GNU bug report logs -
#33312
Guix: many tests fail when building on 0.15
Previous Next
Reported by: swedebugia <swedebugia <at> riseup.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 10:23:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: moreinfo
Done: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 33312 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 33312 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#33312
; Package
guix
.
(Thu, 08 Nov 2018 10:23:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
swedebugia <swedebugia <at> riseup.net>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
.
(Thu, 08 Nov 2018 10:23:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi
I want to contribute to guix with patches and at the same time keep my
GuixSD on 0.15.
To archive this I created and followed the following guide in GuixSD in
Qemu:
https://gitlab.com/swedebugia/guix-notes/blob/master/BUILD.org
Following it Guix 21335fdbec68b4cfb19d8a0ae0877ec81c84ad9c builds fine.
BUT
running make check I got a lot of failed tests and no testlog:
make check-recursive
make[1]: Entering directory '/home/sdb/guix-tree'
Making check in po/guix
make[2]: Entering directory '/home/sdb/guix-tree/po/guix'
make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/sdb/guix-tree/po/guix'
Making check in po/packages
make[2]: Entering directory '/home/sdb/guix-tree/po/packages'
make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/sdb/guix-tree/po/packages'
make[2]: Entering directory '/home/sdb/guix-tree'
Compiling Scheme modules...
make check-TESTS check-local
make[3]: Entering directory '/home/sdb/guix-tree'
make[4]: Entering directory '/home/sdb/guix-tree'
PASS: tests/base16.scm
SKIP: tests/base32.scm
PASS: tests/base64.scm
SKIP: tests/cpio.scm
PASS: tests/pki.scm
PASS: tests/print.scm
PASS: tests/sets.scm
PASS: tests/modules.scm
PASS: tests/gnu-maintenance.scm
PASS: tests/substitute.scm
FAIL: tests/builders.scm
FAIL: tests/derivations.scm
PASS: tests/glob.scm
FAIL: tests/grafts.scm
FAIL: tests/ui.scm
PASS: tests/status.scm
PASS: tests/records.scm
FAIL: tests/processes.scm
PASS: tests/upstream.scm
PASS: tests/combinators.scm
PASS: tests/discovery.scm
PASS: tests/utils.scm
PASS: tests/build-utils.scm
FAIL: tests/packages.scm
SKIP: tests/snix.scm
FAIL: tests/hackage.scm
FAIL: tests/cran.scm
FAIL: tests/elpa.scm
FAIL: tests/texlive.scm
FAIL: tests/store.scm
FAIL: tests/monads.scm
make[4]: Leaving directory '/home/sdb/guix-tree'
make[3]: Leaving directory '/home/sdb/guix-tree'
make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/sdb/guix-tree'
make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/sdb/guix-tree'
--
Cheers
Swedebugia
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#33312
; Package
guix
.
(Thu, 08 Nov 2018 10:42:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 33312 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On 2018-11-08 11:07, swedebugia wrote:
> Hi
>
> I want to contribute to guix with patches and at the same time keep my
> GuixSD on 0.15.
>
> To archive this I created and followed the following guide in GuixSD
> in Qemu:
>
> https://gitlab.com/swedebugia/guix-notes/blob/master/BUILD.org
>
> Following it Guix 21335fdbec68b4cfb19d8a0ae0877ec81c84ad9c builds fine.
>
> BUT
>
> running make check I got a lot of failed tests and no testlog:
>
> make check-recursive
> make[1]: Entering directory '/home/sdb/guix-tree'
> Making check in po/guix
> make[2]: Entering directory '/home/sdb/guix-tree/po/guix'
> make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/sdb/guix-tree/po/guix'
> Making check in po/packages
> make[2]: Entering directory '/home/sdb/guix-tree/po/packages'
> make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/sdb/guix-tree/po/packages'
> make[2]: Entering directory '/home/sdb/guix-tree'
> Compiling Scheme modules...
