X-Loop: owner@HIDDEN Subject: bug#3229: 23.0.93; ediff-directories isn't buffer coding system independent Reply-To: Robert Marshall <robert.marshall@HIDDEN>, 3229 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: Robert Marshall <robert.marshall@HIDDEN> Resent-To: bug-submit-list@HIDDEN Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN> Resent-Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 09:50:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.3229.B.124160291218725@HIDDEN> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 3229 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by submit@HIDDEN id=B.124160291218725 (code B ref -1); Wed, 06 May 2009 09:50:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 6 May 2009 09:41:52 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=4.0 tests=FOURLA autolearn=no version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n469fjU3018705 for <submit@HIDDEN>; Wed, 6 May 2009 02:41:47 -0700 Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:51524 helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <robert.marshall@HIDDEN>) id 1M1ddI-0003cV-RT for emacs-pretest-bug@HIDDEN; Wed, 06 May 2009 05:41:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <robert.marshall@HIDDEN>) id 1M1ddE-0002Y3-MY for emacs-pretest-bug@HIDDEN; Wed, 06 May 2009 05:41:44 -0400 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:50678) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <robert.marshall@HIDDEN>) id 1M1ddE-0002XO-4p for emacs-pretest-bug@HIDDEN; Wed, 06 May 2009 05:41:40 -0400 Received: from tnei.co.uk ([83.170.102.119] helo=mail.tnei-mail.com) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <robert.marshall@HIDDEN>) id 1M1ddC-0004dE-7i for emacs-pretest-bug@HIDDEN; Wed, 06 May 2009 05:41:38 -0400 Received: from mangw.ipsa-power.com ([83.138.33.114] helo=robert-laptop.tnei.co.uk) by mail.tnei-mail.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <robert.marshall@HIDDEN>) id 1M1di8-0007R1-RD for emacs-pretest-bug@HIDDEN; Wed, 06 May 2009 10:47:05 +0100 Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 10:41:05 +0100 Message-Id: <873abipo0e.fsf@HIDDEN> From: Robert Marshall <robert.marshall@HIDDEN> To: emacs-pretest-bug@HIDDEN X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 83.138.33.114 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: robert.marshall@HIDDEN X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:23:22 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.tnei-mail.com) X-Detected-Operating-System: by mx20.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. I have two files with the same name (extracted from two svn repositories) one of which has a coding system of undecided-dos, the other is undecided-unix. WHen I perform an ediff-buffers between the two files loaded into emacs I get - correctly - zero reported differences. However if I look at the differences using ediff-directories I get a single difference region consisting of the whole file. If I manually set the coding systems in the two files to be identical then ediff-directories works correctly reporting no differences. In GNU Emacs 23.0.93.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.14.4) of 2009-05-05 on robert-laptop Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.10502000 Important settings: value of $LC_ALL: nil value of $LC_COLLATE: nil value of $LC_CTYPE: nil value of $LC_MESSAGES: nil value of $LC_MONETARY: nil value of $LC_NUMERIC: nil value of $LC_TIME: nil value of $LANG: en_GB.UTF-8 value of $XMODIFIERS: nil locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix default-enable-multibyte-characters: t Major mode: F90 Minor modes in effect: desktop-save-mode: t recentf-mode: t show-paren-mode: t tooltip-mode: t tool-bar-mode: t mouse-wheel-mode: t menu-bar-mode: t file-name-shadow-mode: t global-font-lock-mode: t font-lock-mode: t blink-cursor-mode: t global-auto-composition-mode: t auto-composition-mode: t auto-encryption-mode: t auto-compression-mode: t line-number-mode: t transient-mark-mode: t Recent input: Recent messages: Processing difference regions ... done Region 1 exceeds the auto-refinement limit. Type `*' to refine [2 times] Quit this Ediff session & show containing session group? (y or n) Quit this session group? (y or n) Making completion list... [2 times] Computing differences between iec909MatrixOps.f90 and iec909MatrixOps.f906806DzI ... Processing difference regions ... done Quit this Ediff session? (y or n) Making completion list... [2 times] Type C-x 4 C-o RET to restore the other window, C-M-v to scroll help.
Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.420 (Entity 5.420) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Loop: owner@HIDDEN From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (Emacs bug Tracking System) To: Robert Marshall <robert.marshall@HIDDEN> Subject: bug#3229: Acknowledgement (23.0.93; ediff-directories isn't buffer coding system independent) Message-ID: <handler.3229.B.124160291218725.ack@HIDDEN> References: <873abipo0e.fsf@HIDDEN> X-Emacs-PR-Message: ack 3229 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs Reply-To: 3229 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 09:50:03 +0000 Thank you for filing a new bug report with Emacs. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN> If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please send it to 3229 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, as before. Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. --=20 3229: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D3229 Emacs Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems
X-Loop: owner@HIDDEN Subject: bug#3229: 23.0.93; ediff-directories isn't buffer coding system independent Reply-To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>, 3229 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN> Resent-To: bug-submit-list@HIDDEN Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN> Resent-Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 14:35:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.3229.B3229.12416201526745@HIDDEN> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 3229 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by 3229-submit@HIDDEN id=B3229.12416201526745 (code B ref 3229); Wed, 06 May 2009 14:35:03 +0000 Received: (at 3229) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 6 May 2009 14:29:12 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=4.0 tests=AWL,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,XIRONPORT autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com (ironport2-out.teksavvy.com [206.248.154.182]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n46ET8X4006730 for <3229@HIDDEN>; Wed, 6 May 2009 07:29:10 -0700 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArUFAMc7AUrO+IYe/2dsb2JhbACBUM9thAEFhU4 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.40,302,1238990400"; d="scan'208";a="38068542" Received: from 206-248-134-30.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([206.248.134.30]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 06 May 2009 10:29:02 -0400 Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 964D27F75; Wed, 6 May 2009 10:29:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN> To: Robert Marshall <robert.marshall@HIDDEN> Cc: 3229 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, emacs-pretest-bug@HIDDEN Message-ID: <jwvvdoejohq.fsf-monnier+emacsbugreports@HIDDEN> References: <873abipo0e.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 10:29:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: <873abipo0e.fsf@HIDDEN> (Robert Marshall's message of "Wed, 06 May 2009 10:41:05 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.93 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > I have two files with the same name (extracted from two svn > repositories) one of which has a coding system of undecided-dos, the > other is undecided-unix. > WHen I perform an ediff-buffers between the two files loaded into > emacs I get - correctly - zero reported differences. However if I look > at the differences using ediff-directories I get a single difference > region consisting of the whole file. Presumably you'll get the same "one big hunk diff" if you use ediff-files. Both ediff-files and ediff-directories work (as the name implies) on files (and directories), not on buffers. While the two buffers show similar (or even identical) contents, the corresponding files are different (contain different byte sequences because of the different coding-system). Stefan
Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.420 (Entity 5.420) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Loop: owner@HIDDEN From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (Emacs bug Tracking System) To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN> Subject: bug#3229: Info received (bug#3229: 23.0.93; ediff-directories isn't buffer coding system independent) Message-ID: <handler.3229.B3229.12416201526745.ackinfo@HIDDEN> References: <jwvvdoejohq.fsf-monnier+emacsbugreports@HIDDEN> X-Emacs-PR-Message: ack-info 3229 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs Reply-To: 3229 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 14:35:03 +0000 Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN> If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please send it to 3229 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, as before. Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. --=20 3229: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D3229 Emacs Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems
X-Loop: owner@HIDDEN Subject: bug#3229: 23.0.93; ediff-directories isn't buffer coding system independent Reply-To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>, 3229 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN> Resent-To: bug-submit-list@HIDDEN Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN> Resent-Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 14:40:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.3229.B.12416204968283@HIDDEN> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 3229 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by submit@HIDDEN id=B.12416204968283 (code B ref -1); Wed, 06 May 2009 14:40:04 +0000 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 6 May 2009 14:34:56 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=4.0 tests=AWL,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,XIRONPORT autolearn=unavailable version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n46EYqYJ008277 for <submit@HIDDEN>; Wed, 6 May 2009 07:34:53 -0700 Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:55147 helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <monnier@HIDDEN>) id 1M1iCx-0000Sy-V7 for emacs-pretest-bug@HIDDEN; Wed, 06 May 2009 10:34:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <monnier@HIDDEN>) id 1M1iCx-0005MM-5y for emacs-pretest-bug@HIDDEN; Wed, 06 May 2009 10:34:51 -0400 Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca ([206.248.154.182]:49239 helo=ironport2-out.teksavvy.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <monnier@HIDDEN>) id 1M1i7V-0003QG-H0 for emacs-pretest-bug@HIDDEN; Wed, 06 May 2009 10:29:13 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArUFAMc7AUrO+IYe/2dsb2JhbACBUM9thAEFhU4 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.40,302,1238990400"; d="scan'208";a="38068542" Received: from 206-248-134-30.