Received: (at 35147) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 May 2022 21:25:17 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 19 17:25:17 2022 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36730 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1nrne1-0005Zc-17 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 19 May 2022 17:25:17 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f44.google.com ([209.85.221.44]:44940) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>) id 1nrndu-0005Yg-Qv for 35147 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 19 May 2022 17:25:11 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f44.google.com with SMTP id h5so7756006wrb.11 for <35147 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 19 May 2022 14:25:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=+os3Uf+SaoXXtpng8Segs9eRpmmj1cQhfvJWXwo3pSM=; b=LS5WdOML5dYjsObkUSP1CtWt60P0E0+uCcqavHcETnmwslX2ufWsqfX2inF0fBICcl ELRAi7/Vwz8KjcPPIwVmHXeudy6cuyUET5ZPpnz2MYCpdt1joIUuqZnEyeGHn/wxn088 TarOPJsCSkGIFVw7QupOZhIUQzdZZo1PYwM8k2ZWzNhrBoza1iSaUk5K4UJaG5lmwqWz KNFWquMcsWspwcxraCaCHigCbstJXSyf4NQWg440v8yzct4S8fYd+N7kMuUoMSJafiT7 zUW8E3uohUnJQCOJs0qRm7iciKXp7Hvr21u/M9tKy+o2iOv5JO8PyeNX05RlcnrXV1lX utXg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=+os3Uf+SaoXXtpng8Segs9eRpmmj1cQhfvJWXwo3pSM=; b=Q8DGWLNZBQzzsWprnMiinhP/66ImU7IIEXWYY1k6MPzw57NjN7HSUi2/LB8n9BzMth 0bahm1Bpkd2WTsLwN3LgTifkGq0hpTUnmXELlicn6ohkRl23tOvhkeKwgn9BnqXFnT7/ CbwNTJZq428eP5F6IkAyyGUE27szwGjc8Y644/d/q4xfAeajj+RadYjqQ/yBDE5DrPPP Wq4uBbL2JKsT8YwzTsWbAAnE+9Q+JBVGXyJtpNd5khM8tRN1yCICWfq3Kh0aFpOYujRc 5RcmZOhZp+QtFDS8ehqJldA4R/zp/SdXIbVOlgAsSUcVEdip/LXZYbiLWLcO+Kfih+gT JGSQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Qtuas0+F5/rkun/ypQcKJWIfrxwm7vUvrG9Ty6ROIkShSr4Ht ANNv+WhpIvrQJaYkZOtVCEV3KsTsxNI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJycuI0F4fLrlA+cRTcxLeLO3QBDBP/FbxDE2Ao9HOuir569UZxzhfMTfHsopdwsugeXwmXDXw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:fb04:0:b0:20c:dcbb:95bc with SMTP id c4-20020adffb04000000b0020cdcbb95bcmr5699706wrr.393.1652995505230; Thu, 19 May 2022 14:25:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lili ([146.0.30.100]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l24-20020adfa398000000b0020e60baffd1sm576605wrb.52.2022.05.19.14.25.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 19 May 2022 14:25:04 -0700 (PDT) From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> To: Pierre Neidhardt <mail@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#35147: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add apsl2.0. References: <20190404164814.26096-1-mail@HIDDEN> <handler.35147.B.155439651118672.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org> <87pnq1n1xb.fsf@HIDDEN> <86a6cx2h5g.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 23:24:23 +0200 In-Reply-To: <86a6cx2h5g.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> (zimoun's message of "Thu, 07 Apr 2022 14:48:43 +0200") Message-ID: <86ee0p8bco.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 1.6 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, On Thu, 07 Apr 2022 at 14:48, zimoun wrote: > On Thu, 04 Apr 2019 at 18:57, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > This old submission [1] is not merged yet. > > 1: <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/35147> > Content analysis details: (1.6 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.221.44 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (zimon.toutoune[at]gmail.com) 1.6 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.221.44 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35147 Cc: 35147 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/) Hi, On Thu, 07 Apr 2022 at 14:48, zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> wrote: > On Thu, 04 Apr 2019 at 18:57, Pierre Neidhardt <mail@HIDDEN> wrote: > This old submission [1] is not merged yet. > > 1: <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/35147> > > Do we drop this submission? If not, what is missing for merging it? I am proposing to drop this submission if no objection. Cheers, simon
