GNU bug report logs -
#34523
Add tetrinet
Previous Next
Reported by: <pkill9 <at> runbox.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 06:58:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 34523 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 34523 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#34523
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Mon, 18 Feb 2019 06:58:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
<pkill9 <at> runbox.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
.
(Mon, 18 Feb 2019 06:58:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Tetrinet is a multiplayer tetris game. There are two versions: a command line implementation and a GTK implementation - this package is the command line implementation. http://tetrinet.or.cz/
The license is written in the README as
```
Distribution/license information
--------------------------------
This program is public domain, and may be modified and distributed without
limitation.
```
So I don't know what license to put it as, so I set it as 'expat'.
[0001-gnu-Add-tetrinet.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#34523
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Mon, 18 Feb 2019 10:38:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 34523 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
pkill9 <at> runbox.com writes:
> The license is written in the README as
>
> ```
> Distribution/license information
> --------------------------------
> This program is public domain, and may be modified and distributed without
> limitation.
> ```
>
> So I don't know what license to put it as, so I set it as 'expat'.
“expat” is not correct. Use “public-domain” instead.
> + #:phases (modify-phases %standard-phases
> + (delete 'configure)
> + (add-after 'unpack 'fix-install-dir
> + (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
> + (let ((out (assoc-ref outputs "out")))
> + (mkdir-p (string-append out "/bin"))
> + (substitute* "Makefile"
> + (("/usr/games") (string-append out "/bin")))))))))
Can this patching be avoided by passing a make flag instead?
--
Ricardo
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#34523
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Mon, 18 Feb 2019 14:12:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 34523 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
pkill -9, Ricardo,
Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> pkill9 <at> runbox.com writes:
>> + `(#:tests? #f ; No tests.
Only nitpicks:
+ `(#:tests? #f ; no tests
If you're using emacs, running C-M-q on the whole definition will
automatically indent your code. There's a way to do the same
without emacs, but I forget how.
>> + #:phases (modify-phases %standard-phases
>> + (delete 'configure)
+ (delete 'configure) ; no configure script
>> + (add-after 'unpack 'fix-install-dir
>> + (lambda* (#:key outputs
>> #:allow-other-keys)
>> + (let ((out (assoc-ref outputs "out")))
>> + (mkdir-p (string-append out "/bin"))
>> + (substitute* "Makefile"
>> + (("/usr/games") (string-append out
>> "/bin")))))))))
>
> Can this patching be avoided by passing a make flag instead?
Nope, it's hard-coded in the Makefile target :-(
Considering the lack of a man(ual) page, how about adding
something like:
(add-after 'install 'install-documentation
(lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
(let* ((out (assoc-ref outputs "out"))
(doc (string-append out "/share/doc/"
,name "-" ,version)))
(for-each (lambda (file)
(install-file file doc))
(list "README" "tetrinet.txt"))
#t))))))
Thanks!
T G-R
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#34523
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Mon, 18 Feb 2019 14:42:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 34523 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 15:11:37 +0100
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr> wrote:
> pkill -9, Ricardo,
>
> Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> > pkill9 <at> runbox.com writes:
> >> + `(#:tests? #f ; No tests.
>
> Only nitpicks:
>
> + `(#:tests? #f ; no tests
>
> If you're using emacs, running C-M-q on the whole definition will
> automatically indent your code. There's a way to do the same
> without emacs, but I forget how.
# In guix's git checkout:
guix environment --fallback --ad-hoc emacs emacs-guix -- emacs --script ./etc/indent-code.el "${modulename}" "${packagename}"
[Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#34523
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Tue, 19 Feb 2019 07:52:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at 34523 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
I've attached an updated patch with the modifications suggested so far:
- Changed license from expat to public-domain
- Changed "No tests" to lowercase "no tests"
- Added "no configure file" comment
- Install Readme files
I indent the package definition in emacs by marking the package definition (CTRL+Space) and running `M-x indent-region`, I'm not sure what indentation was wrong with the original patch I submitted, but I ran indent-region on it again anyway.
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 15:11:37 +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr> wrote:
> pkill -9, Ricardo,
>
> Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> > pkill9 <at> runbox.com writes:
> >> + `(#:tests? #f ; No tests.
>
> Only nitpicks:
>
> + `(#:tests? #f ; no tests
>
> If you're using emacs, running C-M-q on the whole definition will
> automatically indent your code. There's a way to do the same
> without emacs, but I forget how.
>
> >> + #:phases (modify-phases %standard-phases
> >> + (delete 'configure)
>
> + (delete 'configure) ; no configure script
>
> >> + (add-after 'unpack 'fix-install-dir
> >> + (lambda* (#:key outputs
> >> #:allow-other-keys)
> >> + (let ((out (assoc-ref outputs "out")))
> >> + (mkdir-p (string-append out "/bin"))
> >> + (substitute* "Makefile"
> >> + (("/usr/games") (string-append out
> >> "/bin")))))))))
> >
> > Can this patching be avoided by passing a make flag instead?
>
> Nope, it's hard-coded in the Makefile target :-(
>
> Considering the lack of a man(ual) page, how about adding
> something like:
>
> (add-after 'install 'install-documentation
> (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
> (let* ((out (assoc-ref outputs "out"))
> (doc (string-append out "/share/doc/"
> ,name "-" ,version)))
> (for-each (lambda (file)
> (install-file file doc))
> (list "README" "tetrinet.txt"))
> #t))))))
>
> Thanks!
