GNU bug report logs - #33276
guix still building when substitute is available (or is guix pull not reproducible)

Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.

Package: guix; Reported by: Pjotr Prins <pjotr.public12@HIDDEN>; dated Mon, 5 Nov 2018 16:28:01 UTC; Maintainer for guix is bug-guix@HIDDEN.

Message received at 33276 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 33276) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Nov 2018 18:30:44 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Nov 08 13:30:44 2018
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41895 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1gKp4k-0004mU-7Z
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Nov 2018 13:30:42 -0500
Received: from mail.thebird.nl ([94.142.245.5]:39582)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <pjotr2017@HIDDEN>) id 1gKp4i-0004mL-EX
 for 33276 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Nov 2018 13:30:40 -0500
Received: by mail.thebird.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000)
 id 37C817E14; Thu,  8 Nov 2018 19:30:39 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 19:30:39 +0100
From: Pjotr Prins <pjotr.public12@HIDDEN>
To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= <ludo@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#33276: guix still building when substitute is available (or
 is guix pull not reproducible)
Message-ID: <20181108183039.a6drroqcswwd7rl5@HIDDEN>
References: <20181105162651.wss2ex6msdbzrwir@HIDDEN>
 <877ehq1e3a.fsf@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <877ehq1e3a.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33276
Cc: 33276 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Pjotr Prins <pjotr.public12@HIDDEN>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 03:21:29PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> As to why you’re not getting substitutes, it could be missing
> authorization, etc.  What does ‘guix publish’ display?

Substitutes work fine for normal package install. No problem with the
setup. No, this is specific to guix pull with a commit flag.

Did you try this yourself? It is reproducible as a problem.

Could it theoretically be possible that guix pull with a specific
commit set done at different time points leads to a different build?
I.e., is the underlying build system not a variable (bootstrap and all
that)?

When I have time I'll try that guix pull twice. See what happens.

Pj.





Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#33276; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at 33276 <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at 33276) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Nov 2018 14:21:55 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Tue Nov 06 09:21:55 2018
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36188 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1gK2Et-0001AO-01
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2018 09:21:55 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39953)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1gK2En-00018g-J8
 for 33276 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2018 09:21:53 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>) id 1gK2Ed-0002S6-MP
 for 33276 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2018 09:21:43 -0500
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled
 version=3.3.2
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:53930)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1gK2EX-0002OK-27; Tue, 06 Nov 2018 09:21:35 -0500
Received: from [2001:660:6102:320:e120:2c8f:8909:cdfe] (port=33234 helo=ribbon)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <ludo@HIDDEN>)
 id 1gK2EU-0007ji-SB; Tue, 06 Nov 2018 09:21:32 -0500
From: ludo@HIDDEN (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
To: Pjotr Prins <pjotr.public12@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#33276: guix still building when substitute is available (or
 is guix pull not reproducible)
References: <20181105162651.wss2ex6msdbzrwir@HIDDEN>
X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/
X-Revolutionary-Date: 16 Brumaire an 227 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?=
X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5
X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4  0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5
X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2018 15:21:29 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20181105162651.wss2ex6msdbzrwir@HIDDEN> (Pjotr Prins's
 message of "Mon, 5 Nov 2018 17:26:51 +0100")
Message-ID: <877ehq1e3a.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e
X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33276
Cc: 33276 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------)

Hello,

Pjotr Prins <pjotr.public12@HIDDEN> skribis:

> I have a guix-publish server and I am building the packages with the
> exact same checkout of 'guix pull'. Even though the client sees the
> substitutes with --dry-run it still builds them.
>
> On build host (check version first)
>
> 	penguin2:~$ ~/.config/guix/current/bin/guix --version
> 	guix (GNU Guix) ff349415b27cc764fd7168ef35ca76c3b8b05889
>
> 	Copyright (C) 2018 the Guix authors
>
> 	penguin2:~$ ~/.config/guix/current/bin/guix package -i perl mosh --subst=
itute-urls=3D"https://berlin.guixsd.org" --fallback
>
> 	building /gnu/store/ih5liw094mkjg1n4qakipfdgmrhvpj68-protobuf-3.5.1.drv.=
..
> 	building /gnu/store/bhrgmk0xax0yl50whb8faankknw4z254-mosh-1.3.2.drv...
> 	The following packages will be installed:
> 		 perl 5.26.1  /gnu/store/7ifc22sh86zblnzamqimgmv06idyx69v-perl-5.26.1
> 		 mosh 1.3.2   /gnu/store/5qanifm23gqxhg2bh587dzah0mf79fp0-mosh-1.3.2
>
> On client (check version first)
>
> 	monza:~$ ~/.config/guix/current/bin/guix --version
> 	guix (GNU Guix) ff349415b27cc764fd7168ef35ca76c3b8b05889
>
> 	Copyright (C) 2018 the Guix authors
>
> 	monza:~$ ~/.config/guix/current/bin/guix package -i perl mosh --substitu=
te-urls=3D"http://guix.genenetwork.org https://berlin.guixsd.org" --dry-run
> 	The following packages would be installed:
> 		 perl 5.26.1  /gnu/store/6zz27h4l21b8f2mifrk9sidvib9cns2i-perl-5.26.1
> 		 mosh 1.3.2   /gnu/store/dkpkd7ajh3kvpzfdfacqg50x49i78x5y-mosh-1.3.2
>
> Strangely the hash values differ but it still wants to fetch them. But wh=
en I do an actual install it rebuilds:

When you=E2=80=99re using --dry-run, what gets displayed is the file names =
of
the ungrafted packages.  That=E2=80=99s why you see different file names in=
 the
first case.