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#35147; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 35147) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Apr 2022 12:49:32 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Apr 07 08:49:32 2022 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60146 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1ncRZs-00085t-J5 for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2022 08:49:32 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f51.google.com ([209.85.128.51]:35501) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN>) id 1ncRZn-00085S-Uf for 35147 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2022 08:49:31 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f51.google.com with SMTP id c190-20020a1c35c7000000b0038e37907b5bso5636609wma.0 for <35147 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 07 Apr 2022 05:49:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=CEh07qr01OFbUONVMRfNF3sAGN3OtHG/qKv6mdfctQk=; b=Pz/hs7S5/qPZHaJOV94nNPBN3fTsOokVG5EkvQ7HN7QUVmZN/wA5mN8OgcHpm6lMbb G1JAHsv5reWxKy6N6ZI9EdZ7BubG6OsWl8ed3IONBZG41l5/4s2uKv4PFWnTPaBOX6Ei IWB8OpjpnJkdhYHAYqqdNo2gRoOXNZvZWaFzdmTuG58S2ah7RtDM1D1IYf0vFtzEd+Ia EzChGUkIRNABpH3h+KBYtxCUDxI0MxPq4eASiRhJTuKN59cE5/VNP343RhM9mFafUDq+ byNLmSp1i3Lqigsm78Mzafde6Cez42N6yejG7aFzXpSBnwj6McE+WtZ2sHSYshGqD9ew iIgg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=CEh07qr01OFbUONVMRfNF3sAGN3OtHG/qKv6mdfctQk=; b=ehI3W4cQjJ7aguEiMxG3wjlnMIRGvAH+dKvOG+6qs9hqeG2z32g2qCS74YX0vGe+7T L7Gs/F/08lUANcj8LiTP3yJbzxOe84fPHR4o3P+nW6YE0SSI6ojtAXMO+eNmJDilN8jd Ix+N3azUaZQqo6Km/fMsCQsgDEoJl3whMdTgxFwDUkqL3vcDbdn4Aj6jkXpK8q2CINAu JLKDLcIGwIYxvRorgeM9VgN4KTQKt+pSAvq5SuHfXA6yrJq1agf1HItKkUnkhVFyWZWN 4vG6KD6TTzErTgHsOPt4Bu/YDTVWrGkiqaSYPVB0FPzbA+n6Usjke3jpI1lRWCToqVYd R1Gg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533f0PC1OFdFASd443OpVPPpDYIrPcjeG1Xg0oUWb0D3paUbgf3+ hIwctiVIAtQhKFU0oCVrTY5lcCK7m+0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJySSb9p4o0F8keq/oSrTFFXvKlTxf1Hv8iaMfauIPAJTH/zzQCe4MRUD3J9EuRoMBC3ai7C4A== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:35cc:b0:38c:6d25:f4ad with SMTP id r12-20020a05600c35cc00b0038c6d25f4admr12051349wmq.127.1649335761995; Thu, 07 Apr 2022 05:49:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 14-20020a056000154e00b00203f8adde0csm21204686wry.32.2022.04.07.05.49.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 07 Apr 2022 05:49:21 -0700 (PDT) From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@HIDDEN> To: Pierre Neidhardt <mail@HIDDEN> Subject: Re: bug#35147: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add apsl2.0. References: <20190404164814.26096-1-mail@HIDDEN> <handler.35147.B.155439651118672.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org> <87pnq1n1xb.fsf@HIDDEN> Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2022 14:48:43 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87pnq1n1xb.fsf@HIDDEN> (Pierre Neidhardt's message of "Thu, 04 Apr 2019 18:57:36 +0200") Message-ID: <86a6cx2h5g.fsf_-_@HIDDEN> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 1.6 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, This old submission [1] is not merged yet. 1: <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/35147> Content analysis details: (1.6 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.128.51 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.128.51 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR SPF: test of HELO record failed (temperror) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (zimon.toutoune[at]gmail.com) 1.6 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)] -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35147 Cc: 35147 <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/) Hi, This old submission [1] is not merged yet. 1: <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/35147> On Thu, 04 Apr 2019 at 18:57, Pierre Neidhardt <mail@HIDDEN> wrote: > I've got a weird issue with the Makefile: > > CFLAGS += -I$(PWD)/include -DDEBUG_BUILD=0 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D LINUX=1 -D BSD=1 -D VERSION=\"$(VERSION)\" > > PWD is expanded to the parent directory of the current directory (what > the hell?!?), I had to force it to the current directory for it to > work. Any clue what's going on? Is it the blocker? > It seems to work beside I miss how it can work beside that. What is the next step? Especially about the addition of the Apple license to the guix/licenses.scm file. Do we drop this submission? If not, what is missing for merging it? Cheers, simon