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([206.248.134.30]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 06 May 2009 10:29:02 -0400 Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 964D27F75; Wed, 6 May 2009 10:29:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN> To: Robert Marshall <robert.marshall@HIDDEN> Cc: 3229 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, emacs-pretest-bug@HIDDEN Message-ID: <jwvvdoejohq.fsf-monnier+emacsbugreports@HIDDEN> References: <873abipo0e.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 10:29:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: <873abipo0e.fsf@HIDDEN> (Robert Marshall's message of "Wed, 06 May 2009 10:41:05 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.93 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. > I have two files with the same name (extracted from two svn > repositories) one of which has a coding system of undecided-dos, the > other is undecided-unix. > WHen I perform an ediff-buffers between the two files loaded into > emacs I get - correctly - zero reported differences. However if I look > at the differences using ediff-directories I get a single difference > region consisting of the whole file. Presumably you'll get the same "one big hunk diff" if you use ediff-files. Both ediff-files and ediff-directories work (as the name implies) on files (and directories), not on buffers. While the two buffers show similar (or even identical) contents, the corresponding files are different (contain different byte sequences because of the different coding-system). Stefan
Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.420 (Entity 5.420) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Loop: owner@HIDDEN From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (Emacs bug Tracking System) To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN> Subject: bug#3229: Info received (bug#3229: 23.0.93; ediff-directories isn't buffer coding system independent) Message-ID: <handler.3229.B.12416204968283.ackinfo@HIDDEN> References: <jwvvdoejohq.fsf-monnier+emacsbugreports@HIDDEN> X-Emacs-PR-Message: ack-info 3229 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs Reply-To: 3229 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 14:40:05 +0000 Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN> If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please send it to 3229 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, as before. Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. --=20 3229: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D3229 Emacs Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems
X-Loop: owner@HIDDEN Subject: bug#3229: 23.0.93;ediff-directories isn't buffer coding system independent Reply-To: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@HIDDEN>, 3229 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@HIDDEN> Resent-To: bug-submit-list@HIDDEN Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN> Resent-Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 15:15:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.3229.B.124162264219905@HIDDEN> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 3229 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by submit@HIDDEN id=B.124162264219905 (code B ref -1); Wed, 06 May 2009 15:15:04 +0000 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 6 May 2009 15:10:42 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=4.0 tests=AWL,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=unavailable version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n46FAcPc019710 for <submit@HIDDEN>; Wed, 6 May 2009 08:10:39 -0700 Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:35176) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <drew.adams@HIDDEN>) id 1M1ilZ-0002Fi-96 for emacs-pretest-bug@HIDDEN; Wed, 06 May 2009 11:10:37 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <drew.adams@HIDDEN>) id 1M1ilX-0006yD-L0 for emacs-pretest-bug@HIDDEN; Wed, 06 May 2009 11:10:36 -0400 Received: from acsinet12.oracle.com ([141.146.126.234]:30721) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <drew.adams@HIDDEN>) id 1M1ilX-0006y0-7b for emacs-pretest-bug@HIDDEN; Wed, 06 May 2009 11:10:35 -0400 Received: from rgminet15.oracle.com (rcsinet15.oracle.com [148.87.113.117]) by acsinet12.oracle.com (Switch-3.3.1/Switch-3.3.1) with ESMTP id n46FAG5P009768 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 6 May 2009 15:10:17 GMT Received: from abhmt005.oracle.com (abhmt005.oracle.com [141.146.116.14]) by rgminet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.3.1/Switch-3.3.1) with ESMTP id n46FAM6D005564; Wed, 6 May 2009 15:10:22 GMT Received: from dradamslap1 (/130.35.178.194) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Wed, 06 May 2009 08:10:20 -0700 From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@HIDDEN> To: "'Stefan Monnier'" <monnier@HIDDEN>, <3229 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>, "'Robert Marshall'" <robert.marshall@HIDDEN> Cc: <emacs-pretest-bug@HIDDEN> References: <873abipo0e.fsf@HIDDEN> <jwvvdoejohq.fsf-monnier+emacsbugreports@HIDDEN> Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 08:10:19 -0700 Message-ID: <004c01c9ce5c$c5f04220$c2b22382@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <jwvvdoejohq.fsf-monnier+emacsbugreports@HIDDEN> Thread-Index: AcnOW47Om0jQhVWLRta48mgFBJ6wBwAAF2yg X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350 X-Source-IP: abhmt005.oracle.com [141.146.116.14] X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A010209.4A01A85D.02A4:SCFSTAT5015188,ss=1,fgs=0 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) > > I have two files with the same name (extracted from two svn > > repositories) one of which has a coding system of undecided-dos, the > > other is undecided-unix. > > > WHen I perform an ediff-buffers between the two files loaded into > > emacs I get - correctly - zero reported differences. > > However if I look at the differences using ediff-directories I > > get a single difference region consisting of the whole file. > > Presumably you'll get the same "one big hunk diff" if you use > ediff-files. Both ediff-files and ediff-directories work (as the name > implies) on files (and directories), not on buffers. While the two > buffers show similar (or even identical) contents, the corresponding > files are different (contain different byte sequences because of the > different coding-system). Caveat: I haven't followed this thread, but this sounds similar to bug #1183. I believe that the #1183 thread ended with Eli asking Michael Kifer to have Ediff let you know that the two have the same (or similar) content but different coding systems and hence different byte sequences. Perhaps that never got fixed/finished?
Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.420 (Entity 5.420) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Loop: owner@HIDDEN From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (Emacs bug Tracking System) To: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@HIDDEN> Subject: bug#3229: Info received (bug#3229: 23.0.93;ediff-directories isn't buffer coding system independent) Message-ID: <handler.3229.B.124162264219905.ackinfo@HIDDEN> References: <004c01c9ce5c$c5f04220$c2b22382@HIDDEN> X-Emacs-PR-Message: ack-info 3229 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs Reply-To: 3229 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 15:15:05 +0000 Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN> If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please send it to 3229 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, as before. Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. --=20 3229: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D3229 Emacs Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems
X-Loop: owner@HIDDEN Subject: bug#3229: 23.0.93;ediff-directories isn't buffer coding system independent Reply-To: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@HIDDEN>, 3229 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@HIDDEN> Resent-To: bug-submit-list@HIDDEN Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN> Resent-Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 15:15:08 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.3229.B3229.124162263419679@HIDDEN> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 3229 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by 3229-submit@HIDDEN id=B3229.124162263419679 (code B ref 3229); Wed, 06 May 2009 15:15:08 +0000 Received: (at 3229) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 6 May 2009 15:10:34 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=4.0 tests=AWL,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from acsinet12.oracle.com (acsinet12.oracle.com [141.146.126.234]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n46FAT0A019662 for <3229@HIDDEN>; Wed, 6 May 2009 08:10:31 -0700 Received: from rgminet15.oracle.com (rcsinet15.oracle.com [148.87.113.117]) by acsinet12.oracle.com (Switch-3.3.1/Switch-3.3.1) with ESMTP id n46FAG5P009768 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 6 May 2009 15:10:17 GMT Received: from abhmt005.oracle.com (abhmt005.oracle.com [141.146.116.14]) by rgminet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.3.1/Switch-3.3.1) with ESMTP id n46FAM6D005564; Wed, 6 May 2009 15:10:22 GMT Received: from dradamslap1 (/130.35.178.194) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Wed, 06 May 2009 08:10:20 -0700 From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@HIDDEN> To: "'Stefan Monnier'" <monnier@HIDDEN>, <3229 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>, "'Robert Marshall'" <robert.marshall@HIDDEN> Cc: <emacs-pretest-bug@HIDDEN> References: <873abipo0e.fsf@HIDDEN> <jwvvdoejohq.fsf-monnier+emacsbugreports@HIDDEN> Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 08:10:19 -0700 Message-ID: <004c01c9ce5c$c5f04220$c2b22382@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <jwvvdoejohq.fsf-monnier+emacsbugreports@HIDDEN> Thread-Index: AcnOW47Om0jQhVWLRta48mgFBJ6wBwAAF2yg X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350 X-Source-IP: abhmt005.oracle.com [141.146.116.14] X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A010209.4A01A85D.02A4:SCFSTAT5015188,ss=1,fgs=0 > > I have two files with the same name (extracted from two svn > > repositories) one of which has a coding system of undecided-dos, the > > other is undecided-unix. > > > WHen I perform an ediff-buffers between the two files loaded into > > emacs I get - correctly - zero reported differences. > > However if I look at the differences using ediff-directories I > > get a single difference region consisting of the whole file. > > Presumably you'll get the same "one big hunk diff" if you use > ediff-files. Both ediff-files and ediff-directories work (as the name > implies) on files (and directories), not on buffers. While the two > buffers show similar (or even identical) contents, the corresponding > files are different (contain different byte sequences because of the > different coding-system). Caveat: I haven't followed this thread, but this sounds similar to bug #1183. I believe that the #1183 thread ended with Eli asking Michael Kifer to have Ediff let you know that the two have the same (or similar) content but different coding systems and hence different byte sequences. Perhaps that never got fixed/finished?
Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.420 (Entity 5.420) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Loop: owner@HIDDEN From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (Emacs bug Tracking System) To: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@HIDDEN> Subject: bug#3229: Info received (bug#3229: 23.0.93;ediff-directories isn't buffer coding system independent) Message-ID: <handler.3229.B3229.124162263419679.ackinfo@HIDDEN> References: <004c01c9ce5c$c5f04220$c2b22382@HIDDEN> X-Emacs-PR-Message: ack-info 3229 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs Reply-To: 3229 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 15:15:08 +0000 Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN> If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please send it to 3229 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, as before. Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. --=20 3229: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D3229 Emacs Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN Subject: bug#3229: 23.0.93; ediff-directories isn't buffer coding system independent Resent-From: Andrew Hyatt <ahyatt@HIDDEN> Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN Resent-Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 03:55:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.3229.B3229.146604926611195 <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 3229 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@HIDDEN> Cc: 3229 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 3229-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org id=B3229.146604926611195 (code B ref 3229); Thu, 16 Jun 2016 03:55:02 +0000 Received: (at 3229) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jun 2016 03:54:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42779 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1bDONt-0002uU-OG for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 23:54:25 -0400 Received: from mail-qk0-f177.google.com ([209.85.220.177]:35471) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ahyatt@HIDDEN>) id 1bDONs-0002uI-7t for 3229 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 23:54:24 -0400 Received: by mail-qk0-f177.google.com with SMTP id c73so41744788qkg.2 for <3229 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 20:54:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=rrYfFa+u7yE6to9f9MNpAaFcnkoucrwh0SbtRUFRyyE=; b=grkSZ3Hidazs66Bg1QtDhphPwnKeA+rd/LmhBcou534Ojtx3y9sZhiTAallNDeU7KS Nrr0XpxDuCNjzf7poMQYgCRy29+/drlEZ6ybiBXtXsqmuorNzLmtPBI7ZiuxBAcixwEe jdehDDnDjifh+CfcvcONmofdC0dKTrUdAzT8+KxvacupknfjhS4p7+W+G3JoXQswMHAT KJp7pKWIBq2n6ajxONW1HOqDysR77COtE0wrM6gCwiIS8dCDJ42vYfaIuNNvpFX3NwIs MMEZIn65xG3ATjw8MPqnwRBgnWU3P3BA6hLXsNA8YOIpZuwJ8dMlGUQmGfjIF2WcPC9v EGHA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=rrYfFa+u7yE6to9f9MNpAaFcnkoucrwh0SbtRUFRyyE=; b=JftrSwGgZ4/8QzVQgMSuI0X7E9Da9kDgK4MaFXXne7rItVricBsVjUTXt4qcMhy7/J tgeIeYjlpz8/lm8zHH7tJZTfUW4RPy9I1VR53DgIVGiTGDhkq+IJ9hWuRPCthBuKFAR5 i0XPi/LubmkA4uFqikAEGTUipFbIlEFYpYN46v94LBSYgYQue6f27lbDui3JIwi3UYvY qQsrUB6KQxQfXjaQf9wO9O/UsNTc5QOq/9rO1raHSAfX0EOC4ZXshzpNb5yxhOoeHyhy hZc9/dp3m+9yOCULrwvmqBTOoLkMcSt8nykjuRWBoAF89/OJ83hcaFf/n2JRHvyq3PYN BklQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLExryH1fHuhDtjUqj9ODFw1vdfR3UgomrOCN33DAlrtl0yGRAokdEPEVYithgqew== X-Received: by 10.55.69.69 with SMTP id s66mr2488787qka.117.1466049258626; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 20:54:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Andrews-MacBook-Pro.local (cpe-74-73-128-199.nyc.res.rr.com. [74.73.128.199]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 13sm10555148qki.3.2016.06.15.20.54.16 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 15 Jun 2016 20:54:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Andrew Hyatt <ahyatt@HIDDEN> References: <873abipo0e.fsf@HIDDEN> <jwvvdoejohq.fsf-monnier+emacsbugreports@HIDDEN> <004c01c9ce5c$c5f04220$c2b22382@HIDDEN> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 23:54:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: <004c01c9ce5c$c5f04220$c2b22382@HIDDEN> (Drew Adams's message of "Wed, 6 May 2009 08:10:19 -0700") Message-ID: <m2lh25pz4w.fsf@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@HIDDEN> writes: >> > I have two files with the same name (extracted from two svn >> > repositories) one of which has a coding system of undecided-dos, the >> > other is undecided-unix. >> >> > WHen I perform an ediff-buffers between the two files loaded into >> > emacs I get - correctly - zero reported differences. >> > However if I look at the differences using ediff-directories I >> > get a single difference region consisting of the whole file. >> >> Presumably you'll get the same "one big hunk diff" if you use >> ediff-files. Both ediff-files and ediff-directories work (as the name >> implies) on files (and directories), not on buffers. While the two >> buffers show similar (or even identical) contents, the corresponding >> files are different (contain different byte sequences because of the >> different coding-system). > > Caveat: I haven't followed this thread, but this sounds similar to bug #1183. > > I believe that the #1183 thread ended with Eli asking Michael Kifer to have > Ediff let you know that the two have the same (or similar) content but different > coding systems and hence different byte sequences. > > Perhaps that never got fixed/finished? It sounds to me that this is more of a feature request than a bug at this point. If anyone disagrees, let me know, otherwise I'll reclassify this in a few weeks.
Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jun 2016 03:25:02 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 22 23:25:02 2016 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51677 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1bFvGI-0007TT-9s for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 23:25:02 -0400 Received: from mail-qk0-f180.google.com ([209.85.220.180]:34140) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <ahyatt@HIDDEN>) id 1bFvGG-0007Ss-DF for control <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 23:25:00 -0400 Received: by mail-qk0-f180.google.com with SMTP id t127so91769735qkf.1 for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 20:25:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:message-id:to:from:subject; bh=fQY9C92Dd0Z1Oi10hBHdhQiajG84No2iePNZRjd3kTU=; b=Igs2BdCiQ7y8VDvFS+3GJUUvxfLg9C5Fw8hY4yzNqUMLc60aXrt2HjgTwonn6P44mp +PviLkHf+TH0Upl7Hz+EfPztX+jnA+7M257h2t+n3pt2G23MklfTDUM6ZWXluMWBDxFF rxKXcfZrvAeZzkYqn9tooNEdiicc7quSUyhTYo7ebT4Z+ZgGBB54LY10L4IjT1YFZkvn Sn6CxTi1QRTmQvDhw3davpG4fW5RDWjZ4p35TaGXkJzCjR4FjBIz09hIvwehBvT/mhEv yPCx4XvFgBQyKeHGA7eQfGnhj+XR/oFOR7nEpCuiQuoKAoB6JPE74OfMdovjMwJiod9Z /7Nw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:message-id:to:from:subject; bh=fQY9C92Dd0Z1Oi10hBHdhQiajG84No2iePNZRjd3kTU=; b=UXdGkztkrYaYWY/AZ3lV7EpGablEDijxFs50cCYGl8RCsPjLfpP0P3vOqqs6u7F4l6 mIrMWUno4LAzitvXVzWd6T33g2CSfX40EqKm4VTJeCUmrmEUiQ4qqvEjlmbZ1V9owBZZ e4CYlAItUHJkqonWT3eWJ/s40/tVEofabCPfKAkB2k6jNT6bNbzfL+xuQtustV4Q7Pce iNJizC3pX4k9v9EqGFL7TtTMoHWb+ykkN76XH8ppEl1ZaiC5S5ohs68x+yzB5UumWndw Kr4gNaHUZu9vbAThh+GpXAHC93MJienUl19VK045kcV/gh30UKzmBeBXJWXjMPsavoZz UqpQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIOS6sLR351n28AuTTHOo2UHOnfOVb8k/yVyn6oPtbmO6v3I1wCI6V7ANAOsP1OCQ== X-Received: by 10.55.47.6 with SMTP id v6mr40506392qkh.11.1466652294854; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 20:24:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Andrews-MacBook-Pro.local.ahyatt-laptop (cpe-74-73-128-199.nyc.res.rr.com. [74.73.128.199]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 2sm1380131qtg.24.2016.06.22.20.24.53 for <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 22 Jun 2016 20:24:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 23:24:53 -0400 Message-Id: <m2ziqcy4ca.fsf@HIDDEN> To: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org From: Andrew Hyatt <ahyatt@HIDDEN> Subject: control message for bug #3229 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) severity 3229 wishlist
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.