>
> T G-R
[0001-gnu-Add-tetrinet.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#34523
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Sat, 23 Feb 2019 09:24:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #20 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Danny Milosavljevic <dannym <at> scratchpost.org> skrev: (18 februari 2019 15:41:33 CET)
>On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 15:11:37 +0100
>Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr> wrote:
>
>> pkill -9, Ricardo,
>>
>> Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>> > pkill9 <at> runbox.com writes:
>> >> + `(#:tests? #f ; No tests.
>>
>> Only nitpicks:
>>
>> + `(#:tests? #f ; no tests
>>
>> If you're using emacs, running C-M-q on the whole definition will
>> automatically indent your code. There's a way to do the same
>> without emacs, but I forget how.
>
># In guix's git checkout:
>
>guix environment --fallback --ad-hoc emacs emacs-guix -- emacs --script
>./etc/indent-code.el "${modulename}" "${packagename}"
Thanks for the snippet. I think we should add it to the manual. Thoughts?
--
Sent from my k-9 mail for Android.
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#34523
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Sat, 23 Feb 2019 09:24:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#34523
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Sat, 23 Feb 2019 09:27:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #26 received at 34523 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
For the sake of making it easy to find when searching synopsies I suggest you add "game" to the end of yours.
--
Sent from my k-9 mail for Android.
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#34523
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Sat, 23 Feb 2019 09:28:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#34523
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Sat, 23 Feb 2019 11:42:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #32 received at 34523 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On 2019-02-23 10:26, swedebugia wrote:
> For the sake of making it easy to find when searching synopsies I
> suggest you add "game" to the end of yours.
> --
> Sent from my k-9 mail for Android.
having looked it up online I prefer the WP synopsis:
"TetriNET is a console multiplayer online Tetris game for up to six people."
There is a gnome version also. We should state clearly that this is a
console/text-mode client.
As an aside I did not find a working server anywhere and the homepage of
the project is dead. There is a possibility to host your own server with
jetrix though.
There could be trademark issues with the name/game also see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tetris_Company
--
Cheers Swedebugia
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#34523
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Tue, 26 Feb 2019 15:21:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #35 received at 34523 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi Swedebugia,
> having looked it up online I prefer the WP synopsis:
> "TetriNET is a console multiplayer online Tetris game for up to six people."
>
> There is a gnome version also. We should state clearly that this is a
> console/text-mode client.
What does 'WP' mean?
> As an aside I did not find a working server anywhere and the homepage of
> the project is dead. There is a possibility to host your own server with
> jetrix though.
I played Tetrinet with someone over a server, but I can't remember what the address was.
You can't access the homepage of the project? I can access http://tetrinet.or.cz fine. Or do you mean it hasn't been updated in ages?
> There could be trademark issues with the name/game also see
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tetris_Company
Regarding the potential trademark issues, both FSF-approved distros Parabola and PureOS have Tetrinet in their repositories[1][2], so I think it would be acceptable to add it to Guix. And if a copyright claim is made in the future it can always be removed.
[1] Tetrinet in Parabola - https://www.parabola.nu/packages/?q=tetrinet
[2] Tetrinet in PureOS - https://software.pureos.net/search_pkg?term=tetrinet
Thanks
On Sat, 23 Feb 2019 07:23:43 +0100, swedebugia <swedebugia <at> riseup.net> wrote:
> On 2019-02-23 10:26, swedebugia wrote:
> > For the sake of making it easy to find when searching synopsies I
> > suggest you add "game" to the end of yours.
> > --
> > Sent from my k-9 mail for Android.
>
> having looked it up online I prefer the WP synopsis:
> "TetriNET is a console multiplayer online Tetris game for up to six people."
>
> There is a gnome version also. We should state clearly that this is a
> console/text-mode client.
>
> As an aside I did not find a working server anywhere and the homepage of
> the project is dead. There is a possibility to host your own server with
> jetrix though.
>
> There could be trademark issues with the name/game also see
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tetris_Company
>
> --
> Cheers Swedebugia
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#34523
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Tue, 26 Feb 2019 15:45:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #38 received at 34523 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Here is a patch that:
- Removes the full stop after 'no tests'
- Changes the synopsis from "Multiplayer tetris" to "Multiplayer tetris game".
- Replaces the description with what you (swedebugia) suggested.
> As an aside I did not find a working server anywhere ... There is a possibility to host your own server with jetrix though.
Oh I realised you meant a server program - the tetrinet package builds one called 'tetrinet-server', I tested it just now by running these commands in separate terminals:
`tetrinet-server`
`tetrinet player1 localhost`
`tetrinet player2 localhost`
Sending messages as the two different players shows up correctly in each tetrinet client, so I think the server works fine.
On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 15:20:28 +0000 (GMT), <pkill9 <at> runbox.com> wrote:
> Hi Swedebugia,
>
> > having looked it up online I prefer the WP synopsis:
> > "TetriNET is a console multiplayer online Tetris game for up to six people."
> >
> > There is a gnome version also. We should state clearly that this is a
> > console/text-mode client.
>
> What does 'WP' mean?
>
> > As an aside I did not find a working server anywhere and the homepage of
> > the project is dead. There is a possibility to host your own server with
> > jetrix though.
>
> I played Tetrinet with someone over a server, but I can't remember what the address was.
>
> You can't access the homepage of the project? I can access http://tetrinet.or.cz fine. Or do you mean it hasn't been updated in ages?