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#35147; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.Received: (at 35147) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Apr 2019 16:57:42 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Apr 04 12:57:42 2019 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44635 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hC5gL-00054q-Qs for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Apr 2019 12:57:42 -0400 Received: from relay1-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.193]:42905) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <mail@HIDDEN>) id 1hC5gK-00054h-5T for 35147 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Apr 2019 12:57:40 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 92.169.116.19 Received: from bababa (lfbn-1-4117-19.w92-169.abo.wanadoo.fr [92.169.116.19]) (Authenticated sender: pierre@HIDDEN) by relay1-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 916FF240011 for <35147 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 16:57:36 +0000 (UTC) From: Pierre Neidhardt <mail@HIDDEN> To: 35147 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#35147: Acknowledgement ([PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add apsl2.0.) In-Reply-To: <handler.35147.B.155439651118672.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org> References: <20190404164814.26096-1-mail@HIDDEN> <handler.35147.B.155439651118672.ack <at> debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2019 18:57:36 +0200 Message-ID: <87pnq1n1xb.fsf@HIDDEN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35147 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I've got a weird issue with the Makefile: =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- CFLAGS +=3D -I$(PWD)/include -DDEBUG_BUILD=3D0 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=3D64 -D = LINUX=3D1 -D BSD=3D1 -D VERSION=3D\"$(VERSION)\" =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- PWD is expanded to the parent directory of the current directory (what the hell?!?), I had to force it to the current directory for it to work. Any clue what's going on? It seems to work beside that. =2D-=20 Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAlymN4AACgkQm9z0l6S7 zH+5Xwf6A3PBkAyCMSyZMb4C+H1OPiSEw6ESAt5bQv9amuwQ9p9gVKjfQE0tNGnO aPTdM/15B/DAa7c3ftGJpFu4Wy6Vc8zFBN6h/8/mW9G4Rq1kY0T5PPXwHHkav+lZ SXyGb4r1JVZ3sTysNDCREiM/AJJXUZdNla8AGjPxtMhTvhHph/iOuxXnVuMPzeyX qn/Zcr9fN680/LCtgvt34j+sGop9XvP3vviR7OLDpfT6GAoDs5uK6ZliV9+laoTh GE+604ItGeO6xcNvhFKXSLXi5gm3/RfokpicMgNtUI+tGs3/elYK42mt/8HcLzs6 uB1NxaBGvNrRic9qYM8YXUGwxkTJSw== =436v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#35147; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at 35147) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Apr 2019 16:50:03 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Apr 04 12:50:03 2019
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44625 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1hC5Yt-0004tT-7W
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Apr 2019 12:50:03 -0400
Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.197]:55231)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <mail@HIDDEN>) id 1hC5Yq-0004tJ-H7
for 35147 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Apr 2019 12:49:57 -0400
X-Originating-IP: 92.169.116.19
Received: from localhost.localdomain (lfbn-1-4117-19.w92-169.abo.wanadoo.fr
[92.169.116.19]) (Authenticated sender: mail@HIDDEN)
by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6A4BB1C0002
for <35147 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 16:49:55 +0000 (UTC)
From: Pierre Neidhardt <mail@HIDDEN>
To: 35147 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add hfsprogs.
