GNU bug report logs - #29697
Small fixes for java-powermock

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu>

Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 20:34:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Gábor Boskovits <boskovits <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 29697 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 29697 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#29697; Package guix-patches. (Wed, 13 Dec 2017 20:34:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to guix-patches <at> gnu.org. (Wed, 13 Dec 2017 20:34:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: Small fixes for java-powermock
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 21:30:43 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi, these two patches should fix runtime issues with our powermock
package.
[0001-gnu-java-powermock-core-Include-resources.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
[0002-gnu-java-powermock-modules-junit4-Fix-junit-version-.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#29697; Package guix-patches. (Sat, 03 Mar 2018 13:33:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 29697 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Gábor Boskovits <boskovits <at> gmail.com>
To: 29697 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu>
Subject: Patch review
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2018 14:32:46 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
This bug seems to be not touched for a while. I like the first patch, but
I'd like to know if we could extract the package version from the input in
the second package instead, for example with 'package-version' ? That way
we could decouple the packages, so that they can be updated independently.
If not, please add a comment to junit, that java-powermock needs to be also
updated. WDYT?
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Added tag(s) patch. Request was from Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Mon, 19 Mar 2018 08:02:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Reply sent to Gábor Boskovits <boskovits <at> gmail.com>:
You have taken responsibility. (Sat, 23 Jun 2018 15:32:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Sat, 23 Jun 2018 15:32:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #15 received at 29697-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Gábor Boskovits <boskovits <at> gmail.com>
To: 29697-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Small fixes for java-powermock
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2018 17:31:25 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Closing, already on master as 1124683d8cfddf7869c52ff2a4e4fb402a36ac88,
and 59e0021cc79b577daaf0f23a9f0b93e166400261. Thanks!
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Sun, 22 Jul 2018 11:24:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 5 years and 252 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.