GNU bug report logs -
#35242
Backtrace on building with load path
Previous Next
Reported by: brettg <at> posteo.net
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 05:14:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: notabug
Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 35242 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 35242 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#35242
; Package
guix
.
(Fri, 12 Apr 2019 05:14:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
brettg <at> posteo.net
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
.
(Fri, 12 Apr 2019 05:14:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi all. I am trying to build custom packages, and today a regression may
have been introduced either on guix-master or in my own channel. I am
trying to find out where the issue lies.
brettg <at> guixsd ~/Repos/guix-system [env]$ guix build fstar -L .
Backtrace:
In guix/store.scm:
613:10 19 (call-with-store #<procedure 14f3f40 at
guix/scripts/build.scm:889:8…>)
In guix/scripts/build.scm:
895:26 18 (_ #<store-connection 256.99 103fdc0>)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
829:9 17 (catch unbound-variable #<procedure 14fac00 at
guix/ui.scm:499:4 ()> …)
In guix/ui.scm:
500:6 16 (_)
In guix/scripts/build.scm:
863:22 15 (_)
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
679:15 14 (append-map _ _ . _)
592:17 13 (map1 ((argument . "fstar") (system . "x86_64-linux") (# .
0) (. #) …))
In guix/scripts/build.scm:
791:30 12 (_ _)
In gnu/packages.scm:
477:2 11 (%find-package "fstar" "fstar" #f)
383:6 10 (find-best-packages-by-name _ _)
313:55 9 (_ "fstar" _)
In unknown file:
8 (force #<promise #<procedure 7fa491ff4638 at
gnu/packages.scm:303:18…>)
In gnu/packages.scm:
260:33 7 (fold-packages #<procedure 7fa491ff5cf0 at
gnu/packages.scm:304:35 …> …)
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
466:18 6 (fold #<procedure 14fc100 at guix/discovery.scm:133:8 (spec
result)> …)
In guix/discovery.scm:
136:31 5 (_ "." ())
116:14 4 (scheme-modules _ _ #:warn _)
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
501:18 3 (fold-right #<procedure 14fc0c0 at guix/discovery.scm:56:14
(entr…> . #)
In guix/discovery.scm:
66:32 2 (_ _ ("./channels.scm" "./non-gnu/packages/coq-extend.scm"
"./non…" …))
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
501:18 1 (fold-right #<procedure 16566c0 at guix/discovery.scm:56:14
(entr…> . #)
In unknown file:
0 (append #<unspecified> ())
brettg <at> guixsd ~/Repos/guix-system [env]$ guix describe
Generation 38 Apr 11 2019 22:56:24 (current)
guix-system 796b205
repository URL: https://git.sr.ht/~brettgilio/guix-system
branch: master
commit: 796b205ddc019fd366b0025800aa3a0e91b0fa2e
guix 89647ff
repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git
branch: master
commit: 89647ff1d4abc4674973392cb7e08d14898e3ac9
Thanks!
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#35242
; Package
guix
.
(Fri, 12 Apr 2019 12:41:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 35242 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Brett,
brettg <at> posteo.net wrote:
> Backtrace:
Could you ‘export COLUMNS’ so we can see the backtrace in its
untruncated glory?
Kind regards,
T G-R
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#35242
; Package
guix
.
(Fri, 12 Apr 2019 19:23:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 35242 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi T G-R,
Unless I am doing this incorrectly, it doesn't change the output.
brettg <at> guixsd ~/Repos/guix-system [env]$ export COLUMNS
brettg <at> guixsd ~/Repos/guix-system [env]$ guix build fstar -L .
Backtrace:
In guix/store.scm:
613:10 19 (call-with-store #<procedure 1c05320 at
guix/scripts/build.scm:889:8…>)
In guix/scripts/build.scm:
895:26 18 (_ #<store-connection 256.99 1c6deb0>)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
829:9 17 (catch unbound-variable #<procedure 1c09f80 at
guix/ui.scm:499:4 ()> …)
In guix/ui.scm:
500:6 16 (_)
In guix/scripts/build.scm:
863:22 15 (_)
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
679:15 14 (append-map _ _ . _)
592:17 13 (map1 ((argument . "fstar") (system . "x86_64-linux") (# .