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 18:49:54 +0200
Message-Id: <20190404164954.26854-1-mail@HIDDEN>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35147
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)
* gnu/packages/linux.scm (hfsprogs): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/linux.scm | 54 +++++++
.../patches/hfsplus-tools-no-blocks.patch | 147 ++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 201 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 gnu/packages/patches/hfsplus-tools-no-blocks.patch
diff --git a/gnu/packages/linux.scm b/gnu/packages/linux.scm
index 06bf8095be..dcc9e946a2 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/linux.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/linux.scm
@@ -80,8 +80,10 @@
#:use-module (gnu packages gnuzilla)
#:use-module (gnu packages gperf)
#:use-module (gnu packages gtk)
+ #:use-module (gnu packages libbsd)
#:use-module (gnu packages libunwind)
#:use-module (gnu packages libusb)
+ #:use-module (gnu packages llvm)
#:use-module (gnu packages man)
#:use-module (gnu packages maths)
#:use-module (gnu packages multiprecision)
@@ -5329,3 +5331,55 @@ have to construct the archives directly, without using the archiver.")
(description "inputattach dispatches input events from several device
types and interfaces and translates so that the X server can use them.")
(license license:gpl2+)))
+
+(define-public hfsprogs
+ (package
+ (name "hfsprogs")
+ (version "540.1")
+ (source (origin
+ (method url-fetch)
+ (uri (string-append
+ ;; The tarball from
+ ;; https://opensource.apple.com/tarballs/diskdev_cmds/
+ ;; does not contain any Makefile.
+ "http://cavan.codon.org.uk/~mjg59/diskdev_cmds/diskdev_cmds-"
+ version ".linux3.tar.gz"))
+ (sha256
+ (base32
+ "15sl9z1dafykj3b249z6a82p74ljqpgkvh97l0vbz8zrjwx206xh"))
+ ;; The patch cleans up the Makefile so we don't need clang, among others.
+ (patches (search-patches "hfsplus-tools-no-blocks.patch"))))
+ (build-system gnu-build-system)
+ (arguments
+ `(#:tests? #f ; No tests.
+ #:phases
+ (modify-phases %standard-phases
+ (delete 'configure)
+ (replace 'build
+ (lambda _
+ ;; FIXME: Weirdly enough, PWD points to the parent directory when
+ ;; expanded in the CFLAGS, which leads the build to fail with
+ ;; "missing.h" not found.
+ (invoke "make" "CC=gcc"
+ (string-append "PWD=" (getcwd)))))
+ (replace 'install
+ (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
+ (let* ((out (assoc-ref outputs "out"))
+ (bin (string-append out "/bin/"))
+ (doc (string-append out "/share/man/man8")))
+ (mkdir-p bin)
+ (copy-file "newfs_hfs.tproj/newfs_hfs" (string-append bin "/mkfs.hfsplus"))
+ (copy-file "fsck_hfs.tproj/fsck_hfs" (string-append bin "/fsck.hfsplus"))
+ (mkdir-p doc)
+ (copy-file "newfs_hfs.tproj/newfs_hfs.8" (string-append doc "/mkfs.hfsplus.8"))
+ (copy-file "fsck_hfs.tproj/fsck_hfs.8" (string-append doc "/fsck.hfsplus.8"))))))))
+ (inputs
+ `(("openssl" ,openssl)))
+ (native-inputs
+ `(("libbsd" ,libbsd)
+ ("util-linux" ,util-linux)))
+ (home-page "https://opensource.apple.com/")
+ (synopsis "HFS/HFS+ file system tools")
+ (description "This package provides user space tools to create and check
+Apple HFS/HFS+ filesystems.")
