GNU logs - #30076, boring messages


Message sent to bug-guile@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#30076: [PATCH] web: Recognize JSON content type as text.
Resent-From: Arun Isaac <arunisaac@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guile@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 05:33:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.30076.B.151564872429232 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: report 30076
X-GNU-PR-Package: guile
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch
To: 30076 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Arun Isaac <arunisaac@HIDDEN>
X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guile@HIDDEN
Received: via spool by submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B.151564872429232
          (code B ref -1); Thu, 11 Jan 2018 05:33:01 +0000
Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jan 2018 05:32:04 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51636 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1eZVTA-0007bQ-D4
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 00:32:04 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53455)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <arunisaac@HIDDEN>) id 1eZVT8-0007aw-L5
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 00:32:03 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <arunisaac@HIDDEN>) id 1eZVT2-0001zH-Nb
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 00:31:57 -0500
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled
 version=3.3.2
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:40661)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <arunisaac@HIDDEN>)
 id 1eZVT2-0001z4-KN
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 00:31:56 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44418)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <arunisaac@HIDDEN>) id 1eZVT1-0001x0-Mr
 for bug-guile@HIDDEN; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 00:31:56 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <arunisaac@HIDDEN>) id 1eZVSy-0001v1-Fy
 for bug-guile@HIDDEN; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 00:31:55 -0500
Received: from vultr.systemreboot.net ([45.77.148.100]:53872)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <arunisaac@HIDDEN>)
 id 1eZVSy-0001qK-0u
 for bug-guile@HIDDEN; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 00:31:52 -0500
Received: from [117.192.104.45] (helo=localhost.localdomain)
 by systemreboot.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.90) (envelope-from <arunisaac@HIDDEN>)
 id 1eZVSg-00024Q-Oq; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 11:01:34 +0530
From: Arun Isaac <arunisaac@HIDDEN>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 11:01:17 +0530
Message-Id: <20180111053117.4597-1-arunisaac@HIDDEN>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.15.1
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
 [fuzzy]
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x
X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11
X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----)

* module/web/response.scm (text-content-type?): Recognize JSON content
  type as text.
---
 module/web/response.scm | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/module/web/response.scm b/module/web/response.scm
index 06e1c6dc1..679304c4d 100644
--- a/module/web/response.scm
+++ b/module/web/response.scm
@@ -184,6 +184,7 @@ reason phrase for the response's code."
 represents a textual type such as `text/plain'."
   (let ((type (symbol->string type)))
     (or (string-prefix? "text/" type)
+        (string-suffix? "/json" type)
         (string-suffix? "/xml" type)
         (string-suffix? "+xml" type))))
 
-- 
2.15.1





Message sent:


Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Arun Isaac <arunisaac@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#30076: Acknowledgement ([PATCH] web: Recognize JSON content
 type as text.)
Message-ID: <handler.30076.B.151564872429232.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <20180111053117.4597-1-arunisaac@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 30076
X-Gnu-PR-Package: guile
X-Gnu-PR-Keywords: patch
Reply-To: 30076 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 05:33:02 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-guile@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 30076 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
30076: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D30076
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems


Message sent to bug-guile@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#30076: [PATCH] web: Recognize JSON content type as text.
Resent-From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guile@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 03:32:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.30076.B30076.151736950913363 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 30076
X-GNU-PR-Package: guile
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch
To: Arun Isaac <arunisaac@HIDDEN>
Cc: 30076 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 30076-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B30076.151736950913363
          (code B ref 30076); Wed, 31 Jan 2018 03:32:02 +0000
Received: (at 30076) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jan 2018 03:31:49 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50085 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1egj7l-0003TT-F0
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 22:31:49 -0500
Received: from world.peace.net ([50.252.239.5]:51134)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>) id 1egj7j-0003T9-1U
 for 30076 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 22:31:47 -0500
Received: from pool-72-93-27-251.bstnma.east.verizon.net ([72.93.27.251]
 helo=jojen)
 by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>)
 id 1egj7c-0001US-I2; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 22:31:40 -0500
From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN>
References: <20180111053117.4597-1-arunisaac@HIDDEN>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 22:31:04 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20180111053117.4597-1-arunisaac@HIDDEN> (Arun Isaac's
 message of "Thu, 11 Jan 2018 11:01:17 +0530")
Message-ID: <87y3kevh53.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)

Hi Arun,

Arun Isaac <arunisaac@HIDDEN> writes:
> * module/web/response.scm (text-content-type?): Recognize JSON content
>   type as text.

While this would seem reasonable at first glance, it seems to me that
this will result in JSON texts with non-ASCII characters being
mishandled in many cases.

Within Guile, 'text-content-type?' is currently used in two places:

* 'decode-response-body' in (web client), and
* 'response-body-port' in (web response).

In both places, if 'text-content-type?' returns true, the encoding of
the response is assumed to be "ISO-8859-1" if not otherwise specified by
an explicit 'charset' parameter.  This is what RFC 2616 specifies for
text/plain, although RFC 6657 would change the default to US-ASCII, as
it was in RFC 2046, and maybe we should look into that.

However, things are quite different for the application/json MIME type,
as specified in RFCs 4627 and 7159.  Those RFCs specify that JSON text
"SHALL" (i.e. MUST) be encoded in Unicode (UTF-8, UTF-16 or UTF-32),
that the default encoding is UTF-8, and furthermore that no charset
parameter is defined for application/json.

So, we can expect at least some conforming implementations to omit the
'charset' parameter, and yet in that case we must assume that the
encoding is Unicode, and most definitely not ISO-8859-1.

