GNU bug report logs - #32132
daemon store names can't start with a dot

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 32132 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 32132 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Clément Lassieur <clement <at> lassieur.org>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>, bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Cc: Nils Gillmann <ng0 <at> n0.is>, 32111-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: daemon store names can't start with a dot
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 15:20:23 +0200

Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:

> Hello Clément,
>
> Clément Lassieur <clement <at> lassieur.org> skribis:
>
>> Nils Gillmann <ng0 <at> n0.is> writes:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Can you provide some context why this is necessary, maybe even
>>> in the commit message?
>>
>> It's necessary when you want to package a program whose source looks
>> like file:///home/foo/.bar.
>
> I’d rather not make this kind of change.  In general, I think we should
> be very conservative about changes to the daemon and its protocol,
> because that’s the common denominator of all the versions of Guix.
>
> If we change something like it, then we’ll get subtle breakage depending
> on the version of the daemon in use.
>
> WDYT?

Okay, let's abandon this then :-)

CCing bug-guix because I still think it's a bug; please close it if you
disagree.

Clément

Message #10 received at 32132 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Clément Lassieur <clement <at> lassieur.org>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 32132 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Nils Gillmann <ng0 <at> n0.is>,
 32111-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: daemon store names can't start with a dot
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 18:35:06 +0200

Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:

> Looks like you already closed it (or was it me?).

Well, I closed 32111 (guix-patches) but I opened 32132 (bug-guix) with a
wontfix tag, so that people can find it easily if they stumble across
the issue.

> Anyway, it’s certainly a limitation, but given that it’s an annoyance
> more than a showstopper (in my view at least), I’m in favor keeping
> things this way for the sake of compatibility.

Agreed :-)

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.