>
> > There could be trademark issues with the name/game also see
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tetris_Company
>
> Regarding the potential trademark issues, both FSF-approved distros Parabola and PureOS have Tetrinet in their repositories[1][2], so I think it would be acceptable to add it to Guix. And if a copyright claim is made in the future it can always be removed.
>
> [1] Tetrinet in Parabola - https://www.parabola.nu/packages/?q=tetrinet
> [2] Tetrinet in PureOS - https://software.pureos.net/search_pkg?term=tetrinet
>
> Thanks
>
> On Sat, 23 Feb 2019 07:23:43 +0100, swedebugia <swedebugia <at> riseup.net> wrote:
>
> > On 2019-02-23 10:26, swedebugia wrote:
> > > For the sake of making it easy to find when searching synopsies I
> > > suggest you add "game" to the end of yours.
> > > --
> > > Sent from my k-9 mail for Android.
> >
> > having looked it up online I prefer the WP synopsis:
> > "TetriNET is a console multiplayer online Tetris game for up to six people."
> >
> > There is a gnome version also. We should state clearly that this is a
> > console/text-mode client.
> >
> > As an aside I did not find a working server anywhere and the homepage of
> > the project is dead. There is a possibility to host your own server with
> > jetrix though.
> >
> > There could be trademark issues with the name/game also see
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tetris_Company
> >
> > --
> > Cheers Swedebugia
[0001-gnu-Add-tetrinet.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#34523
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Tue, 26 Feb 2019 20:41:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #41 received at 34523 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
pkill9 <at> runbox.com skrev: (26 februari 2019 16:44:44 CET)
>Here is a patch that:
> - Removes the full stop after 'no tests'
>- Changes the synopsis from "Multiplayer tetris" to "Multiplayer tetris
>game".
> - Replaces the description with what you (swedebugia) suggested.
>
>> As an aside I did not find a working server anywhere ... There is a
>possibility to host your own server with jetrix though.
>
>Oh I realised you meant a server program - the tetrinet package builds
>one called 'tetrinet-server', I tested it just now by running these
>commands in separate terminals:
>
>`tetrinet-server`
>`tetrinet player1 localhost`
>`tetrinet player2 localhost`
>
>Sending messages as the two different players shows up correctly in
>each tetrinet client, so I think the server works fine.
>
>On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 15:20:28 +0000 (GMT), <pkill9 <at> runbox.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Swedebugia,
>>
>> > having looked it up online I prefer the WP synopsis:
>> > "TetriNET is a console multiplayer online Tetris game for up to six
>people."
>> >
>> > There is a gnome version also. We should state clearly that this is
>a
>> > console/text-mode client.
>>
>> What does 'WP' mean?
>>
>> > As an aside I did not find a working server anywhere and the
>homepage of
>> > the project is dead. There is a possibility to host your own server
>with
>> > jetrix though.
>>
>> I played Tetrinet with someone over a server, but I can't remember
>what the address was.
>>
>> You can't access the homepage of the project? I can access
>http://tetrinet.or.cz fine. Or do you mean it hasn't been updated in
>ages?
>>
>> > There could be trademark issues with the name/game also see
>> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tetris_Company
>>
>> Regarding the potential trademark issues, both FSF-approved distros
>Parabola and PureOS have Tetrinet in their repositories[1][2], so I
>think it would be acceptable to add it to Guix. And if a copyright
>claim is made in the future it can always be removed.
>>
>> [1] Tetrinet in Parabola -
>https://www.parabola.nu/packages/?q=tetrinet
>> [2] Tetrinet in PureOS -
>https://software.pureos.net/search_pkg?term=tetrinet
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> On Sat, 23 Feb 2019 07:23:43 +0100, swedebugia
><swedebugia <at> riseup.net> wrote:
>>
>> > On 2019-02-23 10:26, swedebugia wrote:
>> > > For the sake of making it easy to find when searching synopsies I
>> > > suggest you add "game" to the end of yours.
>> > > --
>> > > Sent from my k-9 mail for Android.
>> >
>> > having looked it up online I prefer the WP synopsis:
>> > "TetriNET is a console multiplayer online Tetris game for up to six
>people."
>> >
>> > There is a gnome version also. We should state clearly that this is
>a
>> > console/text-mode client.
>> >
>> > As an aside I did not find a working server anywhere and the
>homepage of
>> > the project is dead. There is a possibility to host your own server
>with
>> > jetrix though.
>> >
>> > There could be trademark issues with the name/game also see
>> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tetris_Company
>> >
>> > --
>> > Cheers Swedebugia
A ha, I completely missed the imbedded server. Maybe we should mention in the description that it includes a client and server.
--
Sent from my k-9 mail for Android.
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#34523
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Tue, 26 Feb 2019 20:46:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #44 received at 34523 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
pkill9 <at> runbox.com skrev: (26 februari 2019 16:20:28 CET)
>Hi Swedebugia,
>
>> having looked it up online I prefer the WP synopsis:
>> "TetriNET is a console multiplayer online Tetris game for up to six
>people."
>>
>> There is a gnome version also. We should state clearly that this is a
>> console/text-mode client.
>
>What does 'WP' mean?
>
>> As an aside I did not find a working server anywhere and the homepage
>of
>> the project is dead. There is a possibility to host your own server
>with
>> jetrix though.
>
>I played Tetrinet with someone over a server, but I can't remember what
>the address was.
>
>You can't access the homepage of the project? I can access
>http://tetrinet.or.cz fine. Or do you mean it hasn't been updated in
>ages?