RFC 4627 makes the additional interesting observation (in section 3,
"encoding") that since the first two characters of JSON text will always
be ASCII, and since UTF-8/UTF-16/UTF-32 are the only valid encodings for
JSON text, we can reliably determine the encoding by looking at the
pattern of nul bytes in the first four octets:

           00 00 00 xx  UTF-32BE
           00 xx 00 xx  UTF-16BE
           xx 00 00 00  UTF-32LE
           xx 00 xx 00  UTF-16LE
           xx xx xx xx  UTF-8

Given that any of these encodings above are possible, and that there is
no 'charset' parameter defined for "application/json", it seems to me
that we have no choice but to be prepared to auto-detect the encoding,
as described in RFC 4627 section 3 if the 'charset' parameter is
missing.

What do you think?

      Mark




Message sent to bug-guile@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#30076: [PATCH] web: Recognize JSON content type as text.
Resent-From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guile@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 06:06:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.30076.B30076.15173787192115 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 30076
X-GNU-PR-Package: guile
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch
To: Arun Isaac <arunisaac@HIDDEN>
Cc: 30076 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 30076-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B30076.15173787192115
          (code B ref 30076); Wed, 31 Jan 2018 06:06:02 +0000
Received: (at 30076) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jan 2018 06:05:19 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50201 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1eglWH-0000Y2-8p
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 01:05:18 -0500
Received: from world.peace.net ([50.252.239.5]:51462)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>) id 1eglWG-0000Xn-6N
 for 30076 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 01:05:16 -0500
Received: from pool-72-93-27-251.bstnma.east.verizon.net ([72.93.27.251]
 helo=jojen)
 by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <mhw@HIDDEN>)
 id 1eglWA-0002H6-1T; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 01:05:10 -0500
From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN>
References: <20180111053117.4597-1-arunisaac@HIDDEN>
 <87y3kevh53.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 01:04:32 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87y3kevh53.fsf@HIDDEN> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Tue, 30
 Jan 2018 22:31:04 -0500")
Message-ID: <87lggeva1b.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)

Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN> writes:
> RFC 4627 makes the additional interesting observation (in section 3,
> "encoding") that since the first two characters of JSON text will always
> be ASCII,

Sorry, it turns out that's no longer the case.  RFC 4627 specified that
a JSON text must be either an object or array, but in RFC 7159 a JSON
text can be any JSON value.  So only the first character is guaranteed
to be ASCII.

Having looked into this a bit more, I wonder if Guile should even try to
set the port encoding itself.  As far as I can tell, there's no way to
know the encoding of the response payload in the general case, without
knowledge of the specific MIME media type.  We could teach Guile about
"application/json", but if we follow that path, it would lead to us
teaching Guile's web library about more media types over time, but we
cannot hope to know about all of them.

The 'charset' parameter is not universal.  Whether it is a valid
parameter, and how its value is to be interpreted, depends on the media
type.  For "application/json", technically there is no 'charset'
parameter at all.

Since it's not feasible for Guile to reliably choose the right encoding
for arbitrary media types, perhaps it would be better for Guile to
explicitly say that it's the application programmer's job to set the
encoding of the port, if it contains textual data.

What do you think?

      Mark




Message sent to bug-guile@HIDDEN:


X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
Subject: bug#30076: [PATCH] web: Recognize JSON content type as text.
Resent-From: Arun Isaac <arunisaac@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guile@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2018 07:32:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.30076.B30076.15175567172450 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 30076
X-GNU-PR-Package: guile
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw@HIDDEN>
Cc: 30076 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 30076-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B30076.15175567172450
          (code B ref 30076); Fri, 02 Feb 2018 07:32:02 +0000
Received: (at 30076) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Feb 2018 07:31:57 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53319 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1ehVpF-0000dS-EE
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Feb 2018 02:31:57 -0500
Received: from vultr.systemreboot.net ([45.77.148.100]:42750)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <arunisaac@HIDDEN>) id 1ehVpD-0000dA-1Y
 for 30076 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Feb 2018 02:31:56 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=systemreboot.net; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:
 References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:
 Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:
 Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:
 List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
 bh=HyBHRiQ7xjVUyN6MVZgkroEgcQxIZZSSPUj4MJaXsbg=; b=bgV6IRfl6dfgJO5pNZULFRC7I
 B3bFueT0oE1D/VjDWvFFzTYgE2eELCa01J9flr1p107c7Mbq20kRiADeTuJC7AXeccu3v87D0E3oe
 MaYsoawb8ys/xyHYzonUMqhPiYj5HMwFePSzcmd+c99nSW5fcyCtIMedBeofoKD9hFDX4=;
Received: from [14.139.128.15] (helo=steel)
 by systemreboot.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90) (envelope-from <arunisaac@HIDDEN>)
 id 1ehVp3-00080b-LY; Fri, 02 Feb 2018 13:01:46 +0530
From: Arun Isaac <arunisaac@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <87lggeva1b.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <20180111053117.4597-1-arunisaac@HIDDEN>
 <87y3kevh53.fsf@HIDDEN> <87lggeva1b.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2018 13:01:34 +0530
Message-ID: <cu7tvuzzw2x.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)


> Having looked into this a bit more, I wonder if Guile should even try to
> set the port encoding itself.  As far as I can tell, there's no way to
> know the encoding of the response payload in the general case, without
> knowledge of the specific MIME media type.  We could teach Guile about
> "application/json", but if we follow that path, it would lead to us
> teaching Guile's web library about more media types over time, but we
> cannot hope to know about all of them.

> Since it's not feasible for Guile to reliably choose the right encoding
> for arbitrary media types, perhaps it would be better for Guile to
> explicitly say that it's the application programmer's job to set the
> encoding of the port, if it contains textual data.

"application/json" is common enough that it would be convenient for the
application programmer to have Guile know about it. But, as a Guile
maintainer, this is your call. I don't have strong opinions this way or
that.





Last modified: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 12:00:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.