GNU bug report logs - #29516
Maxima fails to build

Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.

Package: guix; Reported by: Diego Nicola Barbato <dnbarbato@HIDDEN>; dated Fri, 1 Dec 2017 15:45:02 UTC; Maintainer for guix is bug-guix@HIDDEN.

Message received at 29516 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 29516) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Dec 2017 14:58:50 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sun Dec 03 09:58:50 2017
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43505 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1eLVjG-0002Vi-DX
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Dec 2017 09:58:50 -0500
Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:38074)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <dnbarbato@HIDDEN>) id 1eLVjF-0002VS-2j
 for 29516 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Dec 2017 09:58:49 -0500
Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) 
 by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBB11210DC
 for <29516 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun,  3 Dec 2017 15:58:41 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017;
 t=1512313122; bh=yVY62m65Z+F0RG29pJXf05R9R6yQ//7z7cvGfgkPQ6M=;
 h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From;
 b=Pvnswfo2i+4lBEKdFjlEbVQlEn8ncgSNqBs4SpeQX92esZaND7SskQ+QmBfUS+zjg
 I/h85322WksFzT1bWurtIouUQUf7NHOAw6PFgkOo/ow/8iFzmn743xDeUaw0Ajmk3J
 V6qgp0Ne4t6K0icbuyluTJ6uQJ98hzco3vL3Tn+3lWtUPOU6LIXG7F6pvLb2qBqxbT
 D4b+SW1YH8zeUO5cH1OiEOjt3+Ye9+Ye391xWBS7P22+C1/+qNmQ50AtW5UDhlRDUD
 O2VxdYJULL6LAOkt/Q3eKIVE2yu1tA7yO6Q3ccDkpaxNbqeoRqY36jl9NexF236LiH
 eEzS7xc9Lc3IA==
Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3yqWNd0SgPz9rxm;
 Sun,  3 Dec 2017 15:58:38 +0100 (CET)
From: Diego Nicola Barbato <dnbarbato@HIDDEN>
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#29516: Maxima fails to build
References: <87po7y1zzm.fsf@HIDDEN> <20171201174527.GA4636@HIDDEN>
 <877eu61792.fsf@HIDDEN> <874lp912or.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2017 15:58:38 +0100
In-Reply-To: <874lp912or.fsf@HIDDEN> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Sat, 02
 Dec 2017 12:04:36 -0500")
Message-ID: <87wp23oo2p.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 29516
Cc: 29516 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)

Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN> writes:

> Diego Nicola Barbato <dnbarbato@HIDDEN> writes:
>
>> Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> writes:
>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 11:53:01AM +0100, Diego Nicola Barbato wrote:
>>>> `guix build maxima' fails during the `check' phase with the following
>>>> output:
>>>
>>> Thanks for your report!
>
> FYI, the Maxima builds started failing after the recent upgrade to
> 'gcl'.  I raised the issue here:
>
>   https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2017-11/msg00341.html
>
> The person who upgraded 'gcl' first said that he could reproduce the
> build failure locally, and then said that he couldn't.  I'm not sure
> what happened there.
>
>       Mark

This seems to be quite a strange issue indeed:  Out of curiosity I tried
the same thing in a VM (guix system vm-image) and even though it is the
same architecture (x86_64) and the same commit 
(e2721a05e7d778bdf845b7cb7a42fd9f76095b69) guix consistently succeeds to
build maxima in the VM while it consistently fails to build on my
laptop.  I also tried building with only one core on my laptop and
running the VM with two cores (qemu-system-x86_64 -smp cores=2) with the
same result.  `guix build maxima' only fails on the VM when I run it
with `--rounds=2' because the outputs differ.

Diego




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#29516; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 29516 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 29516) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Dec 2017 17:05:04 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 02 12:05:04 2017
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42152 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1eLBDs-0008Cm-6y
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Dec 2017 12:05:04 -0500
Received: from world.peace.net ([50.252.239.5]:51124)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>) id 1eLBDp-0008C6-Ii
 for 29516 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Dec 2017 12:05:02 -0500
Received: from pool-72-93-29-217.bstnma.east.verizon.net ([72.93.29.217]
 helo=jojen)
 by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>)
 id 1eLBDj-00088B-IG; Sat, 02 Dec 2017 12:04:55 -0500
From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN>
To: Diego Nicola Barbato <dnbarbato@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#29516: Maxima fails to build
References: <87po7y1zzm.fsf@HIDDEN> <20171201174527.GA4636@HIDDEN>
 <877eu61792.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2017 12:04:36 -0500
In-Reply-To: <877eu61792.fsf@HIDDEN> (Diego Nicola Barbato's message of
 "Fri, 01 Dec 2017 22:13:45 +0100")
Message-ID: <874lp912or.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 29516
Cc: 29516 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)

Diego Nicola Barbato <dnbarbato@HIDDEN> writes:

> Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> writes:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 11:53:01AM +0100, Diego Nicola Barbato wrote:
>>> `guix build maxima' fails during the `check' phase with the following
>>> output:
>>
>> Thanks for your report!