>
>> There could be trademark issues with the name/game also see
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tetris_Company
>
>Regarding the potential trademark issues, both FSF-approved distros
>Parabola and PureOS have Tetrinet in their repositories[1][2], so I
>think it would be acceptable to add it to Guix. And if a copyright
>claim is made in the future it can always be removed.
>
>[1] Tetrinet in Parabola - https://www.parabola.nu/packages/?q=tetrinet
>[2] Tetrinet in PureOS -
>https://software.pureos.net/search_pkg?term=tetrinet
>
>Thanks
>
>On Sat, 23 Feb 2019 07:23:43 +0100, swedebugia <swedebugia <at> riseup.net>
>wrote:
>
>> On 2019-02-23 10:26, swedebugia wrote:
>> > For the sake of making it easy to find when searching synopsies I
>> > suggest you add "game" to the end of yours.
>> > --
>> > Sent from my k-9 mail for Android.
>>
>> having looked it up online I prefer the WP synopsis:
>> "TetriNET is a console multiplayer online Tetris game for up to six
>people."
>>
>> There is a gnome version also. We should state clearly that this is a
>> console/text-mode client.
>>
>> As an aside I did not find a working server anywhere and the homepage
>of
>> the project is dead. There is a possibility to host your own server
>with
>> jetrix though.
>>
>> There could be trademark issues with the name/game also see
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tetris_Company
>>
>> --
>> Cheers Swedebugia
Hi
I agree with your remarks
WP = wikipedia
Given that there is no pgp signed tarball or even a checksum on that page, have you asked the maintainer about this and verified that you got the code unaltered?
--
Sent from my k-9 mail for Android.
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#34523
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Wed, 27 Feb 2019 07:02:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #47 received at 34523 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
> A ha, I completely missed the imbedded server. Maybe we should mention in the description that it includes a client and server.
Ok I added that
On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 21:40:34 +0100, swedebugia <swedebugia <at> riseup.net> wrote:
> pkill9 <at> runbox.com skrev: (26 februari 2019 16:44:44 CET)
> >Here is a patch that:
> > - Removes the full stop after 'no tests'
> >- Changes the synopsis from "Multiplayer tetris" to "Multiplayer tetris
> >game".
> > - Replaces the description with what you (swedebugia) suggested.
> >
> >> As an aside I did not find a working server anywhere ... There is a
> >possibility to host your own server with jetrix though.
> >
> >Oh I realised you meant a server program - the tetrinet package builds
> >one called 'tetrinet-server', I tested it just now by running these
> >commands in separate terminals:
> >
> >`tetrinet-server`
> >`tetrinet player1 localhost`
> >`tetrinet player2 localhost`
> >
> >Sending messages as the two different players shows up correctly in
> >each tetrinet client, so I think the server works fine.
> >
> >On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 15:20:28 +0000 (GMT), <pkill9 <at> runbox.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Swedebugia,
> >>
> >> > having looked it up online I prefer the WP synopsis:
> >> > "TetriNET is a console multiplayer online Tetris game for up to six
> >people."
> >> >
> >> > There is a gnome version also. We should state clearly that this is
> >a
> >> > console/text-mode client.
> >>
> >> What does 'WP' mean?
> >>
> >> > As an aside I did not find a working server anywhere and the
> >homepage of
> >> > the project is dead. There is a possibility to host your own server
> >with
> >> > jetrix though.
> >>
> >> I played Tetrinet with someone over a server, but I can't remember
> >what the address was.
> >>
> >> You can't access the homepage of the project? I can access
> >http://tetrinet.or.cz fine. Or do you mean it hasn't been updated in
> >ages?
> >>
> >> > There could be trademark issues with the name/game also see
> >> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tetris_Company
> >>
> >> Regarding the potential trademark issues, both FSF-approved distros
> >Parabola and PureOS have Tetrinet in their repositories[1][2], so I
> >think it would be acceptable to add it to Guix. And if a copyright
> >claim is made in the future it can always be removed.
> >>
> >> [1] Tetrinet in Parabola -
> >https://www.parabola.nu/packages/?q=tetrinet
> >> [2] Tetrinet in PureOS -
> >https://software.pureos.net/search_pkg?term=tetrinet
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> On Sat, 23 Feb 2019 07:23:43 +0100, swedebugia
> ><swedebugia <at> riseup.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On 2019-02-23 10:26, swedebugia wrote:
> >> > > For the sake of making it easy to find when searching synopsies I
> >> > > suggest you add "game" to the end of yours.
> >> > > --
> >> > > Sent from my k-9 mail for Android.
> >> >
> >> > having looked it up online I prefer the WP synopsis:
> >> > "TetriNET is a console multiplayer online Tetris game for up to six
> >people."
> >> >
> >> > There is a gnome version also. We should state clearly that this is
> >a
> >> > console/text-mode client.
> >> >
> >> > As an aside I did not find a working server anywhere and the
> >homepage of
> >> > the project is dead. There is a possibility to host your own server
> >with
> >> > jetrix though.
> >> >
> >> > There could be trademark issues with the name/game also see
> >> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tetris_Company
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Cheers Swedebugia
>
> A ha, I completely missed the imbedded server. Maybe we should mention in the description that it includes a client and server.
> --
> Sent from my k-9 mail for Android.
[0001-gnu-Add-tetrinet.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#34523
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Wed, 27 Feb 2019 07:11:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #50 received at 34523 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Given that there is no pgp signed tarball or even a checksum on that page, have you asked the maintainer about this and verified that you got the code unaltered?
