
<87k05y2yjc.fsf@HIDDEN> <86a66u0xhr.fsf@HIDDEN>
<87h7113k9a.fsf@HIDDEN>
Message-ID: <565ee080af7ef230e1c769bcfed440c2@HIDDEN>
X-Sender: jeremy@HIDDEN
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="=_13936658fabfd420a0433caa4296d0b9"
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)
--=_13936658fabfd420a0433caa4296d0b9
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
format=flowed
Le 2022-09-20 21:42, Josselin Poiret a écrit :
> Hi Simon,
>
> zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> writes:
>
>> Well, I would add an error handler; as proposed [1]. :-) Because does
>> “guix build foo --source --with-source=bla” make sense? What is the
>> use-case for such command?
>
> My bad, I didn't see the previous discussion on the subject. To me,
> the
> lack of generality would be unexpected: if I have a package with a
> source, I expect to be able to get that source, whatever the source may
> be. Maxime's minimal example shows that it could happen for a variety
> of different reasons, not just a --with-source= flag. I don't know
> what
> a proper fix for it would be though, since we're passing things around
> that we pretend are derivations but are not, and in many places.
>
> Best,
Hi !
I feel not able to take decision about the proper way right now.
So as a step forward I wrote a test to capture the behavior expected.
Please have a look at it as it's the starting point for me.
Next, I can implement the error handler, making the previous test to
pass.
As the test checks the behaviour, it will let enough space to change
implementation later without invalitating the test.
Cheers,
Jérémy
--=_13936658fabfd420a0433caa4296d0b9
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: text/plain;
name=guix-scripts.scm
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename=guix-scripts.scm;
size=930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--=_13936658fabfd420a0433caa4296d0b9--
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#28510: crash: guix build -S foo --with-source=bla
Resent-From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2022 15:17:03 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.28510.B28510.166524220815422 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28510
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: easy
To: jeremy@HIDDEN, Josselin Poiret <dev@HIDDEN>
Cc: 28510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Maxime Devos <maximedevos@HIDDEN>
Received: via spool by 28510-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B28510.166524220815422
(code B ref 28510); Sat, 08 Oct 2022 15:17:03 +0000
Received: (at 28510) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Oct 2022 15:16:48 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41182 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1ohBZH-00040f-P6
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2022 11:16:48 -0400
Received: from mail-wr1-f54.google.com ([209.85.221.54]:34367)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>) id 1ohBZC-00040I-IQ
for 28510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2022 11:16:46 -0400
Received: by mail-wr1-f54.google.com with SMTP id b4so11166916wrs.1
for <28510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 08 Oct 2022 08:16:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references
:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id
:reply-to; bh=0kaViFz3Fw4ms7uOqOrNNNReBdrAy4J0PMzqmpqfDY8=;
b=KPtc4xXtcUp9o5VFbqwru4vxY123aSgZenmXxSQ1CBO2u+YFhTg4MHu1jDrzx54Bgj
putDjg1VrcEwETOTybVwfCBNtBOYDu0BfM7hu08vst89uTVgBOd9ZthbAqZjE4os6JeI
qSaSFMLNCVqx2UW9eGso4yqjlcfLLiZ7AY5YUMZ2wKf9G8FhUyrKr1aSZMo0GmJT93yx
