GNU bug report logs -
#33925
Qt 5.11.3 bug-fix update
Previous Next
Reported by: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2018 18:30:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 33925 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 33925 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#33925
; Package
guix
.
(Sun, 30 Dec 2018 18:30:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
.
(Sun, 30 Dec 2018 18:30:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
There is a new release of Qt, 5.11.3, which is strictly a bug-fix
release:
https://blog.qt.io/blog/2018/12/04/qt-5-11-3-released-important-security-updates/
It includes several important security-related fixes.
We should try updating it.
`guix refresh -l qtbase` says that 471 packages will need to be rebuilt.
Maybe we can do the work on a special 'qt-updates' branch.
Would anyone like to lead this work?
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#33925
; Package
guix
.
(Mon, 31 Dec 2018 18:45:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 33925 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 01:29:11PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> There is a new release of Qt, 5.11.3, which is strictly a bug-fix
> release:
>
> https://blog.qt.io/blog/2018/12/04/qt-5-11-3-released-important-security-updates/
>
> It includes several important security-related fixes.
>
> We should try updating it.
>
> `guix refresh -l qtbase` says that 471 packages will need to be rebuilt.
> Maybe we can do the work on a special 'qt-updates' branch.
>
> Would anyone like to lead this work?
I normally end up doing the qt updates. my work flow is to download the
md5sum file and use grep, awk or parallel, and aria2 to download the files.
After updating all the qt packages building them all (and qtwebkit)
takes hours, and then another day or two to fix build/test errors. If
you check, for example, the source for qtscript¹, it has barely changed
in the past year, so most of the updates are fairly straightforward.
Of course the fun part is figuring out all the dependant packages and
why they suddenly fail.
¹https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtscript.git/log/
--
Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#33925
; Package
guix
.
(Wed, 02 Jan 2019 13:47:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 33925 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 08:44:01PM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 01:29:11PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> > There is a new release of Qt, 5.11.3, which is strictly a bug-fix
> > release:
> >
> > https://blog.qt.io/blog/2018/12/04/qt-5-11-3-released-important-security-updates/
> >
> > It includes several important security-related fixes.
> >
> > We should try updating it.
> >
> > `guix refresh -l qtbase` says that 471 packages will need to be rebuilt.
> > Maybe we can do the work on a special 'qt-updates' branch.
> >
> > Would anyone like to lead this work?
>
I started the update process. qt, qt-modular, python-sip, pyqt-5 and
qscintilla are updated on the qt-updates branch. I tested python-qscintilla
with python-pyqt-without-qtwebkit. Qtwebkit is still untested, as are
all the packages which depend on them.
--
Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Reply sent
to
Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Mon, 25 Feb 2019 23:44:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Mon, 25 Feb 2019 23:44:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #16 received at 33925-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Qt was updated to 5.11.3 in commit
c82cd3a7bd5d7a85fb48a37c3a5e37fbe3ed6738. Thanks Efraim!
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Tue, 26 Mar 2019 11:24:05 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 5 years and 26 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.