Ok I emailed the current maintainer according to that page asking to verify that I got the source code unaltered, and to maybe update the page with that info.
On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 21:45:23 +0100, swedebugia <swedebugia <at> riseup.net> wrote:
> pkill9 <at> runbox.com skrev: (26 februari 2019 16:20:28 CET)
> >Hi Swedebugia,
> >
> >> having looked it up online I prefer the WP synopsis:
> >> "TetriNET is a console multiplayer online Tetris game for up to six
> >people."
> >>
> >> There is a gnome version also. We should state clearly that this is a
> >> console/text-mode client.
> >
> >What does 'WP' mean?
> >
> >> As an aside I did not find a working server anywhere and the homepage
> >of
> >> the project is dead. There is a possibility to host your own server
> >with
> >> jetrix though.
> >
> >I played Tetrinet with someone over a server, but I can't remember what
> >the address was.
> >
> >You can't access the homepage of the project? I can access
> >http://tetrinet.or.cz fine. Or do you mean it hasn't been updated in
> >ages?
> >
> >> There could be trademark issues with the name/game also see
> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tetris_Company
> >
> >Regarding the potential trademark issues, both FSF-approved distros
> >Parabola and PureOS have Tetrinet in their repositories[1][2], so I
> >think it would be acceptable to add it to Guix. And if a copyright
> >claim is made in the future it can always be removed.
> >
> >[1] Tetrinet in Parabola - https://www.parabola.nu/packages/?q=tetrinet
> >[2] Tetrinet in PureOS -
> >https://software.pureos.net/search_pkg?term=tetrinet
> >
> >Thanks
> >
> >On Sat, 23 Feb 2019 07:23:43 +0100, swedebugia <swedebugia <at> riseup.net>
> >wrote:
> >
> >> On 2019-02-23 10:26, swedebugia wrote:
> >> > For the sake of making it easy to find when searching synopsies I
> >> > suggest you add "game" to the end of yours.
> >> > --
> >> > Sent from my k-9 mail for Android.
> >>
> >> having looked it up online I prefer the WP synopsis:
> >> "TetriNET is a console multiplayer online Tetris game for up to six
> >people."
> >>
> >> There is a gnome version also. We should state clearly that this is a
> >> console/text-mode client.
> >>
> >> As an aside I did not find a working server anywhere and the homepage
> >of
> >> the project is dead. There is a possibility to host your own server
> >with
> >> jetrix though.
> >>
> >> There could be trademark issues with the name/game also see
> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tetris_Company
> >>
> >> --
> >> Cheers Swedebugia
>
> Hi
> I agree with your remarks
> WP = wikipedia
>
> Given that there is no pgp signed tarball or even a checksum on that page, have you asked the maintainer about this and verified that you got the code unaltered?
> --
> Sent from my k-9 mail for Android.
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#34523
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Wed, 27 Feb 2019 14:12:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #53 received at 34523 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
The Tetrinet maintainer added an SHA1 file: http://tetrinet.or.cz/download/tetrinet-0.11.tar.bz2.sha1
On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 07:10:46 +0000 (GMT), <pkill9 <at> runbox.com> wrote:
> > Given that there is no pgp signed tarball or even a checksum on that page, have you asked the maintainer about this and verified that you got the code unaltered?
>
> Ok I emailed the current maintainer according to that page asking to verify that I got the source code unaltered, and to maybe update the page with that info.
>
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 21:45:23 +0100, swedebugia <swedebugia <at> riseup.net> wrote:
>
> > pkill9 <at> runbox.com skrev: (26 februari 2019 16:20:28 CET)
> > >Hi Swedebugia,
> > >
> > >> having looked it up online I prefer the WP synopsis:
> > >> "TetriNET is a console multiplayer online Tetris game for up to six
> > >people."
> > >>
> > >> There is a gnome version also. We should state clearly that this is a
> > >> console/text-mode client.
> > >
> > >What does 'WP' mean?
> > >
> > >> As an aside I did not find a working server anywhere and the homepage
> > >of
> > >> the project is dead. There is a possibility to host your own server
> > >with
> > >> jetrix though.
> > >
> > >I played Tetrinet with someone over a server, but I can't remember what
> > >the address was.
> > >
> > >You can't access the homepage of the project? I can access
> > >http://tetrinet.or.cz fine. Or do you mean it hasn't been updated in
> > >ages?
> > >
> > >> There could be trademark issues with the name/game also see
> > >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tetris_Company
> > >
> > >Regarding the potential trademark issues, both FSF-approved distros
> > >Parabola and PureOS have Tetrinet in their repositories[1][2], so I
> > >think it would be acceptable to add it to Guix. And if a copyright
> > >claim is made in the future it can always be removed.
> > >
> > >[1] Tetrinet in Parabola - https://www.parabola.nu/packages/?q=tetrinet
> > >[2] Tetrinet in PureOS -
> > >https://software.pureos.net/search_pkg?term=tetrinet
> > >
> > >Thanks
> > >
> > >On Sat, 23 Feb 2019 07:23:43 +0100, swedebugia <swedebugia <at> riseup.net>
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 2019-02-23 10:26, swedebugia wrote:
> > >> > For the sake of making it easy to find when searching synopsies I
> > >> > suggest you add "game" to the end of yours.
> > >> > --
> > >> > Sent from my k-9 mail for Android.
