GNU bug report logs -
#35213
Summary commands to go to the next/previous unseen article
Previous Next
Reported by: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen <at> web.de>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:52:02 UTC
Severity: wishlist
Tags: fixed
Found in version 5.13
Fixed in version 27.1
Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 35213 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 35213 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org, bugs <at> gnus.org
:
bug#35213
; Package
emacs,gnus
.
(Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:52:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen <at> web.de>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org, bugs <at> gnus.org
.
(Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:52:04 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello,
this is a request to add commands `gnus-summary-next-unseen-article' and
`gnus-summary-prev-unseen-article'; analogue to
`gnus-summary-next-unread-article' and
`gnus-summary-prev-unread-article', but for unseen instead of unread
articles.
These commands would fit a, I think, quite common use case: you read
mails, but you're short of time and didn't read everything so you leave
unread articles. When you check the next time, you may want to have a
look to only unseen articles to see if there is something new that is
important.
You currently can only do / . (`gnus-summary-limit-to-unseen'), but you
loose the thread display, so being able to move by unseen articles would
be comfortable.
Thanks,
Michael.
Gnus v5.13
GNU Emacs 27.0.50 (build 20, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.24.5)
of 2019-04-09
200 nntp.aioe.org InterNetNews NNRP server INN 2.5.4 ready (posting ok)
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org, bugs <at> gnus.org
:
bug#35213
; Package
emacs,gnus
.
(Tue, 09 Jul 2019 15:57:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 35213 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen <at> web.de> writes:
> this is a request to add commands `gnus-summary-next-unseen-article' and
> `gnus-summary-prev-unseen-article'; analogue to
> `gnus-summary-next-unread-article' and
> `gnus-summary-prev-unread-article', but for unseen instead of unread
> articles.
Sounds like a good idea. What keystrokes would these be bound to?
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org, bugs <at> gnus.org
:
bug#35213
; Package
emacs,gnus
.
(Tue, 09 Jul 2019 16:53:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 35213 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen <at> web.de> writes:
> I have no clue. , and . would be cool and intuitive, but they are
> already occupied. I have no preference for other keys so far, maybe
> others have a good idea.
Quotes are unused: '´` - maybe these would make sense? I think these
new commands would be used quite frequently, so a one-key binding would
make sense. If I was me, I would really vote for , and ..
Michael.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org, bugs <at> gnus.org
:
bug#35213
; Package
emacs,gnus
.
(Tue, 09 Jul 2019 16:55:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 35213 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> writes:
> > this is a request to add commands `gnus-summary-next-unseen-article'
> > and
> > `gnus-summary-prev-unseen-article'; analogue to
> > `gnus-summary-next-unread-article' and
> > `gnus-summary-prev-unread-article', but for unseen instead of unread
> > articles.
>
> Sounds like a good idea. What keystrokes would these be bound to?
I have no clue. , and . would be cool and intuitive, but they are
already occupied. I have no preference for other keys so far, maybe
others have a good idea.
Michael.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org, bugs <at> gnus.org
:
bug#35213
; Package
emacs,gnus
.
(Sun, 29 Sep 2019 07:45:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at 35213 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen <at> web.de> writes:
> Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen <at> web.de> writes:
>
>> I have no clue. , and . would be cool and intuitive, but they are
>> already occupied. I have no preference for other keys so far, maybe
>> others have a good idea.
>
> Quotes are unused: '´` - maybe these would make sense? I think these
> new commands would be used quite frequently, so a one-key binding would
> make sense. If I was me, I would really vote for , and ..
` is free, but ' is taken, and we need a key pair.
I use the current `.' and `,' commands quite frequently, so I don't want
to rebind them.
The summary keymap is very... full... But one unshifted pair that's not
taken is [ and ].
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org, bugs <at> gnus.org
:
bug#35213
; Package
emacs,gnus
.
(Sun, 29 Sep 2019 07:58:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #20 received at 35213 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> writes:
> The summary keymap is very... full... But one unshifted pair that's not
> taken is [ and ].
I've now done this. If somebody has better ideas for the key bindings,
feel free to modify.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
Added tag(s) fixed.
Request was from
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Sun, 29 Sep 2019 07:58:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
bug marked as fixed in version 27.1, send any further explanations to
35213 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen <at> web.de>
Request was from
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Sun, 29 Sep 2019 07:58:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org, bugs <at> gnus.org
:
bug#35213
; Package
emacs,gnus
.
(Sat, 05 Oct 2019 14:32:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #27 received at 35213 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> writes:
> Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> writes:
>
> > The summary keymap is very... full... But one unshifted pair that's not
> > taken is [ and ].
>
> I've now done this. If somebody has better ideas for the key bindings,
> feel free to modify.
Thank you very much. I am happy!
Michael.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Sun, 03 Nov 2019 12:24:04 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 4 years and 147 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.