GNU bug report logs -
#34626
pack: Construct inferior package names correctly.
Previous Next
Reported by: Shyam <shyam <at> sykloid.org>
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2019 05:24:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 34626 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 34626 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#34626
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Sat, 23 Feb 2019 05:24:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Shyam <shyam <at> sykloid.org>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
.
(Sat, 23 Feb 2019 05:24:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hello everyone,
This patch fixes a bug where inferior packages' names were not being
constructed correctly when calling `guix pack --relocatable`.
Cheers,
Shyam
[0001-pack-Construct-inferior-package-names-correctly.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
Reply sent
to
Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Fri, 15 Mar 2019 22:27:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Shyam <shyam <at> sykloid.org>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Fri, 15 Mar 2019 22:27:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #10 received at 34626-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hello,
Shyam <shyam <at> sykloid.org> skribis:
> This patch fixes a bug where inferior packages' names were not being
> constructed correctly when calling `guix pack --relocatable`.
Good catch!
>>From dd2171ce0d074cb6003afdaec353df572ed784a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: "P.C. Shyamshankar" <shyam <at> sykloid.org>
> Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 22:38:47 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] pack: Construct inferior package names correctly.
>
> * guix/scripts/pack.scm: 'wrapped-package' now correctly constructs full
> names of inferior packages, allowing relocatable packs.
Applied with the minor change below.
Thank you, and sorry for the delay!
Ludo’.
[Message part 2 (text/x-patch, inline)]
diff --git a/guix/scripts/pack.scm b/guix/scripts/pack.scm
index e40c2085f7..17a166d9d7 100644
--- a/guix/scripts/pack.scm
+++ b/guix/scripts/pack.scm
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
#:use-module (guix store)
#:use-module ((guix status) #:select (with-status-verbosity))
#:use-module (guix grafts)
- #:use-module (guix inferior)
+ #:autoload (guix inferior) (inferior-package?)
#:use-module (guix monads)
#:use-module (guix modules)
#:use-module (guix packages)
@@ -593,7 +593,8 @@ please email '~a'~%")
((inferior-package? package)
(string-append (inferior-package-name package)
"-"
- (inferior-package-version package))))
+ (inferior-package-version package)))
+ (else "wrapper"))
"R")
build))
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Sat, 13 Apr 2019 11:24:04 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 5 years and 12 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.