> > >>
> > >> having looked it up online I prefer the WP synopsis:
> > >> "TetriNET is a console multiplayer online Tetris game for up to six
> > >people."
> > >>
> > >> There is a gnome version also. We should state clearly that this is a
> > >> console/text-mode client.
> > >>
> > >> As an aside I did not find a working server anywhere and the homepage
> > >of
> > >> the project is dead. There is a possibility to host your own server
> > >with
> > >> jetrix though.
> > >>
> > >> There could be trademark issues with the name/game also see
> > >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tetris_Company
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Cheers Swedebugia
> >
> > Hi
> > I agree with your remarks
> > WP = wikipedia
> >
> > Given that there is no pgp signed tarball or even a checksum on that page, have you asked the maintainer about this and verified that you got the code unaltered?
> > --
> > Sent from my k-9 mail for Android.
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#34523
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Thu, 28 Feb 2019 04:05:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #56 received at 34523 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
pkill9 <at> runbox.com skrev: (27 februari 2019 15:11:20 CET)
>The Tetrinet maintainer added an SHA1 file:
>http://tetrinet.or.cz/download/tetrinet-0.11.tar.bz2.sha1
>
>On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 07:10:46 +0000 (GMT), <pkill9 <at> runbox.com> wrote:
>
>> > Given that there is no pgp signed tarball or even a checksum on
>that page, have you asked the maintainer about this and verified that
>you got the code unaltered?
>>
>> Ok I emailed the current maintainer according to that page asking to
>verify that I got the source code unaltered, and to maybe update the
>page with that info.
>>
>> On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 21:45:23 +0100, swedebugia
><swedebugia <at> riseup.net> wrote:
>>
>> > pkill9 <at> runbox.com skrev: (26 februari 2019 16:20:28 CET)
>> > >Hi Swedebugia,
>> > >
>> > >> having looked it up online I prefer the WP synopsis:
>> > >> "TetriNET is a console multiplayer online Tetris game for up to
>six
>> > >people."
>> > >>
>> > >> There is a gnome version also. We should state clearly that this
>is a
>> > >> console/text-mode client.
>> > >
>> > >What does 'WP' mean?
>> > >
>> > >> As an aside I did not find a working server anywhere and the
>homepage
>> > >of
>> > >> the project is dead. There is a possibility to host your own
>server
>> > >with
>> > >> jetrix though.
>> > >
>> > >I played Tetrinet with someone over a server, but I can't remember
>what
>> > >the address was.
>> > >
>> > >You can't access the homepage of the project? I can access
>> > >http://tetrinet.or.cz fine. Or do you mean it hasn't been updated
>in
>> > >ages?
>> > >
>> > >> There could be trademark issues with the name/game also see
>> > >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tetris_Company
>> > >
>> > >Regarding the potential trademark issues, both FSF-approved
>distros
>> > >Parabola and PureOS have Tetrinet in their repositories[1][2], so
>I
>> > >think it would be acceptable to add it to Guix. And if a copyright
>> > >claim is made in the future it can always be removed.
>> > >
>> > >[1] Tetrinet in Parabola -
>https://www.parabola.nu/packages/?q=tetrinet
>> > >[2] Tetrinet in PureOS -
>> > >https://software.pureos.net/search_pkg?term=tetrinet
>> > >
>> > >Thanks
>> > >
>> > >On Sat, 23 Feb 2019 07:23:43 +0100, swedebugia
><swedebugia <at> riseup.net>
>> > >wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> On 2019-02-23 10:26, swedebugia wrote:
>> > >> > For the sake of making it easy to find when searching
>synopsies I
>> > >> > suggest you add "game" to the end of yours.
>> > >> > --
>> > >> > Sent from my k-9 mail for Android.
>> > >>
>> > >> having looked it up online I prefer the WP synopsis:
>> > >> "TetriNET is a console multiplayer online Tetris game for up to
>six
>> > >people."
>> > >>
>> > >> There is a gnome version also. We should state clearly that this
>is a
>> > >> console/text-mode client.
>> > >>
>> > >> As an aside I did not find a working server anywhere and the
>homepage
>> > >of
>> > >> the project is dead. There is a possibility to host your own
>server
>> > >with
>> > >> jetrix though.
>> > >>
>> > >> There could be trademark issues with the name/game also see
>> > >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tetris_Company
>> > >>
>> > >> --
>> > >> Cheers Swedebugia
>> >
>> > Hi
>> > I agree with your remarks
>> > WP = wikipedia
>> >
>> > Given that there is no pgp signed tarball or even a checksum on
>that page, have you asked the maintainer about this and verified that
>you got the code unaltered?
>> > --
>> > Sent from my k-9 mail for Android.
Good, did you point out that http is easy to spoof?
If they are serious about application and distribution security they really should enable https.
I had the same issue with another maintainer serving a hash over http. I asked him over email if my hash was correct. This is not perfect out of band but given most email providers post snowden now use starttls and enforce https it is better than nothing.
Assuming it is tainted is my default stance with http. I would rather not use it at all and would like a browser that drops it or issue a dire warning when encountered.
--
Sent from my k-9 mail for Android.
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#34523
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Sat, 02 Mar 2019 20:11:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #59 received at 34523 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
This was their reply:
```
Hi,
I'm not sure how it confirms its validity further :), but it's:
2fb2bfcfe1fc2af82b01b66e2b28a77ad1262c17
The last release of tetrinet was about 15 years ago, this is a purely
legacy archive - I haven't considered adding an https certificate, sorry.