0) (. #) …))
In guix/scripts/build.scm:
791:30 12 (_ _)
In gnu/packages.scm:
477:2 11 (%find-package "fstar" "fstar" #f)
383:6 10 (find-best-packages-by-name _ _)
313:55 9 (_ "fstar" _)
In unknown file:
8 (force #<promise #<procedure 7ff6bbc49638 at
gnu/packages.scm:303:18…>)
In gnu/packages.scm:
260:33 7 (fold-packages #<procedure 7ff6bbc4acf0 at
gnu/packages.scm:304:35 …> …)
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
466:18 6 (fold #<procedure 1c0c5a0 at guix/discovery.scm:133:8 (spec
result)> …)
In guix/discovery.scm:
136:31 5 (_ "." ())
116:14 4 (scheme-modules _ _ #:warn _)
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
501:18 3 (fold-right #<procedure 1c0c560 at guix/discovery.scm:56:14
(entr…> . #)
In guix/discovery.scm:
66:32 2 (_ _ ("./channels.scm" "./non-gnu/packages/coq-extend.scm"
"./non…" …))
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
501:18 1 (fold-right #<procedure 1ec9a40 at guix/discovery.scm:56:14
(entr…> . #)
In unknown file:
0 (append #<unspecified> ())
ERROR: In procedure append:
In procedure append: Wrong type argument in position 1 (expecting empty
list): #<unspecified>
brettg <at> guixsd ~/Repos/guix-system [env]$
On 12.04.2019 14:40, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
> Brett,
>
> brettg <at> posteo.net wrote:
>> Backtrace:
>
> Could you ‘export COLUMNS’ so we can see the backtrace in its
> untruncated glory?
>
> Kind regards,
>
> T G-R
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#35242
; Package
guix
.
(Fri, 12 Apr 2019 19:53:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 35242 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
brettg <at> posteo.net skribis:
> brettg <at> guixsd ~/Repos/guix-system [env]$ guix build fstar -L .
[...]
> In gnu/packages.scm:
> 260:33 7 (fold-packages #<procedure 7fa491ff5cf0 at gnu/packages.scm:304:35 …> …)
> In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
> 466:18 6 (fold #<procedure 14fc100 at guix/discovery.scm:133:8 (spec result)> …)
> In guix/discovery.scm:
> 136:31 5 (_ "." ())
> 116:14 4 (scheme-modules _ _ #:warn _)
> In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
> 501:18 3 (fold-right #<procedure 14fc0c0 at guix/discovery.scm:56:14 (entr…> . #)
> In guix/discovery.scm:
> 66:32 2 (_ _ ("./channels.scm" "./non-gnu/packages/coq-extend.scm" "./non…" …))
> In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
> 501:18 1 (fold-right #<procedure 16566c0 at guix/discovery.scm:56:14 (entr…> . #)
> In unknown file:
> 0 (append #<unspecified> ())
It looks like the error happens while traversing the “.” directory with
your own files. Could you try inspecting it, or perhaps removing some
of the files until you find the culprit?
Thanks,
Ludo’.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#35242
; Package
guix
.
(Fri, 12 Apr 2019 23:54:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at 35242 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi ludo! Thanks. You were correct. Thank you.------ Original message------From: Ludovic CourtèsDate: Fri, Apr 12, 2019 2:52 PMTo: brettg <at> posteo.net;Cc: 35242 <at> debbugs.gnu.org;Subject:Re: bug#35242: Backtrace on building with load pathbrettg <at> posteo.net skribis:
> brettg <at> guixsd ~/Repos/guix-system [env]$ guix build fstar -L .
[...]
> In gnu/packages.scm:
> 260:33 7 (fold-packages # …)
> In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
> 466:18 6 (fold # …)
> In guix/discovery.scm:
> 136:31 5 (_ "." ())
> 116:14 4 (scheme-modules _ _ #:warn _)
> In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
> 501:18 3 (fold-right # . #)
> In guix/discovery.scm:
> 66:32 2 (_ _ ("./channels.scm" "./non-gnu/packages/coq-extend.scm" "./non…" …))
> In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
> 501:18 1 (fold-right # . #)
> In unknown file:
> 0 (append # ())
It looks like the error happens while traversing the “.” directory with
your own files. Could you try inspecting it, or perhaps removing some
of the files until you find the culprit?
Thanks,
Ludo’.
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
Added tag(s) notabug.
Request was from
Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Sun, 14 Apr 2019 15:03:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
bug closed, send any further explanations to
35242 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and brettg <at> posteo.net
Request was from
Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Sun, 14 Apr 2019 15:03:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Mon, 13 May 2019 11:24:06 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 4 years and 321 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.