FYI, the Maxima builds started failing after the recent upgrade to
'gcl'.  I raised the issue here:

  https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2017-11/msg00341.html

The person who upgraded 'gcl' first said that he could reproduce the
build failure locally, and then said that he couldn't.  I'm not sure
what happened there.

      Mark




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#29516; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 29516 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 29516) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Dec 2017 21:14:01 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 01 16:14:00 2017
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40611 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1eKsdC-00055S-Qz
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2017 16:13:59 -0500
Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:53556)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <dnbarbato@HIDDEN>) id 1eKsdA-00055E-Dc
 for 29516 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2017 16:13:57 -0500
Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) 
 by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 445C320E66
 for <29516 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri,  1 Dec 2017 22:13:47 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017;
 t=1512162830; bh=2oxUg4pSXF9wIEyg2J3jAssOrcracI/E9V8ZZ4NFXIM=;
 h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From;
 b=IitprOj4jPeAdfo4zyCpiJ7ZU0HhNj0Zt18CY8PUqc4MVvG7HFoIs+rzzL7dkI/+t
 nC53e+fOluTHMyLj2h+amBfNp4htOrTdTIkIgDx/89ll8MRRt2sbZLpDR3XoeCmkBe
 BGtrf0igQBkQFiIcluTy9fP+RYcPXDK56Q9qFjb2z4n3gS15A97xovesNTdzRebJ1C
 J7QahxXaCfQTTkUu3TfZiBTKMrUE5/PleYpdUwJvDbKros8rjEJJMoghthhDLswYwX
 XRhB+f0MMSlfnlk0EpVOa5VlA8yKq3U6yqSka/7UTeWoU0YNDStC/mO069P3qOH2bW
 yxvebPjpuCePw==
Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3ypRpM24V3z9rxD;
 Fri,  1 Dec 2017 22:13:46 +0100 (CET)
From: Diego Nicola Barbato <dnbarbato@HIDDEN>
To: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#29516: Maxima fails to build
References: <87po7y1zzm.fsf@HIDDEN> <20171201174527.GA4636@HIDDEN>
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2017 22:13:45 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20171201174527.GA4636@HIDDEN> (Leo Famulari's message of
 "Fri, 1 Dec 2017 12:45:27 -0500")
Message-ID: <877eu61792.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-="
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 29516
Cc: 29516 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain

Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN> writes:

> On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 11:53:01AM +0100, Diego Nicola Barbato wrote:
>> `guix build maxima' fails during the `check' phase with the following
>> output:
>
> Thanks for your report!
>
>> Testsuite summary for maxima 5.41.0
>> ============================================================================
>> # TOTAL: 1
>> # PASS:  0
>> # SKIP:  0
>> # XFAIL: 0
>> # FAIL:  1
>> # XPASS: 0
>> # ERROR: 0
>> ============================================================================
>> See tests/test-suite.log
>> ============================================================================
>
> Can you retry the build with '--keep-failed' and send the
> 'tests/test-suite.log' file that will be in the directory of the failed
> build?

As requested I ran `build' with `--keep-failed'.  This is the resulting
log file:


--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline; filename=test-suite.log
Content-Description: tests/test-suite.log

=========================================
   maxima 5.41.0: tests/test-suite.log
=========================================

