GNU bug report logs - #30441
[PATCH] gnu: boost: Update to 1.66.0.

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 30441 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 30441 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Arun Isaac <arunisaac <at> systemreboot.net>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Cc: Arun Isaac <arunisaac <at> systemreboot.net>
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: boost: Update to 1.66.0.
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 05:03:58 +0530

* gnu/packages/boost.scm (boost): Update to 1.66.0.
[arguments]: Replace system* with invoke.
[home-page]: Update URI.
---
 gnu/packages/boost.scm | 33 +++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/boost.scm b/gnu/packages/boost.scm
index 91dd2f915..bf584fa6c 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/boost.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/boost.scm
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
 ;;; Copyright © 2015 Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
 ;;; Copyright © 2017 Thomas Danckaert <post <at> thomasdanckaert.be>
 ;;; Copyright © 2018 Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
+;;; Copyright © 2018 Arun Isaac <arunisaac <at> systemreboot.net>
 ;;;
 ;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
 ;;;
@@ -37,7 +38,7 @@
 (define-public boost
   (package
     (name "boost")
-    (version "1.64.0")
+    (version "1.66.0")
     (source (origin
               (method url-fetch)
               (uri (string-append
@@ -46,7 +47,7 @@
                     ".tar.bz2"))
               (sha256
                (base32
-                "0cikd35xfkpg9nnl76yqqnqxnf3hyfjjww8xjd4akflprsm5rk3v"))))
+                "1aaw48cmimsskzgiclwn0iifp62a5iw9cbqrhfari876af1828ap"))))
     (build-system gnu-build-system)
     (inputs `(("icu4c" ,icu4c)
               ("zlib" ,zlib)))
@@ -73,8 +74,7 @@
                    '()))
        #:phases
        (modify-phases %standard-phases
-         (replace
-             'configure
+         (replace 'configure
            (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
              (let ((out (assoc-ref outputs "out")))
                (substitute* '("libs/config/configure"
@@ -88,21 +88,22 @@
                (setenv "SHELL" (which "sh"))
                (setenv "CONFIG_SHELL" (which "sh"))
 
-               (zero? (system* "./bootstrap.sh"
-                               (string-append "--prefix=" out)
-                               "--with-toolset=gcc")))))
-         (replace
-             'build
+               (invoke "./bootstrap.sh"
+                       (string-append "--prefix=" out)
+                       "--with-toolset=gcc")
+               #t)))
+         (replace 'build
            (lambda* (#:key outputs make-flags #:allow-other-keys)
-             (zero? (apply system* "./b2"
-                           (format #f "-j~a" (parallel-job-count))
-                           make-flags))))
-         (replace
-             'install
+             (apply invoke "./b2"
+                    (format #f "-j~a" (parallel-job-count))
+                    make-flags)
+             #t))
+         (replace 'install
            (lambda* (#:key outputs make-flags #:allow-other-keys)
-             (zero? (apply system* "./b2" "install" make-flags)))))))
+             (apply invoke "./b2" "install" make-flags)
+             #t)))))
 
-    (home-page "http://boost.org")
+    (home-page "http://www.boost.org")
     (synopsis "Peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries")
     (description
      "A collection of libraries intended to be widely useful, and usable
-- 
2.15.1

Message #8 received at 30441 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: Arun Isaac <arunisaac <at> systemreboot.net>
Cc: 30441 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#30441] [PATCH] gnu: boost: Update to 1.66.0.
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 14:46:33 -0500

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 05:03:58AM +0530, Arun Isaac wrote:
> * gnu/packages/boost.scm (boost): Update to 1.66.0.
> [arguments]: Replace system* with invoke.
> [home-page]: Update URI.

Thanks!

This is a change for the next core-updates cycle, so I put it on my
local core-updates-next branch. But please try to remember it, too :)

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #11 received at 30441 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Arun Isaac <arunisaac <at> systemreboot.net>
To: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Cc: 30441 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#30441] [PATCH] gnu: boost: Update to 1.66.0.
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 11:50:20 +0530

Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name> writes:

> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 05:03:58AM +0530, Arun Isaac wrote:
>> * gnu/packages/boost.scm (boost): Update to 1.66.0.
>> [arguments]: Replace system* with invoke.
>> [home-page]: Update URI.
>
> Thanks!
>
> This is a change for the next core-updates cycle, so I put it on my
> local core-updates-next branch. But please try to remember it, too :)

Sure!