As to why you=E2=80=99re not getting substitutes, it could be missing
authorization, etc.  What does =E2=80=98guix publish=E2=80=99 display?

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.




Information forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#33276; Package guix. Full text available.

Message received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org:


Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Nov 2018 16:27:14 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 05 11:27:14 2018
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35496 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1gJhia-0004xY-Se
	for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 11:27:14 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36227)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <pjotr2017@HIDDEN>) id 1gJhiZ-0004xL-2z
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 11:27:11 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <pjotr2017@HIDDEN>) id 1gJhiT-0000qQ-4Y
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 11:27:06 -0500
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled
 version=3.3.2
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:41346)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <pjotr2017@HIDDEN>)
 id 1gJhiS-0000pe-Vr
 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 11:27:05 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45812)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <pjotr2017@HIDDEN>) id 1gJhiR-0004kU-PT
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 11:27:04 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <pjotr2017@HIDDEN>) id 1gJhiM-0000a5-Cu
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 11:27:02 -0500
Received: from mail.thebird.nl ([94.142.245.5]:39336)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <pjotr2017@HIDDEN>)
 id 1gJhiJ-0000QV-47
 for bug-guix@HIDDEN; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 11:26:56 -0500
Received: by mail.thebird.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000)
 id 0CB087D46; Mon,  5 Nov 2018 17:26:51 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 17:26:51 +0100
From: Pjotr Prins <pjotr.public12@HIDDEN>
To: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Subject: guix still building when substitute is available (or is guix pull
 not reproducible)
Message-ID: <20181105162651.wss2ex6msdbzrwir@HIDDEN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x
X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11
X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------)

I have a guix-publish server and I am building the packages with the
exact same checkout of 'guix pull'. Even though the client sees the
substitutes with --dry-run it still builds them.

On build host (check version first)

	penguin2:~$ ~/.config/guix/current/bin/guix --version
	guix (GNU Guix) ff349415b27cc764fd7168ef35ca76c3b8b05889

	Copyright (C) 2018 the Guix authors

	penguin2:~$ ~/.config/guix/current/bin/guix package -i perl mosh --substitute-urls="https://berlin.guixsd.org" --fallback

	building /gnu/store/ih5liw094mkjg1n4qakipfdgmrhvpj68-protobuf-3.5.1.drv...
	building /gnu/store/bhrgmk0xax0yl50whb8faankknw4z254-mosh-1.3.2.drv...
	The following packages will be installed:
		 perl 5.26.1  /gnu/store/7ifc22sh86zblnzamqimgmv06idyx69v-perl-5.26.1
		 mosh 1.3.2   /gnu/store/5qanifm23gqxhg2bh587dzah0mf79fp0-mosh-1.3.2

On client (check version first)

	monza:~$ ~/.config/guix/current/bin/guix --version
	guix (GNU Guix) ff349415b27cc764fd7168ef35ca76c3b8b05889

	Copyright (C) 2018 the Guix authors

	monza:~$ ~/.config/guix/current/bin/guix package -i perl mosh --substitute-urls="http://guix.genenetwork.org https://berlin.guixsd.org" --dry-run
	The following packages would be installed:
		 perl 5.26.1  /gnu/store/6zz27h4l21b8f2mifrk9sidvib9cns2i-perl-5.26.1
		 mosh 1.3.2   /gnu/store/dkpkd7ajh3kvpzfdfacqg50x49i78x5y-mosh-1.3.2

Strangely the hash values differ but it still wants to fetch them. But when I do an actual install it rebuilds:

	monza:~$ ~/.config/guix/current/bin/guix package -i perl mosh --substitute-urls="http://guix.genenetwork.org https://berlin.guixsd.org"
	building /gnu/store/ih5liw094mkjg1n4qakipfdgmrhvpj68-protobuf-3.5.1.drv...

What is causing the difference? Should the guix pull not be identical
when it is the same checkout? Or am I missing something.

Obviously this does not work for my deployment purposes. Or at least
it is limited in use if I can't use a 'guix publish' server. Showing
the faulty substitutes is also interesting behaviour...




Acknowledgement sent to Pjotr Prins <pjotr.public12@HIDDEN>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN. Full text available.
Report forwarded to bug-guix@HIDDEN:
bug#33276; Package guix. Full text available.
Please note: This is a static page, with minimal formatting, updated once a day.
Click here to see this page with the latest information and nicer formatting.
Last modified: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 12:00:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.