# TOTAL: 1
# PASS:  0
# SKIP:  0
# XFAIL: 0
# FAIL:  1
# XPASS: 0
# ERROR: 0

.. contents:: :depth: 2

FAIL: gcl-test.sh
=================

Maxima 5.41.0 http://maxima.sourceforge.net
using Lisp GNU Common Lisp (GCL) GCL 2.6.12
Distributed under the GNU Public License. See the file COPYING.
Dedicated to the memory of William Schelter.
The function bug_report() provides bug reporting information.
(%i1) run_testsuite()
Running tests in rtest_rules: 103/103 tests passed
Running tests in rtestnset: 601/601 tests passed
Running tests in rtest1: 186/186 tests passed (not counting 3 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest1a: 34/34 tests passed (not counting 1 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest2: 268/268 tests passed (not counting 2 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest4: 93/93 tests passed
Running tests in rtest5: 83/83 tests passed
Running tests in rtest6: 39/39 tests passed
Running tests in rtest6a: 62/62 tests passed
Running tests in rtest6b: 27/27 tests passed
Running tests in rtest7: 85/85 tests passed
Running tests in rtest9: 89/89 tests passed
Running tests in rtest9a: 76/76 tests passed
Running tests in rtest10: 62/62 tests passed (not counting 2 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest11: 243/243 tests passed (not counting 3 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest13: 23/23 tests passed
Running tests in rtest13s: 17/17 tests passed
Running tests in rtest14: 418/418 tests passed
Running tests in rtest15: 
********************** Problem 55 ***************
Input:
compile(f)


Result:
warning: encountered undefined variable qwerty in translation.
Compiling /tmp/gazonk_4051_0.lsp.
End of Pass 1.  
End of Pass 2.  
OPTIMIZE levels: Safety=2, Space=3, Speed=3
Finished compiling /tmp/gazonk_4051_0.o.
error-catch

This differed from the expected result:
[f]

********************** Problem 61 ***************
Input:
compile(f)


Result:
Compiling /tmp/gazonk_4051_1.lsp.
End of Pass 1.  
End of Pass 2.  
OPTIMIZE levels: Safety=2, Space=3, Speed=3
Finished compiling /tmp/gazonk_4051_1.o.
error-catch

This differed from the expected result:
[f]

********************** Problem 67 ***************
Input:
compile(f)


Result:
Compiling /tmp/gazonk_4051_2.lsp.
End of Pass 1.  
End of Pass 2.  
OPTIMIZE levels: Safety=2, Space=3, Speed=3
Finished compiling /tmp/gazonk_4051_2.o.
error-catch

This differed from the expected result:
[f]

********************** Problem 73 ***************
Input:
compile(f)


Result:
warning: encountered undefined variable qwerty in translation.
Compiling /tmp/gazonk_4051_3.lsp.
End of Pass 1.  
End of Pass 2.  
OPTIMIZE levels: Safety=2, Space=3, Speed=3
Finished compiling /tmp/gazonk_4051_3.o.
error-catch

This differed from the expected result:
[f]

********************** Problem 79 ***************
Input:
compile(f)


Result:
warning: encountered undefined variable qwerty in translation.
Compiling /tmp/gazonk_4051_4.lsp.
End of Pass 1.  
End of Pass 2.  
OPTIMIZE levels: Safety=2, Space=3, Speed=3
Finished compiling /tmp/gazonk_4051_4.o.
error-catch

This differed from the expected result:
[f]

********************** Problem 85 ***************
Input:
compile(f)


Result:
Compiling /tmp/gazonk_4051_5.lsp.
End of Pass 1.  
End of Pass 2.  
OPTIMIZE levels: Safety=2, Space=3, Speed=3
Finished compiling /tmp/gazonk_4051_5.o.
error-catch

This differed from the expected result:
[f]

********************** Problem 91 ***************
Input:
compile(f)


Result:
Compiling /tmp/gazonk_4051_6.lsp.
End of Pass 1.  
End of Pass 2.  
OPTIMIZE levels: Safety=2, Space=3, Speed=3
Finished compiling /tmp/gazonk_4051_6.o.
error-catch

This differed from the expected result:
[f]

********************** Problem 164 ***************
Input:
compile(aref)


Result:
Compiling /tmp/gazonk_4051_7.lsp.
End of Pass 1.  
End of Pass 2.  
OPTIMIZE levels: Safety=2, Space=3, Speed=3
Finished compiling /tmp/gazonk_4051_7.o.
error-catch

This differed from the expected result:
[aref]

********************** Problem 173 ***************
Input:
compile(foo)


Result:
Compiling /tmp/gazonk_4051_8.lsp.
End of Pass 1.  
End of Pass 2.  
OPTIMIZE levels: Safety=2, Space=3, Speed=3
Finished compiling /tmp/gazonk_4051_8.o.
error-catch

This differed from the expected result:
[foo]

