GNU bug report logs -
#34184
Nitpick on reconfigure message: Installing for i386-pc platform.
Previous Next
Reported by: swedebugia <swedebugia <at> riseup.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 21:23:02 UTC
Severity: wishlist
Done: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 34184 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 34184 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#34184
; Package
guix
.
(Wed, 23 Jan 2019 21:23:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
swedebugia <swedebugia <at> riseup.net>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
.
(Wed, 23 Jan 2019 21:23:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
"Installing for i386-pc platform.
Installation finished. No error reported."
After reboot:
$ uname -a
Linux komputilo 4.20.3-gnu #1 SMP 1 x86_64 GNU/Linux
The i386 is technically incorrect according to
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_80386 and
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86-64
I think we should drop the line and keep "Installation finished. No
error reported."
--
Cheers
Swedebugia
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#34184
; Package
guix
.
(Wed, 23 Jan 2019 22:16:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 34184 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Le 23 janvier 2019 22:12:58 GMT+01:00, swedebugia <swedebugia <at> riseup.net> a écrit :
>"Installing for i386-pc platform.
>Installation finished. No error reported."
>
>After reboot:
> $ uname -a
>Linux komputilo 4.20.3-gnu #1 SMP 1 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
>The i386 is technically incorrect according to
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_80386 and
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86-64
>
>I think we should drop the line and keep "Installation finished. No
>error reported."
Hi, this message is actually from grub-install and is perfectly correct: it means it's intalling in legacy (bios) mode. "No error reported" is also from grub and is very confusing…
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#34184
; Package
guix
.
(Wed, 23 Jan 2019 22:29:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 34184 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu> writes:
> Le 23 janvier 2019 22:12:58 GMT+01:00, swedebugia <swedebugia <at> riseup.net> a écrit :
>>"Installing for i386-pc platform.
>>Installation finished. No error reported."
>>
>>After reboot:
>> $ uname -a
>>Linux komputilo 4.20.3-gnu #1 SMP 1 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>
>>The i386 is technically incorrect according to
>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_80386 and
>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86-64
>>
>>I think we should drop the line and keep "Installation finished. No
>>error reported."
>
> Hi, this message is actually from grub-install and is perfectly
> correct: it means it's intalling in legacy (bios) mode. "No error
> reported" is also from grub and is very confusing…
Maybe we should
1) prefix messages from other tools with the name of the tool, and
2) hide these tool messages by default behind descriptive messages like
“installing bootloader”
What do you think?
--
Ricardo
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#34184
; Package
guix
.
(Thu, 24 Jan 2019 07:42:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 34184 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net> skrev: (23 januari 2019 23:27:26 CET)
>
>Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu> writes:
>
>> Le 23 janvier 2019 22:12:58 GMT+01:00, swedebugia
><swedebugia <at> riseup.net> a écrit :
>>>"Installing for i386-pc platform.
>>>Installation finished. No error reported."
>>>
>>>After reboot:
>>> $ uname -a
>>>Linux komputilo 4.20.3-gnu #1 SMP 1 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>>
>>>The i386 is technically incorrect according to
>>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_80386 and
>>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86-64
>>>
>>>I think we should drop the line and keep "Installation finished. No
>>>error reported."
>>
>> Hi, this message is actually from grub-install and is perfectly
>> correct: it means it's intalling in legacy (bios) mode. "No error
>> reported" is also from grub and is very confusing…
>
>Maybe we should
>
>1) prefix messages from other tools with the name of the tool, and
>2) hide these tool messages by default behind descriptive messages like
>“installing bootloader”
>
>What do you think?
>
>--
>Ricardo
+1 😃
--
Sent from my p≡p for Android.
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#34184
; Package
guix
.
(Thu, 24 Jan 2019 18:45:04 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at 34184 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 10:12:58PM +0100, swedebugia wrote:
> "Installing for i386-pc platform.
> Installation finished. No error reported."
This message comes from GRUB. Not having read the GRUB docs closely, I
assume it refers to the bootloader style ("PC" vs EFI) rather than the
CPU architecture.
I agree it's a bit misleading, especially to non-technical users. I
wonder how it could be improved, however?
In the long run, I think we should offer a graphical interface to `guix
system`, `guix package`, etc, and in that case non-technical users would
never see this message.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#34184
; Package
guix
.
(Fri, 25 Jan 2019 22:38:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #20 received at 34184 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net> skribis:
> Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu> writes:
[...]
>> Hi, this message is actually from grub-install and is perfectly
>> correct: it means it's intalling in legacy (bios) mode. "No error
>> reported" is also from grub and is very confusing…
>
> Maybe we should
>
> 1) prefix messages from other tools with the name of the tool, and
> 2) hide these tool messages by default behind descriptive messages like
> “installing bootloader”
>
> What do you think?
Good idea, that would avoid confusions; I’m fine one way or the other.
It may still be useful, though, to grab the raw messages from these
tools in case something goes wrong (or even if it succeeds but
‘grub-install’ made an EFI install when you were expecting a BIOS
install, say.)
Thanks,
Ludo’.
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal'
Request was from
Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Tue, 12 Feb 2019 17:35:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#34184
; Package
guix
.
(Tue, 12 Feb 2019 17:47:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #25 received at 34184 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 11:27:26PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> Maybe we should
>
> 1) prefix messages from other tools with the name of the tool, and
> 2) hide these tool messages by default behind descriptive messages like
> “installing bootloader”
Yes, absolutely. We just had another person ask about this on IRC.
It may not be the most important thing to fix overall, but it's one of
the first things people see when starting with a Guix system so it is
important.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Reply sent
to
Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Wed, 13 May 2020 21:54:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
swedebugia <swedebugia <at> riseup.net>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Wed, 13 May 2020 21:54:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #30 received at 34184-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
I believe this was fixed by commit
21fcfe1ee969cc477dc41486ae4074e655d44274.
Closing.
--
Ricardo
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Thu, 11 Jun 2020 11:24:08 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 291 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.