GNU bug report logs -
#32935
`guix package --verbose` does not produce verbose output
Previous Next
Reported by: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 21:04:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 32935 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 32935 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#32935
; Package
guix
.
(Thu, 04 Oct 2018 21:04:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
.
(Thu, 04 Oct 2018 21:04:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Debian, from Guix commit 9e783d0bf22a7ff965105eb45f6c179a832bbabf,
the --verbose argument to `guix package` doesn't seem to have the
desired effect.
Rather than showing the raw output of whatever builds are being
performed, it just shows the "spinner".
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#32935
; Package
guix
.
(Mon, 08 Oct 2018 12:51:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 32935 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi Leo,
Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name> skribis:
> On Debian, from Guix commit 9e783d0bf22a7ff965105eb45f6c179a832bbabf,
> the --verbose argument to `guix package` doesn't seem to have the
> desired effect.
>
> Rather than showing the raw output of whatever builds are being
> performed, it just shows the "spinner".
The ‘--verbose’ option predates the new “quiet” output for ‘guix
package’, so it doesn’t do what you expect, I believe.
I think we need to change the meaning of ‘--verbose’ or repurpose
‘--verbosity’ to choose whether or not build output should be displayed.
We should come up with the same option for all the commands.
Thoughts?
Ludo’.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#32935
; Package
guix
.
(Mon, 08 Oct 2018 20:24:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 32935 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 02:50:31PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> The ‘--verbose’ option predates the new “quiet” output for ‘guix
> package’, so it doesn’t do what you expect, I believe.
I didn't follow the development of the UI changes closely, but the
original patch proposal message said that --verbose would allow the
build log to be printed:
"For “guix package” the default behaviour is
to also hide all build output that does not announce progress (unless
“--verbose” is passed) and to let a spinner show progress instead."
https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=32634#5
Did that not make it into the final commit?
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#32935
; Package
guix
.
(Mon, 08 Oct 2018 20:37:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 32935 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name> skribis:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 02:50:31PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> The ‘--verbose’ option predates the new “quiet” output for ‘guix
>> package’, so it doesn’t do what you expect, I believe.
>
> I didn't follow the development of the UI changes closely, but the
> original patch proposal message said that --verbose would allow the
> build log to be printed:
>
> "For “guix package” the default behaviour is
> to also hide all build output that does not announce progress (unless
> “--verbose” is passed) and to let a spinner show progress instead."
>
> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=32634#5
>
> Did that not make it into the final commit?
I don’t think so, but it sounds like a good plan, provided we also
provide ‘--quiet’ to do the opposite (and in ‘guix build’, we rename the
current ‘--quiet’ to ‘--silent’.)
Thoughts?
Ludo’.
Reply sent
to
Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Mon, 25 Feb 2019 23:42:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Mon, 25 Feb 2019 23:42:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #19 received at 32935-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
The requested features were added in commit
f1de676ea82c2bed9a435fce37ade0186296bfc9.
Thanks, Ludo!
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Tue, 26 Mar 2019 11:24:06 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 5 years and 31 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.