GNU bug report logs - #34453
[PATCH] build guile-static with guile-2.0

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 34453 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 34453 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Cc: 34427 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] build guile-static with guile-2.0
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 11:17:40 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

When experimenting I found that using guile <at> 2.0 as a base for
guile-static, the resulting guile-static didn't segfault on the target
architecture.


-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

[0001-gnu-guile-static-Build-for-guile-2.0.patch (text/plain, attachment)]

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #8 received at 34453 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
Cc: 34453 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 34427 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#34453] [PATCH] build guile-static with guile-2.0
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2019 17:06:05 +0100

Hi Efraim,

Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> skribis:

> When experimenting I found that using guile <at> 2.0 as a base for
> guile-static, the resulting guile-static didn't segfault on the target
> architecture.

As discussed in <https://issues.guix.info/issue/34427>, I would rather
fix the segfault in 2.2 than move back to 2.0 and effectively delay the
problem.

Ludo’.

Message #11 received at 34453 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 34453 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 34427 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
Subject: Re: bug#34453: [PATCH] build guile-static with guile-2.0
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 12:10:09 +0200

Hi,

What is the status of this old patch #34453?

http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/34453


On Sat, 16 Feb 2019 at 17:06, Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> wrote:
> Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> skribis:
>
>> When experimenting I found that using guile <at> 2.0 as a base for
>> guile-static, the resulting guile-static didn't segfault on the target
>> architecture.
>
> As discussed in <https://issues.guix.info/issue/34427>, I would rather
> fix the segfault in 2.2 than move back to 2.0 and effectively delay the
> problem.

Note that #34427 is still open.


Cheers,
simon

Message #14 received at 34453 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 34453 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 34427 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Re: bug#34453: [PATCH] build guile-static with guile-2.0
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 00:07:07 +0300

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 12:10:09PM +0200, zimoun wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> What is the status of this old patch #34453?
> 
> http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/34453
> 
> 
> On Sat, 16 Feb 2019 at 17:06, Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> wrote:
> > Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> skribis:
> >
> >> When experimenting I found that using guile <at> 2.0 as a base for
> >> guile-static, the resulting guile-static didn't segfault on the target
> >> architecture.
> >
> > As discussed in <https://issues.guix.info/issue/34427>, I would rather
> > fix the segfault in 2.2 than move back to 2.0 and effectively delay the
> > problem.
> 
> Note that #34427 is still open.

We can probably drop it. We'll pick it back up again if/when it comes up
again.

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #19 received at 34453-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
Cc: 34453-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Re: bug#34453: [PATCH] build guile-static with guile-2.0
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 10:14:42 +0200

Hi,

On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 at 00:07, Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 12:10:09PM +0200, zimoun wrote:
>> On Sat, 16 Feb 2019 at 17:06, Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> wrote:
>> > Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> skribis:

>> > As discussed in <https://issues.guix.info/issue/34427>, I would rather
>> > fix the segfault in 2.2 than move back to 2.0 and effectively delay the
>> > problem.
>>
>> Note that #34427 is still open.
>
> We can probably drop it. We'll pick it back up again if/when it comes up
> again.

Therefore, I am closing.


Cheers,
simon

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.