GNU logs - #34231, boring messages

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#34231: Openjdk11 not reproducilbe
Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits <boskovits@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 08:27:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.34231.B.154866401511090 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 34231 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits <boskovits@HIDDEN>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 09:26:18 +0100
Message-ID: <CAE4v=pj9J33VkRb+h4GWVpj7v=uuG88iiXZhZFt5_YERjTkYLg@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

The openjdk package, as submitted on the tracker as #34230 is not reproducible.

doc output passes rounds=2
jdk output does not, differing files:

jmods/java.base.jmod:
this is a jmod file.
You can use diffoscope on it, after strippeing of the 4 bytes binary
header, as it becomes a
standard zip archive then.
the only differing file inside the archive is:
classes/module-info.class, and only the module hashes differ.
This also causes the zip CRC to mismatch.
In summary these seems to be the syndrome of modules differing.

lib/classList:
this file has non-deterministic ordering issues. I could just sort it,
but I believe it causes problems in other files. If it turns out to be
not related to other problems, this is trivial to fix.

lib/modules:
This is a jimage file.
Most differences are from metadata.
You can extract the content using the jimage tool, which is available
from any openjdk package.
There are two problems:
1. We can't regenerate the file from the extracted content, as it
needs additional information. We will have to find the spot in the
build system where this file is created to regenerate it, or patch the
jimage tool to create deteministic metadata.
2. unfortunately there are some real differences in the content:
java.base/jdk/internal/module/SystemModules$all.class:
integer differences
also bytecode differences

module-info.class:
hash differences
(this seems to be a sympthom)

I have no info on the out output, as the daemon only reports the first
differing output.

Thanks for Julien in helping me out in collecting these informations.

Message sent:

Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
From: help-debbugs@HIDDEN (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits <boskovits@HIDDEN>
Subject: bug#34231: Acknowledgement (Openjdk11 not reproducilbe)
Message-ID: <handler.34231.B.154866401511090.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <CAE4v=pj9J33VkRb+h4GWVpj7v=uuG88iiXZhZFt5_YERjTkYLg@HIDDEN>
X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 34231
X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix
Reply-To: 34231 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 08:27:04 +0000

Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 bug-guix@HIDDEN

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 34231 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@HIDDEN unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

--=20
34231: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D34231
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@HIDDEN with problems

Message sent to bug-guix@HIDDEN:

Subject: bug#34231: Openjdk11 not reproducible
References: <CAE4v=pj9J33VkRb+h4GWVpj7v=uuG88iiXZhZFt5_YERjTkYLg@HIDDEN>
In-Reply-To: <CAE4v=pj9J33VkRb+h4GWVpj7v=uuG88iiXZhZFt5_YERjTkYLg@HIDDEN>
Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits <boskovits@HIDDEN>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@HIDDEN
Resent-Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2019 12:10:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.34231.B34231.15490229685943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@HIDDEN
To: 34231 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits <boskovits@HIDDEN>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2019 13:09:08 +0100
Message-ID: <CAE4v=phQ2mGrcJ65mhPRqPg9ar19HhWMRQLxxCCKpMFWLkerXw@HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: list
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>

See comments in make/scripts/compare.sh.

It might make sense to add a build system flag to enable reproducible
build, for most people building openjdk should not pay the performance
penalty involved.

Last modified: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 12:00:02 UTC

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.