358/367 tests passed

The following 9 problems failed: (55 61 67 73 79 85 91 164 173)
Running tests in rtest16: 616/616 tests passed
Running tests in rtestode: 95/95 tests passed
Running tests in rtestode_zp: 30/30 tests passed
Running tests in rtest3: 157/157 tests passed
Running tests in rtest8: 
********************** Problem 133 ***************
Input:
(compile(foo17), first(quad_qags(foo17, u, - 1, 0)))


Result:
Compiling /tmp/gazonk_4051_9.lsp.
End of Pass 1.  
End of Pass 2.  
OPTIMIZE levels: Safety=2, Space=3, Speed=3
Finished compiling /tmp/gazonk_4051_9.o.
error-catch

This differed from the expected result:
- 0.359753467469551

173/174 tests passed

The following 1 problem failed: (133)
Running tests in rtest12: 79/79 tests passed (not counting 2 expected errors)
Running tests in rexamples: 137/137 tests passed
Running tests in rtesthyp: 423/423 tests passed (not counting 6 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_hypgeo: 291/291 tests passed (not counting 1 expected errors)
Running tests in rtestmt19937: 15/15 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_allnummod: 548/548 tests passed
Running tests in rtestconjugate: 136/136 tests passed
Running tests in rtestsum: 306/306 tests passed (not counting 4 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_trig: 160/160 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_zeta: 22/22 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_diff_invtrig: 22/22 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_scalarp: 20/20 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_everysome: 84/84 tests passed
Running tests in rtestint: 309/309 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_numth: 201/201 tests passed
Running tests in rtestifactor: 25/25 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_equal: 207/207 tests passed (not counting 2 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_abs: 140/140 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_taylor: 149/149 tests passed (not counting 6 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_dot: 60/60 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_mset: 112/112 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_boolean: 116/116 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_round: 101/101 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_map: 118/118 tests passed (not counting 3 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_sign: 357/357 tests passed (not counting 7 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_algebraic: 45/45 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_gamma: 761/761 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_expintegral: 210/210 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_signum: 59/59 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_lambert_w: 57/57 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_elliptic: 179/179 tests passed (not counting 2 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_integrate: 812/812 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_integrate_special: 53/53 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_sqrt: 313/313 tests passed (not counting 1 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_carg: 55/55 tests passed (not counting 2 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_log: 129/129 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_power: 72/72 tests passed (not counting 5 expected errors)
Running tests in rtestdefstruct: 32/32 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_limit: 214/214 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_powerseries: 67/67 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_laplace: 98/98 tests passed (not counting 11 expected errors)
Running tests in rtest_plotoptions: 5/5 tests passed
Running tests in rtest_algsys: 56/56 tests passed

Error summary:
Errors found in /tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.41.0.drv-0/maxima-5.41.0/tests/rtest15.mac, problems:
(55 61 67 73 79 85 91 164 173)
Error found in /tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.41.0.drv-0/maxima-5.41.0/tests/rtest8.mac, problem:
(133)
10 tests failed out of 11,303 total tests.
real time       :    218.919 secs
run-gbc time    :    166.080 secs
child run time  :     17.440 secs
gbc time        :     23.620 secs
(%o0)                                done