+ (license license:apsl2.0)))
diff --git a/gnu/packages/patches/hfsplus-tools-no-blocks.patch b/gnu/packages/patches/hfsplus-tools-no-blocks.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..2017055744
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gnu/packages/patches/hfsplus-tools-no-blocks.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
+diff -up diskdev_cmds-540.1.linux3/fsck_hfs.tproj/dfalib/SControl.c.jx diskdev_cmds-540.1.linux3/fsck_hfs.tproj/dfalib/SControl.c
+--- diskdev_cmds-540.1.linux3/fsck_hfs.tproj/dfalib/SControl.c.jx 2012-02-02 17:16:56.000000000 -0500
++++ diskdev_cmds-540.1.linux3/fsck_hfs.tproj/dfalib/SControl.c 2014-06-18 13:01:42.716781467 -0400
+@@ -200,6 +200,22 @@ isMinorError(int msg, int *counts)
+ }
+ }
+
++static int *msgCounts = NULL;
++static jmp_buf envBuf;
++
++static fsck_block_status_t
++fsckAfterCallback(fsck_ctx_t c, int msgNum, va_list args)
++{
++ if (abs(msgNum) > E_FirstError && abs(msgNum) < E_LastError) {
++ if (isMinorError(abs(msgNum), msgCounts) == 1)
++ return fsckBlockContinue;
++ longjmp(envBuf, 1);
++ return fsckBlockAbort;
++ } else {
++ return fsckBlockContinue;
++ }
++}
++
+ /*------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+ External
+@@ -207,7 +223,6 @@ External
+
+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
+
+-static jmp_buf envBuf;
+ int
+ CheckHFS( const char *rdevnode, int fsReadRef, int fsWriteRef, int checkLevel,
+ int repairLevel, fsck_ctx_t fsckContext, int lostAndFoundMode,
+@@ -222,7 +237,6 @@ CheckHFS( const char *rdevnode, int fsRe
+ int isJournaled = 0;
+ Boolean autoRepair;
+ Boolean exitEarly = 0;
+- __block int *msgCounts = NULL;
+ Boolean majorErrors = 0;
+
+ if (checkLevel == kMajorCheck) {
+@@ -292,16 +306,7 @@ CheckHFS( const char *rdevnode, int fsRe
+ * the message in question corresponds to a major or a minor error. If it's
+ * major, we longjmp just above, which causes us to exit out early.
+ */
+- fsckSetBlock(fsckContext, fsckPhaseAfterMessage, (fsckBlock_t) ^(fsck_ctx_t c, int msgNum, va_list args) {
+- if (abs(msgNum) > E_FirstError && abs(msgNum) < E_LastError) {
+- if (isMinorError(abs(msgNum), msgCounts) == 1)
+- return fsckBlockContinue;
+- longjmp(envBuf, 1);
+- return fsckBlockAbort;
+- } else {
+- return fsckBlockContinue;
+- }
+- });
++ fsckSetBlock(fsckContext, fsckPhaseAfterMessage, fsckAfterCallback);
+ }
+ }
+ DoAgain:
+diff -up diskdev_cmds-540.1.linux3/fsck_hfs.tproj/fsck_messages.c.jx diskdev_cmds-540.1.linux3/fsck_hfs.tproj/fsck_messages.c
+--- diskdev_cmds-540.1.linux3/fsck_hfs.tproj/fsck_messages.c.jx 2012-02-02 17:42:58.000000000 -0500
++++ diskdev_cmds-540.1.linux3/fsck_hfs.tproj/fsck_messages.c 2014-06-18 12:57:01.110952333 -0400
+@@ -29,7 +29,6 @@
+ #include <stdarg.h>
+ #include <string.h>
+ #include <assert.h>
+-#include <Block.h>
+
+ #include "fsck_messages.h"
+ #include "fsck_keys.h"
+@@ -287,20 +286,10 @@ fsckSetBlock(fsck_ctx_t c, fsck_block_ph
+ if (c != NULL) {
+ switch (phase) {
+ case fsckPhaseBeforeMessage:
+- if (ctx->preMessage) {
+- Block_release(ctx->preMessage);
+- ctx->preMessage = NULL;
+- }
+- if (bp)