> make check-TESTS check-local
> make[3]: Entering directory '/home/sdb/guix-tree'
> make[4]: Entering directory '/home/sdb/guix-tree'
> PASS: tests/base16.scm
> SKIP: tests/base32.scm
> PASS: tests/base64.scm
> SKIP: tests/cpio.scm
> PASS: tests/pki.scm
> PASS: tests/print.scm
> PASS: tests/sets.scm
> PASS: tests/modules.scm
> PASS: tests/gnu-maintenance.scm
> PASS: tests/substitute.scm
> FAIL: tests/builders.scm
> FAIL: tests/derivations.scm
> PASS: tests/glob.scm
> FAIL: tests/grafts.scm
> FAIL: tests/ui.scm
> PASS: tests/status.scm
> PASS: tests/records.scm
> FAIL: tests/processes.scm
> PASS: tests/upstream.scm
> PASS: tests/combinators.scm
> PASS: tests/discovery.scm
> PASS: tests/utils.scm
> PASS: tests/build-utils.scm
> FAIL: tests/packages.scm
> SKIP: tests/snix.scm
> FAIL: tests/hackage.scm
> FAIL: tests/cran.scm
> FAIL: tests/elpa.scm
> FAIL: tests/texlive.scm
> FAIL: tests/store.scm
> FAIL: tests/monads.scm
> make[4]: Leaving directory '/home/sdb/guix-tree'
> make[3]: Leaving directory '/home/sdb/guix-tree'
> make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/sdb/guix-tree'
> make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/sdb/guix-tree'
>
Dependencies:
$ guile --version |head -1 && guix --version|head -1 && gcc
--version|head -1 && echo -n "libgcrypt " && libgcrypt-config --version
&& make --version|head -1
guile (GNU Guile) 2.2.4
guix (GNU Guix) 1f44934fb6e2cefccbecd4fa347025349fa9ff76
gcc (GCC) 8.1.0
libgcrypt 1.8.2
GNU Make 4.2.1
--
Cheers
Swedebugia
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#33312
; Package
guix
.
(Sun, 11 Nov 2018 16:04:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 33312 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello,
swedebugia <swedebugia <at> riseup.net> skribis:
> running make check I got a lot of failed tests and no testlog:
Could you send ‘test-suite.log’ as noted in
<https://gnu.org/software/guix/manual/en/html_node/Running-the-Test-Suite.html>?
TIA,
Ludo’.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#33312
; Package
guix
.
(Sun, 11 Nov 2018 20:01:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 33312 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On 2018-11-11 17:03, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello,
>
> swedebugia <swedebugia <at> riseup.net> skribis:
>
>> running make check I got a lot of failed tests and no testlog:
>
> Could you send ‘test-suite.log’ as noted in
> <https://gnu.org/software/guix/manual/en/html_node/Running-the-Test-Suite.html>?
>
> TIA,
> Ludo’.
>
It is not found. Not generated.
Dunno why.
I run "make check" and it only gave me what I already sent.
--
Cheers
Swedebugia
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#33312
; Package
guix
.
(Mon, 12 Nov 2018 08:45:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at 33312 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
swedebugia <swedebugia <at> riseup.net> skribis:
> On 2018-11-11 17:03, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> swedebugia <swedebugia <at> riseup.net> skribis:
>>
>>> running make check I got a lot of failed tests and no testlog:
>>
>> Could you send ‘test-suite.log’ as noted in
>> <https://gnu.org/software/guix/manual/en/html_node/Running-the-Test-Suite.html>?
>>
>> TIA,
>> Ludo’.
>>
> It is not found. Not generated.
> Dunno why.
> I run "make check" and it only gave me what I already sent.
Weird. Is ‘test-suite.log’ generated if you let “make check” run to
completion?
Thank you,
Ludo’.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#33312
; Package
guix
.
(Wed, 14 Nov 2018 10:16:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #20 received at 33312 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Ping! :-)
ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
> swedebugia <swedebugia <at> riseup.net> skribis:
>
>> On 2018-11-11 17:03, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> swedebugia <swedebugia <at> riseup.net> skribis:
>>>
>>>> running make check I got a lot of failed tests and no testlog:
>>>
>>> Could you send ‘test-suite.log’ as noted in
>>> <https://gnu.org/software/guix/manual/en/html_node/Running-the-Test-Suite.html>?
>>>
>>> TIA,
>>> Ludo’.
>>>
>> It is not found. Not generated.
>> Dunno why.
>> I run "make check" and it only gave me what I already sent.
>
> Weird. Is ‘test-suite.log’ generated if you let “make check” run to
> completion?
>
> Thank you,
> Ludo’.
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
Request was from
ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Wed, 14 Nov 2018 10:16:04 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Reply sent
to
Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Sat, 05 Sep 2020 20:39:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
swedebugia <swedebugia <at> riseup.net>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Sat, 05 Sep 2020 20:39:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #27 received at 33312-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
This version is so old that the bug report does not seem relevant any more.
Please open a new bug when "make check" fails.
Andreas
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Sun, 04 Oct 2020 11:24:05 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 198 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.