--=-=-=--




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#29516; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 29516 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 29516) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Dec 2017 17:45:32 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 01 12:45:32 2017
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40351 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1eKpNU-0004az-5w
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2017 12:45:32 -0500
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:36549)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <leo@HIDDEN>) id 1eKpNR-0004aq-KV
 for 29516 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2017 12:45:30 -0500
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44])
 by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 225D220B4C;
 Fri,  1 Dec 2017 12:45:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160])
 by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 01 Dec 2017 12:45:29 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name;
 h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version
 :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=
 mesmtp; bh=7U7UhZEwe0S4P851W3WN3j+Kz/FgMduEoeeIxCGe16Q=; b=WkE1V
 Cvqv6aOa3AhAb/6BloLbucnyuY5lwr6/JaIezufBXdso/+3bH1BkDL5tqlyBimwR
 Ip4xAXfg3+teLMleZV6GbOac2ySVDF/WaZwYMpyx4gbMerWtqGNUDLfa7Dy8PyY5
 rU9Trmfy4c7VuukfpTyspn73RQTZmKcOwRuyBU=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to
 :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender
 :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=7U7UhZEwe0S4P851W3WN3j+Kz/FgM
 duEoeeIxCGe16Q=; b=rSevLsDELBobfjxbcPR6trPbjxZA3SxQoNC2Jf67x1gk0
 WnfUSniKI2rf8PMpmBrnboS2pLbGj+F6DMjsZo7AIQ3pI2aHo4rEcj4CTtxPkD5s
 7eKj3eJlKubgylBKW2xS5fqg37hPURc/RyLKD2kjDlMMgFJ0nyj8tGrv32omc/Ci
 njDMbK6sp/UlfkWSKtKmXMZvJVMYTmVFrxFYaemBjJ7Nvqv421ZtOEdj5EHnefn6
 n0BJwZ6s8S8h6M1Lk2WK0KVlQxXGmV9re3GjjznNabm2EtABSZi+ciVhvV1t05ZM
 VFvUwbr2pc+57KSNUW6R05PIBj2DrbqxWAqAUmQkQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:OZUhWhaiQpRclQyXMZPtvd265TaVTejEtoSOWhsc7cPJGToe3JwbYQ>
Received: from localhost (unknown [172.58.200.9])
 by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B894F7FAF6;
 Fri,  1 Dec 2017 12:45:28 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 12:45:27 -0500
From: Leo Famulari <leo@HIDDEN>
To: Diego Nicola Barbato <dnbarbato@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#29516: Maxima fails to build
Message-ID: <20171201174527.GA4636@HIDDEN>
References: <87po7y1zzm.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87po7y1zzm.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 29516
Cc: 29516 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)


--sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 11:53:01AM +0100, Diego Nicola Barbato wrote:
> `guix build maxima' fails during the `check' phase with the following
> output:

Thanks for your report!

> Testsuite summary for maxima 5.41.0
> ============================================================================
> # TOTAL: 1
> # PASS:  0
> # SKIP:  0
> # XFAIL: 0
> # FAIL:  1
> # XPASS: 0
> # ERROR: 0
> ============================================================================
> See tests/test-suite.log
> ============================================================================

Can you retry the build with '--keep-failed' and send the
'tests/test-suite.log' file that will be in the directory of the failed
build?

And if that log's messages about the failing test refer to another log
file, please send that one too.

--sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=ko6O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu--




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#29516; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Dec 2017 15:44:53 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 01 10:44:52 2017
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40151 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1eKnUi-0001b9-HE
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2017 10:44:52 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51893)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <dnbarbato@HIDDEN>) id 1eKnUg-0001ax-T7
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2017 10:44:51 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <dnbarbato@HIDDEN>) id 1eKnTn-0003iO-C2
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2017 10:44:45 -0500
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_DKIM_INVALID
 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:54838)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <dnbarbato@HIDDEN>) id 1eKnTm-0003gq-CP
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2017 10:43:54 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39945)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <dnbarbato@HIDDEN>) id 1eKnT8-0005b5-Hw
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Fri, 01 Dec 2017 10:43:53 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <dnbarbato@HIDDEN>) id 1eKnSH-0001Xk-J2
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Fri, 01 Dec 2017 10:43:14 -0500
Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:34413)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <dnbarbato@HIDDEN>) id 1eKnSG-0001SY-HY
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Fri, 01 Dec 2017 10:42:21 -0500
Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) 
 by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 346E520F42
 for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Fri,  1 Dec 2017 11:53:03 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017;
 t=1512125583; bh=H+4h+rYKGvFPj5mJDAMu07lyLtzY1qjL5cSAtX5KyGM=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:From;
 b=q6N2SdG0MvtQ+5AcDwYi6Z2kABuiJmjB/kAkkUoL7D/7SH0ExTFTJ/N5reYBIS/ZX
 uQ5oWu9j98Te52/tVCyD2PWzUhezoAlNveyJ+n1+FKbYwh010PqMkEkwMmm/5nR3Ds
 CMHO8uIFgerkxkQ+1utKh24nsXtpHyhD1Lzp8BVCk//3iol4ttyM916e9LVdFTGTW6
 5rU/SGhEMXsDPSkFQHSf4jakG7BEs3C/7YgUn2t6OJjUSLogU0NlVtzRE/rAbWvPyu
 Kzd6JlNt6o59GPha5Rc+ma839xNz1/LASBE7CHEQqnZi6FHDuO7wwLX8HaUETSnujW
 B+z107DYqZ11Q==
Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3ypB2645zHz9rxX
 for <bug-guix@HIDDEN>; Fri,  1 Dec 2017 11:53:02 +0100 (CET)
From: Diego Nicola Barbato <dnbarbato@HIDDEN>
To: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Subject: Maxima fails to build
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2017 11:53:01 +0100
Message-ID: <87po7y1zzm.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-="
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
 [fuzzy]
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x
X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11
X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----)

