Received: (at 29895) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Feb 2018 19:14:53 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 14 14:14:53 2018 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43162 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1em2W5-00055Y-Ba for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 14:14:53 -0500 Received: from ec2-34-202-238-73.compute-1.amazonaws.com ([34.202.238.73]:48370 helo=vps.thesusis.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <psusi@HIDDEN>) id 1em2W3-00055K-0s for 29895 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 14:14:51 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vps.thesusis.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4796247E7; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 14:14:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from vps.thesusis.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (vps.thesusis.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KewiGSz2qSce; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 14:14:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.1.1.181] (unknown [97.68.109.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: psusi) by vps.thesusis.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1C66D26A18; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 14:14:45 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: bug#29895: Parted 3.2 accessing /dev/mmcblk0rpmb considered a bug? To: Ceriel Jacobs <linux-ide@HIDDEN>, 29895 <at> debbugs.gnu.org References: <8f27a184-3dd5-e1db-c4d0-91dca115889f@HIDDEN> From: Phil Susi <psusi@HIDDEN> Message-ID: <ed86b5c5-159c-d424-7984-1321e8b3f2f4@HIDDEN> Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 14:14:44 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8f27a184-3dd5-e1db-c4d0-91dca115889f@HIDDEN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.4 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 29895 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: 0.4 (/) On 12/29/2017 9:00 AM, Ceriel Jacobs wrote: > eMMC spec 4.5 has a tiny (2MiB or 4MiB) Replay Protected Memory Block. > As well as UFS and NVMe have support for RPMB. This came to my attention a while back elsewhere.. probably the debian bug tracker. The question is how to identify such a device so it can be excluded? Does it have a unique dev no? Or some sysfs attribute that flags it as an RPMB?
bug-parted@HIDDEN:bug#29895; Package parted.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jan 2018 17:25:49 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 02 12:25:49 2018 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33380 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1eWQJx-0002bn-91 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jan 2018 12:25:49 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52474) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <bcl@HIDDEN>) id 1eWQJv-0002ba-5x for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jan 2018 12:25:47 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <bcl@HIDDEN>) id 1eWQJp-0001xo-0p for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jan 2018 12:25:42 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:50960) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <bcl@HIDDEN>) id 1eWQJo-0001xg-UL for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jan 2018 12:25:40 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43424) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <bcl@HIDDEN>) id 1eWQJn-0007qf-Tc for bug-parted@HIDDEN; Tue, 02 Jan 2018 12:25:40 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <bcl@HIDDEN>) id 1eWQJk-0001sj-MS for bug-parted@HIDDEN; Tue, 02 Jan 2018 12:25:39 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:41078) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <bcl@HIDDEN>) id 1eWQJk-0001r3-Fb for bug-parted@HIDDEN; Tue, 02 Jan 2018 12:25:36 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEFE291FCE for <bug-parted@HIDDEN>; Tue, 2 Jan 2018 17:25:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lister.brianlane.com (ovpn-112-17.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.112.17]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A18660C95 for <bug-parted@HIDDEN>; Tue, 2 Jan 2018 17:25:34 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 09:25:31 -0800 From: "Brian C. Lane" <bcl@HIDDEN> To: bug-parted@HIDDEN Subject: Re: bug#29895: Parted 3.2 accessing /dev/mmcblk0rpmb considered a bug? Message-ID: <20180102172531.GB32512@HIDDEN> References: <8f27a184-3dd5-e1db-c4d0-91dca115889f@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8f27a184-3dd5-e1db-c4d0-91dca115889f@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.29]); Tue, 02 Jan 2018 17:25:34 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 03:00:54PM +0100, Ceriel Jacobs wrote: > eMMC spec 4.5 has a tiny (2MiB or 4MiB) Replay Protected Memory Block. > As well as UFS and NVMe have support for RPMB. > > That RPMB area is protected from readwrite access. > > --- > The kernel has been patched to not access this rpmb area: > > $ dmesg | grep rpmb > [ 6.712468] mmcblk0rpmb: mmc0:0001 SEM04G partition 3 2.00 MiB > --- > Parted (GNU parted) 3.2 still tries to access the RPMB: > > Error: /dev/mmcblk0rpmb: unrecognised disk label > Warning: Error fsyncing/closing /dev/mmcblk0rpmb: Input/output error > Retry/Ignore? > > Resulting in dmesg logged errors like: > > [46684.715228] print_req_error: I/O error, dev mmcblk0rpmb, sector 0 > --- > > Should (GNU) parted be patched too, or not? What was the parted cmdline you were running? And what are the permissions of the device node? -- Brian C. Lane (PST8PDT)
bug-parted@HIDDEN:bug#29895; Package parted.
Full text available.Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Dec 2017 17:08:01 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 29 12:08:01 2017 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56873 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1eUy8W-0000ls-IS for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 12:08:00 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59054) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <linux-ide@HIDDEN>) id 1eUvDo-0004Eu-0p for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 09:01:16 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <linux-ide@HIDDEN>) id 1eUvDf-0003Lq-Nw for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 09:01:10 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20, TVD_SUBJ_NUM_OBFU_MINFP autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:43706) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <linux-ide@HIDDEN>) id 1eUvDf-0003Le-Ka for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 09:01:07 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49888) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <linux-ide@HIDDEN>) id 1eUvDZ-0002gh-Rc for bug-parted@HIDDEN; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 09:01:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <linux-ide@HIDDEN>) id 1eUvDW-0003GG-RQ for bug-parted@HIDDEN; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 09:01:01 -0500 Received: from relay2-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.194]:53513) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <linux-ide@HIDDEN>) id 1eUvDW-0003Ec-LF for bug-parted@HIDDEN; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 09:00:58 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 81.28.80.241 Received: from mac02.local (d.probackup.nl [81.28.80.241]) (Authenticated sender: linux-ide@HIDDEN) by relay2-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 76797C5A5D for <bug-parted@HIDDEN>; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 15:00:55 +0100 (CET) To: bug-parted@HIDDEN From: Ceriel Jacobs <linux-ide@HIDDEN> Subject: Parted 3.2 accessing /dev/mmcblk0rpmb considered a bug? Message-ID: <8f27a184-3dd5-e1db-c4d0-91dca115889f@HIDDEN> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 15:00:54 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: nl Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -3.1 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 12:07:58 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) eMMC spec 4.5 has a tiny (2MiB or 4MiB) Replay Protected Memory Block. As well as UFS and NVMe have support for RPMB. That RPMB area is protected from readwrite access. --- The kernel has been patched to not access this rpmb area: $ dmesg | grep rpmb [ 6.712468] mmcblk0rpmb: mmc0:0001 SEM04G partition 3 2.00 MiB --- Parted (GNU parted) 3.2 still tries to access the RPMB: Error: /dev/mmcblk0rpmb: unrecognised disk label Warning: Error fsyncing/closing /dev/mmcblk0rpmb: Input/output error Retry/Ignore? Resulting in dmesg logged errors like: [46684.715228] print_req_error: I/O error, dev mmcblk0rpmb, sector 0 --- Should (GNU) parted be patched too, or not? Cheers, Ceriel
Ceriel Jacobs <linux-ide@HIDDEN>:bug-parted@HIDDEN.
Full text available.bug-parted@HIDDEN:bug#29895; Package parted.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.