GNU bug report logs -
#33859
ghc-conduit-extra build fails
Previous Next
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 33859 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 33859 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#33859
; Package
guix
.
(Mon, 24 Dec 2018 15:55:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Gabriel Hondet <gabrielhondet <at> gmail.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
.
(Mon, 24 Dec 2018 15:55:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hello,
I've been trying to compile ghc-conduit-extra since it is needed by
ghc-xmonad-extra and xmobar. The build fails the following way (sorry
for the poor layout):
Building library for conduit-extra-1.3.0.. [0/1051]
[ 1 of 13] Compiling Data.Conduit.Attoparsec ( Data/Conduit/Attoparsec.hs, dist/build/Data/Conduit/Attoparsec.o )
Data/Conduit/Attoparsec.hs:99:14: error:
• Couldn't match type ‘text-1.2.3.0:Data.Text.Internal.Text’
with ‘TI.Text’
NB: ‘TI.Text’
is defined in ‘Data.Text.Internal’ in package ‘text-1.2.3.0’
‘text-1.2.3.0:Data.Text.Internal.Text’
is defined in ‘Data.Text.Internal’ in package ‘text-1.2.3.0’
Expected type: A.Parser TI.Text b -> TI.Text -> A.IResult TI.Text b
Actual type: Data.Attoparsec.Text.Parser b
-> text-1.2.3.0:Data.Text.Internal.Text
-> Data.Attoparsec.Text.Result b
• In the expression: Data.Attoparsec.Text.parse
In an equation for ‘parseA’: parseA = Data.Attoparsec.Text.parse
In the instance declaration for ‘AttoparsecInput TI.Text’
|
99 | parseA = Data.Attoparsec.Text.parse
|
As far as I'm concerned, the error seems to be in the haskell package
more than in the guix build process, but downgrading to previous version
is not really feasible considering the number of dependencies.
Could someone confirm that the error comes indeed from the haskell
package, and thus motivate a bug report on hackage?
Thanks
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Reply sent
to
Gabriel Hondet <gabrielhondet <at> gmail.com>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Wed, 23 Jan 2019 10:15:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Gabriel Hondet <gabrielhondet <at> gmail.com>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Wed, 23 Jan 2019 10:15:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #10 received at 33859-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Builds without problem since 5de93cdba77db3777f8f026c029acadd7b8bdde3
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Wed, 20 Feb 2019 12:24:05 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 5 years and 72 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.