GNU bug report logs - #35185
[PATCH] gnu: mu: Update to 1.2.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Pierre Langlois <pierre.langlois <at> gmx.com>

Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 21:26:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 35185 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 35185 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#35185; Package guix-patches. (Sun, 07 Apr 2019 21:26:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Pierre Langlois <pierre.langlois <at> gmx.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to guix-patches <at> gnu.org. (Sun, 07 Apr 2019 21:26:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Pierre Langlois <pierre.langlois <at> gmx.com>
To: Guix-patches <guix-patches <at> gnu.org>
Cc: Pierre Langlois <pierre.langlois <at> gmx.com>
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: mu: Update to 1.2.
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2019 22:25:18 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hello Guix!

Here's an update for mu!

I've noticed we've moved away from using Github's generated tarballs and
using git-fetch instead. However, it looks like the tarball for mu is
provided by the developer so we should be fine.

Is that right?  See "Assets" from https://github.com/djcb/mu/releases/tag/1.2 .

Thanks,
Pierre

[0001-gnu-mu-Update-to-1.2.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#35185; Package guix-patches. (Sun, 07 Apr 2019 22:15:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 35185 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
To: Pierre Langlois <pierre.langlois <at> gmx.com>
Cc: 35185 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#35185] [PATCH] gnu: mu: Update to 1.2.
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2019 00:12:36 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Pierre,

Upstream wrote:
> Substantial (algorithmic) speed-up of message-threading

\o/

Pierre Langlois wrote:
> I've noticed we've moved away from using Github's generated 
> tarballs and
> using git-fetch instead. However, it looks like the tarball for 
> mu is
> provided by the developer so we should be fine.
>
> Is that right?

Yes.  These unreliable (auto)-‘generated tarballs’ we're getting 
rid of have ‘/archive/’ in the URL.  Others are fine.

> +                                  "download/" version "/mu-" 
> version
> +                                  ".0.tar.xz"))

I've added the ‘.0’ to VERSION instead, and will push this 
tomorrow after some testing.

Thanks!

T G-R
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#35185; Package guix-patches. (Sun, 07 Apr 2019 22:25:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #11 received at 35185 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Pierre Langlois <pierre.langlois <at> gmx.com>
To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
Cc: Pierre Langlois <pierre.langlois <at> gmx.com>, 35185 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#35185] [PATCH] gnu: mu: Update to 1.2.
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2019 23:23:23 +0100
Hi Tobias,

Tobias Geerinckx-Rice writes:

> Pierre,
>
> Upstream wrote:
>> Substantial (algorithmic) speed-up of message-threading
>
> \o/

Yes! Full disclaimer, I've been running a git snapshot of mu for the
past few months just so I could get this early :-).

>
> Pierre Langlois wrote:
>> I've noticed we've moved away from using Github's generated tarballs
>> and
>> using git-fetch instead. However, it looks like the tarball for mu
>> is
>> provided by the developer so we should be fine.
>>
>> Is that right?
>
> Yes.  These unreliable (auto)-‘generated tarballs’ we're getting rid
> of have ‘/archive/’ in the URL.  Others are fine.
>
>> +                                  "download/" version "/mu-" 
>> version
>> +                                  ".0.tar.xz"))
>
> I've added the ‘.0’ to VERSION instead, and will push this tomorrow
> after some testing.
>
> Thanks!

Yeah, I wasn't sure what to make of the extra ".0" since the tagged
release is only "1.2". I think adding it to VERSION has you've done it
better.

Thanks!
Pierre




Reply sent to Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>:
You have taken responsibility. (Mon, 08 Apr 2019 10:45:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to Pierre Langlois <pierre.langlois <at> gmx.com>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Mon, 08 Apr 2019 10:45:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #16 received at 35185-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
To: Pierre Langlois <pierre.langlois <at> gmx.com>
Cc: 35185-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#35185] [PATCH] gnu: mu: Update to 1.2.
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2019 12:44:20 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
> I've added the ‘.0’ to VERSION instead, and will push this 
> tomorrow
> after some testing.

Done as 857fabcd0b29a41c4a1263686254de648cfefc59.

Kind regards,

T G-R
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Mon, 06 May 2019 11:24:06 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 4 years and 327 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.