Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Feb 2019 15:54:11 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Mon Feb 11 10:54:11 2019 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43955 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gtDuM-00060y-OI for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 10:54:11 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34849) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <bsmall2@HIDDEN>) id 1gtD7m-0004e0-Sj for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 10:04:02 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:39150) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <bsmall2@HIDDEN>) id 1gtD7W-0003Bb-49 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 10:03:45 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49203) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <bsmall2@HIDDEN>) id 1gtD7U-0006pM-NS for bug-guile@HIDDEN; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 10:03:41 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <bsmall2@HIDDEN>) id 1gtD7S-0002ys-5o for bug-guile@HIDDEN; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 10:03:40 -0500 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:40126) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <bsmall2@HIDDEN>) id 1gtD7R-0002Sc-9j for bug-guile@HIDDEN; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 10:03:38 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A692B16005D for <bug-guile@HIDDEN>; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 16:03:25 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1549897405; bh=5q30LE8ncLrOb1W8VxQMYShrvuLBlUwZWTJ0b+fx2uc=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=aEvZXfGjNzYn015uYaGJoSPmMDiUPTW/rzo3aISY1/FaWOLYueZvGDua8UdBkxODz xWMn9MZyoft6JC7xhXLNNKEg+8yIm5SWXE8Mq9sAAlqGOANkX+DGvdGa58UWf3fBfu pPqvdjmUpdFj0bT2G7I20jJ5jPnMToxRGAFDyeZz3BywGskkyXdnwqBcDO0+lE/Ig8 395A/k322ZyIrbSR4PSO88Qgx+BWjf7mDBRRltkRKWygjO/BfFCG2kNAYdAzOkllJn y0GIlmC1nvdzqyFZzEaAJUPNBD+KK+qzMoWPhUi+1ZX4GzAk3lSafhMPvX9h5SWjvb ZCtBRUZg7TV5g== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 43ypvJ6Xprz6tmX for <bug-guile@HIDDEN>; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 16:03:24 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 00:03:24 +0900 From: Brian Small <bsmall2@HIDDEN> To: bug-guile@HIDDEN Subject: Guile 2.2.4 Installation Experience Message-ID: <39dda32f8c3e6249b9d06355d67e7485@HIDDEN> X-Sender: bsmall2@HIDDEN User-Agent: Posteo Webmail X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 185.67.36.65 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 10:54:06 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Hello, Guile and its manual have been teaching me a lot. Thank you. > Any problems with the installation should be reported to > bug-guile@HIDDEN I wrote up some of the details that gave me trouble while installing guile (GNU Guile) 2.2.4. (fn:1) For Debian 9 Guile 2.2 seems to require an installation of Guile 2.0 for shared libraries. Maybe most people that use Guile are developers and already have -devel packages installed: > When the messages said I needed libtdl or libunistring, I really needed > libtdl-dev and libunistring-dev. For Debian: > The installation process mentioned the need for bdw-gc. A search( > showed me that Debian's libgc-dev package would work so a quick # > apt-get install libgc-dev let me avoid longer download, configure and > make process. > The need for libffi was, like libtdl and libunistring, met by Debian's > -dev package # apt-get install libffi-dev. I hope this mail will help and not just distract. Eventually I'd like to use Guile Scheme for basic programming education. The smoother the installation process goes for non-developers, the more likely it is that the Guile Scheme notation will be good for general education, the way Lancelot Hogben in _Mathematics for the Millions_ about the importance of notation. Take it easy, Brian Small - (fn:1) https://write.as/bs2gs/installing-guile-2-2-4-on-two-computers ----------------- Brian Small On-line Writings: https://ruhrspora.de/u/bsmall2 https://wordsmith.social/bsmall2/ https://write.as/bsmall2/ On-line Photos: https://pixelfed.social/bsmall2 https://snap.as/bsmall2 https://goblinrefuge.com/mediagoblin/u/bsmall2/
Brian Small <bsmall2@HIDDEN>
:bug-guile@HIDDEN
.
Full text available.bug-guile@HIDDEN
:bug#34437
; Package guile
.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.