GNU bug report logs - #34389
GNU Parted 3.2 – Claimed: msdos disk labels do not support partition name

Previous Next

Package: parted;

Reported by: Ricky Tigg <ricky.tigg <at> gmail.com>

Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 15:40:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: "Brian C. Lane" <bcl <at> redhat.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 34389 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 34389 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-parted <at> gnu.org:
bug#34389; Package parted. (Fri, 08 Feb 2019 15:40:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Ricky Tigg <ricky.tigg <at> gmail.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-parted <at> gnu.org. (Fri, 08 Feb 2019 15:40:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ricky Tigg <ricky.tigg <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-parted <at> gnu.org
Subject: GNU Parted 3.2 – Claimed: msdos disk labels do not support partition name
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 16:38:57 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi. *Parted* v. 3.2 claims *msdos disk labels do not support partition name*
.Commands executed in interactive *Parted*-shell:

(parted) mklabel msdos
(parted) mkpart primary ext4 0% 100%
(parted) name 1 USB
Error: msdos disk labels do not support partition name.

I then had to rely on *Gparted* v. 0.33  for creating a *partition name*:

$ blkid | grep sdc
/dev/sdc1: LABEL="USB" UUID="2b491b98-46e8-42fe-9e24-96e115532d99"
TYPE="ext4" PARTUUID="2c168f1d-01"

Illustrated as well in the attachment.  Regards.
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
[gparted_0.33.0.png (image/png, attachment)]

Reply sent to "Brian C. Lane" <bcl <at> redhat.com>:
You have taken responsibility. (Mon, 11 Feb 2019 18:36:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to Ricky Tigg <ricky.tigg <at> gmail.com>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Mon, 11 Feb 2019 18:36:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #10 received at 34389-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "Brian C. Lane" <bcl <at> redhat.com>
To: 34389-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#34389: GNU Parted 3.2 –
 Claimed: msdos disk labels do not support partition name
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 10:35:03 -0800
On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 04:38:57PM +0100, Ricky Tigg wrote:
> Hi. *Parted* v. 3.2 claims *msdos disk labels do not support partition name*
> .Commands executed in interactive *Parted*-shell:
> 
> (parted) mklabel msdos
> (parted) mkpart primary ext4 0% 100%
> (parted) name 1 USB
> Error: msdos disk labels do not support partition name.
> 
> I then had to rely on *Gparted* v. 0.33  for creating a *partition name*:
> 
> $ blkid | grep sdc
> /dev/sdc1: LABEL="USB" UUID="2b491b98-46e8-42fe-9e24-96e115532d99"
> TYPE="ext4" PARTUUID="2c168f1d-01"

This is a filesystem label, not a partition name. MSDOS has no space in
the partition table to store names.


-- 
Brian C. Lane (PST8PDT)




Information forwarded to bug-parted <at> gnu.org:
bug#34389; Package parted. (Tue, 12 Feb 2019 09:23:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #13 received at 34389 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ricky Tigg <ricky.tigg <at> gmail.com>
To: 34389 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 10:21:47 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Currently used terminology may had a role at the source of my confusion:
$ parted  -h
(...)
  name NUMBER NAME                         name partition NUMBER as NAME

I know now – which doesn't mean I am clever –."name partition " was meant
to be interpreted, possibly implicitly, that way you depicted. I would
certainly have interpreted correctly a terminology such as the one
illustrated here:
$ parted  -h
(...)
  name NUMBER NAME                         name filesystem label NUMBER as
NAME
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Information forwarded to bug-parted <at> gnu.org:
bug#34389; Package parted. (Tue, 12 Feb 2019 17:59:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #16 received at 34389 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "Brian C. Lane" <bcl <at> redhat.com>
To: Ricky Tigg <ricky.tigg <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 34389 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#34389:
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 09:58:31 -0800
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 10:21:47AM +0100, Ricky Tigg wrote:
> Currently used terminology may had a role at the source of my confusion:
> $ parted  -h
> (...)
>   name NUMBER NAME                         name partition NUMBER as NAME
> 
> I know now – which doesn't mean I am clever –."name partition " was meant
> to be interpreted, possibly implicitly, that way you depicted. I would
> certainly have interpreted correctly a terminology such as the one
> illustrated here:
> $ parted  -h
> (...)
>   name NUMBER NAME                         name filesystem label NUMBER as
> NAME

That would be incorrect. parted doesn't do anything with filesystem
naming, only partition naming. eg. GPT supports partition names, but
MSDOS does not.

gparted combines features of parted with other filesystem features, allowing you to
set the filesystem name, or the partition name.

-- 
Brian C. Lane (PST8PDT)




bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 13 Mar 2019 11:24:13 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 5 years and 38 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.