Message #14 received at 30441 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
To: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Cc: Arun Isaac <arunisaac <at> systemreboot.net>, 30441 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#30441] [PATCH] gnu: boost: Update to 1.66.0.
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2018 14:58:07 +0100

Hello,

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 02:46:33PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> This is a change for the next core-updates cycle, so I put it on my
> local core-updates-next branch. But please try to remember it, too :)

would it not be better to build it (after the next core-updates merge,
or even the next release) on a feature branch?

There are new releases of mpfr and mpc; it would be nice to have a quick
core-updates run with these packages that really belong to the core (together
with a few others, maybe, like glibc?) right after the next guix release.

Andreas

Message #17 received at 30441 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
Cc: Arun Isaac <arunisaac <at> systemreboot.net>, 30441 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Subject: Re: [bug#30441] [PATCH] gnu: boost: Update to 1.66.0.
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 10:31:42 +0100

Hello,

Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr> skribis:

> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 02:46:33PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
>> This is a change for the next core-updates cycle, so I put it on my
>> local core-updates-next branch. But please try to remember it, too :)
>
> would it not be better to build it (after the next core-updates merge,
> or even the next release) on a feature branch?

I’d recommend either that or current ‘staging’ (though you’d need to
check with Leo and Marius if that’s fine) or ‘core-updates’.

> There are new releases of mpfr and mpc; it would be nice to have a quick
> core-updates run with these packages that really belong to the core (together
> with a few others, maybe, like glibc?) right after the next guix release.

You should definitely try updating them in the current ‘core-updates’
branch.  Now’s the time!  :-)

Thanks,
Ludo’.

Message #20 received at 30441 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>, Andreas Enge
 <andreas <at> enge.fr>
Cc: 30441 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#30441] [PATCH] gnu: boost: Update to 1.66.0.
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 14:49:12 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:

> Hello,
>
> Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr> skribis:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 02:46:33PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
>>> This is a change for the next core-updates cycle, so I put it on my
>>> local core-updates-next branch. But please try to remember it, too :)
>>
>> would it not be better to build it (after the next core-updates merge,
>> or even the next release) on a feature branch?
>
> I’d recommend either that or current ‘staging’ (though you’d need to
> check with Leo and Marius if that’s fine) or ‘core-updates’.

Current 'staging' is almost built, so it would have to be the next round.

Also, Boost has ~1400 dependents, so it's a bit heavy even for 'staging'.

Let's try to do a new 'core-updates' soonish instead.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #23 received at 30441 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
Cc: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>, 30441 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#30441] [PATCH] gnu: boost: Update to 1.66.0.
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 15:22:20 +0100

Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com> skribis:

> Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr> skribis:
>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 02:46:33PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
>>>> This is a change for the next core-updates cycle, so I put it on my
>>>> local core-updates-next branch. But please try to remember it, too :)
>>>
>>> would it not be better to build it (after the next core-updates merge,
>>> or even the next release) on a feature branch?
>>
>> I’d recommend either that or current ‘staging’ (though you’d need to
>> check with Leo and Marius if that’s fine) or ‘core-updates’.
>
> Current 'staging' is almost built, so it would have to be the next round.
>
> Also, Boost has ~1400 dependents, so it's a bit heavy even for 'staging'.

Sounds reasonable.

> Let's try to do a new 'core-updates' soonish instead.

Actually ‘core-updates’ already exist, so I suppose we can give it a try
right away?

berlin.guixsd.org should have substitutes for the core packages on
‘core-updates’, hopefully making it less painful to try things out.

Ludo’.

Message #28 received at 30441-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Gábor Boskovits <boskovits <at> gmail.com>
To: 30441-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: gnu: boost: Update to 1.66.0.
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 17:59:26 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Thanks, this landed on master as *baef70bb.*

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.