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain

Hello Guix,

`guix build maxima' fails during the `check' phase with the following
output:


--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline; filename=maxima-build-error.txt
Content-Description: error message

starting phase `check'
Making check in admin
make[1]: Entering directory '/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.41.0.drv-0/maxima-5.41.0/admin'
make[1]: Nothing to be done for 'check'.
make[1]: Leaving directory '/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.41.0.drv-0/maxima-5.41.0/admin'
Making check in crosscompile-windows
make[1]: Entering directory '/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.41.0.drv-0/maxima-5.41.0/crosscompile-windows'
make[1]: Nothing to be done for 'check'.
make[1]: Leaving directory '/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.41.0.drv-0/maxima-5.41.0/crosscompile-windows'
Making check in src
make[1]: Entering directory '/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.41.0.drv-0/maxima-5.41.0/src'
make[1]: Nothing to be done for 'check'.
make[1]: Leaving directory '/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.41.0.drv-0/maxima-5.41.0/src'
Making check in lisp-utils
make[1]: Entering directory '/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.41.0.drv-0/maxima-5.41.0/lisp-utils'
make[1]: Nothing to be done for 'check'.
make[1]: Leaving directory '/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.41.0.drv-0/maxima-5.41.0/lisp-utils'
Making check in tests
make[1]: Entering directory '/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.41.0.drv-0/maxima-5.41.0/tests'
make  check-TESTS
make[2]: Entering directory '/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.41.0.drv-0/maxima-5.41.0/tests'
make[3]: Entering directory '/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.41.0.drv-0/maxima-5.41.0/tests'
sed <"test.sh.in" >"gcl-test.sh"                                          \
  -e 's#!LOCAL_MAXIMA!#/gnu/store/kpxi8h3669afr9r1bgvaf9ij3y4wdyyn-bash-minimal-4.4.12/bin/sh ../maxima-local#'                       \
  -e 's#!LISPNAME!#gcl#'                                 \
  -e 's#!OUTPUT_LOG!#../tests/gcl.log#'
chmod a+x "gcl-test.sh"
FAIL: gcl-test.sh
make[4]: Entering directory '/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.41.0.drv-0/maxima-5.41.0/tests'
make[4]: Nothing to be done for 'all'.
make[4]: Leaving directory '/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.41.0.drv-0/maxima-5.41.0/tests'
============================================================================
Testsuite summary for maxima 5.41.0
============================================================================
# TOTAL: 1
# PASS:  0
# SKIP:  0
# XFAIL: 0
# FAIL:  1
# XPASS: 0
# ERROR: 0
============================================================================
See tests/test-suite.log
============================================================================
make[3]: *** [Makefile:558: test-suite.log] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory '/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.41.0.drv-0/maxima-5.41.0/tests'
make[2]: *** [Makefile:666: check-TESTS] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory '/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.41.0.drv-0/maxima-5.41.0/tests'
make[1]: *** [Makefile:792: check-am] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory '/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.41.0.drv-0/maxima-5.41.0/tests'
make: *** [Makefile:457: check-recursive] Error 1
phase `check' failed after 261.2 seconds
builder for `/gnu/store/cmz95fkz1mc7nb3yxch4x83iaxml6gzs-maxima-5.41.0.drv' failed with exit code 1
@ build-failed /gnu/store/cmz95fkz1mc7nb3yxch4x83iaxml6gzs-maxima-5.41.0.drv - 1 builder for `/gnu/store/cmz95fkz1mc7nb3yxch4x83iaxml6gzs-maxima-5.41.0.drv' failed with exit code 1
guix build: error: build failed: build of `/gnu/store/cmz95fkz1mc7nb3yxch4x83iaxml6gzs-maxima-5.41.0.drv' failed

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain


I am running GuixSD on a x86_64 machine (commit:
9ce07f2dbafe068aea81e79decc4cfc146a48259).
The x86_64 version also failed to build on hydra.gnu.org
(https://hydra.gnu.org/build/2361466).

Greetings

Diego

--=-=-=--




Acknowledgement sent to Diego Nicola Barbato <dnbarbato@HIDDEN>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN. Full text available.
Report forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#29516; Package guix. Full text available.
Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.
Last modified: Sun, 3 Dec 2017 15:00:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.