```
On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 05:03:50 +0100, swedebugia <swedebugia <at> riseup.net> wrote:
> pkill9 <at> runbox.com skrev: (27 februari 2019 15:11:20 CET)
> >The Tetrinet maintainer added an SHA1 file:
> >http://tetrinet.or.cz/download/tetrinet-0.11.tar.bz2.sha1
> >
> >On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 07:10:46 +0000 (GMT), <pkill9 <at> runbox.com> wrote:
> >
> >> > Given that there is no pgp signed tarball or even a checksum on
> >that page, have you asked the maintainer about this and verified that
> >you got the code unaltered?
> >>
> >> Ok I emailed the current maintainer according to that page asking to
> >verify that I got the source code unaltered, and to maybe update the
> >page with that info.
> >>
> >> On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 21:45:23 +0100, swedebugia
> ><swedebugia <at> riseup.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> > pkill9 <at> runbox.com skrev: (26 februari 2019 16:20:28 CET)
> >> > >Hi Swedebugia,
> >> > >
> >> > >> having looked it up online I prefer the WP synopsis:
> >> > >> "TetriNET is a console multiplayer online Tetris game for up to
> >six
> >> > >people."
> >> > >>
> >> > >> There is a gnome version also. We should state clearly that this
> >is a
> >> > >> console/text-mode client.
> >> > >
> >> > >What does 'WP' mean?
> >> > >
> >> > >> As an aside I did not find a working server anywhere and the
> >homepage
> >> > >of
> >> > >> the project is dead. There is a possibility to host your own
> >server
> >> > >with
> >> > >> jetrix though.
> >> > >
> >> > >I played Tetrinet with someone over a server, but I can't remember
> >what
> >> > >the address was.
> >> > >
> >> > >You can't access the homepage of the project? I can access
> >> > >http://tetrinet.or.cz fine. Or do you mean it hasn't been updated
> >in
> >> > >ages?
> >> > >
> >> > >> There could be trademark issues with the name/game also see
> >> > >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tetris_Company
> >> > >
> >> > >Regarding the potential trademark issues, both FSF-approved
> >distros
> >> > >Parabola and PureOS have Tetrinet in their repositories[1][2], so
> >I
> >> > >think it would be acceptable to add it to Guix. And if a copyright
> >> > >claim is made in the future it can always be removed.
> >> > >
> >> > >[1] Tetrinet in Parabola -
> >https://www.parabola.nu/packages/?q=tetrinet
> >> > >[2] Tetrinet in PureOS -
> >> > >https://software.pureos.net/search_pkg?term=tetrinet
> >> > >
> >> > >Thanks
> >> > >
> >> > >On Sat, 23 Feb 2019 07:23:43 +0100, swedebugia
> ><swedebugia <at> riseup.net>
> >> > >wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> On 2019-02-23 10:26, swedebugia wrote:
> >> > >> > For the sake of making it easy to find when searching
> >synopsies I
> >> > >> > suggest you add "game" to the end of yours.
> >> > >> > --
> >> > >> > Sent from my k-9 mail for Android.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> having looked it up online I prefer the WP synopsis:
> >> > >> "TetriNET is a console multiplayer online Tetris game for up to
> >six
> >> > >people."
> >> > >>
> >> > >> There is a gnome version also. We should state clearly that this
> >is a
> >> > >> console/text-mode client.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> As an aside I did not find a working server anywhere and the
> >homepage
> >> > >of
> >> > >> the project is dead. There is a possibility to host your own
> >server
> >> > >with
> >> > >> jetrix though.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> There could be trademark issues with the name/game also see
> >> > >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tetris_Company
> >> > >>
> >> > >> --
> >> > >> Cheers Swedebugia
> >> >
> >> > Hi
> >> > I agree with your remarks
> >> > WP = wikipedia
> >> >
> >> > Given that there is no pgp signed tarball or even a checksum on
> >that page, have you asked the maintainer about this and verified that
> >you got the code unaltered?
> >> > --
> >> > Sent from my k-9 mail for Android.
>
> Good, did you point out that http is easy to spoof?
>
> If they are serious about application and distribution security they really should enable https.
>
> I had the same issue with another maintainer serving a hash over http. I asked him over email if my hash was correct. This is not perfect out of band but given most email providers post snowden now use starttls and enforce https it is better than nothing.
>
> Assuming it is tainted is my default stance with http. I would rather not use it at all and would like a browser that drops it or issue a dire warning when encountered.
> --
> Sent from my k-9 mail for Android.
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#34523
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Sun, 31 Mar 2019 11:45:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #62 received at 34523 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
So I looked at the PureOS page for Tetrinet (https://software.pureos.net/package/source/landing/tetrinet) and the "VCS browser" links to a git repository for Tetrinet which is served via https: https://repo.or.cz/tetrinet.git, this is linked to on the frontpage of http://tetrinet.or.cz (a link to the README) file, so I'll change the source to use this instead.
On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 05:03:50 +0100, swedebugia <swedebugia <at> riseup.net> wrote:
> pkill9 <at> runbox.com skrev: (27 februari 2019 15:11:20 CET)
> >The Tetrinet maintainer added an SHA1 file:
> >http://tetrinet.or.cz/download/tetrinet-0.11.tar.bz2.sha1
> >
> >On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 07:10:46 +0000 (GMT), <pkill9 <at> runbox.com> wrote:
> >
> >> > Given that there is no pgp signed tarball or even a checksum on
> >that page, have you asked the maintainer about this and verified that
> >you got the code unaltered?