+- ctx->preMessage = (fsckBlock_t)Block_copy(bp);
++ ctx->preMessage = bp;
+ break;
+ case fsckPhaseAfterMessage:
+- if (ctx->postMessage) {
+- Block_release(ctx->postMessage);
+- ctx->postMessage = NULL;
+- }
+- if (bp)
+- ctx->postMessage = (fsckBlock_t)Block_copy(bp);
++ ctx->postMessage = bp;
+ break;
+ case fsckPhaseNone:
+ /* Just here for compiler warnings */
+@@ -591,12 +580,6 @@ fsckDestroy(fsck_ctx_t c)
+ if (ctx->flags & cfFromFD) {
+ fclose(ctx->fp);
+ }
+- if (ctx->preMessage) {
+- Block_release(ctx->preMessage);
+- }
+- if (ctx->postMessage) {
+- Block_release(ctx->postMessage);
+- }
+
+ free(ctx);
+ return;
+diff -up diskdev_cmds-540.1.linux3/fsck_hfs.tproj/fsck_messages.h.jx diskdev_cmds-540.1.linux3/fsck_hfs.tproj/fsck_messages.h
+--- diskdev_cmds-540.1.linux3/fsck_hfs.tproj/fsck_messages.h.jx 2012-02-02 17:54:40.000000000 -0500
++++ diskdev_cmds-540.1.linux3/fsck_hfs.tproj/fsck_messages.h 2014-06-18 12:31:48.602094998 -0400
+@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ typedef enum fsck_block_phase_type fsck_
+ * the third is a va_list of the arguments for the message.
+ */
+
+-typedef fsck_block_status_t (^fsckBlock_t)(fsck_ctx_t, int, va_list);
++typedef fsck_block_status_t (*fsckBlock_t)(fsck_ctx_t, int, va_list);
+
+ extern fsckBlock_t fsckGetBlock(fsck_ctx_t, fsck_block_phase_t);
+ extern void fsckSetBlock(fsck_ctx_t, fsck_block_phase_t, fsckBlock_t);
+diff -up diskdev_cmds-540.1.linux3/fsck_hfs.tproj/Makefile.lnx.jx diskdev_cmds-540.1.linux3/fsck_hfs.tproj/Makefile.lnx
+--- diskdev_cmds-540.1.linux3/fsck_hfs.tproj/Makefile.lnx.jx 2012-02-03 11:25:21.000000000 -0500
++++ diskdev_cmds-540.1.linux3/fsck_hfs.tproj/Makefile.lnx 2014-06-18 12:52:03.146015370 -0400
+@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ OFILES = $(CFILES:.c=.o)
+ all: fsck_hfs
+
+ fsck_hfs: $(OFILES) dfalib/libdfa.a
+- $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) $(OFILES) dfalib/libdfa.a -o fsck_hfs -lBlocksRunTime -lpthread
++ $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) $(OFILES) dfalib/libdfa.a -o fsck_hfs -lpthread
+
+ dfalib/libdfa.a: FORCE
+ $(MAKE) -C dfalib -f Makefile.lnx libdfa.a
+diff -up diskdev_cmds-540.1.linux3/Makefile.jx diskdev_cmds-540.1.linux3/Makefile
+--- diskdev_cmds-540.1.linux3/Makefile.jx 2012-02-16 15:00:18.000000000 -0500
++++ diskdev_cmds-540.1.linux3/Makefile 2014-06-18 12:42:59.015463500 -0400
+@@ -1,9 +1,8 @@
+ VERSION=540.1.linux3
+
+-CC := clang
+-CFLAGS := -g3 -Wall -fblocks -I$(PWD)/BlocksRunTime -I$(PWD)/include -DDEBUG_BUILD=0 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D LINUX=1 -D BSD=1 -D VERSION=\"$(VERSION)\"
+-LDFLAGS := -Wl,--build-id -L$(PWD)/BlocksRunTime
+-SUBDIRS := BlocksRunTime newfs_hfs.tproj fsck_hfs.tproj
++CFLAGS += -I$(PWD)/include -DDEBUG_BUILD=0 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D LINUX=1 -D BSD=1 -D VERSION=\"$(VERSION)\"
++LDFLAGS := -Wl,--build-id
++SUBDIRS := newfs_hfs.tproj fsck_hfs.tproj
+
+ all clean:
+ for d in $(SUBDIRS); do $(MAKE) -C $$d -f Makefile.lnx $@; done
--
2.21.0
guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#35147; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Apr 2019 16:48:31 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org Thu Apr 04 12:48:31 2019
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44620 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1hC5XS-0004r6-Cu
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Apr 2019 12:48:31 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34654)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <mail@HIDDEN>) id 1hC5XO-0004qs-Or
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Apr 2019 12:48:27 -0400
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:46691)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@HIDDEN>) id 1hC5XJ-0003AT-IE
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Apr 2019 12:48:21 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49023)
by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <mail@HIDDEN>) id 1hC5XI-0001Q6-Ey
for guix-patches@HIDDEN; Thu, 04 Apr 2019 12:48:21 -0400
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <mail@HIDDEN>) id 1hC5XH-00036I-Du
for guix-patches@HIDDEN; Thu, 04 Apr 2019 12:48:20 -0400
Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.197]:59461)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@HIDDEN>) id 1hC5XH-0002uR-4e
for guix-patches@HIDDEN; Thu, 04 Apr 2019 12:48:19 -0400
X-Originating-IP: 92.169.116.19
Received: from localhost.localdomain (lfbn-1-4117-19.w92-169.abo.wanadoo.fr
[92.169.116.19]) (Authenticated sender: mail@HIDDEN)
by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 950E31C0006
for <guix-patches@HIDDEN>; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 16:48:14 +0000 (UTC)
From: Pierre Neidhardt <mail@HIDDEN>
To: guix-patches@HIDDEN
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add apsl2.0.
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 18:48:14 +0200
Message-Id: <20190404164814.26096-1-mail@HIDDEN>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Received-From: 217.70.183.197
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>,
<mailto:debbugs-submit-request <at> debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
* guix/licenses.scm (apsl2.0): New variable.
---
guix/licenses.scm | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/guix/licenses.scm b/guix/licenses.scm
index 676e71acdb..623ec69898 100644
--- a/guix/licenses.scm
+++ b/guix/licenses.scm
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
#:use-module (srfi srfi-9)
#:export (license? license-name license-uri license-comment
agpl1 agpl3 agpl3+
+ apsl2.0
asl1.1 asl2.0
boost1.0
bsd-2 bsd-3 bsd-4
@@ -129,6 +130,11 @@
"https://gnu.org/licenses/agpl.html"
"https://gnu.org/licenses/why-affero-gpl.html"))
+(define apsl2.0
+ (license "APSL 2.0"
+ "https://opensource.apple.com/apsl/"
+ "Apple Public Source License 2.0"))
+
(define asl1.1
(license "ASL 1.1"
"http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:Apache1.1"
--
2.21.0
Pierre Neidhardt <mail@HIDDEN>:guix-patches@HIDDEN.
Full text available.guix-patches@HIDDEN:bug#35147; Package guix-patches.
Full text available.
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.