B+iyB40S2nvZevGX2pQojLM0Vla9jFCE4lSv+GY2SMKdXXMlXRv4RzdIpLu3udHYj0fK
ubsS0dWxV4Q9tCQp58wkItTdEHweEHMRuIY17JFfFkvxBSvM1SjqFjNhPKaX3wT6BXNm
R5Nw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references
:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc
:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=0kaViFz3Fw4ms7uOqOrNNNReBdrAy4J0PMzqmpqfDY8=;
b=2Oz6b7hRLttHpbWYeOASxepYunsXSiObSt4mrowDd3GxdDFjx3At8MX9uwrxHLuQA7
MYQwj1QfLu7tFcBZ3OAUeSXJaMpFcakTxd0U/KOKoJc1JAMKh0hHNrLIHQ/OUmFFH1pZ
nh8FSoW2yHfJ9lrwWp5ug29Y/+5JLJcNj0Fbjo15rhtlTc/H69rdqnWGKnhwvKRc5MGJ
1wxYmF4DaJKu+H/3t91tuxdTp/sDXMPxSqRyxLUblWbrvOF7WUz7kMUAkv0BRegiEgkE
Ribd1tbfuGw86/gN7vtgUzAr+oS3ECC3l68nhKZa8Sn6e01SMp9ij6ZwjAKXHKgPYHo7
O+qA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2twfeXibNkXT+tQ5XCh+t+RG1vNNJDupb1ztlnfNGifh/LCZJH
ggZqu2fF+zOuOgLipa6/CR8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5U9dnNMb9Ohwbw8XxaMf8xUIMu3v3j4R5po8mf/GS0r4y/nVBRHYr4vsVkhb93qNisxrem3g==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1886:b0:22e:3921:fdc2 with SMTP id
a6-20020a056000188600b0022e3921fdc2mr6408429wri.565.1665242196517;
Sat, 08 Oct 2022 08:16:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
h4-20020a05600c350400b003c1a7ea3736sm6438715wmq.11.2022.10.08.08.16.35
(version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
Sat, 08 Oct 2022 08:16:35 -0700 (PDT)
From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <565ee080af7ef230e1c769bcfed440c2@HIDDEN>
References: <idjwp4uvqim.fsf@HIDDEN>
<d566d759-38d7-849e-d067-35e207359210@HIDDEN>
<229c1399-ce4b-b942-1bae-deea501f1c48@HIDDEN>
<87k05y2yjc.fsf@HIDDEN> <86a66u0xhr.fsf@HIDDEN>
<87h7113k9a.fsf@HIDDEN>
<565ee080af7ef230e1c769bcfed440c2@HIDDEN>
Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2022 15:52:46 +0200
Message-ID: <86mta6tob5.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
Hi J=C3=A9r=C3=A9my,
On Fri, 07 Oct 2022 at 10:41, jeremy@HIDDEN wrote:
> I feel not able to take decision about the proper way right now.
> So as a step forward I wrote a test to capture the behavior expected.
> Please have a look at it as it's the starting point for me.
> Next, I can implement the error handler, making the previous test to=20
> pass.
> As the test checks the behaviour, it will let enough space to change=20
> implementation later without invalitating the test.
Nice to start by the test! :-)
> (define-module (tests scripts build)
> #:use-module (srfi srfi-64)
> #:use-module (ice-9 exceptions)
> #:use-module (guix scripts build)
> #:use-module (srfi srfi-34))
>
> (test-begin "scripts")
>
> (define DUMMY_DEFINITION_PATH "/tmp/a.scm")
>
> (define (create-dummy-definition)
> (call-with-output-file DUMMY_DEFINITION_PATH
> (lambda (port)
> (format port
> "(use-modules (gnu packages) (guix packages) (guix gexp)) (=
package (inherit (specification->package \"hello\")) (source (local-file \"=
a.scm\")))"))))
>
> (define (delete-dummy-definition)
> (delete-file DUMMY_DEFINITION_PATH))
>
> (test-group-with-cleanup "build"
>
> (create-dummy-definition)
>
> (test-equal "package definition as only source"
> "/gnu/store/7mnkrg9bmybgyf1dn5n67di6ng6qvhkz-a.scm"
> (guard
> (ex
> ((exception? ex) #f))
> (guix-build "-f" DUMMY_DEFINITION_PATH "--source")))
Well, this test looks good to me. However, I would lower what the
procedure under test. For instance, package-source-derivation in
guix/packages.scm or show-derivation-outputs, as Josselin pointed [1].
1: <https://yhetil.org/guix/87k05y2yjc.fsf@HIDDEN>
>
> (delete-dummy-definition))
>
> (test-end "scripts")
Cheers,
simon
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.