> >>
> >> Ok I emailed the current maintainer according to that page asking to
> >verify that I got the source code unaltered, and to maybe update the
> >page with that info.
> >>
> >> On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 21:45:23 +0100, swedebugia
> ><swedebugia <at> riseup.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> > pkill9 <at> runbox.com skrev: (26 februari 2019 16:20:28 CET)
> >> > >Hi Swedebugia,
> >> > >
> >> > >> having looked it up online I prefer the WP synopsis:
> >> > >> "TetriNET is a console multiplayer online Tetris game for up to
> >six
> >> > >people."
> >> > >>
> >> > >> There is a gnome version also. We should state clearly that this
> >is a
> >> > >> console/text-mode client.
> >> > >
> >> > >What does 'WP' mean?
> >> > >
> >> > >> As an aside I did not find a working server anywhere and the
> >homepage
> >> > >of
> >> > >> the project is dead. There is a possibility to host your own
> >server
> >> > >with
> >> > >> jetrix though.
> >> > >
> >> > >I played Tetrinet with someone over a server, but I can't remember
> >what
> >> > >the address was.
> >> > >
> >> > >You can't access the homepage of the project? I can access
> >> > >http://tetrinet.or.cz fine. Or do you mean it hasn't been updated
> >in
> >> > >ages?
> >> > >
> >> > >> There could be trademark issues with the name/game also see
> >> > >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tetris_Company
> >> > >
> >> > >Regarding the potential trademark issues, both FSF-approved
> >distros
> >> > >Parabola and PureOS have Tetrinet in their repositories[1][2], so
> >I
> >> > >think it would be acceptable to add it to Guix. And if a copyright
> >> > >claim is made in the future it can always be removed.
> >> > >
> >> > >[1] Tetrinet in Parabola -
> >https://www.parabola.nu/packages/?q=tetrinet
> >> > >[2] Tetrinet in PureOS -
> >> > >https://software.pureos.net/search_pkg?term=tetrinet
> >> > >
> >> > >Thanks
> >> > >
> >> > >On Sat, 23 Feb 2019 07:23:43 +0100, swedebugia
> ><swedebugia <at> riseup.net>
> >> > >wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> On 2019-02-23 10:26, swedebugia wrote:
> >> > >> > For the sake of making it easy to find when searching
> >synopsies I
> >> > >> > suggest you add "game" to the end of yours.
> >> > >> > --
> >> > >> > Sent from my k-9 mail for Android.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> having looked it up online I prefer the WP synopsis:
> >> > >> "TetriNET is a console multiplayer online Tetris game for up to
> >six
> >> > >people."
> >> > >>
> >> > >> There is a gnome version also. We should state clearly that this
> >is a
> >> > >> console/text-mode client.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> As an aside I did not find a working server anywhere and the
> >homepage
> >> > >of
> >> > >> the project is dead. There is a possibility to host your own
> >server
> >> > >with
> >> > >> jetrix though.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> There could be trademark issues with the name/game also see
> >> > >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tetris_Company
> >> > >>
> >> > >> --
> >> > >> Cheers Swedebugia
> >> >
> >> > Hi
> >> > I agree with your remarks
> >> > WP = wikipedia
> >> >
> >> > Given that there is no pgp signed tarball or even a checksum on
> >that page, have you asked the maintainer about this and verified that
> >you got the code unaltered?
> >> > --
> >> > Sent from my k-9 mail for Android.
>
> Good, did you point out that http is easy to spoof?
>
> If they are serious about application and distribution security they really should enable https.
>
> I had the same issue with another maintainer serving a hash over http. I asked him over email if my hash was correct. This is not perfect out of band but given most email providers post snowden now use starttls and enforce https it is better than nothing.
>
> Assuming it is tainted is my default stance with http. I would rather not use it at all and would like a browser that drops it or issue a dire warning when encountered.
> --
> Sent from my k-9 mail for Android.
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#34523
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Wed, 10 Apr 2019 13:08:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #65 received at 34523 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
I've attached a patch with an updated source url pointing to the git repository which is served via https.
[0001-gnu-Add-tetrinet.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#34523
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Sun, 30 Jun 2019 09:34:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #68 received at 34523 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 14:07:16 +0100 (BST), <pkill9 <at> runbox.com> wrote:
> I've attached a patch with an updated source url pointing to the git repository which is served via https.
Since this patch no longer applies, I have attached an updated patch that applies to the guix repository.
[0001-gnu-Add-tetrinet.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
Reply sent
to
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Fri, 06 Aug 2021 03:21:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
<pkill9 <at> runbox.com>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Fri, 06 Aug 2021 03:21:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #73 received at 34523-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello,
<pkill9 <at> runbox.com> writes:
> I've attached an updated patch with the modifications suggested so far:
>
> - Changed license from expat to public-domain
> - Changed "No tests" to lowercase "no tests"
> - Added "no configure file" comment
> - Install Readme files
>
> I indent the package definition in emacs by marking the package
> definition (CTRL+Space) and running `M-x indent-region`, I'm not sure
> what indentation was wrong with the original patch I submitted, but I
> ran indent-region on it again anyway.
[...]
Applied as commit f8f096d1e8f930ebeecd98125b9c03d97b3c7f65, with some
small adjustments.
Thank you!
Maxim
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Fri, 03 Sep 2021 11:24:06 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 207 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.