GNU bug report logs - #3382
23.0.94; reveal-mode and outline-minor-mode

Message received at submit@HIDDEN:

Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 26 May 2009 09:41:55 +0000
From geb-bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN Tue May 26 02:41:54 2009
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
	(2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available.
	hammytokens:Tokens not available.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=4.0 tests=AWL,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
	autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165])
	by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n4Q9fnPv004028
	for <submit@HIDDEN>; Tue, 26 May 2009 02:41:51 -0700
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1M8tAK-0006dx-L1
	for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Tue, 26 May 2009 05:41:48 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1M8tAF-0006cZ-Un
	for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Tue, 26 May 2009 05:41:48 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36580 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1M8tAF-0006cR-Hr
	for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Tue, 26 May 2009 05:41:43 -0400
Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:35814 helo=ciao.gmane.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <geb-bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>)
	id 1M8tAF-0003U4-6l
	for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Tue, 26 May 2009 05:41:43 -0400
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43)
	id 1M8tA8-0000E9-J0
	for bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN; Tue, 26 May 2009 09:41:36 +0000
Received: from smaug.linux.pwf.cam.ac.uk ([193.60.95.72])
        by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>; Tue, 26 May 2009 09:41:36 +0000
Received: from sdl.web by smaug.linux.pwf.cam.ac.uk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN>; Tue, 26 May 2009 09:41:36 +0000
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: bug-gnu-emacs@HIDDEN
From: Leo <sdl.web@HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: bug#3382: 23.0.94; reveal-mode and outline-minor-mode
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 10:41:25 +0100
Organization: University of Cambridge
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <xbaiskisryka.fsf@HIDDEN>
References: <m0bpph1b74.fsf@HIDDEN>
	<jwv8wkk8xs7.fsf-monnier+emacsbugreports@HIDDEN>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: usenet@HIDDEN
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: smaug.linux.pwf.cam.ac.uk
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:kRoS4ETc8nHmvutaM0SFSprEcEs=
Sender: news <news@HIDDEN>
X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)

On 2009-05-26 02:29 +0100, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> There's no such mechanism, no.
> If you have an idea of how that could work, I'm all ears.

Thank you for your response. I think I'll live with that for now.

> My only related plan is to provide a reveal command that reveals
> non-transiently (kind of like the mark can be used to force one other
> place to stay reveled).

Leo

Message received at 3382@HIDDEN:

Received: (at 3382) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 26 May 2009 01:29:45 +0000
From monnier@HIDDEN Mon May 25 18:29:45 2009
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
	(2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available.
	hammytokens:Tokens not available.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=4.0 tests=AWL,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
	VALID_BTS_CONTROL autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com (ironport2-out.teksavvy.com [206.248.154.182])
	by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n4Q1TaqT020620;
	Mon, 25 May 2009 18:29:37 -0700
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: At8EAH/iGkrO+IBc/2dsb2JhbACBT8tDhAsFhgA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.41,247,1241409600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="39074866"
Received: from 206-248-128-92.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([206.248.128.92])
  by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 25 May 2009 21:29:30 -0400
Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848)
	id 7BC06B40AF; Mon, 25 May 2009 21:29:30 -0400 (EDT)
From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@HIDDEN>
To: Leo <sdl.web@HIDDEN>
Cc: 3382 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#3382: 23.0.94; reveal-mode and outline-minor-mode
Message-ID: <jwv8wkk8xs7.fsf-monnier+emacsbugreports@HIDDEN>
References: <m0bpph1b74.fsf@HIDDEN>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 21:29:30 -0400
In-Reply-To: <m0bpph1b74.fsf@HIDDEN> (Leo's message of "Mon, 25 May 2009
	15:58:23 +0100")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.93 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

severity 3382 wishlist
thanks

> If I use reveal-mode to open Section 2 by moving the point to ..., the
> tree opens fine. Now move the point to Section 1 and the buffer changes
> to:

> ** Section 1...
> ** Section 2...

> i.e. the headlines of subsections are now hidden.  I wonder if
> reveal-mode can stop hiding anything that is not hidden before.

There's no such mechanism, no.
If you have an idea of how that could work, I'm all ears.

My only related plan is to provide a reveal command that reveals
non-transiently (kind of like the mark can be used to force one other
place to stay reveled).


        Stefan

Message received at submit@HIDDEN:

Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 25 May 2009 23:27:54 +0000
From sl392@HIDDEN Mon May 25 16:27:54 2009
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
	(2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available.
	hammytokens:Tokens not available.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=4.0 tests=AWL autolearn=ham
	version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10])
	by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n4PNRoPf000806
	for <submit@HIDDEN>; Mon, 25 May 2009 16:27:51 -0700
Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:43171)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67)
	(envelope-from <sl392@HIDDEN>)
	id 1M8bdE-00055x-8d
	for emacs-pretest-bug@HIDDEN; Mon, 25 May 2009 10:58:28 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <sl392@HIDDEN>)
	id 1M8bdC-0005RJ-T2
	for emacs-pretest-bug@HIDDEN; Mon, 25 May 2009 10:58:28 -0400
Received: from ppsw-0.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.130]:38045)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <sl392@HIDDEN>)
	id 1M8bdC-0005R5-Ek
	for emacs-pretest-bug@HIDDEN; Mon, 25 May 2009 10:58:26 -0400
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-SpamDetails: not scanned
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
Received: from sl392.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.223.202]:55562 helo=victoria.local)
	by ppsw-0.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.150]:587)
	with esmtpsa (PLAIN:sl392) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128)
	id 1M8bdB-0008CC-1G (Exim 4.70) for emacs-pretest-bug@HIDDEN
	(return-path <sl392@HIDDEN>); Mon, 25 May 2009 15:58:25 +0100
From: Leo <sdl.web@HIDDEN>
To: emacs-pretest-bug@HIDDEN
Subject: 23.0.94; reveal-mode and outline-minor-mode
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 15:58:23 +0100
Message-ID: <m0bpph1b74.fsf@HIDDEN>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.94 (darwin)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: "Leo, Shidai Liu" <sl392@HIDDEN>
X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)

Please describe exactly what actions triggered the bug
and the precise symptoms of the bug:

I am trying to use outline-minor-mode and reveal-mode together while
editing a LaTeX document. There's one small annoyance with reveal mode.
It is this. Suppose my doc with outline-minor and hide-body looks like
this:

** Section 1...
** Section 2...
*** Subsection 1
*** Subsection 2

If I use reveal-mode to open Section 2 by moving the point to ..., the
tree opens fine. Now move the point to Section 1 and the buffer changes
to:

** Section 1...
** Section 2...

i.e. the headlines of subsections are now hidden. I wonder if
reveal-mode can stop hiding anything that is not hidden before. As you
can see the Subsection headlines are as important as the Section
headlines for an overview of the content.

Thanks.

Leo