GNU bug report logs - #34857
gnunet updates (gnunet,gnunet-gtk,gnurl,libextractor)

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 34857 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 34857 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ng0 <at> n0.is
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: gnunet updates (gnunet,gnunet-gtk,gnurl,libextractor)
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 14:19:58 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi,

here are 5 patches.

1 + 2: in retrospective and experience this makes sense.
3: libextractor
4: gnurl
5: gnunet + gnunet-gtk

Caveat at 5: This is the absolute base of an update.
             I can't invest more time for Guix at the
             the moment but I can help with answering
             questions of the person who'll finish this
             patch:
             gnunet-gtk doesn't find gnunet, can't link
             against it.
             gnunet does not pick up on the @PYTHON@
             for python3.7 which should be replaced
             at build time, which happens in every
             other system I tested.
             gnunet doesn't run its tests but they
             should work now. Note that if tests
             fail on guix or guixsd, you should report
             them to us, we've started to fix what we
             can fix for certain systems.

Cheers!
ng0

[0001-mailmap-Adjustment-my-nick.patch (text/plain, attachment)]

[0002-Revert-name-changes-for-ng0.patch (text/plain, attachment)]

[0003-gnu-libextractor-Update-to-1.9.patch (text/plain, attachment)]

[0004-gnu-gnurl-Update-to-7.64.0.patch (text/plain, attachment)]

[0005-gnu-gnunet-Update-to-0.11.0.patch (text/plain, attachment)]

Message #8 received at 34857 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
To: 34857 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: gnunet updates (gnunet,gnunet-gtk,gnurl,libextractor)
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 15:08:19 +0100

ng0,

I've pushed the first three patches (squashed into two) as 
47956fa0c24efcdcba3493f0231c30e9a39ec7df and 
a3f2c295e7f8719dc47d5757b89188e0ed68faf2.

Kind regards,

T G-R

Message #11 received at 34857 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ng0 <at> n0.is
To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
Cc: 34857 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#34857] gnunet updates (gnunet, gnunet-gtk, gnurl,
 libextractor)
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 11:21:36 +0000

Tobias Geerinckx-Rice transcribed 180 bytes:
> ng0,
> 
> I've pushed the first three patches (squashed into two) as
> 47956fa0c24efcdcba3493f0231c30e9a39ec7df and
> a3f2c295e7f8719dc47d5757b89188e0ed68faf2.
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> T G-R

Thanks!

is there a problem with the libgnurl patch?
It's also independent fro mthe last patch.

Next time I'll open independent ticketids for them again.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.